collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Five Subs  (Read 4575 times)

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 42435
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Five Subs
« Reply #45 on: April 02, 2022, 05:49:44 PM »
Well with Digne likely being a regular again next season you can see one reason why we voted for five subs!

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9660
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Five Subs
« Reply #46 on: April 02, 2022, 07:45:28 PM »
we could have changed all 11 today and it wouldn't have made a blind bit of (positive) difference

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28922
  • Age: 52
  • Location: My own little world.
  • GM : 10.10.2024
Re: Five Subs
« Reply #47 on: April 03, 2022, 11:11:15 AM »
Yeah. But the quality of the players Man City bring on will be far superior to the replacements Norwich can. So their chance of victory will be increased.

Didn't Man. City make 0 changes when they drew 0-0 at Palace recently?

This was also their bench v us in December:

Zach Steffen, Scott Carson, Luke Mbete, Cole Palmer, James McAtee, Romeo Lavia, Josh Wilson-Esbrand, Foden and Grealish.

Grealish was only sub they made that night and he came on right at the end. So yes Man. City can make 5 subs when 3 or 4 up v Burnley but Pep wasn't exacly going to throw on half the youth team especially as they were clinging on a bit.

Whereas that night we had Jacob Ramsey and El Ghazi as unused subs and either may have scored if we'd had 5 subs.

You look at the bench Arsenal had the other week aswell and it's not like that was overflowing with top quality players either.

I think this should benefit us next season as we really need to give more minutes to Carney, Archer, Kesler and JPB so this should really benefit as most managers use the 5 subs to just take FBs off after 70 minutes so some games could start Kesler and bring on Cash for example.

Man City yesterday had Mahrez, Fernandinho, Jesus, Silva, Stones, Zinchenko on the bench.

Liverpool had Mane, Diaz, Fabinho, Milner, TAA, and Oxlade Chamberlain

Chelsea, Lukaku, James, Jorghino, Kovacic and Christenson

We had Young, Luiz, Buendia, Traore, Chambers.

I know whose subs would be able to improve their team more. Even Man Utd had Rashford, Matic, Lingard, Mata and Wan Bissaka.

Offline SoccerHQ

  • Member
  • Posts: 42435
  • Location: Down, down, deeper and Down.
  • GM : 19.06.2021
Re: Five Subs
« Reply #48 on: April 03, 2022, 12:30:54 PM »
Mata is an old man who can barely move anymore, Lingard has wanted to leave Man. United for last 18 months and Rashford last had a good game in 2019 seemingly so I doubt having 5 subs would've had them challenging for the league given this is worst man. united squad since the 80s.

Next week we'll play Spurs and their backup CF on the bench will be Dane Scarlett.

I think it's a myth clubs in 4th-7th have 20 world class players in their squads, they don't. Chelsea bench will also be weaker next season unless they get another billionaire taking over.

I think it's good for us as we obviously need another LB in the summer. Many will be probably reluctant to join given what we spent on Digne but we can just say to them you'll get regular sub cameos as many managers use the extra subs to change the full backs around the 70th min mark.

Offline Footy-Vill

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6667
  • GM : 01.11.2024
Re: Five Subs
« Reply #49 on: July 02, 2022, 09:31:47 AM »
How many more signings do people feel needed for our bench to have 5 subs of rotational standard?
Gerrard certainly wants that and to finish in top 6-8 we need that extra squad quality.
Also have to take into account with have some absolutely superb young players.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal