Quote from: Dave on February 12, 2011, 07:11:05 PMQuote from: WikiVilla on February 12, 2011, 07:01:28 PMQuote from: Dave on February 12, 2011, 06:18:34 PMIncidentally, Charlie Adam looked superb for them.If he had been in our midfield rather than theirs then we would have walked all over them today.eh ? did u watch the game ?Pray tell me what I have said that is wrong.adam did not look "superb" far from it, he looks like a Div 2 player yes we made him look good
Quote from: WikiVilla on February 12, 2011, 07:01:28 PMQuote from: Dave on February 12, 2011, 06:18:34 PMIncidentally, Charlie Adam looked superb for them.If he had been in our midfield rather than theirs then we would have walked all over them today.eh ? did u watch the game ?Pray tell me what I have said that is wrong.
Quote from: Dave on February 12, 2011, 06:18:34 PMIncidentally, Charlie Adam looked superb for them.If he had been in our midfield rather than theirs then we would have walked all over them today.eh ? did u watch the game ?
Incidentally, Charlie Adam looked superb for them.If he had been in our midfield rather than theirs then we would have walked all over them today.
We are not, in Premiership terms, very good. Finish.
negative bent looks like he did at spurs under harry. not upto to it and they both knew it.positivebent's the finished article 15+ prem goals
We were a couple of final balls from being out of sight at half time having completely outplayed them for the first 45.
All this wailing; Tony, what is Houllier supposed to do, finish Downings one on one for him?When you've watched the first half you'll see that we should have been 4 or 5 up. We're causing our own problems by being so wasteful.