You'll have to explain that one to me.So we weren't in a relegation battle under GH in 2010/11, when we only guaranteed safety on the second last weekend of the campaign.But we were when we finished 7th under JG and qualified for Europe? We were something like 14th when BL left. Not great, but his departure wasn't entirely down to results. We won the next game against Liverpool and moved up to mid table by the end of Feb.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on December 31, 2013, 01:31:34 AMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on December 31, 2013, 01:25:51 AMThree. We were in the shit when Gregory took us over in Feb. We finished 7th in '98. I defy anyone to claim finishing 7th is a relegation battle. Are you being serious?So if we are 15th in feb and on a run of 1 win in 7 you won't be worried and call it a relegation battle?And I'm pretty sure you class finishing 9th under GH as a relegation battle season.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on December 31, 2013, 01:25:51 AMThree. We were in the shit when Gregory took us over in Feb. We finished 7th in '98. I defy anyone to claim finishing 7th is a relegation battle. Are you being serious?
Three. We were in the shit when Gregory took us over in Feb.
We were 15th and had won 1 in 7 when Brian left. Beating Liverpool took us 14th. We're currently 13th but a number of people think we are in a relegation battle.
The difference was in 1998 (and in 2011, to an extent) was we looked like a big club underperforming, a side who were out of place at that end of the table. Now we quite comfortably look like one of the worst sides in the division. Also, In Gregory's first season we were nowhere near relegation concerns in March and April. Under Houllier, there was a nervousness and general shiteness to our play right up until the end of April.
Less of one than I did in 98 when Brian lost at Wimbledon.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2013, 06:00:42 PMSo to sum up - if we take out all the good years, and take away all the teams who are worse than us, we're at the bottom.If you took out the 3 or so good years we'd be bottom of the ever present table and not 2nd bottom. Now matter how you try, Dave, you'll struggle to find a positive with this topic.
So to sum up - if we take out all the good years, and take away all the teams who are worse than us, we're at the bottom.
You can draw up a table over any period in the last thirty years for definite and probably longer than that and our home form will look comparatively poor. We've never been particularly good at home.
Quote from: saunders_heroes on December 30, 2013, 06:05:29 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2013, 06:00:42 PMSo to sum up - if we take out all the good years, and take away all the teams who are worse than us, we're at the bottom.If you took out the 3 or so good years we'd be bottom of the ever present table and not 2nd bottom. Now matter how you try, Dave, you'll struggle to find a positive with this topic. I'm sure this has been responded to in the next few pages but it's such a bizarre comment that I couldn't ignore it. How about the positive that we haven't been relegated? That big one, which 20 of the 30 clubs in the table would love to be able to say?
I think the time to discuss whether we're in a relegation battle or not is in March.