Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: Oscar Arce on January 05, 2016, 03:36:11 PM

Title: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Oscar Arce on January 05, 2016, 03:36:11 PM
Interesting discussion on 5 Live last night sums up the shambles at our club.
58 minutes in.
Sigh.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03dlnpv
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: villabear on January 05, 2016, 03:39:17 PM
Discussed on Tom Fox meets supporters thread. 'Muppet' reference good though!
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: peter w on January 05, 2016, 03:58:38 PM
*sighs*
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 05, 2016, 04:04:30 PM
Find it hard to say this but Joey Barton made some pretty astute observations about AVFC...hard to take coming from him but bluntly honest...then lapsed into "muppetmuppetmupppet" which somewhat devalued his earlier points.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: levico on January 05, 2016, 06:06:10 PM
I think he's right about us being down for some time while people like Fox, Riley and Almstadt remain at the club.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: el león Benidorm on January 05, 2016, 06:14:34 PM
As long as we are selling enough shirts... FFS
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2016, 06:15:05 PM
so hes happy with the kit deals

Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: john2710 on January 05, 2016, 06:27:58 PM
Find it hard to say this but Joey Barton made some pretty astute observations about AVFC...hard to take coming from him but bluntly honest...then lapsed into "muppetmuppetmupppet" which somewhat devalued his earlier points.

I know this much, we'll come back, might not be straight away but it won't last forever.

Joey Barton, however, will always be a first rate, low life cnut. Nothing will ever change that.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: TopDeck113 on January 05, 2016, 09:49:50 PM
Barton is Collymore-esque.  There's so much about him personally that you want to dislike, but he comes across as an articulate man who is able to argue his point in a reasoned and measured manner - at least in comparison with the majority of pundits.

As for the programme itself, whilst there was a slight sneer in the tone of some of the contributors, I'm pleased that at long last the finger of blame for our decline and impending fall is starting to be pointed on a national forum. 
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: maigrait on January 05, 2016, 10:04:19 PM
That was hard listening as a lot of slagging off of the situation. Not sure Nigel Pearson would be the right candidate full stop - the bloke seems to be a loon and a bully. Perhaps thats what you need to keep up.... no idea.

The difference is which they all glossed over was the fact that the team has been in decline - yes we spent 50 million but that was to replace most of the squad. We had no players so we had to get as many as possible for the money we had.

What they did get right is that lerner isn't around and the people at the top haven't a scooby.

Barton tried to say Newcastle was in a different place? I don't think so, they had a gash squad, no manager and a loony owner also. I'm not sure thats very different to us...
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: olaftab on January 05, 2016, 10:06:03 PM
One of the most annoying thing in our current plight is that whenever they discuss Villa on either 5Live or TS it always starts with a chuckle and laughter and then some patronising hollow comments follow and they quickly move on to let's discuss colour of the grass at Old Trafford or how tea is served from tea pots at eastlands. Wankers all of them!
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Pat McMahon on January 05, 2016, 10:19:23 PM
Somebody told me they heard a discussion on us Sunday afternoon on 5Live too. Did anybody hear it?
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: django on January 06, 2016, 12:29:37 AM
Sad to say but Newcastles squad was better than our current one.
I listened to the radio 5 show and thought it was all fair comment.

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.

Also Pat Mutphy gets slagged off on here but from what I can gather it's because he has been scathing about Lerner, can't say he was wrong on this evidence.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Sexual Ealing on January 06, 2016, 12:39:45 AM
I like Pat Murphy.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Irish villain on January 06, 2016, 01:08:47 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2016, 01:11:01 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing? 
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Gareth on January 06, 2016, 01:31:18 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing?

Still think that was actually a good deal done by Fox & co.  Sure he wouldnt have signed a deal without the clause & equally sure no one expected City to come shopping for him when it was signed
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: tomd2103 on January 06, 2016, 01:39:10 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing?

Still think that was actually a good deal done by Fox & co.  Sure he wouldnt have signed a deal without the clause & equally sure no one expected City to come shopping for him when it was signed

Agree, although I do think we may have been able to get a few million more on the clause.  He would have definitely left for free in the summer if he hadn't signed that contract, so my only issue with him is the stuff he came out with last summer.  If he had kept his mouth shut the I would have had no problem with him going.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2016, 01:39:21 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing?

Still think that was actually a good deal done by Fox & co.  Sure he wouldnt have signed a deal without the clause & equally sure no one expected City to come shopping for him when it was signed

Fox admitted that the mistake was not getting him to sign earlier. Blame them for that, not for making the best out of a bad deal later.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: tomd2103 on January 06, 2016, 01:44:55 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing?

Still think that was actually a good deal done by Fox & co.  Sure he wouldnt have signed a deal without the clause & equally sure no one expected City to come shopping for him when it was signed

Fox admitted that the mistake was not getting him to sign earlier. Blame them for that, not for making the best out of a bad deal later.

Not sure he would have signed earlier anyway Dave.  Once he broke into the a England team, it was only a matter of time before the vultures began circling.  Biggest 'tap up' opportunity out there.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Gareth on January 06, 2016, 01:45:07 AM

Tom fox sounded like an absolute cluess pillock, the first time I'd heard him speak and an absolute waste of space. What worried me was the suggestion that the men currently promoted above their station would be making managerial appointments to ensure they remained in place, basically ruling out the type of root and branch change we need.


Do yourself a big favour and don't ever go searching for anything Fox said at the time they paraded Delph around at the time the new contract was signed. Some of the things Fox said, despite knowing about the pathetic £8m release fee, are downright contemptible.

You say £8 million was pathetic. In that case, what would you have done - let him leave for nothing?

Still think that was actually a good deal done by Fox & co.  Sure he wouldnt have signed a deal without the clause & equally sure no one expected City to come shopping for him when it was signed

Fox admitted that the mistake was not getting him to sign earlier. Blame them for that, not for making the best out of a bad deal later.

Absolutely, summer 2014 was the time to have got it done
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2016, 01:48:36 AM
The two posts above highlight the dilemma clubs always face when they're bringing players through. Once the players gets better than the club he's fair game for the vultures.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: ChicagoLion on January 06, 2016, 02:36:50 AM
The two posts above highlight the dilemma clubs always face when they're bringing players through. Once the players gets better than the club he's fair game for the vultures.
There is the saying, If you train your people well they leave, if you don't they stay.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2016, 08:04:09 AM
I don't have a problem with the deal from the club's perspective. I don't even have a problem with Delph leaving. It was the claims of loyalty and being at the clubs for years to come etc that really irritated me.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 06, 2016, 08:26:15 AM
I don't have a problem with the deal from the club's perspective. I don't even have a problem with Delph leaving. It was the claims of loyalty and being at the clubs for years to come etc that really irritated me.

Yep
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: paul richard on January 06, 2016, 03:45:19 PM
Good discussion on R5L last night, even if it made painful listening.  I still think the commentators collectively missed the point about the transfers last summer.  They went on about the loss of Benteke and Delph, which is fair enough, but they made out that the incoming players weren't good enough, whereas, as has been well set out on another thread, the real damage was done in previous transfer windows, so that the handful of more able incomers (Ayew, Veretout, Amavi) were good players introduced in to a poor squad.  Ayew, Veretout, Amavi etc are not the ones to blame. 
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 06, 2016, 03:55:46 PM
Made me chuckle because everyone was on twitter saying yeah Joey top comments mate, we'd love you down Villa park etc.. You can guarentee if we were linked with him they'd all be saying fuck off your a ******
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: tomd2103 on January 06, 2016, 04:16:52 PM
The two posts above highlight the dilemma clubs always face when they're bringing players through. Once the players gets better than the club he's fair game for the vultures.

Agree Dave, especially as such a disparity now exists in the financial power of clubs.  When clubs are able to pay players ridiculous money just to sit on their bench then there is very little anyone can do about it.
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: in exile on January 06, 2016, 04:30:22 PM
... You can guarentee if we were linked with him they'd all be saying fuck off your a c***
That's because he is
Title: Re: Radio Five Live last night
Post by: maigrait on January 07, 2016, 12:46:56 AM
Sad to say but Newcastles squad was better than our current one.

Yet they still got relegated so all very subjective...
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal