Yes I agree with this. Also its about having the options to change it around. I like 4-3-3 and in certain examples of it offers the most flexibility but the option to revert to 4-4-2 is also desirable.But going back to 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 and how I'd like to see it employed. It firstly requires full backs to support the attack as the three in midfield would be isolated. It requires one defensive minded midfielder or better still, two box to box types behind a playmaker. The wide men need to be able to tuck back to protect their full backs but also support the striker. This asks quite a lot of them but they're paramount to it working or not.
Shouldn't we have enough creativity in the team with Young, Downing and Albrighton often playing?To me it's more a question of build up play. For example when Barry was here he was always very good at moving the ball quickl;y to he wide players and keeping them involved in the game so very often he'd get it out early to Young who'd be one on one with the defender.For most of this season it's taken a bleeding age for the ball to get to the wide players from the central two so when they get it there's often two or three defenders surrounding them so the pass very often gets overhit.It worked better at Everton last week as Downing got the cross in early and Young for once actually didn't overhit a throughball so we got two goals from Bent.
I just remember Dwight Yorke and Andy Cole. Shame we don't have a young Dwight Yorke to play with Bent as he is probably best option for us. Craig Bellamy could be a short term solution
Fucking hell, If Stephen Ireland is the answer then I really do not want to know the question.