Libor Kozák (confirmed post #190)

[BoskoDjembaSalifou]

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

Jesus Christ, what a load of utter, utter bollocks.

There's a limit to how bad a game he can have had, what with him having scored.

Why is it bollocks? Because I have a different opinion to you?

I'm not alone either. The match thread was full of people saying he was having a poor game.

It's bollocks because it is absolute bollocks.

I spotted your Kozak miserablist routine before kick off, so it's no surprise that you're still having a pop - despite him having just scored for us. It kind of limits how shit a game he's had, doesn't it, him having scored?

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

[PeterWithesShin]

Still no excuse for breaking site rules. I don't agree with him but I don't resort to personal insults.

[pauliewalnuts]

Before the match:

He's lost the plot. An out of form Benteke is better than Kozak, fuck me.

I'm allowed to think Kozak is useless. I hope he proves me wrong.

During the match:

Honestly, that was a shit header from Kozak. A better goalkeeper would've stopped that.

Shortly after that one:

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

[richardhubbard]

Still no excuse for breaking site rules. I don't agree with him but I don't resort to personal insults.

Peter I don't going to argue with you but he make stupid statements and will continue to .

[dave.woodhall]

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

Jesus Christ, what a load of utter, utter bollocks.

There's a limit to how bad a game he can have had, what with him having scored.

Why is it bollocks? Because I have a different opinion to you?

I'm not alone either. The match thread was full of people saying he was having a poor game.

It's bollocks because it is absolute bollocks.

I spotted your Kozak miserablist routine before kick off, so it's no surprise that you're still having a pop - despite him having just scored for us. It kind of limits how shit a game he's had, doesn't it, him having scored?

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

I see three goals, two of them winners, in six starts. What do you see?

[BoskoDjembaSalifou]

Before the match:

He's lost the plot. An out of form Benteke is better than Kozak, fuck me.

I'm allowed to think Kozak is useless. I hope he proves me wrong.

During the match:

Honestly, that was a shit header from Kozak. A better goalkeeper would've stopped that.

Shortly after that one:

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

So, what's your point?

Another thing, is there a quick way to quote multiple posts on this forum?

[pauliewalnuts]

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

You are missing the fact that not thinking he is shit does not mean you think he's brilliant.

It strikes me as really odd that, just after a match in which he scored one of the goals in a 3-2 win away at a side that had conceded a couple of goals at home all season, you feel the need to come back again and reiterate how shit he is.

I'm not having a go at you for not rating a player, I am pointing out the flaws in your moaning about Kozak at this point in time.

Maybe a better goalkeeper would have saved Gabby's shot, maybe a better centre half wouldn't have been put on his arse by Gabby, maybe a better centre half wouldn't have stood off Delph for so long and let him get that shot in in the first place.

You're entitled to your view, despite your attempts to play the "what, I am not allowed to have an opinion" card, but don't be surprised if people point out the gigantic, glaring flaw in your argument.

[richardhubbard]

9 points he got for us this season he is shocking really poor

[pauliewalnuts]

Before the match:

He's lost the plot. An out of form Benteke is better than Kozak, fuck me.

I'm allowed to think Kozak is useless. I hope he proves me wrong.

During the match:

Honestly, that was a shit header from Kozak. A better goalkeeper would've stopped that.

Shortly after that one:

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

So, what's your point?

Another thing, is there a quick way to quote multiple posts on this forum?

My point - if it isn't massively clear from those posts - is that you've clearly decided already he's shit, and nothing - not even scoring - is going to put you off that conviction.

"A better goalkeeper would have saved that" indeed.

[PGW]

Perhaps Richard is a brummie based member of the ''Beijing Casuals''!!!!!

[VillaAlways]

Thanks Dave. I'm absolutely non plussed by the negativity about him,he's  exceeding my expectations.

[BoskoDjembaSalifou]

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

Jesus Christ, what a load of utter, utter bollocks.

There's a limit to how bad a game he can have had, what with him having scored.

Why is it bollocks? Because I have a different opinion to you?

I'm not alone either. The match thread was full of people saying he was having a poor game.

It's bollocks because it is absolute bollocks.

I spotted your Kozak miserablist routine before kick off, so it's no surprise that you're still having a pop - despite him having just scored for us. It kind of limits how shit a game he's had, doesn't it, him having scored?

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

I see three goals, two of them winners, in six starts. What do you see?

Bent scored goals but he offered us nothing else. Kozak tries but I don't think he has much ability.

[VillaAlways]

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

Jesus Christ, what a load of utter, utter bollocks.

There's a limit to how bad a game he can have had, what with him having scored.

Why is it bollocks? Because I have a different opinion to you?

I'm not alone either. The match thread was full of people saying he was having a poor game.

It's bollocks because it is absolute bollocks.

I spotted your Kozak miserablist routine before kick off, so it's no surprise that you're still having a pop - despite him having just scored for us. It kind of limits how shit a game he's had, doesn't it, him having scored?

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

I see three goals, two of them winners, in six starts. What do you see?

Bent scored goals but he offered us nothing else. Kozak tries but I don't think he has much ability.

Sigh!

[SoccerHQ]

Such an ugly player to watch....not my type of centre forward if I'm honest but as I said after Norwich I get the feeling he'll score some important goals for us, a sort of cheaper Zigic.

[pauliewalnuts]

He had a really bad game today. I don't even think his header was that good, a better goalkeeper would've saved that IMO. Just my opinion.

Jesus Christ, what a load of utter, utter bollocks.

There's a limit to how bad a game he can have had, what with him having scored.

Why is it bollocks? Because I have a different opinion to you?

I'm not alone either. The match thread was full of people saying he was having a poor game.

It's bollocks because it is absolute bollocks.

I spotted your Kozak miserablist routine before kick off, so it's no surprise that you're still having a pop - despite him having just scored for us. It kind of limits how shit a game he's had, doesn't it, him having scored?

I wish I was saying how great he is but, sadly, I don't see what you all see.

You're basically having a go at me for not rating a player, do you realise how ridiculous that sounds?

I see three goals, two of them winners, in six starts. What do you see?

Bent scored goals but he offered us nothing else. Kozak tries but I don't think he has much ability.

As Dave said, though six starts, three goals, two winners.

That surely buys him a bit of time?