I'd like to see him being brought on as sub in the next few games to see if he gets his confidence and form back. If he can, we've got a decent crosser of the ball which Beneteke could thrive on.
Quote from: Clampy on November 18, 2012, 02:58:12 PMI'd like to see him being brought on as sub in the next few games to see if he gets his confidence and form back. If he can, we've got a decent crosser of the ball which Beneteke could thrive on. Indeed, it's certainly not a situation where he should be training with hutton but long term is he good enough? I actually think the real problem is Nzog. Albrighton is arguably performing his function as an able squad player, whereas based on wages and status Nzog should be one of our stars.
I'd rather have Carruthers as an option on the bench than Albrighton.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on November 18, 2012, 03:04:57 PMI'd rather have Carruthers as an option on the bench than Albrighton.Carruthers looked really useful towards the end of last season, i'm surprised he's got nowhere near the subs bench so far though.
Quote from: Rip Van doin' the Lambert walk on November 18, 2012, 10:57:00 AMThe standard default now seems to be'We're not as bad as we were under McLeish.'Whoopey-do!Even though we're clearly worse. The football is maybe marginally better, but the results are far worse, so overall it's hard to argue that Lambert is cutting the mustard.
The standard default now seems to be'We're not as bad as we were under McLeish.'Whoopey-do!
Quote from: Rissbert on November 18, 2012, 11:02:26 AMQuote from: Rip Van doin' the Lambert walk on November 18, 2012, 10:57:00 AMThe standard default now seems to be'We're not as bad as we were under McLeish.'Whoopey-do!Even though we're clearly worse. The football is maybe marginally better, but the results are far worse, so overall it's hard to argue that Lambert is cutting the mustard.No they aren't, compared to the same fixtures last year they are better.
Ah, the ridiculous thing that shows you pessimists are talking out your arses?
Quote from: Drummond on November 19, 2012, 08:27:09 AMAh, the ridiculous thing that shows you pessimists are talking out your arses? Go on then, show us this totally non-ridiculous analysis that demonstrates that despite being in the bottom three after our worst start to a season in living memory, that things are actually better than last year. I could do with a laugh.
Quote from: Rissbert on November 19, 2012, 10:08:59 AMQuote from: Drummond on November 19, 2012, 08:27:09 AMAh, the ridiculous thing that shows you pessimists are talking out your arses? Go on then, show us this totally non-ridiculous analysis that demonstrates that despite being in the bottom three after our worst start to a season in living memory, that things are actually better than last year. I could do with a laugh.Would you even consider changing your mind if I could be arsed to?
Quote from: Drummond on November 19, 2012, 01:12:34 PMQuote from: Rissbert on November 19, 2012, 10:08:59 AMQuote from: Drummond on November 19, 2012, 08:27:09 AMAh, the ridiculous thing that shows you pessimists are talking out your arses? Go on then, show us this totally non-ridiculous analysis that demonstrates that despite being in the bottom three after our worst start to a season in living memory, that things are actually better than last year. I could do with a laugh.Would you even consider changing your mind if I could be arsed to?If you're going to make spurious claims, at least have the figures to back them up. I suspect you know deep down that trying to spin the figures to say that things this season are better than last is impossible given our woeful first third of the season.