If I was Given, and at 37 offered a loan deal to go and sit on another bench at half the wages I would not go. If I was offered it to play though, knowing I still had 2 years beyond that still on 60k at Villa I would go as it would be better to play than not. If I were Hutton, I would cling to the 40k as long as possible, in full knowledge that no other mug will ever pay that again so I need to trouser it for as long as I can.
I can't believe anyone at Villa would seriously want Steer to replace Guzan in the first team if something happened to him. The lads not even played a handful of top flight games in his career and to throw him in as #1 could be a potential disaster for us and himI'd much rather Shay was given (no pun intended) the back up jersey and Steer got some experience on loan or something
I'd like rid but I'd trust Given as back up. Although I'd also expect a fair few blunders.
Quote from: Malandro on September 12, 2013, 11:22:46 AMI'd like rid but I'd trust Given as back up. Although I'd also expect a fair few blunders.I saw him twice last season.Against Everton at home, when he chucked one in, and against Norwich away in the cup, where I spent the whole game bar the last couple of minutes convinced he was going to cost us the tie.
Quote from: Malandro on September 12, 2013, 11:22:46 AMI'd like rid but I'd trust Given as back up. Although I'd also expect a fair few blunders.I saw him twice last season.Against Everton at home, when he chucked one in, and against Norwich away in the cup, where I spent the whole game bar the last couple of minutes convinced he was going to cost us the tie.I'd rather see this highly rated youngster given a chance.
... So how will we ever know if he's good enough if he never gets to play? Anyway, thankfully the over-cautious approach to giving youngsters a chance fucked off out the door with McLeish, so we don't have to worry about that kind of backwards thinking anymore.