sorry if it has been dealt with elsewhere, but is there any truth in the rumour that Bent isn't playing because another game would trigger a further payment to Sunderland?
Quote from: peter w on November 27, 2012, 07:16:51 PMQuote from: eastie on November 27, 2012, 07:14:55 PMLambert had better hope we win this because I find the decision to leave bent out of the squad quite ridiculous- he should be at least on the bench.A case of too stubborn for his own good me thinks- glad to see baker fit again and Holman for kea makes sense.But you, we, don't know what's been said or done behind the scenes. According to lambert there's no problem with bent which makes it seem ridiculous, he keeps saying there's no rift and then not picking him .
Quote from: eastie on November 27, 2012, 07:14:55 PMLambert had better hope we win this because I find the decision to leave bent out of the squad quite ridiculous- he should be at least on the bench.A case of too stubborn for his own good me thinks- glad to see baker fit again and Holman for kea makes sense.But you, we, don't know what's been said or done behind the scenes.
Lambert had better hope we win this because I find the decision to leave bent out of the squad quite ridiculous- he should be at least on the bench.A case of too stubborn for his own good me thinks- glad to see baker fit again and Holman for kea makes sense.
well every time we dont play him , knocks £250,000 off the price