collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Pau Torres by RamboandBruno
[Today at 08:42:41 AM]


Brentford vs Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Walmley_Villa
[Today at 08:41:44 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by lovejoy
[Today at 08:41:21 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VinnieChase84
[Today at 08:38:55 AM]


Unai Emery by Rico
[Today at 08:29:43 AM]


Morgan Rogers - PFA Young Player of the Year 24/25 by ROBBO
[Today at 08:21:32 AM]


FFP by Dave
[Today at 07:48:00 AM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Dave
[Today at 07:41:18 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Martin O'Neill thread (with added sacking #2188)  (Read 353261 times)

Offline john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20565
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1830 on: March 18, 2013, 07:36:47 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1831 on: March 18, 2013, 07:41:38 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Not with the type of players we sign these days though. I think Lerner is happy just to see us survive every season. A bit like Wigan I suppose.

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23881
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1832 on: March 18, 2013, 07:41:41 PM »
Didn't MONs best run for us coincide with Sidwell being in the team?

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10100
  • Location: Peckham
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1833 on: March 18, 2013, 07:44:28 PM »
Ginger Messi with Gabby up front on his own. World beaters. Till we went to Moscow.

Offline john e

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20565
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1834 on: March 18, 2013, 07:45:39 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Not with the type of players we sign these days though. I think Lerner is happy just to see us survive every season. A bit like Wigan I suppose.


disagree,
with the likes of Benteke, Wieman, Westwood, Guzan plus one or two others i think we could well challenge for a top 7/8 finish
but obviously my optimistic prediction is based on a quite different assement of Lamberts capabillities compared to yours

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37294
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1835 on: March 18, 2013, 07:47:09 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Not with the type of players we sign these days though. I think Lerner is happy just to see us survive every season. A bit like Wigan I suppose.

Like Benteke for instance?

Online Mister E

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18194
  • Location: Mostly the Republic of Yorkshire (N)
  • GM : 16.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1836 on: March 18, 2013, 07:48:59 PM »
He offloaded three young players currently playing in Premiership defences (Cahill, Gardner and Ridgewell) and brought in a number of highly-paid defenders on long contracts. I'm not saying the aforemeontioned three would have been our salvation, but we needed seasoned defenders this season and have suffered from not having them.

Add to this all the other hindsighted issues with MON and I wish him nothing but an ignomious fall from his media pedestal.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10100
  • Location: Peckham
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1837 on: March 18, 2013, 07:52:00 PM »
I'd have killed for Gardner, Cahill and even Ridgewell at times this season.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1838 on: March 18, 2013, 07:59:51 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Not with the type of players we sign these days though. I think Lerner is happy just to see us survive every season. A bit like Wigan I suppose.


disagree,
with the likes of Benteke, Wieman, Westwood, Guzan plus one or two others i think we could well challenge for a top 7/8 finish
but obviously my optimistic prediction is based on a quite different assement of Lamberts capabillities compared to yours

Benteke is a good signing. The rest, well, the league table tells the tale.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1839 on: March 18, 2013, 08:00:37 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!


yes agreed
but i still dont think it imposible for us to finish 7th, which is the new 6th because of Man City in the next say 2-3 years

Not with the type of players we sign these days though. I think Lerner is happy just to see us survive every season. A bit like Wigan I suppose.

Like Benteke for instance?

Or Bennett?

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1840 on: March 18, 2013, 08:03:27 PM »
I'd have killed for Gardner, Cahill and even Ridgewell at times this season.

No one batted an eyelid when Gardner and Ridgewell left. Cahill, well that's a different matter.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10100
  • Location: Peckham
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1841 on: March 18, 2013, 08:16:30 PM »
I'd have killed for Gardner, Cahill and even Ridgewell at times this season.

No one batted an eyelid when Gardner and Ridgewell left. Cahill, well that's a different matter.
That shows how far we've fell really.

Offline saunders_heroes

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15664
  • GM : 28.02.2026
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1842 on: March 18, 2013, 08:21:46 PM »
I'd have killed for Gardner, Cahill and even Ridgewell at times this season.

No one batted an eyelid when Gardner and Ridgewell left. Cahill, well that's a different matter.
That shows how far we've fell really.

Yep.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43244
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1843 on: March 18, 2013, 08:29:32 PM »
the top of the table is very different now than when MON was with us

there was a set in stone top 4 of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal then,
now we have Man City's millions to deal with, Totenham are a real force now, but were flirting with relegation at times back then,

so if you accept that the top 4 would reamain the same, you were competing against Everton, Spurs,Newcastle or a smaller club having a great season to finish 5th or 6th,
Man City were no where near anything at the time,
 so with the many millions spent the 3 x 6th spots i dont think were anything that special

Better than the shit served up this season though!

You'd expect that for the vast amount of money spent wouldn't you? MON spent a lot more than 25m a season.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 43244
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: The Martin O'Neill thread
« Reply #1844 on: March 18, 2013, 08:32:56 PM »
I wonder if he now looks back on shitting on us, and wishes he hadn't done it.

If he gets the bullet or walks from Sunderland, surely that's it for his career. He'd struggle to get a sideways move, even.

I think Damon called it right. He'll just retire like Clough did and pop up on tv from time to time.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal