Yes, he has to hit the ground running (as I think our more "sensitive" fans won't give him any honeymoon period at all), no he shouldn't have to go the extra mile, whatever that means. Coming up with the goods to me means winning football matches consistently, and improving on the previous season. This is EXACTLY what I'm (and, I presume, Chris is) giving him the opportunity to do. What's so difficult to understand about that?EDIT: I've just realised that using the phrase "giving him the opportunity" sounds a bit pretentious, but you know what I mean. We can hardly start calling for his head when he hasn't even had a chance to start winning matches yet, can we?
I didn't want him as manager.
I really cannot see the point of beating the shit out of this. Are people who are still staunchly against him being manager, for whatever reason going to do anything other than continuously analyze and moan for the rest of the season? The only fuel you have to continue to your argument and position is if he actually fails. Otherwise, it's over and done with. Had the club employed any other employed manager we'd have paid some form of compensation so that part in my opinion is a pointless argument. They identfied a candidate, did what they had to do and now he's in place.You are now either going to refocus and get behind the club and hope the manager succeeds or you're going to keep on with complaining about it which is getting so exhausting. Look, almost none of us wanted him, but he's here now. Give him a chance to win you over. Is that really so much to ask?
Had the club employed any other employed manager we'd have paid some form of compensation so that part in my opinion is a pointless argument.
Quote from: toronto villa on July 13, 2011, 02:46:30 PMI really cannot see the point of beating the shit out of this. Are people who are still staunchly against him being manager, for whatever reason going to do anything other than continuously analyze and moan for the rest of the season? The only fuel you have to continue to your argument and position is if he actually fails. Otherwise, it's over and done with. Had the club employed any other employed manager we'd have paid some form of compensation so that part in my opinion is a pointless argument. They identfied a candidate, did what they had to do and now he's in place.You are now either going to refocus and get behind the club and hope the manager succeeds or you're going to keep on with complaining about it which is getting so exhausting. Look, almost none of us wanted him, but he's here now. Give him a chance to win you over. Is that really so much to ask?There's always an off button, tv. What you have to accept is that there are a significant number of fans, not least on H&V, who don't share your almost Timmy Mallet levels of enthusiasm and perkiness. In fact, speaking for myself, I haven't felt quite so dispirited about a forthcoming season since before O'Neill arrived. If, in the face of the McLeish appointment and the lowering of expectations, you still find reason to be incredibly positive then I salute you. But it's unreasonable to expect everyone else to share that view, or to refrain from posting about how they do feel. And if that means there are threads you feel you don't want to contribute to, then steer clear of them. As much as you can't see the point in some threads, you have to accept that others do.
Quote from: toronto villa on July 13, 2011, 02:46:30 PM Had the club employed any other employed manager we'd have paid some form of compensation so that part in my opinion is a pointless argument. I don't see it as a pointless argument at all.You accept coughing up compensation for a quality manager, but I and many others object to stumping up for a manager with a sub-standard record.Due to his below par record people ARE going to analyse his methods to a higher degree than they would normally.If that's 'exhausting', lay the blame at the feet of the board who made this baffling appointment.
Not at all. And a convincingly argued point.We'll give the useless ginger c*** a fair crack.
Quote from: Chris Smith on July 13, 2011, 02:34:18 PMI didn't want him as manager.What was that view based on?
Quote from: hilts_coolerking on July 13, 2011, 02:43:26 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on July 13, 2011, 02:34:18 PMI didn't want him as manager.What was that view based on?Blind prejudice.