Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: Steve R on June 03, 2016, 03:13:44 AM

Title: Jack Woodward
Post by: Steve R on June 03, 2016, 03:13:44 AM
It seems a bit of a shame to see Jack go without at least giving him a proper thread of his own. He just seems to be slipping out of the back door without anyone really paying much attention to his leaving.

All the best for the future Jack, wherever it lies.

Given that we will not feature much on the dark streams next season, I'll be tuning in to AVTV whoever will be commentating.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 03, 2016, 03:22:44 AM
He was bloody terrible. As much as you never want to see anyone lose their job I won't miss his shit corny lines. For a club of our size we should have someone better than him.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Ron Manager on June 03, 2016, 04:35:24 AM
You can't release Jack into society. How will he cope?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: wozwebs on June 03, 2016, 04:40:08 AM
Sounds to me as if AVTV will be no more next season.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Steve67 on June 03, 2016, 05:12:23 AM
Hopefully, AVTV will be replaced by something much more professional and reliable. Jack was pretty poor but I don't like the thought of him losing his job. I hope he finds something suitable, quickly and is happy doing it. Good luck Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on June 03, 2016, 06:23:44 AM
Avtv was shite
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: robbo1874 on June 03, 2016, 06:43:38 AM
Good luck Jack.

Your interview with Mr 110% still burns bright in the memory 😄

What's the most important thing about a successful team Ron?

.................................................Shape..............................

Shape Ron?

.................................Yes, shape................


You get the jist. Excruciating! To be fair Saunders could probably do that to people of a much higher calibre than our Jack, but it was almost painful to watch.

Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave shelley on June 03, 2016, 06:44:42 AM
It's never nice to see anyone lose their job.  I don't have AVTV so only saw him on the free bits on the official site and can see how he would grate on your nerves.  Still, the best of luck to him in the future.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: UK Redsox on June 03, 2016, 07:40:09 AM
Seemed like a nice bloke but I only spoke to him a couple of times.

However, as a commentator ......... ::)

Best wishes J-Dub
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Witton Warrior on June 03, 2016, 08:11:57 AM
Avtv was shite

I think I have watched it twice but it was always a faff trying to get onto it and then there was Jack...
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on June 03, 2016, 08:22:02 AM
Jack's corny commentaries were pretty awful but wonderfully biased!
I give him a bit of credit for that!

All the best Jack!

UTV!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Clampy on June 03, 2016, 08:44:42 AM
Chatted to him on the way back from Dublin a few years back, a really nice chap who genuinely seemed to like us as a club.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: not3bad on June 03, 2016, 09:18:00 AM
Safe to say he's not the slickest broadcaster who has walked the Earth - at the same time never short on entertainment. All the best Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: berneboy on June 03, 2016, 09:30:47 AM
I'm in a minority, I know, but I thought Jack was OK. Wonderfully biased which is what I want. And I like him.
Thanks, Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Zouch Villa on June 03, 2016, 09:53:32 AM
All the best Jack. Seemed a genuinely nice bloke who knew he had landed a cushy gig.

Does anyone know if this part of the cost cutting measures, or more of a new broom/change of direction?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Edvard Remberg on June 03, 2016, 10:08:10 AM
His punditry and poesy always sent a shiver down my spine, just before I smashed the speakers. 
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Clark W Griswold on June 03, 2016, 10:14:04 AM
I thought most on here had re-named him 'Woodwank', to be fair I only saw bits of him but he certainly wasn't as irritating as some well known football presenters/commentators etc. It just sounds like he was not very good at what he did, a sort of Westwood/Clark/Hutton if you like.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on June 03, 2016, 11:43:33 AM


Never like to see anyone lose their job, he was however cringe worthy in the extreme. He'd make an ideal compare at Butlins or on a shitty cruise ship
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Gregorys Boy on June 03, 2016, 11:47:45 AM
Will behonest I have no idea who he is, but judging by some of the comments that might make me the lucky one.. ;)
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 03, 2016, 11:56:14 AM
I always got the feeling that a lot of what he did was extremely tongue in cheek. He'll be missed.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: mrastonvilla on June 03, 2016, 12:45:30 PM
That video of Jack in the bath singing some of the players names with his villa rubber duck will live with me for ever.

So bad it was good.

Good luck Jack

Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on June 03, 2016, 12:45:38 PM
Not a fan of commentaries at all but he will still be a big miss.

It wasn't like he just rocked up at 2pm on Saturdays and did comms, he did all the reserve and youth team games. Also did all the community and Acorns interviews so quite a lot to replace I think.

Need to certainly get someone in, maybe Amelia will get a bigger role next season?

I don't really watch AVTV and certainly don't want to subscribe to it but what we certainly need a revamp of is our Youtube content.

Given we now have the China market to appeal to I think we'll see a lot of changes in that area over the next year. When you compare our Youtube offerings compared to even league one clubs, it is pretty poor offering in terms of behind the scenes and player interviews.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on June 03, 2016, 12:46:29 PM
Hopefully, AVTV will be replaced by something much more professional and reliable. Jack was pretty poor but I don't like the thought of him losing his job. I hope he finds something suitable, quickly and is happy doing it. Good luck Jack.

Pretty sure on weekends off he used to pop up on Talksport and also Soccer Saturday so he won't be short of those sort of gigs if he goes freelance.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: sirlordbaltimore on June 03, 2016, 01:02:15 PM


Which Wembley appearance was it when he read out the team sheet with added shit like 'the bald Eagle' Braaaaaad Guzzzaaan etc etc ?

The opposition fans must've been pissing themselves
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Jarpie on June 03, 2016, 01:03:34 PM
He reminds me a lot about one finnish presenter who is mostly disliked, both would suit to host childrens program lot more than sports.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on June 03, 2016, 01:06:56 PM


Which Wembley appearance was it when he read out the team sheet with added shit like 'the bald Eagle' Braaaaaad Guzzzaaan etc etc ?

The opposition fans must've been pissing themselves

Did he genuinely have a stutter as I could then understand why he always did the ccccc Ciaran Clark and Cuellar when he was here when reading the times.

Otherwise he sounded an idiot!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: paul_e on June 03, 2016, 01:11:06 PM
Always came across as being more than a bit Alan Partridge to me, some of his commentary fitted perfectly into that funny/uncomfortable niche.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Chipsticks on June 03, 2016, 01:11:41 PM
I met him a few years ago when I ended up in the Trinity, I think it was McLeish's first game where we beat Blackburn 2-0. Just got chatting to him and he seemed like a really lovely guy, we should definitely have something a bit more professional as the mouthpiece of the club, mind.

I've heard him do other tid-bits of voice-over work for Football League coverage so I'm sure he'll find work.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave.woodhall on June 03, 2016, 01:25:11 PM
I was told that he would drive to away reserve games when he wasn't working, so that he could recognise the players better. That sort of professionalism and attention to detail makes me think he knew exactly what he was doing.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on June 03, 2016, 01:32:48 PM
I was told that he would drive to away reserve games when he wasn't working, so that he could recognise the players better. That sort of professionalism and attention to detail makes me think he knew exactly what he was doing.

No doubting the professionalism at all, just the delievery wasn't the best when he was commentating.

Tbf I don't have AVTV and haven't listened to his comms for quite a while now (maybe back to when the Villain was on Sky tv) but it wasn't great then. Worst was when they got rid of proper commentators and just had him doing the goal comms on the season reviews.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Diablo on June 03, 2016, 02:21:12 PM
Was/is he actually a Villa fan?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Proposition Joe on June 03, 2016, 03:07:53 PM
You know when you hear someone's voice before ever seeing them and build up a mental image of how they look? Jack was one of the very, very few people who looked exactly like he sounded.

Anyway, he may not have been the best broadcaster, but seemed like a decent person so I can do nothing but wish him the best.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: amfy on June 03, 2016, 03:27:03 PM
My outstanding memory of him will always be the annual Villa memorial service which Jane & I attended with Mike Jeffries following the sad & sudden passing of Mike's dad.

For some reason someone allowed Jack to think it was a good idea for hm to sing 'Unforgettable'.

He was lucky that most of his audience were too sad about their recent bereavements to find it as funny as it actually was.

Good Luck Jack - you seemed a nice bloke & I will.miss your mid-commentary golf analogies.


Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: shirley_villan on June 03, 2016, 03:55:24 PM
Good luck to him.

Always remember one of his lines after one of (I think) Hendries goals - ''it's a curler, it's a twirler, it's an absolute pearler''
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on June 03, 2016, 04:34:06 PM
Was/is he actually a Villa fan?

Sheff Weds.

Was amazed doing a bit of research that Jack's been a club employee for 15 years (joined in 2001) so would've certainly developed affection for the club when you serve it for so long.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: HK Villan on June 03, 2016, 06:00:11 PM
Good luck to him.

Always remember one of his lines after one of (I think) Hendries goals - ''it's a curler, it's a twirler, it's an absolute pearler''

That's a classic, and really sums him up.  I grew to quite like his coverage in a sort of masochistic way.  One thing is for sure its the end of an era and AVTV will never be the same again!  I wish him all the best and thanks for all the memories!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on June 03, 2016, 07:15:08 PM
Good luck to him.

Always remember one of his lines after one of (I think) Hendries goals - ''it's a curler, it's a twirler, it's an absolute pearler''

That's a classic, and really sums him up.  I grew to quite like his coverage in a sort of masochistic way.  One thing is for sure its the end of an era and AVTV will never be the same again!  I wish him all the best and thanks for all the memories!

Ha! I remember that quote of his. Pure Woodward. Good luck to him, wherever he ends up.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: PeterWithesShin on June 03, 2016, 07:17:27 PM
I met him a couple of times and seemed a very nice bloke. his commentary wasn't the best but it was rarely boring. I'm sure during a pre-season game shown live on AVTV a few years ago he started talking about his hotel bathroom and/or having a bath. All the best Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: pauliewalnuts on June 03, 2016, 07:24:38 PM
People saying he was shit should probably reflect that being the voice of AVTV is hardly going to attract your Martin Tylers.

What are they replacing AVTV with?

Is it by any chance "nothing"?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: nuninho on June 03, 2016, 07:29:16 PM
Used to enjoy the match preview clips with Froggie.  Hope he gets something - he seems a geniune likeable Partridge type.  Good luck and thanks Jack!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: robbo1874 on June 04, 2016, 12:00:14 AM
My outstanding memory of him will always be the annual Villa memorial service which Jane & I attended with Mike Jeffries following the sad & sudden passing of Mike's dad.

For some reason someone allowed Jack to think it was a good idea for hm to sing 'Unforgettable'.

He was lucky that most of his audience were too sad about their recent bereavements to find it as funny as it actually was.

Good Luck Jack - you seemed a nice bloke & I will.miss your mid-commentary golf analogies.



Ha Ha! Very good.

'But I don't want to talk to you, I want to talk to him over there!'
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: villan from luton on June 04, 2016, 02:34:13 AM
Seems a nice bloke but his commentary when I heard it was abysmal to say the least. I gave up a few years ago cos of him
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Toronto Villa on June 04, 2016, 03:53:56 AM
Seems a nice bloke but his commentary when I heard it was abysmal to say the least. I gave up a few years ago cos of him

And his interviews were utterly cringeworthy. I'm sure he's a lovely fella and I have no doubt about his dedication but he just wasn't very good as the voice of a PL football club.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Matt C on June 04, 2016, 06:03:24 AM
Good luck to him, I don't want to see anyone lose their job*

*'Hateful Eight' aside.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dekko on June 04, 2016, 08:18:15 AM
I quite liked Woodward, because I like puns, and things that are so awful they go right round the scale and become brilliant again.  And he does seem like a good bloke, hard worker etc.

But that said, his interviews were unforgivably bad.  I know you'll never get hard hitting journalism on the OS (and that he was interviewing people not exactly renowned for their eloquence) but he didn't even ask questions half the time, he'd make a statement and then stick the mic out for an agreement off whoever he was talking to.

Good luck to him, but I think we can do better.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 04, 2016, 02:13:36 PM
Never once heard him which seems like a blessing from reactions. Good luck to him.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Dominic22 on June 04, 2016, 02:33:53 PM
Agree with some of the comments about him but. As others have said, a good guy who did work hard. He covered lots of stuff for the Villa and was dealing also with AVTV that to say was run on a shoestring was polite.

He will be missed by me as he made me laugh and cringe in equal measure and as I also suspect the alternative is nothing...
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Pete3206 on June 04, 2016, 03:04:55 PM
How on earth can Villa let this man go with quality like this
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: edgysatsuma89 on June 04, 2016, 03:07:48 PM
How on earth can Villa let this man go with quality like this


I clearly missed out.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: pooligan on June 04, 2016, 03:10:23 PM
I was certainly not his greatest fan but sad he has lost his job Best of luck Jack whatever you do next
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Pete3206 on June 04, 2016, 06:00:39 PM
I think he should present the new series of Monkey Tennis
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: London Villan on June 04, 2016, 06:10:57 PM
TSM2 gave him a proper verbal bullying at one of the start of season forums. Really out-of-order sort of stuff too, well beyond normal p*ss-taking. Sums TSM2 up really.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Diablo on June 05, 2016, 04:40:25 AM
Was/is he actually a Villa fan?

Sheff Weds.

Was amazed doing a bit of research that Jack's been a club employee for 15 years (joined in 2001) so would've certainly developed affection for the club when you serve it for so long.

Thanks Soccer HQ. I had a sneaky feelin' that he may not have been. Good to know my Villa-dar is firing on all cylinders (the other good news after a quick consultation is that my Villa-dar 100% confirms that David Cameron is definitely not a Villa fan - but we always knew that didn't we?).
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Dave P on June 05, 2016, 06:30:16 AM
If he is not a Villa fan, then his greatest legacy for me was that he made me truly believe he was.  A lot of his commontry was cringeworthy though wasn't it?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: eamonn on June 06, 2016, 09:30:40 AM
Yes, for the affection for the Villa that shone through in his lameness, the fact that he didn't even support us reflects well on him. I remember him singing a Christmas carol, eyes closed, dramatic vocals, in front of some of the squad one year, might have been an Acorns event. I hope the players were fond of him, Gabby would often struggle to keep a straight face during his interviews with Jack, which was interesting as on TV his serious, cliche-ridden ones are far less entertaining.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: aj2k77 on June 06, 2016, 10:07:05 AM
Harmless, nice guy, not the best but we will miss him.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: thegreatdane on June 06, 2016, 12:28:43 PM
He was ugly and annoying with an awful commentary voice. Farewell
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on June 06, 2016, 12:32:01 PM
What have looks got to do with it Adonis?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: thegreatdane on June 06, 2016, 12:48:52 PM
Quite a lot when your the face of AVTV  :-*
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Diablo on June 07, 2016, 03:38:30 PM
Best of luck in the future Jack. Thanks for all your hard work.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Jane on June 09, 2016, 08:39:02 AM
My outstanding memory of him will always be the annual Villa memorial service which Jane & I attended with Mike Jeffries following the sad & sudden passing of Mike's dad.

For some reason someone allowed Jack to think it was a good idea for hm to sing 'Unforgettable'.

He was lucky that most of his audience were too sad about their recent bereavements to find it as funny as it actually was.


I have tears in my eyes just remembering that! I seem to remember he sang another song which I had to leave the room for....

Best of luck Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Dazvillain on June 09, 2016, 09:36:12 AM
Built up a connection with jack after meeting him a few times at vp. Was a really helpful and generous bloke. Invited my daughter and I into press box couple of times sitting with him and Tony Morley once then pat heard. Great experience seeing all the press live at work during a game, thanks jack great memories , all the best
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: SoccerHQ on July 21, 2019, 02:09:50 PM
Guess who's back.....

Looks like we've re-appointed him to be main commentator/presenter for our online content this season given he's doing the game today.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: eamonn on July 21, 2019, 02:20:32 PM
Hahaha...I was going to ask on here the other day after watching the highlights of the Minnesota game on AVTV. The commentator's voice seemed familiar - and as soon as Lansbury's goal made him quip "Henri hoovers up the chance to score" I thought "Christ, it can't be..." but then in the comments section on YouTube someone referred to the commentator under a different name.

Did we release Jack when we got relegated?  He must be demanding the type of money only PL status can afford!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: UK Redsox on July 21, 2019, 02:45:58 PM
He still doesn’t stop to take a breath
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Steve67 on July 21, 2019, 02:55:02 PM
At least he's actually commentating on what's actually going on, on the pitch, instead of ruminating about what he's having for dinner later!  That's his usual standard.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Davkaus on July 21, 2019, 02:57:25 PM
At least a couple of times, the daft bastard has asked a question, realised he doesn't have a co-commentator, then answered himself.
Title: Re: Jack Woodwank
Post by: Bad English on July 21, 2019, 03:02:28 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 21, 2019, 03:39:22 PM
It’s murder listening to him. The biggest consolation is that we won’t have to listen to him much this season being back in the PL.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Smirker on July 21, 2019, 05:06:29 PM
At least a couple of times, the daft bastard has asked a question, realised he doesn't have a co-commentator, then answered himself.

 ;D oh Jack.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Dazvillain on July 21, 2019, 06:45:08 PM
Jack the legend....”it’s a puler it’s a curler, it’s gone in the top corner “
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Pete3206 on July 21, 2019, 06:59:37 PM
I like him
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Clark W Griswold on July 21, 2019, 07:03:05 PM
I thought he was ok too. I'd sooner listen to him than cunting Motson or fucking Pearce.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Virgil Caine on July 21, 2019, 07:05:42 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Damo70 on July 21, 2019, 07:11:01 PM
I saw the thread and thought he had died.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 21, 2019, 07:11:59 PM
He didn’t die. A little piece of me did though as I listened to his drivel.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Lastfootstamper on July 21, 2019, 07:30:38 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: exiled on the wirral! on July 21, 2019, 07:51:36 PM
I'll be honest I really like him, he makes me laugh with his silly puns. He is like a younger version of Tony Blackburn. Fair play if we are re-employing him.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: AsTallAsLions on July 21, 2019, 07:58:53 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Billy Walker on July 21, 2019, 08:10:46 PM
Jack for me is synonymous with the past decade of Lerner horror.  As lovely a fella as he might be, I just can't listen to him without major football-related ptsd kicking in.  Please Villa, bring in fresh blood for the new era.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Ian. on July 21, 2019, 08:35:22 PM
At one point during the first half he stated that Villa have not conceded yet in pre-season, which unless I’m mistaken that’s just over 100 minutes of footy!

He’s ok though, he reminds me of an 80’s social club DJ.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Toronto Villa on July 21, 2019, 08:57:02 PM
He’s like the awkward bloke who never talked as a kid then was given an inspirational chat by a careers teacher to find himself. He gets involved in the school radio station and the rest is history. He’s making up for years of silence with utter mindless drivel.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: London Villan on July 21, 2019, 09:15:06 PM
I remember an end of season award ceremony when TSM2’s banter on stage overstepped the mark and sounded more like bullying. I felt sorry for Jack, but he is still like alan partridge.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: AV82EC on July 21, 2019, 09:16:06 PM
Don’t think he’s on staff as he’s gone freelance judging by his Twatter feed.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 21, 2019, 09:33:44 PM
Who thinks the club are right to have Woodward commentating?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: villan from luton on July 21, 2019, 09:37:21 PM
He is so like Alan Partridge
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 21, 2019, 09:42:04 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Yes you can. It is a collective noun and can be third person singular or plural. We Brits generally prefer the plural, unlike our less-developed brethren in Gilead.

"The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer". There, much better!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Louzie0 on July 21, 2019, 10:17:45 PM
Who thinks the club are right to have Woodward commentating?


I do /does
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Edvard Remberg on July 21, 2019, 11:21:41 PM
Who thinks the club are right to have Woodward commentating?
He is horrible and makes my ears bleed. Nooooo
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Flin5tone on July 21, 2019, 11:34:18 PM
Great Guy, love him  ;)
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Louzie0 on July 21, 2019, 11:36:33 PM
Re-examine your earbuds, Edvard.

Jack W is cool.
Flin5Tone is simpatico.



Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Clampy on July 22, 2019, 07:01:16 AM
I don't mind him and it's not as if we have to listen to him all time. I spoke to him on the way back from Dublin a few years back, he was a lovely chap.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Perthvillan on July 22, 2019, 07:29:39 AM
I think that most of you are being a bit harsh on Jack.
I don't think we will hear as much of him as in pre-relegation days if that's any consolation.
I wonder if he has been waiting by the phone waiting for a call from Villa since that glorious day at Wembley in May!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: thick_mike on July 22, 2019, 08:05:39 AM
He is ok, problem is that he does a radio commentary over tv pictures. Nowhere near as bad as some, not as good as others.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 22, 2019, 02:34:29 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.

Ermmm... yes you can, because that's correct.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: AsTallAsLions on July 22, 2019, 02:59:19 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Yes you can. It is a collective noun and can be third person singular or plural. We Brits generally prefer the plural, unlike our less-developed brethren in Gilead.

"The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer". There, much better!

Only if the members/components of the team/club/collective entity are operating as individuals. There's a good explanation here: https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/parts-of-speech/nouns/collective-nouns.html

In the given example, "The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer", the club members are not operating as individuals in any express sense, so the noun takes the singular form of the verb, i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer."

CC cdbullyweefan...
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 22, 2019, 03:01:31 PM
"Bolton Wanderers is about to make its tenth signing of the summer."

"Blackburn Rovers is playing today."

That sounds right to you?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: AsTallAsLions on July 22, 2019, 03:09:13 PM
"Bolton Wanderers is about to make its tenth signing of the summer."

"Blackburn Rovers is playing today."

That sounds right to you?

I think it's:

Bolton Wanderers are playing today.

Bolton Wanderers Football Club is playing today.

Apologies to all who are bored to death.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: passport1 on July 22, 2019, 04:06:50 PM
Oh boy. We really need a Pedants Corner thread.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Legion on July 22, 2019, 04:40:10 PM
Pedant's Corner
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 22, 2019, 04:41:13 PM
Oh boy. We really need a Pedants' Corner thread.

Corrected.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 22, 2019, 04:42:04 PM
Pedant's Corner

Tsk. Only one pedant?

A teacher, too.

*Shakes head in disappointment.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Damo70 on July 22, 2019, 04:48:15 PM
"Bolton Wanderers is about to make its tenth signing of the summer."

"Blackburn Rovers is playing today."

That sounds right to you?

I think it's:

Bolton Wanderers are playing today.

Bolton Wanderers Football Club is playing today.

Apologies to all who are bored to death.


I would say Bolton Wanderers are playing today.

The phrase Bolton Wanderers football club is playing today sounds like a line from a Pathe News report.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 22, 2019, 05:20:39 PM
"Bolton Wanderers is about to make its tenth signing of the summer."

"Blackburn Rovers is playing today."

That sounds right to you?

I think it's:

Bolton Wanderers are playing today.

Bolton Wanderers Football Club is playing today.

Apologies to all who are bored to death.

Bolton Wanderers Football Club are playing today. Much better.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: papa lazarou on July 22, 2019, 05:22:59 PM
I think it's:
Wulverampton Wunderers am playing today.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 22, 2019, 05:36:48 PM
At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Yes you can. It is a collective noun and can be third person singular or plural. We Brits generally prefer the plural, unlike our less-developed brethren in Gilead.

"The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer". There, much better!

Only if the members/components of the team/club/collective entity are operating as individuals. There's a good explanation here: https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/parts-of-speech/nouns/collective-nouns.html

In the given example, "The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer", the club members are not operating as individuals in any express sense, so the noun takes the singular form of the verb, i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer."

CC cdbullyweefan...
ATAL 1. you are quoting an American English site to comment upon British usage. 2. You are trying to force prescriptive grammar down our throats when there is no need. We can say "the club 'are'" irrespective of whether the members are 'acting as individuals' or not. Either you consider the noun as a singular unit or a group, then you conjugate accordingly. It's up to you. Really.

*Starts chant "We do what we want, we do what we waaaaant, we're British English, we do what we want."
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 22, 2019, 05:37:30 PM
I think it's:
Wulverampton Wunderers am playing today.
We'm googling to check.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Edvard Remberg on July 23, 2019, 10:30:08 AM

At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Yes you can. It is a collective noun and can be third person singular or plural. We Brits generally prefer the plural, unlike our less-developed brethren in Gilead.

"The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer". There, much better!

Only if the members/components of the team/club/collective entity are operating as individuals. There's a good explanation here: https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/parts-of-speech/nouns/collective-nouns.html

In the given example, "The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer", the club members are not operating as individuals in any express sense, so the noun takes the singular form of the verb, i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer."

CC cdbullyweefan...
ATAL 1. you are quoting an American English site to comment upon British usage. 2. You are trying to force prescriptive grammar down our throats when there is no need. We can say "the club 'are'" irrespective of whether the members are 'acting as individuals' or not. Either you consider the noun as a singular unit or a group, then you conjugate accordingly. It's up to you. Really.

*Starts chant "We do what we want, we do what we waaaaant, we're British English, we do what we want."
Apropos something totally different - how come Hyperbole is "Hyperb-ole" while it isn't "Hyperb-olic" - double standards clearly?
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 23, 2019, 10:32:27 AM
If you're talking about pronunciation, "hyperbole" should be said as if it has four syllables. "Hy-per-bol-e".

Otherwise I'm confused as to what you are asking.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: pauliewalnuts on July 23, 2019, 10:33:48 AM

At one point he said "Aston Villa is back where it belongs", which is that dumbed-down American version of Engerlish. Tsk!

I’ll bow to your superior knowledge BE but I thought when dealing with single entities such as Aston Villa that one should you the singular ‘is’ rather tha ‘are’. It has always confused me as it reads as a tad clunky but certainly my company always uses the singular.


Villa are a "we", not an "it".

This is definitely a US/British thing, but from a strictly grammatical perspective it would be more appropriate in a majority of cases to use singular i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer..." as you can't say "The club are...", and in this instance "the club" is the stand-in noun for Aston Villa.

However, people on this side of the pond are more comfortable speaking of a team or a club as a collective, and though it's a bit awkward, "Aston Villa are..." certainly sounds better.
Yes you can. It is a collective noun and can be third person singular or plural. We Brits generally prefer the plural, unlike our less-developed brethren in Gilead.

"The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer". There, much better!

Only if the members/components of the team/club/collective entity are operating as individuals. There's a good explanation here: https://grammar.yourdictionary.com/parts-of-speech/nouns/collective-nouns.html

In the given example, "The club are expected to make their tenth signing of the summer", the club members are not operating as individuals in any express sense, so the noun takes the singular form of the verb, i.e. "The club is expected to make its tenth signing of the summer."

CC cdbullyweefan...
ATAL 1. you are quoting an American English site to comment upon British usage. 2. You are trying to force prescriptive grammar down our throats when there is no need. We can say "the club 'are'" irrespective of whether the members are 'acting as individuals' or not. Either you consider the noun as a singular unit or a group, then you conjugate accordingly. It's up to you. Really.

*Starts chant "We do what we want, we do what we waaaaant, we're British English, we do what we want."
Apropos something totally different - how come Hyperbole is "Hyperb-ole" while it isn't "Hyperb-olic" - double standards clearly?

Basically, the English language is made difficult like that to make foreigners work hard to get it right ;-)

Mind you, at least we weren't as sadistic as, say, the Finnish with theirs.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Edvard Remberg on July 23, 2019, 11:12:21 AM
If you're talking about pronunciation, "hyperbole" should be said as if it has four syllables. "Hy-per-bol-e".

Otherwise I'm confused as to what you are asking.
I know that hyperbole is pronounced like that - just don't understand why, when hyperbolic isn't, which is the same word (more or less)
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 23, 2019, 12:20:59 PM
Basically, a word ending with the suffix -ic is always stressed on the syllable that precedes -ic : realistic; wanktastic ; electronic; intracytoplasmic, hyperbolic, and so on.

The word 'hyperbole' contains the prefix 'hyper' which normally has a secondary stress on its first syllable, as in 'hypersonic' but, according to the Oxford Guide to English Morphology, when hyper is attached to a neoclassical form which attracts stress to the syllable which immediately precedes it, then it is the second syllable of hyper that is stressed : hyperbole, hyperbola, hypertrophy etc.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: eamonn on July 24, 2019, 08:32:18 AM
Neat explanation BE. In fact, wankTAStic!
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Bad English on July 24, 2019, 09:48:03 AM
If you're talking about pronunciation, "hyperbole" should be said as if it has four syllables. "Hy-per-bol-e".

Otherwise I'm confused as to what you are asking.
This is why you have education systems with 'English teachers'. ;-)
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Edvard Remberg on July 24, 2019, 10:00:50 AM
If you're talking about pronunciation, "hyperbole" should be said as if it has four syllables. "Hy-per-bol-e".

Otherwise I'm confused as to what you are asking.
This is why you have education systems with 'English teachers'. ;-)

So - what is the difference between I and me?




*joking
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Flin5tone on August 09, 2019, 01:33:13 PM
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BG8Ro-ZEAG0

 Smooth operator 😎
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave.woodhall on August 09, 2019, 01:40:21 PM
I know he's hardly Mr Slick, but there's something about Jack Woodward that's just so Villa.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Flin5tone on August 09, 2019, 03:32:15 PM
I know he's hardly Mr Slick, but there's something about Jack Woodward that's just so Villa.

Agreed,  it's hard not to like him. Fun & positive. He could make a 6-0 defeat sound good
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Rodders on August 09, 2019, 08:36:32 PM
When Ron Vlaar (yes, I know) signed, I took Mini Rodders - now of this parish, I'm delighted to say - to VP to get his shirt signed. Jack pounced on us and interviewed us for AVTV.

He (Jack) was warm, kind, gentle and enormously encouraging of Felix' then nascent love for the Villa, being a supporter himself made him all the more credible in his role.

He may well be a slightly rubbish commentator, but he's *our* slightly rubbish commentator and I'll forgive him pretty much anything for being incredibly nice to my son when he didn't have to be. I'll even laugh at some of his shit puns, because it takes a nerd to know a nerd.

I'd love to see that video again; a different era altogether for the club and for me.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Nev on August 09, 2019, 09:35:27 PM
Woodward supports Staff Weds.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Damo70 on August 09, 2019, 09:44:33 PM
I know he's hardly Mr Slick, but there's something about Jack Woodward that's just so Villa.

Agreed,  it's hard not to like him. Fun & positive. He could make a 6-0 defeat sound good


There was a stage when he had to make heavy defeats sound good.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave.woodhall on August 09, 2019, 09:56:57 PM
Apologies if I've sad this before, but when Jack first got the job here he used to travel to away reserve matches in his own time and at his own expense, to find out more about the players. You can't knock that sort of attention to detail.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: danno on August 09, 2019, 10:04:52 PM
A lot of folk lost their jobs three years ago, getting him back in is as Aston Villa as it gets.

Even in the clip Grealish's cheery welcome back is loaded, as he knows Woodward only left in the first place because we were relegated. We're back and so is he, I'm happy with that.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: dave.woodhall on August 09, 2019, 10:07:54 PM
A lot of folk lost their jobs three years ago, getting him back in is as Aston Villa as it gets.

Even in the clip Grealish's cheery welcome back is loaded, as he knows Woodward only left in the first place because we were relegated. We're back and so is he, I'm happy with that.

It wasn't all about relegation. Someone who works there said that the cuts weren't because of relegation, they were because they should have been made three years earlier. It seems they employed people from 2010 onwards ready for a massive expansion in all areas that never happened.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: danno on August 09, 2019, 10:25:06 PM
Three years is a long time to let things drift on. I suppose that's what happens when you're owned by one individual there's always that risk of them becoming an absentee landlord.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: charlatan on August 09, 2019, 10:39:24 PM
I took a six month NCTJ journalism course with Jack in 1998-99 at Norton College in Sheffield. Wednesday fan iirc. Had the ridiculous football commentator voice in real life even at that point. Haven't ever spotted the name of any other budding journalist who was on that course in print, although I would have forgotten most of them by now. I never worked as a journalist. Did spot the entrance to the college in the last This is England series though.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: amfy on August 10, 2019, 10:29:44 AM
Jack Woodward has the air of an 9 year old Villa fan in a man’s body. There is something about him that appeals to our inner child I think.
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Dazvillain on August 10, 2019, 10:36:24 AM
He’s part of AVFC like we all are , glad he’s back
Title: Re: Jack Woodward
Post by: Legion on August 10, 2019, 10:50:13 AM
He posted this yesterday:

Quote
Hello. Just a quick post to to confirm that I'll be commentating on Villa's Premier League return this season for the club's official AVTV live radio channel ( starting with Spurs game tomorrow! ) and interviewing/presenting for the TV service. Looking forward to it!
I will still be freelance and also working for a number of different companies who I've enjoyed broadcasting with over the past few years, particularly covering the EFL and hosting events. Thanks! JW
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal