He's also probably on about one quarter of the annual salary of say, Barry Bannan. I can't think of too many other industries where the person in charge of everything gets paid such a small proportion of the overall wage bill.If you pay peanuts etc...
He can't win though, if he was on £1 mill you'd all be moaning about his high wages. I think £250k is about right for the CEO of a business of our size.
Quote from: paul_e on April 19, 2013, 04:58:42 PMQuote from: Jon Crofts on April 19, 2013, 04:43:56 PMPerhaps he's paid for performance? 5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well. I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.Years of appalling losses, falling turnover, the appointment of a manager like McLeish.....how exactly is he doing well. No wonder he doesn't earn very much.
Quote from: Jon Crofts on April 19, 2013, 04:43:56 PMPerhaps he's paid for performance? 5th reply is one taking the piss out his performance despite the fact that, in most measures on the performance of a CEO, he's doing pretty well. I expected it to be in the first 3 but Dave W bought a couple of posts by posting Niall Quinn's salary.
Perhaps he's paid for performance?
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: Paul the Pauper (Read 12416 times)
