Quote from: PeterWithesShin on October 08, 2012, 02:34:26 PMI like Weimann and hope he has the chance to show he has a future with us. In fairness, we were losing 2-1 at City when he went off. True. But in terms of performance we were the better team at that stage. My point is that Weimann is usually involved in anything good attack-wise when he plays. Bent also looks much better when playing in front of him and they do have a good understanding it would seem.
I like Weimann and hope he has the chance to show he has a future with us. In fairness, we were losing 2-1 at City when he went off.
I bet when Benteke was signed Weimann couldn't believe his bad luck. Out of the four we've got (if you don't count Bowery), Weimann's performances have been consistently high. The only thing he was lacking was goals and he's been unlucky not to bag more.
Quote from: curiousorange on October 10, 2012, 11:27:11 PMI bet when Benteke was signed Weimann couldn't believe his bad luck. Out of the four we've got (if you don't count Bowery), Weimann's performances have been consistently high. The only thing he was lacking was goals and he's been unlucky not to bag more. I'm not sure that Benteke was signed specifically to come in for him as they are totally different players with different strengths. They can play together as showed against Citeh. I do agree that he was unfortunate to lose his place though and he always looks like he will get chances in a game (same can be said for Benteke to be fair).
I didn't mean Benteke was bought as a Weimann replacement (although I admit, it does read like that), more that he'd just about put himself either first or second choice and now he's really waiting for another player to get injured to get back to where he was.
Weimann is a great player. I hope we don't put him on loan. He is always a threat, darting about everywhere with loads of energy.