Quote from: Stu on December 21, 2013, 10:11:47 PMI don't think this is the time, Liam, to be honest.Why?I'm actually defending Paul Lambert and your players here!Is it the results or the lack of entertainment which is a problem for some of you? I know my mate feels there is very little entertainment value.Having seen some of your games recently, I think you're crying out for an experienced player in the middle of the park. A person for those younger players in the side to turn too when the chips are down as well as being able to use the ball effectively - Sylla and Delph, from what I've seen are forever playing in first gear - there comes a time when a side needs a steady eddie and an old head.
I don't think this is the time, Liam, to be honest.
If we sack Lambert, we bring in somebody who will change the squad, start again, etc.We've got to stick with him, but please would someone tell him that 4-3-3 is bollocks.Palace lost three nil today, they're playing us next, to quote David Coleman, 'what happened next?'. We're gonna fucking balls it up again. Zero points from three games is simply not good enough.In Lerner terms, we're stuck with Lambert, so I just hope it works out...
50 years ive been going to villa park i see one real problem the feckin owner tight fisted yankee twat came here with great intentions but words mean jack
Any manager that witnesses a performance like that from his team is bound to be nervous. Especially since it was the second such effort in three weeks. Stoke were shocking too. There was only one moment of quality in the game that I remember, the cross for Stoke's winner. The behaviour of a number of our players during the game was a disgrace. This is where Lambert really misses a couple of solid pros in the dressing room with him to sort some of this sh*te out. Clark continually getting booked for ridiculous lunging tackles, Herd, Lowton and Delph giving away multiple stupid freekicks. Weimann mouthing constantly at the ref. Once it starts in a team its infectious, far too many of our players were more interested in starting fights that passing the ball to a teammate. I honestly think if Lambert was given money he still wouldnt address the crippling lack of leadership and experience in the squad. That for me is the worrying thing about keeping him on.
Would we even be having this discussion if the ref or Lino had been competent enough to give the handball?
Your right , things could be worse - as our beloved neighbours are proving
Quote from: TimbertVilla on December 21, 2013, 10:19:27 PMIf we sack Lambert, we bring in somebody who will change the squad, start again, etc.We've got to stick with him, but please would someone tell him that 4-3-3 is bollocks.Palace lost three nil today, they're playing us next, to quote David Coleman, 'what happened next?'. We're gonna fucking balls it up again. Zero points from three games is simply not good enough.In Lerner terms, we're stuck with Lambert, so I just hope it works out...He didn't play 4-3-3 today. He played 4-2-4. It was bollocks.
What we miss, what we absolutely miss, is a midfield. We do not have one. The one we have, to a man, is rubbish.We're not quite in the shit yet; but if Palace get a win against us on Boxing Day, we are in the shit good and proper.
Crap result. No idea how we played as haven't seen or heard anything apart from the score.