collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Emi Martinez by Villa in Denmark
[Today at 09:12:10 PM]
Re: Emi Martinez by villa for life
[Today at 09:11:31 PM]
Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 09:09:51 PM]
Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Gareth
[Today at 09:03:51 PM]
Re: Kits 25/26 by Tuscans
[Today at 09:02:31 PM]
Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 09:02:23 PM]
Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 09:00:44 PM]
Re: Other Games 2025-26 by brontebilly
[Today at 08:58:57 PM]

Follow us on...

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: A case for the defence  (Read 9454 times)

Offline Phil from the upper holte

  • Member
  • Posts: 10142
  • Location: B62
Re: A case for the defence
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2011, 08:30:47 AM »
Quote from: Chris Smith on December 04, 2011, 08:19:44 AM
The midfield is our biggest problem not the defence, they've tightened up the last 2 games and looked far more solid.

Do you not think Collins is missing the midfield by just pumping it down the pitch?
Logged

Offline Irish villain

  • Member
  • Posts: 8526
  • Age: 39
Re: A case for the defence
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2011, 08:35:35 AM »
Did anybody in the trinity hear what Dunne said to McLeish?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal