Anyone who needs the facts should read the excellent book "Hillsborough - The Truth" by Professor Phil Scraton. Chilling and will have you in tears by the end.
I had the pleasure of meeting Margaret Aspinall last year. She's been through so much, yet still shows amazing strength. Thoughts are with her and all those still looking for the truth.
RIP. Justice for the 96.
Hillsborough is the very stuff of how disasters happen, the ordinary going extraordinarily wrong with a backdrop of individual component parts, all likely to contribute to a disaster, but which don’t, until everything goes wrong simultaneously.
A central paradox to the disaster is that it was a non-hooligan related disaster borne out of thirty years of hooliganism. So although we are right to clean the stain of hooliganism from those who died that day, the context of why it happened was provided by what had happened before.
Twenty five years on it is difficult to appreciate how much has changed, and how much was tolerated. Thirty years of terrace warfare had wiped thousands off gates , games were routinely the backcloth to mob battles and containment was the order of the day. The authorities clubs, and many fans had given up. Gate storming, robbery and violence were the norm, and Liverpool were not immune. Tony Evan’s “Far Foreign lands” and Nicky Alts’ “The Mersey Boys” both offer excellent first- hand accounts of the era.
Heysel will always be the elephant in the room for Liverpool, and the FA. If a proper UK enquiry had taken place the lessons learned may have averted Hillsborough. The component parts, poor stadium choice, inadequate stadium facilities, a focus on crowd control and not safety but he police and authorities, and the way that football crowds behaved then are to be found in both disasters. But Liverpool, and the FA looked the other way, the rest is history.
The role of the Police is curiously positioned these days and has done much to hinder progress, with the Police themselves perverting the course of justice to little benefit. By the standards of the day opening a gate outside to relieve crowd pressure was not unusual, the results were. Incompetence and or negligence in doing so was always going to be hard to press.
But in the same way that “blame” associated with the gate opening is probably harsh ( by the standards of the day), what followed was far worse. Institutional perjury by an entire force had never happened before with the possible exception of the Flying Squad “fit up” scandals in the Met and West Midlands. Names and responsibility for the cover-up is far more clear cut than for the disaster itself.
How did the FA allow a showpiece event to take place at a ground without a current safety certificate? How did Sheffield Council allow any sporting event to be held there? How did the Football league allow any games at all to be played there? And in an era of IRA terrorism why was there no “disaster plan” held by the Police and Ambulance authorities for major public events?
The finest legacy for the 96 are football grounds now fit for purpose with not a single ground related death at a British football ground since. One of the further paradoxes is how the Leppings Lane End defied demolition and Anfield remains substantially unredeveloped when so much has been done elsewhere.
Hopefully the current inquest will reveal all that needs to be revealed. The major battle, to clear the names of the 96, is all but won. Maybe the 21st Century stadia we enjoy is an unappreciated by-product of their sacrifice. .Most of the Police on duty that day were working class men and football fans themselves, they did not set out to take life willfully, or by negligence. But there is understandable and rightful anger at those who lied afterwards and I believe that is where the focus should now lie.
Very good article garyfouroaks.The big issue for me is that there was such a cover up, which has now really been admitted, and that Duckworth et al panicked and tried to hide their inadequacies by blaming the fans.
Now i accept all that, and accept that those responsible should be held to account, with possible , if relevant, legal action taken.But when i hear justice for the 96, i'm a bit confused about what "justice" they actually want, is it prosecutions or what?
Don't want to offend, just clarification.
Most of the Police on duty that day were working class men and football fans themselves, they did not set out to take life willfully, or by negligence. But there is understandable and rightful anger at those who lied afterwards and I believe that is where the focus should now lie.
I found this a good read from a viewpoint of a resident that lived close to Hillsborough on that day http://yicetor.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/hillsborough-disaster/
I guess my comments will not go down well but it seems that some points are simply forgotten in all this .........
Why did numerous Liverpool fans attempt to gain access without tickets?
Why did these Liverpool fans arrive at the ground so late to kick off?
Were many of these fans not drinking heavily just before kick off?
I am sorry but these Liverpool fans have to take blame for what happened 25 years ago
Many errors took place on the day and yes I am sure not all the truth has been told BUT if people without tickets had not attempted to gain access and people had arrived in a sober condition earlier would the events still have happened ?
I am sure the 96 were innocent parties as they were people in the ground with tickets and its sad what happened
However Liverpool are not the innocent parties that they wish us to believe
Sorry for taking very much the opposite view
I guess my comments will not go down well but it seems that some points are simply forgotten in all this .........
Why did numerous Liverpool fans attempt to gain access without tickets?
Why did these Liverpool fans arrive at the ground so late to kick off?
Were many of these fans not drinking heavily just before kick off?
I am sorry but these Liverpool fans have to take blame for what happened 25 years ago
Many errors took place on the day and yes I am sure not all the truth has been told BUT if people without tickets had not attempted to gain access and people had arrived in a sober condition earlier would the events still have happened ?
I am sure the 96 were innocent parties as they were people in the ground with tickets and its sad what happened
However Liverpool are not the innocent parties that they wish us to believe
Sorry for taking very much the opposite view
I guess my comments will not go down well but it seems that some points are simply forgotten in all this .........
Why did numerous Liverpool fans attempt to gain access without tickets?
Why did these Liverpool fans arrive at the ground so late to kick off?
Were many of these fans not drinking heavily just before kick off?
I am sorry but these Liverpool fans have to take blame for what happened 25 years ago
Many errors took place on the day and yes I am sure not all the truth has been told BUT if people without tickets had not attempted to gain access and people had arrived in a sober condition earlier would the events still have happened ?
I am sure the 96 were innocent parties as they were people in the ground with tickets and its sad what happened
However Liverpool are not the innocent parties that they wish us to believe
Sorry for taking very much the opposite view
The problem was not so much the opening of the gates as not shutting off access to the tunnel leading to pens 3 and 4. If they had done that then the people coming through gate C would have been redirected to the pens on either side, where there was plenty of room.Certainly it was possible to close the entrance to the central pens, but gates had been opened before at other grounds without that precaution. Radio communication was erratic, the crush was escalating, a Judgement of Solomon awaited, do you risk death or serious injury in the crush outside, or hope that everything would sort itself out, as it had before, by opening the gates? Stewarding was primeval, the Police were focussed on crowd control, not crowd safety.
The problem was not so much the opening of the gates as not shutting off access to the tunnel leading to pens 3 and 4. If they had done that then the people coming through gate C would have been redirected to the pens on either side, where there was plenty of room.Certainly it was possible to close the entrance to the central pens, but gates had been opened before at other grounds without that precaution. Radio communication was erratic, the crush was escalating, a Judgement of Solomon awaited, do you risk death or serious injury in the crush outside, or hope that everything would sort itself out, as it had before, by opening the gates? Stewarding was primeval, the Police were focussed on crowd control, not crowd safety.
There was the option for fans to access the wing pens, some did, but many chose the central entrance and to push their way in, and in doing so crushed their fellow fans to death. Normally there was sufficient spare space for fans to spill sideways at games, this time there was not. I don’t blame those fans, that was what you did in those days.
I guess my comments will not go down well but it seems that some points are simply forgotten in all this .........
Why did numerous Liverpool fans attempt to gain access without tickets?
Why did these Liverpool fans arrive at the ground so late to kick off?
Were many of these fans not drinking heavily just before kick off?
I am sorry but these Liverpool fans have to take blame for what happened 25 years ago
Many errors took place on the day and yes I am sure not all the truth has been told BUT if people without tickets had not attempted to gain access and people had arrived in a sober condition earlier would the events still have happened ?
I am sure the 96 were innocent parties as they were people in the ground with tickets and its sad what happened
However Liverpool are not the innocent parties that they wish us to believe
Sorry for taking very much the opposite view
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
West Ham away in the League Cup, in the January prior to Hillsborough. It could so easily have been us.
I see the Man United fanzine 'Red Issue' has stayed classy today.
Can't believe people are still choosing to believe the lies printed in that vile rag. Putting aside your obvious hatred for all things Liverpool can you not understand it could have happened to anybody?
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Heysel was caused by football hooliganism. The authorities lied and said Hillsborough was about football hooliganism.
You see the difference, right?
Why was Bradford more of a tragedy than Hillsborough? Where have you formed your opinion on Hillsborough? Have you ever arrived late for kick off? Have you ever had a drink before a game? Have you ever been to a football match?
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Heysel was caused by football hooliganism. The authorities lied and said Hillsborough was about football hooliganism.
You see the difference, right?
Why was Bradford more of a tragedy than Hillsborough? Where have you formed your opinion on Hillsborough? Have you ever arrived late for kick off? Have you ever had a drink before a game? Have you ever been to a football match?
In answer to your questions ......
I think its obvious why Bradford was more of a tragedy
My opinion is based purely on that ...just the same as yours is on your opinion
If late by seconds
Drink ...NO do that after the game
Maybe never been to a game ........ I watch Villa as a season ticket holder !
Were you actually there? Unlikely so we all have views which are second hand ....but then thats whats good about this country we are are able to have a view !
Dont suppose next we will accept that Gerrard has ever thrown an elbow lol
I see the Man United fanzine 'Red Issue' has stayed classy today.
Can't believe people are still choosing to believe the lies printed in that vile rag. Putting aside your obvious hatred for all things Liverpool can you not understand it could have happened to anybody?
Red Issue, quite possibly the only thing in print that can make The Sun look tasteful.
Tedious, ignorant, biased rubbish.Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Heysel was caused by football hooliganism. The authorities lied and said Hillsborough was about football hooliganism.
You see the difference, right?
Why was Bradford more of a tragedy than Hillsborough? Where have you formed your opinion on Hillsborough? Have you ever arrived late for kick off? Have you ever had a drink before a game? Have you ever been to a football match?
In answer to your questions ......
I think its obvious why Bradford was more of a tragedy
My opinion is based purely on that ...just the same as yours is on your opinion
If late by seconds
Drink ...NO do that after the game
Maybe never been to a game ........ I watch Villa as a season ticket holder !
Were you actually there? Unlikely so we all have views which are second hand ....but then thats whats good about this country we are are able to have a view !
Dont suppose next we will accept that Gerrard has ever thrown an elbow lol
Seems we all seem to believe Liverpool fans were innocent then ...........
Guess they were also innocent at another game when many were killed ............ where is the justice for those guys? Or have the media misled us again?
The biggest tragedy in my eyes in football stadiums in the past 25 years was Bradford and that just almost passes without a mention ........
I am not anti Liverpool but the coverage in my eyes is simply OTT
Heysel was caused by football hooliganism. The authorities lied and said Hillsborough was about football hooliganism.
You see the difference, right?
Why was Bradford more of a tragedy than Hillsborough? Where have you formed your opinion on Hillsborough? Have you ever arrived late for kick off? Have you ever had a drink before a game? Have you ever been to a football match?
In answer to your questions ......
I think its obvious why Bradford was more of a tragedy
My opinion is based purely on that ...just the same as yours is on your opinion
If late by seconds
Drink ...NO do that after the game
Maybe never been to a game ........ I watch Villa as a season ticket holder !
Were you actually there? Unlikely so we all have views which are second hand ....but then thats whats good about this country we are are able to have a view !
Dont suppose next we will accept that Gerrard has ever thrown an elbow lol
I don't for one minute agree with Leicester_Villain but it does seem that the Bradford disaster has been somewhat forgotten in this country and never gets the wall to wall coverage of memorial services like Hillsborough. Perhaps it's because they have closure and there's not any controversy surrounding it, but I don't remember every league game kicking off late out of respect to those who died like it did last weekend for the Liverpool disaster.
I don't for one minute agree with Leicester_Villain but it does seem that the Bradford disaster has been somewhat forgotten in this country and never gets the wall to wall coverage of memorial services like Hillsborough. Perhaps it's because they have closure and there's not any controversy surrounding it, but I don't remember every league game kicking off late out of respect to those who died like it did last weekend for the Liverpool disaster.
I think the point you make about closure is exactly the reason. If the families, and the wider Liverpool fan base, hadn't kept it going then it would have been forgotten and the lazy assumptions would be the mainstream view.
I also think a lot of people think of Hillsborough as a tragedy where lots of people died, full stop.
It would be bad enough if it were just that, but it wasn't, it was a series of lies and cover ups involving the police, the press and - almost certainly - the government of this country, which meant that those families didn't just lose their loved ones 25 years ago, they had their faces rubbed in the shit for almost that whole time after.
They've also had to live with the lingering suspicion that their relatives, or peers of them, were in some way responsible for their deaths. Imagine what that feels like. Imagine what it feels like to have your teenage daughters' dead bodies alcohol level tested to find some way of blaming them. How must that feel? How must it feel to lose your children and be treated so utterly callously by your country, your police?
They also have to put up with utter, utter bollocks of the like posted by Leicester Villain, which is a very good example of this. Some people will just never get the message, they will always think the fans were in some way to blame, they will say things like "I think it's obvious why Bradford was more of a disaster".
I genuinely find it crass, insulting and obnoxious in the extreme to see that some people still, still genuinely do feel that way. People like that are a large part of the problem, they perpetuate the myths and they go on insulting the dead and their families, because they're too dense or too bigoted to stop and have a think about the actual facts re what happened.
I just do not understand some people.
I was at the Villa, West Ham game. I was about 8 rows from the back of the stand and was leaning on the barrier above a stairway. I got crushed there!
I was at the Villa, West Ham game. I was about 8 rows from the back of the stand and was leaning on the barrier above a stairway. I got crushed there!
That sounds like exactly where I was standing. I remember watching as our fans spilled over the advertising hoardings and onto the pitch, even over the white line, on the actual playing surface. As I recall, they briefly stopped the game while the ref and some police shooed the fans back behind the line, where they stood to watch the game. It looked like they were standing on the line for a while. There was a very moody atmosphere that night too. If there had been fences there I dread to think what would have happened.
By any measure the response to Heysel by LFC, and the FA, was pathetic. It is difficult to support the claim that any sort of justice was served. The Belgian judicial review was perfunctory and neither the UEFA or FA held independent enquiries. If they had, the problems which the Belgian authorities had identified, poor stadia, inadequate policing, inadequate planning, and official indifference to the appalling behaviour of British fans abroad, might have resulted in action which would have headed off the inevitability of Hillsborough. A familiar litany of official incompetence and complacency joins Heysel to Hillsborough
There was justice for Heysel. People went to prison for it. No-one has ever been held accountable for Hillsborough.
Nearly twice as many people died at Hillsborough than died at Bradford, and it is more recent, so it's hardly surprising it attracts more attention.
I don't understand why people bring Heysel into this discussion at all, unless they are implying in some way that Hillsborough was karma for it. They were two totally different incidents with different causes.
By any measure the response to Heysel by LFC, and the FA, was pathetic. It is difficult to support the claim that any sort of justice was served. The Belgian judicial review was perfunctory and neither the UEFA or FA held independent enquiries. If they had, the problems which the Belgian authorities had identified, poor stadia, inadequate policing, inadequate planning, and official indifference to the appalling behaviour of British fans abroad, might have resulted in action which would have headed off the inevitability of Hillsborough. A familiar litany of official incompetence and complacency joins Heysel to Hillsborough
There was justice for Heysel. People went to prison for it. No-one has ever been held accountable for Hillsborough.
Nearly twice as many people died at Hillsborough than died at Bradford, and it is more recent, so it's hardly surprising it attracts more attention.
I don't understand why people bring Heysel into this discussion at all, unless they are implying in some way that Hillsborough was karma for it. They were two totally different incidents with different causes.
Not a single Liverpool fan served a custodial sentence post conviction, although some were remanded in custody pre-trial. No record of fines being settled exists.
I agree and accept that the pre-eminence of Hillsborough over Bradford is down to the body count.
I disagree that there is not a line which can be drawn which links the death of a Leeds fan at St Andrews , Bradford, Heysel and Hillsborough. “ A slum sport played in slum grounds”
14 Liverpool supporters were convicted. Seven went to prison, the others receive suspended sentences. The official Liverpool website calls it the lowest point in the club's history. And this is neither the time, nor the place, to mention Heysel.
14 Liverpool supporters were convicted. Seven went to prison, the others receive suspended sentences. The official Liverpool website calls it the lowest point in the club's history. And this is neither the time, nor the place, to mention Heysel.
The links between Heysel and Hillsborough, poor stadia, indifferent authorities, poor policing and a total lack of official accountability are crystal clear. At a time when Justice and the truth are paramount in people's minds it would be wrong NOT to acknowledge that.
On a point of fact no Liverpool fan served a sentence post conviction. The seven to whom you refer were released having been remanded in custody for varying periods of time. Fines were not settled. The Belgian authorities just wanted to forget. It is something we should not do, 96 people paid for it with their lives just a few years later.
Hillsborough did not happen in a vacuum, there was a chilling evitability that it would happen somewhere, sometime. People ignored that at the time, to ignore it now would be wrong.
ESPN had a 2 hour special on this tonight at 8pm (prime time). Hard not to get dust in your eyes watching it and apparently, the program is not allowed to be shown in the UK.
I haven't read this thread as no doubt it has regurgitated the arguments previously discussed, but the one issue that I cannot get my head round is that nowhere or nobody seems to be holding the FA in any way responsible for this.
Hillsborough did not have a safety certificate valid at the time - the match should never have been played there. If it had not been held there, then hopefully this tragedy could not have occurred anywhere.
How come the FA are getting away with failing to fulfil the most basic requirement regarding staging a match?
Watched some of today I thought Martinez came across very well.
Wow!(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/1920583_10203502563344049_7094406662098250804_n.jpg)
The saddest story I've heard was the man whose brother died. I think he may have given him his ticket, but he always blamed himself. He slept at his brother's grave and lost his job. After a long time out of work he finally got another one, only to be killed in an accident on his first day.
Watch the Peter Jones clip on You Tube and you can see why he's sometimes called the 97th victim.
Wow!(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1.0-9/1920583_10203502563344049_7094406662098250804_n.jpg)
They showed that image on the front page of the Daily Mirror at the time. I remember wondering for a long time if those people had got out.
They showed that image on the front page of the Daily Mirror at the time. I remember wondering for a long time if those people had got out.
I was a student in Newcastle when Hillsborough happened.
I remember the morning after, or the Monday, we were sat in the student's union, and every single person in there was reading the papers, in which lots of photos like that featured, and I vividly remember hardly anyone spoke, there were people crying, there was just silence as people took in what happened. Nobody said a word.
I think maybe some younger people who aren't old enough to remember it, and who have grown up knowing it happened, might not realise just what an event it was.
It was something which managed to be at the same time, both beyond belief but, for people who regularly went to games at the time, entirely believable in a "could have been us" way.