What if the relationship is not like that though?
Not sure how reliable it is but talksport reckon villa have had the fourth highest net spend since 2008.
Quote from: Matt Collins on February 02, 2014, 02:47:05 PMNot sure how reliable it is but talksport reckon villa have had the fourth highest net spend since 2008. Sounds about right given how little we've recouped on players, and how much we spent. That would still include two summers of O Neill's spending. We made money on Young, Downing and Milner in that time, but our net despite that, must still be very high. Despite how little we've spent under Lambert, we've not really sold anyone for anything of note either. Newcastle conversely had the lowest from the table I saw.
Quote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 07:41:58 AMQuote from: Phil from the upper holte on February 02, 2014, 07:39:43 AMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etcObviously I can't prove it but Randy must be making a fair bit of money these days. Doesn't he also charge a management fee?Yet again - the club's accounts are freely available. Have a look at them and see if you can find this "fair bit of money".
Quote from: Phil from the upper holte on February 02, 2014, 07:39:43 AMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etcObviously I can't prove it but Randy must be making a fair bit of money these days. Doesn't he also charge a management fee?
Quote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etc
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?
Quote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning?
I can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for sale
I hope Lerner is staying. He is trustworthy and there has been ample evidence that he 'gets' Aston Villa. If there are few out there that would spend 200 mill on mid table football club there will be even fewer that give a monkeys about what Villa stands for.As an aside, if we're using the accounts from the McLeish year as a starting point, players who were then on the payroll but have since departed :-Warnock, Collins, Dunne, Heskey, Bannan, Ireland, Delfouneso, Cuellar, Makoun, BeyePretty frightening when you consider what that group actually contributed on the field.Petrov and Lichaj have also departed. I'd make getting on for 25 million in wages clawed back. I would be surprised if their replacements are being paid more than a third of that.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:19:16 PMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 07:41:58 AMQuote from: Phil from the upper holte on February 02, 2014, 07:39:43 AMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etcObviously I can't prove it but Randy must be making a fair bit of money these days. Doesn't he also charge a management fee?Yet again - the club's accounts are freely available. Have a look at them and see if you can find this "fair bit of money".If we are still making a loss with our current wage bill and what we are prepared to pay for players then we must be in shit street. How do other clubs sustain a squad on premiership wages?
Jean 2M was on a decent whack, and Bannan was too. Add in Given and Bent and 25m is getting there. Heskey was on near 70 wasn't he?
Quote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:06:55 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:19:16 PMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 07:41:58 AMQuote from: Phil from the upper holte on February 02, 2014, 07:39:43 AMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etcObviously I can't prove it but Randy must be making a fair bit of money these days. Doesn't he also charge a management fee?Yet again - the club's accounts are freely available. Have a look at them and see if you can find this "fair bit of money".If we are still making a loss with our current wage bill and what we are prepared to pay for players then we must be in shit street. How do other clubs sustain a squad on premiership wages?You were just asking about money that he's supposedly taking out. Nobody mentioned losses.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 03:51:16 PMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:06:55 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:19:16 PMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 07:41:58 AMQuote from: Phil from the upper holte on February 02, 2014, 07:39:43 AMQuote from: Fergal on February 02, 2014, 03:44:34 AMQuote from: dave.woodhall on February 02, 2014, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: willywombat on February 02, 2014, 12:44:01 AMI can see no other logical reason for the hugely risky cost cutting that we've seen over the last few years other than RL preparing the club for saleiHow about because we were spending more than we were earning? Is that the case now?Doubt it, how much do sky put in, then there is sponsor, ticket sales, corporate etcObviously I can't prove it but Randy must be making a fair bit of money these days. Doesn't he also charge a management fee?Yet again - the club's accounts are freely available. Have a look at them and see if you can find this "fair bit of money".If we are still making a loss with our current wage bill and what we are prepared to pay for players then we must be in shit street. How do other clubs sustain a squad on premiership wages?You were just asking about money that he's supposedly taking out. Nobody mentioned losses.I think it's relevant to the discussion. If we are making money where is it going?