collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Unai Emery by walsall villain
[Today at 07:18:34 AM]


Snooker by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 03:12:26 AM]


Boubacar Kamara by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:24:53 AM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:19:39 AM]


Golf 2026 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:04:26 AM]


The Arrers by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 12:52:07 AM]


Nottingham Forest v Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by Drummond
[Today at 12:41:44 AM]


Cult heroes of Villa Park - Jed Steer pt II by Louzie0
[Today at 12:03:56 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Unai Emery by walsall villain
[Today at 07:18:34 AM]


Re: Unai Emery by frank black
[Today at 07:06:38 AM]


Re: Snooker by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 03:12:26 AM]


Re: Snooker by Rory
[Today at 02:26:00 AM]


Re: Snooker by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:13:53 AM]


Re: Snooker by Rory
[Today at 02:05:52 AM]


Re: Unai Emery by Rory
[Today at 01:31:28 AM]


Re: Boubacar Kamara by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:24:53 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Aston Villa vs Brentford Post-Match Thread  (Read 14720 times)

Offline martyn ellis

  • Member
  • Posts: 689
  • Location: Within earshot of Big Ben
    • http://www.martin-martyn.co.uk
Re: Aston Villa vs Brentford Post-Match Thread
« Reply #210 on: December 06, 2024, 12:10:36 PM »
Some rubbish on here about pen and offside. It was most definitely a penalty as Ollie was unbalanced with the tug on his arm. There was no interference by Ollie as defender was able to do what he wanted to do, clear the ball. That’s what he would have done 10 times out of 10 in that position regardless of where attacker was.
Agreed.
The Watkins 'interference with play' claim is obviously without foundation as the defender was trying to clear the ball and not challenging Watkins. It was very similar to the Southampton goal that was ruled out for the same reason against Brighton. The attacker was in front of the defender who was trying to clear the ball with no interference from the attacker. That one went against them. Watkins one went for us, and justifiably.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37271
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Aston Villa vs Brentford Post-Match Thread
« Reply #211 on: December 06, 2024, 12:19:35 PM »
Some rubbish on here about pen and offside. It was most definitely a penalty as Ollie was unbalanced with the tug on his arm. There was no interference by Ollie as defender was able to do what he wanted to do, clear the ball. That’s what he would have done 10 times out of 10 in that position regardless of where attacker was.
Agreed.
The Watkins 'interference with play' claim is obviously without foundation as the defender was trying to clear the ball and not challenging Watkins. It was very similar to the Southampton goal that was ruled out for the same reason against Brighton. The attacker was in front of the defender who was trying to clear the ball with no interference from the attacker. That one went against them. Watkins one went for us, and justifiably.

The one for Southampton was flagged offside at the time, with the lino probably telling the ref/var who he flagged and for why. This one was given onfield. Reverse the onfield decisions and Southampton would have scored and ours would have been ruled out as there is not enough of an error to justify a VAR change.

Offline usav

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16580
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • GM : 27.05.26
Re: Aston Villa vs Brentford Post-Match Thread
« Reply #212 on: December 06, 2024, 01:11:22 PM »
My takeaway from the incident is that Ollie (still) needs to do a better job of staying onside.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal