We have to give him a full season, problem is, unless results start to arrive his position may become untenable as the fans frustrations are simmering just below the surface. A loss to Norwich and it will be getting serious for Paul Lambert.
His signings have been poor, none of them are ready to make an impact on the Premier League yet.
Quote from: JJ-AV on October 21, 2012, 09:15:47 AMHis signings have been poor, none of them are ready to make an impact on the Premier League yet.Surely Vlaar and KEA aren't 'poor'? In fact the only player I consider to look poor value for money is Benteke at present, but think he will improve.
The signings we've made are probably the best players we can attact in the sorry state we're in.
Vlaar's cost us goals since he's been here and KEA seems to have perfected the art of sideways and backward passing at Villa. You must be watching a different Villa to me.
Lambert, given time will come good. Even if we go down, I wouldn't want us to get rid because I think he'd build us into a better side when we go back up.
Quote from: supertom on October 21, 2012, 09:59:59 AMLambert, given time will come good. Even if we go down, I wouldn't want us to get rid because I think he'd build us into a better side when we go back up. Going down would be a disaster, and if Lambert is the man to do it he should be put on the next one way NASA mission to Mars. Even that idiot McLeish didn't manage to relegate us, and Lambert has spent £20m with no significant departures.
Agreed Eastie, but to be fair he gave Lambert £20m, which although not enough to repair the damage that has been done for the last three years, should have been enough to at least make a big difference to last year. Lambert gambled it all on lots of very average players though, when he'd probably have been better buying two or three very good players.
we lack a cutting edge and someone who can go forward and create from midfield.