Press-ure's off

[TRO]

That's it, when losing an argument, pretend that the other person doesn't understand.

That's seems to be very much so the feelings by some on this thread. You only have to read other media to see the world thinks different.

[TRO]

Readit from the start then.

Show me where someone said he was shit. It's a simple enough request, or are you deliberately trying to wind people up?

No (I'm browsing on an iPad not a PC and you can single out the various comments) and No. I've been here for many years and that's not me. I don't do that.  I have a genuine disagreement with another members POV which I back up with facts of that days performances .

[PeterWithesShin]

You can post the reply numbers of the posts saying he's shit if you can't quote. Or you can always admit that no one in this thread has ever said he was shit.

[TRO]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

[dave.woodhall]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

[TRO]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

So disagreeing with you is "trolling" ? How adult.

Nice to see that after I left it at page 3 there are others who have echoed my sentiments that you were wrong in your content.

[PeterWithesShin]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

So you're admitting no one has said he's shit?

[dave.woodhall]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

So disagreeing with you is "trolling" ? How adult.

Nice to see that after I left it at page 3 there are others who have echoed my sentiments that you were wrong in your content.

There's disagreeing and there's the sort of openly provocative posts which you have used since the start of this thread, where you have made insulting comments and are now lying about what others have said on here. It's noticeable that you've posted on no other thread in over a month, yet on three occasions in the past few days you've been able to come on here within minutes.

[bertlambshank]

Bolt is shit......shit hot.

[eric woolban woolban]

You can only be as good as the events you compete in and the people / teams you compete against and at the era in time you compete.

At present Bolt is the best there has been in the 100 metres. Not so sure about the 200 metres as I think Michael Johnson is up there.

[TRO]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

So disagreeing with you is "trolling" ? How adult.

Nice to see that after I left it at page 3 there are others who have echoed my sentiments that you were wrong in your content.

There's disagreeing and there's the sort of openly provocative posts which you have used since the start of this thread, where you have made insulting comments and are now lying about what others have said on here. It's noticeable that you've posted on no other thread in over a month, yet on three occasions in the past few days you've been able to come on here within minutes.

So now I'm a liar ? You are absolutely condescending and patronising.

For the record , YOU posted a link stating  that " We have seen better than Usain Bolt" .......... Well Bolt is a SPRINTER, not middle distance, not hurdles, not Marathon but A SPRINTER.

As a SPRINTER he is THE WORLDS BEST EVER. FACT.

Yet YOU continue to compare him against RUNNER that has done multi discipline but was not a SPRINTER.

YOU are comparing Apples and Pears and expecting a valid comparison.

That Mr Woodhall is the facts. World Records and achievements do not lie.

I hope you have the balls to apologise to me for calling me a liar.

[dave.woodhall]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

So disagreeing with you is "trolling" ? How adult.

Nice to see that after I left it at page 3 there are others who have echoed my sentiments that you were wrong in your content.

There's disagreeing and there's the sort of openly provocative posts which you have used since the start of this thread, where you have made insulting comments and are now lying about what others have said on here. It's noticeable that you've posted on no other thread in over a month, yet on three occasions in the past few days you've been able to come on here within minutes.

So now I'm a liar ? You are absolutely condescending and patronising.

For the record , YOU posted a link stating  that " We have seen better than Usain Bolt" .......... Well Bolt is a SPRINTER, not middle distance, not hurdles, not Marathon but A SPRINTER.

As a SPRINTER he is THE WORLDS BEST EVER. FACT.

Yet YOU continue to compare him against RUNNER that has done multi discipline but was not a SPRINTER.

YOU are comparing Apples and Pears and expecting a valid comparison.

That Mr Woodhall is the facts. World Records and achievements do not lie.

I hope you have the balls to apologise to me for calling me a liar.

If you're going to use words, it's best to know what they mean. I'm not being condescending, or patronising. Quite the opposite, in fact. Nobody is denying that Usain Bolt isn't the fastest runner ever. The original statement was that Birmingham has seen a better runner performing. That's 'better' not 'faster.' The facts that you are so keen to shout about bear this out. What your angry capitals are all about I don't know.

And I don't intend to apologise for calling you a liar because on this thread you have told lies. Nobody has said Usian Bolt is sShit," nobody from page three onwards "echoed your sentiments." As I said earlier, I find it strange that you haven't been on any other thread since early July, yet have found time to visit this one so regularly.

[TRO]

Or you can admit that those arguing against Bolt, had said that he was merely a regular top athlete rather than the spectacular one of a kind that he is proving to be.

Which nobody has. Carry on Trolling.

So disagreeing with you is "trolling" ? How adult.

Nice to see that after I left it at page 3 there are others who have echoed my sentiments that you were wrong in your content.

There's disagreeing and there's the sort of openly provocative posts which you have used since the start of this thread, where you have made insulting comments and are now lying about what others have said on here. It's noticeable that you've posted on no other thread in over a month, yet on three occasions in the past few days you've been able to come on here within minutes.

So now I'm a liar ? You are absolutely condescending and patronising.

For the record , YOU posted a link stating  that " We have seen better than Usain Bolt" .......... Well Bolt is a SPRINTER, not middle distance, not hurdles, not Marathon but A SPRINTER.

As a SPRINTER he is THE WORLDS BEST EVER. FACT.

Yet YOU continue to compare him against RUNNER that has done multi discipline but was not a SPRINTER.

YOU are comparing Apples and Pears and expecting a valid comparison.

That Mr Woodhall is the facts. World Records and achievements do not lie.

I hope you have the balls to apologise to me for calling me a liar.

If you're going to use words, it's best to know what they mean. I'm not being condescending, or patronising. Quite the opposite, in fact. Nobody is denying that Usain Bolt isn't the fastest runner ever. The original statement was that Birmingham has seen a better runner performing. That's 'better' not 'faster.' The facts that you are so keen to shout about bear this out. What your angry capitals are all about I don't know.

And I don't intend to apologise for calling you a liar because on this thread you have told lies. Nobody has said Usian Bolt is sShit," nobody from page three onwards "echoed your sentiments." As I said earlier, I find it strange that you haven't been on any other thread since early July, yet have found time to visit this one so regularly.

Your usage of the word "Better" is one of mere opinion. Your argument derailed by fact.

Yes there are others agreeing since page 3 and indeed the thread.

The usage of Capitalisation of letters is for Emphasis - indeed it is the third recognised form, after italics and bold. I thought you knew your literary forms ? Not "Angry" , maybe you are looking at yourself ?

I said he was "shit" as a form of sarcasm.

Whether I lurk or post on this site, is my prerogative . It's not always interesting to do so. This particular thread struck an interest, is that alright with you ?

As for you not having the balls to apologise, that says more about you than I.

[hawkeye]

TRO - KRO

[dave.woodhall]

It might be for emphasis, but I still don't understand what you were talking about.

Not apologising does say something about me. It says I've posted nothing on here that I need to apologise for. I certainly didn't tell a lie then say I was being sarcastic, neither did I repeat a previous lie. Feel free to pop back when something else interests you. Strange, though, that a Villa supporter isn't interested in five weeks of Villa comment, but can regularly be on another topic within minutes.