Quote from: Demitri_C on September 02, 2025, 09:27:39 AMIt just seems utterly ridiculous that again we are actually showing a positive balance on transfer fees while manure again are in the red. Surely they are failing FFP because they are losing every windowTheir commercial revenues are huge in comparison.
It just seems utterly ridiculous that again we are actually showing a positive balance on transfer fees while manure again are in the red. Surely they are failing FFP because they are losing every window
The way things are going, football won't even be a thing eventually. Come Saturday afternoon, we'll all be piling down to VP to watch two teams of chartered accountants sitting opposite one another and comparing P&L statements.
Come Saturday afternoon, we'll all be piling down to VP to watch two teams of chartered accountants sitting opposite one another and comparing P&L statements.
Quote from: Somniloquism on September 02, 2025, 01:34:15 PMThe money does have to be paid, and in most cases the payments are spread over several years. But for the point of FFP working out, only 3/4 of the fee will appear at most at any one time and others are then dropping off, but the whole of the sold home-grown is on for the three years. So previously Elanga, McTominay, Greenwood, Henderson and the lower priced but multiple numbers of lower placed players all helped them waste the money the last few years. But as SCR seems to be the new thing, it doesn't surprise me that all the clubs with the most revenues are spending all the money this year. Yep, it’s all about revenue. I wonder how long before NSWE realise that only a Spurs style stadium will allow us to compete. Even if we manage to consistently get the 5th champions league spot, we’ll still be outgunned every single year on revenue. Spurs don’t even need CL money, they rake it in.
The money does have to be paid, and in most cases the payments are spread over several years. But for the point of FFP working out, only 3/4 of the fee will appear at most at any one time and others are then dropping off, but the whole of the sold home-grown is on for the three years. So previously Elanga, McTominay, Greenwood, Henderson and the lower priced but multiple numbers of lower placed players all helped them waste the money the last few years. But as SCR seems to be the new thing, it doesn't surprise me that all the clubs with the most revenues are spending all the money this year.
One thing though we already will be spendobg 30m bext summer on Elliott so we must havw some money next summer or we couldnt do this deal
Quote from: Demitri_C on September 02, 2025, 03:33:58 PMOne thing though we already will be spendobg 30m bext summer on Elliott so we must havw some money next summer or we couldnt do this dealWe get the Enzo and Bailey money next year, I presume.