Elmo or Bacuna? Elmo for me.
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on September 16, 2017, 11:49:58 PMQuote from: Dave on September 16, 2017, 10:54:57 PMQuote from: SoccerHQ on September 16, 2017, 10:50:55 PMNo issue with him at RB.Agreed. An right back with a decent cross and an instinct to get forward is fine with me.He just shouldn't be one of our three most attacking players like he has been in previous matches.He scares the shit out of me at right back. He's completely reckless in that he has no positional sense, leaves asteroid size holes down our right side when he decides he'd rather play on the wing. Watching him jog back numerous times today had me screaming. If it had been anybody else he'd have been hung. For me, he's the weak link in our back for and we'll be punished sooner rather than later for his lack of intelligence, as technically he's a more than decent player.Great cross for the third goal today though.A completely unnecessary signing.
Quote from: Dave on September 16, 2017, 10:54:57 PMQuote from: SoccerHQ on September 16, 2017, 10:50:55 PMNo issue with him at RB.Agreed. An right back with a decent cross and an instinct to get forward is fine with me.He just shouldn't be one of our three most attacking players like he has been in previous matches.He scares the shit out of me at right back. He's completely reckless in that he has no positional sense, leaves asteroid size holes down our right side when he decides he'd rather play on the wing. Watching him jog back numerous times today had me screaming. If it had been anybody else he'd have been hung. For me, he's the weak link in our back for and we'll be punished sooner rather than later for his lack of intelligence, as technically he's a more than decent player.Great cross for the third goal today though.
Quote from: SoccerHQ on September 16, 2017, 10:50:55 PMNo issue with him at RB.Agreed. An right back with a decent cross and an instinct to get forward is fine with me.He just shouldn't be one of our three most attacking players like he has been in previous matches.
No issue with him at RB.
He brought him in because he knows him well, he trusts him and knows he can do a job and while we probably didn't need him now Snodgrass is here, I can understand why he wanted him. He's been ok-ish so far.
As a measureHutton - he is better in all areas than "Cafu"Bree - mistake ridden and not convinced by him - although still very youngDeLaet - The most accomplished defender but has turned into the invisible manRichards - Good God - I would rather play with 10 menSo unless we can dispel the myth that is RDL and he starts to play - there is no one better for that position
Quote from: Clampy on September 18, 2017, 01:28:56 PMHe brought him in because he knows him well, he trusts him and knows he can do a job and while we probably didn't need him now Snodgrass is here, I can understand why he wanted him. He's been ok-ish so far. On the last two displays he's probably the best right back we have, which doesn't say much for De Laet or Bree.
I do wonder if Green was in that role as wide right then would we have been further ahead in matches and scored more goals. Even having Bjarnasson or Grealish in one of the wide attacking roles.
Quote from: footyskillz on August 28, 2018, 09:56:32 AMI do wonder if Green was in that role as wide right then would we have been further ahead in matches and scored more goals. Even having Bjarnasson or Grealish in one of the wide attacking roles.To answer your points - Green no. The lad isn't ready. I'm not going to write him off but he's been very poor this season and needs to go on a season's loan somewhere down the league.As for Bjarnason, Bruce tried him in an attacking position on the left last season, and to say it wasn't a huge success is a massive understatement. In any case, we now have Adomah, El Ghazi and Bolasie fighting for three spots, so not sure why you'd need to play the players you mention out of position.