Quote from: London Villan on January 27, 2025, 09:53:56 AMI said this yesterday - every game we play is played with an eye on the next game. I'd have left Watkins and Ramsey on yesterday as they were both causing west ham problems. But no doubt the decision was made with Wednesday in mind.Ramsey played only 5-10 mins in Monaco. No way he needed to be replaced. Poor decision. Bailey was ok too. We went to bits on the flanks when they both went off. Credit to Kamara as he was carrying that midfield, Tielemans badly needed to be replaced last 20-30. None of our subs made an impact, mind.
I said this yesterday - every game we play is played with an eye on the next game. I'd have left Watkins and Ramsey on yesterday as they were both causing west ham problems. But no doubt the decision was made with Wednesday in mind.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on January 27, 2025, 01:51:28 PMYou do, so chucking him in there wouldn’t have been a good call. Also with the greatest respect the comparison to Rogers is ludicrous. Other than them both being young they are not remotely comparable. Rogers had played 80 odd senior games before came to us, up to Championship level. There was plenty to say he had a great chance.Swinkels has played one senior game hasn’t he? The aforementioned League Cup game.Unless the coaching staff don't think they are ready, there's surely got to be a time where they are given a chance though? Both Swinkels and Bogarde are now 21, so not really kids anymore. Surely they would be desperate to get a chance to play?
You do, so chucking him in there wouldn’t have been a good call. Also with the greatest respect the comparison to Rogers is ludicrous. Other than them both being young they are not remotely comparable. Rogers had played 80 odd senior games before came to us, up to Championship level. There was plenty to say he had a great chance.Swinkels has played one senior game hasn’t he? The aforementioned League Cup game.
Quote from: brontebilly on January 27, 2025, 02:10:17 PMQuote from: London Villan on January 27, 2025, 09:53:56 AMI said this yesterday - every game we play is played with an eye on the next game. I'd have left Watkins and Ramsey on yesterday as they were both causing west ham problems. But no doubt the decision was made with Wednesday in mind.Ramsey played only 5-10 mins in Monaco. No way he needed to be replaced. Poor decision. Bailey was ok too. We went to bits on the flanks when they both went off. Credit to Kamara as he was carrying that midfield, Tielemans badly needed to be replaced last 20-30. None of our subs made an impact, mind.With all due respect, how do you know? As supporters we're not armed with his fitness or performance stats, we don't know whether or not players are still good to go or what their plan is.It seemed to me that yesterday was the first time Ramsey had the shackles off fully, he seemed to be running with more purpose, power and speed than he has at any other time this season. Perhaps the plan was for him to have 'x' amount of time so as not to overdo it.I liked what I saw of him yesterday, and was also disappointed he went off because I think we lost something when he did.