Dalian Atkinson

[bob]

Read the thread again.

Maybe try a few times.

Which particular bit do you think supports you? No one disagrees that the officer was in the wrong, no one is upset that he's facing criminal charges. Some people are grown-up enough to offer comments beyond your brand of bullshit.

You are speaking on behalf if other people

[bob]

A policeman is alleged to have murdered him. There will be a trial and the Court will hear evidence.

What's your point?

You said a policeman murdered Dalian. He might have, but we will find out once the trial is complete and justice has been served.

You have to be particularly dim to think he wasn't murdered

[Ads]

A policeman is alleged to have murdered him. There will be a trial and the Court will hear evidence.

What's your point?

You said a policeman murdered Dalian. He might have, but we will find out once the trial is complete and justice has been served.

You have to be particularly dim to think he wasn't murdered

The officer, like anybody else, has the benefit of the presumption of innocence. The Crown must prove their case.

I've not seen any of the evidence to come to a conclusion. What evidence have you seen?

[paul_e]

Read the thread again.

Maybe try a few times.

Which particular bit do you think supports you? No one disagrees that the officer was in the wrong, no one is upset that he's facing criminal charges. Some people are grown-up enough to offer comments beyond your brand of bullshit.

You are speaking on behalf if other people

No, I'm pointing out what's been said in the thread. If you think you can find a post defending the policeman in this then good luck but otherwise all this little exchange serves is to show that I, and numerous other people who have called you out, have a much better understanding of this thread than you do.

[bob]

Read the thread again.

Maybe try a few times.

Which particular bit do you think supports you? No one disagrees that the officer was in the wrong, no one is upset that he's facing criminal charges. Some people are grown-up enough to offer comments beyond your brand of bullshit.

You are speaking on behalf if other people

No, I'm pointing out what's been said in the thread. If you think you can find a post defending the policeman in this then good luck but otherwise all this little exchange serves is to show that I, and numerous other people who have called you out, have a much better understanding of this thread than you do.

No that is solely your, incorrect, analysis.

[PeterWithesShin]

I agree with Paul, so it's not solely at all.

[bob]

A policeman is alleged to have murdered him. There will be a trial and the Court will hear evidence.

What's your point?

You said a policeman murdered Dalian. He might have, but we will find out once the trial is complete and justice has been served.

You have to be particularly dim to think he wasn't murdered

The officer, like anybody else, has the benefit of the presumption of innocence. The Crown must prove their case.

I've not seen any of the evidence to come to a conclusion. What evidence have you seen?

You haven't seen any evidence?

Then yours is a false appeal to authority.

[Ads]

A policeman is alleged to have murdered him. There will be a trial and the Court will hear evidence.

What's your point?

You said a policeman murdered Dalian. He might have, but we will find out once the trial is complete and justice has been served.

You have to be particularly dim to think he wasn't murdered

The officer, like anybody else, has the benefit of the presumption of innocence. The Crown must prove their case.

I've not seen any of the evidence to come to a conclusion. What evidence have you seen?

You haven't seen any evidence?

Then yours is a false appeal to authority.

No, I've not. Have you? What evidence have you seen that leads you to conclude, beyond reasonable doubt, that Dalian was murdered?

[bob]

A policeman is alleged to have murdered him. There will be a trial and the Court will hear evidence.

What's your point?

You said a policeman murdered Dalian. He might have, but we will find out once the trial is complete and justice has been served.

You have to be particularly dim to think he wasn't murdered

The officer, like anybody else, has the benefit of the presumption of innocence. The Crown must prove their case.

I've not seen any of the evidence to come to a conclusion. What evidence have you seen?

You haven't seen any evidence?

Then yours is a false appeal to authority.

No, I've not. Have you? What evidence have you seen that leads you to conclude, beyond reasonable doubt, that Dalian was murdered?

The same evidence everyone who has entered this thread has seen.

[bob]

Apart from you.

[bob]

What is your problem here?

[Ads]

So, none then. Gotcha.

A car rolls up, who can it be?
A fresh El Camino rolled kilo G

[bob]

Pathetic

[paul_e]

The same evidence everyone who has entered this thread has seen.

Which is insufficient to charge him with murder, which is why that was a discussion on here.

No, I'm pointing out what's been said in the thread. If you think you can find a post defending the policeman in this then good luck but otherwise all this little exchange serves is to show that I, and numerous other people who have called you out, have a much better understanding of this thread than you do.

No that is solely your, incorrect, analysis.

Again no, it's based on the views shared in the thread.

Given you told me to read it these 2 posts seem to show that you have very little understanding of what's been said in here.

[bob]

The evidence is in public domain

Details of Dalian's death are not hard to find

Nor are details of his physical and mental health

Do I have to wait for The Crown to tell me what happened?

Am I allowed to make.my.own assessment?