Quote from: Villadroid on May 28, 2013, 10:09:20 AMWiki says Villa paid £3.5m for him and has appeared 34 times.The Daily Star say he's on £60k a week (£6.24m in wages over two years), and that he will accept £5m to leave rather the £9m his contract entitles him to.So if he is kind enough to offer to leave for only £5m he would have cost Villa £14.74m.He's played 34 games for Villa, which means every appearance will have cost Villa £433,000.Good business?About as good as Heskey, who cost us around £1m per goal scored.
Wiki says Villa paid £3.5m for him and has appeared 34 times.The Daily Star say he's on £60k a week (£6.24m in wages over two years), and that he will accept £5m to leave rather the £9m his contract entitles him to.So if he is kind enough to offer to leave for only £5m he would have cost Villa £14.74m.He's played 34 games for Villa, which means every appearance will have cost Villa £433,000.Good business?
I think you mean Bergovic (sp). Im with you though that Hughes may try and get Given, was supposed to be after him last summer.
Quote from: villan from luton on May 28, 2013, 05:37:49 PMI think you mean Bergovic (sp). Im with you though that Hughes may try and get Given, was supposed to be after him last summer. Sorry, quite right. Mignolet is the Blunderland keeper? Begovic was supposed to be off to Manu or Arse, I think I read somewhere!
I said during pre season I thought Guzan would start at West Ham, given Ruddy was the first choice at Norwich Lambert clearly prefers athletic and imposing keepers which Given isn't so I was surprised he started the season as number one. Suppose Lambert didn't want to rock the boat too early but the Everton performance made it a much easier decision.