collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

So close, but never felt so far.... by Drummond
[Today at 10:43:29 AM]


Brian Madjo by Dave
[Today at 10:28:32 AM]


Alysson - signed by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 10:20:26 AM]


Ollie Watkins by PaulWinch again
[Today at 09:39:52 AM]


I know none of you care but ........ (the Baseball thread) by UK Redsox
[Today at 09:15:00 AM]


FFP by Baldy
[Today at 08:50:12 AM]


Manchester Utd vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Somniloquism
[Today at 08:40:34 AM]


Lamare Bogarde by Mister E
[Today at 08:34:57 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: So close, but never felt so far.... by Drummond
[Today at 10:43:29 AM]


Re: So close, but never felt so far.... by TheToffnar
[Today at 10:29:11 AM]


Re: Brian Madjo by Dave
[Today at 10:28:32 AM]


Re: Brian Madjo by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:24:32 AM]


Re: Brian Madjo by paul_e
[Today at 10:22:28 AM]


Re: Alysson - signed by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 10:20:26 AM]


Re: Brian Madjo by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:12:52 AM]


Re: So close, but never felt so far.... by Billy Walker
[Today at 10:02:35 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: England 2012 Cricket Thread  (Read 348865 times)

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #330 on: February 05, 2012, 11:22:56 AM »
Azhar gone.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #331 on: February 05, 2012, 11:32:37 AM »
323 to win, Monty five for!

Offline spangley1812

  • Member
  • Posts: 6560
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #332 on: February 05, 2012, 11:33:03 AM »
Well bowled Monty.................

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14154
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #333 on: February 05, 2012, 11:37:10 AM »
In theory with more than two days to score 323 we should walk it. In reality, our batsmen must be bricking it!

Judging by the 1st innings, Strauss and KP are in some sort of form so let's hope that they each grind out a score.

Offline Dave Cooper please

  • Member
  • Posts: 29991
  • Location: In a medium sized launch tethered off Biarritz
  • GM : 20.04.2019
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #334 on: February 05, 2012, 11:42:42 AM »
323 has only been chased down 14 times in Test history.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #335 on: February 05, 2012, 11:50:11 AM »
We need to be no more than 2 down at around 120 to stand a chance.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #336 on: February 05, 2012, 11:51:12 AM »
We've made 4 without losing a wicket so that's a bonus.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #337 on: February 05, 2012, 11:55:45 AM »
Cook dropped already

Offline TheTimVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 11396
  • Age: 51
  • Location: German Germany
  • GM : 13.02.2022
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #338 on: February 05, 2012, 12:00:53 PM »
We need to be no more than 2 down at around 120 to stand a chance.
We could be 200 for 0 and I wouldn't be confident at the moment!

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #339 on: February 05, 2012, 12:00:59 PM »
I think teams should penalised 5 runs for obviously ridiculous appeals. It's really annoying when teams constantly appeal when it's clearly not out.

Offline olaftab

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45578
  • Location: Castle Bromwich
  • GM : 13.12.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #340 on: February 05, 2012, 12:03:21 PM »
First 4 need to stand up and be counted. When spinners come on use the bat and not leave it or pad up.

and one more thing "champions" usually prevail in these circumstances. Bowlers have done well to bring some sort of respectability now it's....
« Last Edit: February 05, 2012, 12:10:32 PM by aftab235 »

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #341 on: February 05, 2012, 12:09:07 PM »
Here comes the spin.

Online Villan For Life

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14154
  • Location: Exiled on Main Street
  • GM : 07.08.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #342 on: February 05, 2012, 12:09:32 PM »
Here comes the first spinner

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57991
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #343 on: February 05, 2012, 12:11:49 PM »
Strauss has got to pick the length better, going back is suicide.

Offline TheTimVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 11396
  • Age: 51
  • Location: German Germany
  • GM : 13.02.2022
Re: England 2012 Cricket Thread
« Reply #344 on: February 05, 2012, 12:12:26 PM »
I think teams should penalised 5 runs for obviously ridiculous appeals. It's really annoying when teams constantly appeal when it's clearly not out.
I think their wicketkeeper's voice will be less annoying once his balls have dropped.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal