Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: alanclare on April 25, 2011, 12:50:58 PM

Title: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: alanclare on April 25, 2011, 12:50:58 PM
Chelsea paid £50 million for Fernando Torres who has scored one goal in 14 appearances for them.

Villa paid less than half of that amount for Darren Bent who has scored seven goals in 12 appearances for us.

Did Gérard Houllier know what he was doing or what?
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Slaphead on April 25, 2011, 01:01:25 PM
Yeah I am glad we turned down Torres for Bent, what a lot of money we would have wasted.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air on April 25, 2011, 01:15:56 PM
Well if we had a return of one goal instead of seven then we would probably now be at best about a point off the relegation places instead of virtually safe. Short term it has paid off big time.

If we get to half way through next season with Bent on 12/13 and Torres on 3/4, Mr Abramovich will be most displeased.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: DeKuip on April 25, 2011, 01:54:40 PM
It's all about chemistry and strikers suiting a teams' style of play.

For instance Ian Rush and Mark Hughes didn't become bad players when they moved abroad, but they turned out to be bad buys.
Garry Birtles scored loads for Clough's Forest but looked like a pub player at ManU.

I hope Torres turns it round at Chelsea - he's a top talent and the game needs players of his ability.

If you look at the returns from all the Premier League's January transfers then Bent is one of the few who have really paid off. The loan signings of Danny Sturridge and Obafemi Martins (one touch one trophy) are two others who have turned out to have been worth the effort.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Toronto Villa on April 25, 2011, 02:00:40 PM
If he can stay fit, I think we'll see Torres' true value next season when Chelsea have dispensed with Drogba and possibly Anelka and built a system around him. Torres is a great striker who isn't fit or comfortable. I still think that Bent offers far more value because he can score in any system, whereas Torres needs the right set up.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on April 25, 2011, 02:18:28 PM
I wouldn't buy Torres as he need to be 100% right and a system suit him, but when it is right, he is very good. Chelsea can afford to spend silly money unlike us.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: placeforparks on April 26, 2011, 07:46:39 AM
I hope Torres turns it round at Chelsea.

me too. can't stand smug scousers.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on April 26, 2011, 07:52:28 AM
Be interesting to see if the thickos at Chelsea let Sturridge go.

A top player in front of their noses and they don't seem to realise it.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Linus on April 26, 2011, 08:31:30 AM
I don't think you can call Houllier a genius for signing a striker any manager (except Meltface) would have.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Chris Smith on April 26, 2011, 08:50:06 AM
Bent was the perfect signing for us. We needed a goal scorer and he has delivered immediately. The way we did the deal; out of the blue and without alerting other clubs was a great piece of work. To not give the manager any credit strikes me as a bit petty.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Brend'Watkins on April 26, 2011, 08:55:06 AM
Genius would be a bit strong a description, spotting good value would be more apt.  So far we've had a decent return on our investment.  The same can't be said for Liverpool and Chelsea, for the former, we'll have to see what he does injury free but he strikes me as the kind of player who is injury prone.  The latter....I really think they've bought a dud.  He may well chip in with a few goals now and then but for £50 million you would want him dictating games much in the same way as Drogba has done over the seasons.  He's no where near that level.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Greg N'Ash on April 26, 2011, 08:57:45 AM
I don't think you can call Houllier a genius for signing a striker any manager (except Meltface) would have.

Maybe but the fact remains he was the only one who actually took the risk and signed him. They didn't.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on April 26, 2011, 09:24:22 AM
I don't think you can call Houllier a genius for signing a striker any manager (except Meltface) would have.

Maybe but the fact remains he was the only one who actually took the risk and signed him. They didn't.
Quite.
He deserves credit for taking the plunge.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Greg N'Ash on April 26, 2011, 09:28:21 AM
yep. if the last guy had a clue about prolific strikers we'd have probably made the CL. All he could come up with was Emile :0(
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on April 26, 2011, 09:38:36 AM
yep. if the last guy had a clue about prolific strikers we'd have probably made the CL. All he could come up with was Emile :0(
My mate said that after the game.
'If we'd have signed Bent 2 seasons ago, we'd have made the Champions League.'

O'Neill's pathalogical aversion to strikers has cost us dear.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: JJ-AV on April 26, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
If he gets penalties, scores 'em and stays fit, I reckon Bent could nab 20 league goals next year.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Drummond on April 26, 2011, 01:17:48 PM
IF we keep Young A. and Downing then he'll certainly bag a few. That said, Albrighton having a run in the side might help a bit! Perhaps Joe Cole wouldn't be a bad buy either.

Bent is perfect for us. He's a Centre Forward that scores goals; he's scored them pretty much everywhere he's been for a number of years. Let's hope he's with us for a few years and keeps going at the rate he is so far.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: WikiVilla on April 26, 2011, 01:25:35 PM
GED did what the short irish fellow should have done 3 years ago
full credit due
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Mac on April 26, 2011, 02:18:02 PM
I don't think you can call Houllier a genius for signing a striker any manager (except Meltface) would have.

Or Martin O'Neill.  So give him some credit.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: jembob on April 26, 2011, 02:24:36 PM
I wouldn't buy Torres as he need to be 100% right and a system suit him, but when it is right, he is very good. Chelsea can afford to spend silly money unlike us.

Torres can't seem to get through a full season without injury and this is his real problem. If Chelsea decide to build a system around him and he is out for 3 months of the season then it won't look very good.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: TheSandman on April 26, 2011, 02:48:36 PM
Torres has suffered a few injuries and he has played pretty much non-stop for the past two seasons apart from when he has been injured. He had become such an important player for Liverpool that after every injury he was rushed back furthering his fatigue. Add to this fatigue (it is perhaps a consequence of the fatigue) the fact that the gaps between each goal have become longer. Even before his Chelsea move he wasn't in the most prolific of form and as such an important player for the Liverpool cause that there was intense pressure upon him. Then he moved to Chelsea with the burden of a £50million price tag. This ratcheted up the pressure upon him and combined with the fatigue lead to his drought. If you watched him he was almost trying too hard. With his goal on Saturday the pressure has lifted but even then I think we will only see a few more Torres goals this season. He will get a rest over the summer and will really hit the ground running next season. Well it is either that or he is completely shot.

As a nasty sadistic person who has an intense dislike of all but a handful of football clubs I tend to hope that every big money signing by most clubs would fail. I would love it if Torres and Caroll don't score another goal ever but that is a completely unrealistic wish. They are good enough to get goals. Imagine if we had picked up Caroll when he was available for a few million and Mazrim was championing him? An instant improvement upon Heskey and Carew and in him, Bent and Gabby we would find ourselves with three forwards each with different skills who could complement each other.

That said I struggle to see Caroll being worth nearly two Darren Bents and Torres being worth more than 2 and a half. I probably wouldn't swap him for either due to the issues I've mentioned with Torres and the fact that Caroll would not deliver as many goals. We needed someone who would hit the ground running with goals and in that Bent has delivered handsomely and it is that we must thank for our still being a premier league side.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 26, 2011, 02:59:22 PM
GED did what the short irish fellow should have done 3 years ago
full credit due


In keeping with the theme of this thread of who got the best deal.

John Carew (swap) started 105 games whilst at Villa plus 28 sub appearances and scored 52 goals (includes 6 starts, 4 subs, 0 goals under Houllier)

Darren Bent (£18m-£24m) started 106 games whilst at Spurs/Sunderland plus 35 sub appearances and scored 61 goals.

Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on April 26, 2011, 03:03:06 PM
GED did what the short irish fellow should have done 3 years ago
full credit due


In keeping with the theme of this thread of who got the best deal.

John Carew (swap) started 105 games whilst at Villa plus 28 sub appearances and scored 52 goals (includes 6 starts, 4 subs, 0 goals under Houllier)

Darren Bent (£18m-£24m) started 106 games whilst at Spurs/Sunderland plus 35 sub appearances and scored 61 goals.


Carew did well, but the reluctance to sign a partner for him was odd, not to mention needing to somebody to fill in when he was having his injury niggles.

We got Heskey - A Carew type that doesn't score.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: KevinGage on April 26, 2011, 03:25:39 PM
If he gets penalties, scores 'em and stays fit, I reckon Bent could nab 20 league goals next year.

He'd probably be close to that figure now, had he been on penalty duty with us since Jan, not had a few goals ruled out due to borderline calls and so on.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: WikiVilla on April 26, 2011, 03:28:55 PM
He'd be in double figures that's for sure
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Ads on April 26, 2011, 04:38:25 PM
Be interesting to see if the thickos at Chelsea let Sturridge go.

A top player in front of their noses and they don't seem to realise it.

Bent, Gabby and Sturridge would make a very nice triumvirate of forwards.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on April 26, 2011, 04:51:58 PM
Be interesting to see if the thickos at Chelsea let Sturridge go.

A top player in front of their noses and they don't seem to realise it.

Bent, Gabby and Sturridge would make a very nice triumvirate of forwards.
Sturridge really does look good.

I wonder if Chelsea will let him go?
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: not3bad on April 26, 2011, 04:59:56 PM
I don't think you can call Houllier a genius for signing a striker any manager (except Meltface) would have.

Martin O'Neill is meltface?
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on April 26, 2011, 05:08:05 PM
GED did what the short irish fellow should have done 3 years ago
full credit due


In keeping with the theme of this thread of who got the best deal.

John Carew (swap) started 105 games whilst at Villa plus 28 sub appearances and scored 52 goals (includes 6 starts, 4 subs, 0 goals under Houllier)

Darren Bent (£18m-£24m) started 106 games whilst at Spurs/Sunderland plus 35 sub appearances and scored 61 goals.


Carew did well, but the reluctance to sign a partner for him was odd, not to mention needing to somebody to fill in when he was having his injury niggles.

We got Heskey - A Carew type that doesn't score.

The infuriating thing with Carew is that he has all the attributes to be one of the most effective strikers in the world, as we saw when he was "in the mood" for it.

The problems started when he wasn't quite so up for it, and that was quite often.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Risso on April 26, 2011, 05:12:20 PM
It's been said before Paulie, that if Carew was "up for it" all of the time, he wouldn't ever have ended up at Villa in the first place.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on April 26, 2011, 05:13:04 PM
It's been said before Paulie, that if Carew was "up for it" all of the time, he wouldn't ever have ended up at Villa in the first place.

That's true enough.

Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 26, 2011, 06:44:30 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: mattjpa on April 26, 2011, 06:55:22 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.
Fair point but take into account jc's natural abilities. His sheer size and strength guarantees him a large return. Added to the fact he is a great finisher with both head and feet,  and this goes some way to explaining his healthy return without really giving 100%. his class and ability has never been in doubt...
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Dave Cooper please on April 26, 2011, 07:05:20 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.

We all know how good he can be, but we are just the latest club to see him be outstanding for two seasons and then be shite and move on, he's done it throughout his career. I have no idea why.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: cheltenhamlion on April 26, 2011, 07:32:22 PM
And if we had signed Bent from Ipswich like I said.... Or when he left Spuds like many of us were advocating the Blessed St Martin should have....
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Arsey on April 26, 2011, 08:30:24 PM
Carew got 37 goals in 113 appearances, 1 goal per 3.05 games. 

Benty - 7 from 12 - 1 per 1.7
Withe - 74 from 182 - 1 per 2.5
Shaw - 59 from 169 - 1 per 2.9
Deano - 37 from 110 - 1 per 2.97
Savo - 29 from 90 - 1 per 3.1
Yorkie - 73 from 232 - 1 per 3.2
Dublin - 48 from 155 - 1 per 3.3
Rambo - 18 from 59 - 1 per 3.3
Joachim - 39 from 141 - 1 per 3.6
Gabby - 49 from 178 - 1 per 3.6
Dalian - 23 from 85 - 1 per 3.7
JPA - 44 from 175 - 1 per 4.0
Vassell - 35 from 162 - 1 per 4.6




Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Arsey on April 26, 2011, 08:30:49 PM
Carew got 37 goals in 113 appearances, 1 goal per 3.05 games. 

Benty - 7 from 12 - 1 per 1.7
Withe - 74 from 182 - 1 per 2.5
Shaw - 59 from 169 - 1 per 2.9
Deano - 37 from 110 - 1 per 2.97
Savo - 29 from 90 - 1 per 3.1
Yorkie - 73 from 232 - 1 per 3.2
Dublin - 48 from 155 - 1 per 3.3
Rambo - 18 from 59 - 1 per 3.3
Joachim - 39 from 141 - 1 per 3.6
Gabby - 49 from 178 - 1 per 3.6
Dalian - 23 from 85 - 1 per 3.7
JPA - 44 from 175 - 1 per 4.0
Vassell - 35 from 162 - 1 per 4.6






Benty !!!!!!!
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: The Left Side on April 26, 2011, 09:16:36 PM
Great Stats!
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on April 26, 2011, 09:26:59 PM
And if we had signed Bent from Ipswich like I said.... Or when he left Spuds like many of us were advocating the Blessed St Martin should have....

When Bent left Spurs to go to Sunderland for 10m in 2009, Martin was too busy spending 20 million pounds on defenders, partly to replace the ones he'd spent 25m on the season before.

This was at a time when we clearly needed more firepower. The striker he bought in 09 was Emile Heskey, the one before that was Marlon Harewood, who, combined, cost not a lot less than Bent cost Sunderland.

Some of the players Martin bought were good buys, but if anything illustrates the scattergun nature of his transfer policy and the frivolous way he chucked money around (fees and, more importantly, wages), it is the above.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: SoccerHQ on April 26, 2011, 09:43:30 PM
I wish we'd signed Bent in summer 2009.

I'm certain he'd have turned a few of those many home draws into wins and got us 4th and won us the league cup.

I think he'd have been very effective in a MON team that got the ball more forward quickly, set pieces were more accurate and he would've had Heskey/ Carew/gabby alongside him to hold the ball up.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: dave.woodhall on April 26, 2011, 09:44:39 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.

Except as the facts below show, he didn't.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: SoccerHQ on April 26, 2011, 09:47:10 PM
Carew did have pretty much a 1 in 2 goal record for us though despite the sulks and injury so superior to pretty much any striker we've had in the last 10 years who we've signed pre bent.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Holtenderinthesky on April 26, 2011, 09:51:36 PM
Chelsea paid £50 million for Fernando Torres who has scored one goal in 14 appearances for them.

Villa paid less than half of that amount for Darren Bent who has scored seven goals in 12 appearances for us.

Did Gérard Houllier know what he was doing or what?

If Bent had cost us 50 mil and Torres had gone to Chelsea for 18 mil then I would still say that we have got the best deal.  This is largely due to the fact that he has kept us in the Premier League with his goals and that alone is almost invaluable.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Somniloquism on April 26, 2011, 09:57:29 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.

Except as the facts below show, he didn't.

Depends where Platt and Gray come from on that list. Either they weren't worked out or they are off the bottom in which case VD is correct that he falls between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on April 26, 2011, 10:54:02 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.

Except as the facts below show, he didn't.

Depends where Platt and Gray come from on that list. Either they weren't worked out or they are off the bottom in which case VD is correct that he falls between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw.

I can only find figures for all players if we take league appearances only.

Andy Gray - 167 apps, 59 goals - 1 goal per 2.83 games
Platt - 121 apps, 50 goals- 1 goal per 2.42 games
Shaw - 165 apps, 59 goals - 1 goal per 2.79 games
Withe - 182 apps, 74 goals - 1 goal per 2.45 games

Carew - 113 apps, 37 goals - 1 goal per 3.05 games.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 26, 2011, 11:01:49 PM
Carew's goals per appearance record sits somewhere between Gray/Platt and Withe/Shaw. He must be some player if he's done that without being up for it.

Except as the facts below show, he didn't.

I used the stats in John Lerwill's list of key Villa players to compare against Carew's stats. Those stats include cup games and I'm pretty sure they are right. I took Carew's stats from Soccerbase.com.

52 goals in 133 appearances (122 under O'Neill), which is 1 goal every 2.55 (2.34 under O'Neill) games.

Either way, he is in with the gods when it comes to Villa goalscorers.


Gray, Andy     Centre-forward     141     69     2.04     1975     1979     Sco     Also a second spell 1985-87 at end of his career.
Ford, Trevor    Centre-forward    128    61    2.10    1947    1950    Wal    
Thompson, Tommy    Forward    165    76    2.17    1950    1955    Eng    
Walker, Billy    Inside-forward    531    244    2.18    1920    1933    Eng    An England captain.
Dickson, Ian    Centre-forward    83    38    2.18    1921    1923    zzz    
Stephenson, Clem    Forward    217    96    2.26    1910    1921    zzz    Brother to George. In list of 100 top-players in English league football.
Platt, David    Midfield (attacking)    155    68    2.28    1988    1991    Eng    
Houghton, Eric    Wing-forward    392    170    2.31    1927    1946    Eng    Subsequent team manager at AVFC and also a director.
Dougan, Derek    Centre-forward    60    26    2.31    1961    1963    NI    
Garratty, Billy    Forward    260    112    2.32    1897    1908    Eng    
Johnson, George    Forward    111    47    2.36    1898    1904    zzz    
Hodgetts, Denny    Forward    218    90    2.42    1886    1896    Eng    Club vice-president to death (1944).
Thomson, Bobby    Forward (and wing-half)    172    70    2.46    1959    1964    zzz    
Burrows, Harry    Wing-forward    181    73    2.48    1960    1965    zzz    
Withe, Peter    Centre-forward    233    92    2.53    1980    1985    Eng    
McInally, Alan    Centre-forward    71    28    2.54    1987    1989    zzz    
Pace, Derek    Centre-forward    107    42    2.55    1954    1957    zzz    Unlucky to be reserve for the 1957 Cup Final.
Bache, Joe    Inside-forward    474    184    2.57    1900    1915    Eng    Captain of 'renaissance' side of 1909-14.
Shaw, Gary    Striker    213    79    2.70    1979    1988    zzz    A marvellous player whose career was blighted by injury.
Leonard, Keith    Centre-forward    47    17    2.76    1972    1975    zzz    Promising career blighted by injury.
Deehan, John    Striker    139    50    2.78    1975    1979    zzz    
Cowan, John    Wing-forward    70    25    2.80    1895    1899    zzz    Brother of James.
McParland, Peter    Wing-forward    341    121    2.82    1954    1962    NI    
Walsh, Dave    Centre-forward    114    40    2.85    1951    1955    Ire    
Chester, Reg    Wing-forward    97    34    2.85    1924    1935    zzz    
Graydon, Ray    Wing-forward    232    81    2.86    1971    1977    zzz    
Rideout, Paul    Centre-forward    63    22    2.86    1983    1985    zzz    
Walters, Joey    Forward    122    42    2.90    1906    1912    zzz    
Yorke, Dwight    Centre-forward    287    98    2.93    1990    1998    Tri    
Saunders, Dean    Centre-forward    144    49    2.94    1992    1995    Wal    
Dixon, Johnny    Forward    430    144    2.99    1946    1961    zzz    Captain of 1957 Cup-winning side.

 John Lerwill - Key AV Players - Clicky (http://www.lerwill-life.org.uk/astonvilla/avkeyplayers.htm)
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: JJ-AV on April 26, 2011, 11:05:32 PM
Gabby aint far from being our leading Premier League scorer.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: dave.woodhall on April 26, 2011, 11:15:12 PM
Now go back and add the ones you missed out.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 26, 2011, 11:25:02 PM
Pongo Waring 159 in 216 games... one goal per 1.35 games.
Harry Hampton 215 in 341... one per 1.59.

Both better than any in VD's list, off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 26, 2011, 11:26:57 PM
Now go back and add the ones you missed out.

I'm afraid you've lost me?
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: dave.woodhall on April 26, 2011, 11:30:13 PM
It's not difficult. Add the players with better goalscoring records than Carew. cd'a made a start, and there are others.   
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Clark W Griswold on April 26, 2011, 11:33:07 PM
It's a bit early to start crowing, but i agree about Bent being a great signing for us. Torres may well 'step it up' somewhat though.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 26, 2011, 11:34:20 PM


My list was just the section of Villa goalscorers that John Carew fitted into, I wasn't trying to suggest that Andy Gray was our best striker of all time.

The ones above are;

Halse, Harold     Forward     36     28     1.29     1912     1913     zzz     
Waring, Tom 'Pongo'    Centre-forward    225    167    1.35    1928    1935    Eng    Holds record for most goals in one season (50 in 1930-31)
McLuckie, James    Centre-forward    62    46    1.35    1901    1904    zzz    
Brown, George    Centre-forward    126    89    1.42    1929    1934    Eng    
Campbell, Johnny    Centre-forward    63    42    1.50    1895    1897    Sco    
Cook, Billy    Centre-forward    61    40    1.53    1927    1929    zzz    
Hampton, Harry    Centre-forward    372    242    1.54    1904    1920    Eng    
Capewell, Len    Centre-forward    157    100    1.57    1921    1930    zzz    
Broome, Frank    Forward    151    91    1.66    1934    1946    Eng    
Hitchens, Gerry    Centre-forward    160    96    1.67    1957    1961    Eng    Left to continue his career in Italy; died in his 40s.
Devey, John    Forward    311    183    1.70    1891    1902    Eng    Captain during Golden Years; club director from 1904-1934
Hateley, Tony    Centre-forward    148    86    1.72    1963    1966    zzz    
Astley, Dai    Centre-forward    173    100    1.73    1931    1936    Wal    
Wheldon, Fred    Inside-forward    139    75    1.85    1896    1900    Eng    
Brown, Albert    Forward    114    59    1.93    1884    1894    zzz    Brother of Arthur.
Dickson, Billy    Centre-forward    64    33    1.94    1889    1892    Sco    Captain of 1892 Cup Final side.

The ones below with a better than 1 in 5 record are;

Stainrod, Simon     Forward     81     27     3.00     1985     1988     zzz     
Atkinson, Dalian    Centre-forward    114    36    3.17    1991    1995    zzz    
Dublin, Dion    Centre-forward    189    59    3.20    1998    2004    Eng    Played a number of games at cente-back
Angel, Juan Pablo    Centre-forward    205    62    3.31    2001    2007    Col    
Haycock, Freddie    Forward    110    33    3.33    1936    1946    zzz    
Beresford, Joe    Inside-forward    251    73    3.44    1927    1935    Eng    
Dix, Ronnie    Forward    104    30    3.47    1933    1937    zzz    
Lochhead, Andy    Centre-forward    154    44    3.50    1970    1973    zzz    
Hall, Albert    Wing-forward    215    61    3.52    1904    1912    Eng    
Chatt, Bob    Forward (and Utility)    95    27    3.52    1893    1898    zzz    
Milosevic, Savo    Centre-forward    117    33    3.55    1995    1998    Ser    
Athersmith, Charlie    Wing-forward    311    86    3.61    1891    1901    Eng    
Sewell, Jackie    Forward    145    40    3.63    1955    1959    zzz    
Little, Brian    Inside-forward    302    82    3.68    1972    1980    Eng    Career prematurely ended by injury. Subsequent AV team manager.
Edwards, George    Forward    152    41    3.71    1938    1951    zzz    Best part of his career in wartime football.
Joachim, Julian    Striker    172    45    3.82    1996    2001    zzz    
Goffin, Billy    Wing-forward    173    42    4.12    1945    1954    zzz    
Woosnam, Phil    Inside-forward    125    29    4.31    1962    1966    Wal    Since an important figure in soccer in the United States
Mandley, Jack    Inside-forward    112    26    4.31    1930    1934    zzz    
Stephenson, George    Forward    95    22    4.32    1919    1927    zzz    Brother to Clem
Kirton, Billy    Inside-forward    261    60    4.35    1919    1928    Eng    
Smith, Steve    Wing-forward    187    43    4.35    1893    1901    Eng    
Vassell, Darius    Striker    201    45    4.47    1998    2005    Eng    
York, Dicky    Wing-forward    390    87    4.48    1919    1930    Eng    Narrowly survived aircrash as pilot in WW1.
Vowden, Geoff    Inside-forward    115    25    4.60    1971    1974    zzz    
Walters, Mark    Wing-forward    225    48    4.69    1982    1987    zzz    
Rioch, Bruce    Midfield (attacking)    176    37    4.76    1969    1974    zzz    
McMahon, Pat    Midfield (attacking)    150    30    5.00    1969    1976    zzz

Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 26, 2011, 11:36:42 PM
I must say I'd never heard of Harold Halse before. Seems strange that we decided to get rid of our top scorer after winning the cup and finishing second in the league. Perhaps we were trying to raise cash for the expansion of Villa Park to 130,000.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: dave.woodhall on April 26, 2011, 11:39:18 PM
I must say I'd never heard of Harold Halse before. Seems strange that we decided to get rid of our top scorer after winning the cup and finishing second in the league. Perhaps we were trying to raise cash for the expansion of Villa Park to 130,000.

We had Harry Hampton.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 26, 2011, 11:41:52 PM
Didn't realise he was still playing that late on. Not that it really mattered anyway due to that ostrich getting shot.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: dave.woodhall on April 26, 2011, 11:43:26 PM
Didn't realise he was still playing that late on. Not that it really mattered anyway due to that ostrich getting shot.

Shouldn't have been hungry.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Dave Cooper please on April 27, 2011, 08:31:36 AM
So to make him look good you have missed out all our best strikers and he has, in fact, only a slightly better record than Simon Stainrod?

Hmm...
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 27, 2011, 11:09:35 AM
So to make him look good you have missed out all our best strikers and he has, in fact, only a slightly better record than Simon Stainrod?

Hmm...

Hmm… indeed.

I suppose I have to accept my own responsibility for some people getting the wrong end of the stick. I didn’t miss out our best strikers to make Carew look good, he doesn’t need it with a goalscoring record like his. I just never imagined that people would take the list to be anything other than a cross-section of our top goalscorers. I thought that sourcing the information and providing a link to the data in my post for people to check would prevent any misunderstanding

So just to be clear; This is a cross-section of key Aston Villa players taken from John Lerwill’s website, listed according to average goals per game in all 1st class matches (league and cup). I’ve included John Carew’s stats taken from Soccerbase.com, in correct order. The first entry is according to his record under Martin O’Neill and the second includes the 11 games he played this season. 

Gray, Andy     Centre-forward     141     69     2.04     1975     1979     Sco     Also a second spell 1985-87 at end of his career.
Ford, Trevor    Centre-forward    128    61    2.10    1947    1950    Wal    
Thompson, Tommy    Forward    165    76    2.17    1950    1955    Eng    
Walker, Billy    Inside-forward    531    244    2.18    1920    1933    Eng    An England captain.
Dickson, Ian    Centre-forward    83    38    2.18    1921    1923    zzz    
Stephenson, Clem    Forward    217    96    2.26    1910    1921    zzz    Brother to George. In list of 100 top-players in English league football.
Platt, David    Midfield (attacking)    155    68    2.28    1988    1991    Eng    
Houghton, Eric    Wing-forward    392    170    2.31    1927    1946    Eng    Subsequent team manager at AVFC and also a director.
Dougan, Derek    Centre-forward    60    26    2.31    1961    1963    NI    
Garratty, Billy    Forward    260    112    2.32    1897    1908    Eng    
Carew, John    Forward    122    52    2.34    2007    2010    Nor    
Johnson, George    Forward    111    47    2.36    1898    1904    zzz    
Hodgetts, Denny    Forward    218    90    2.42    1886    1896    Eng    Club vice-president to death (1944).
Thomson, Bobby    Forward (and wing-half)    172    70    2.46    1959    1964    zzz    
Burrows, Harry    Wing-forward    181    73    2.48    1960    1965    zzz    
Withe, Peter    Centre-forward    233    92    2.53    1980    1985    Eng    
McInally, Alan    Centre-forward    71    28    2.54    1987    1989    zzz    
Pace, Derek    Centre-forward    107    42    2.55    1954    1957    zzz    Unlucky to be reserve for the 1957 Cup Final.
Carew, John    Forward    133    52    2.55    2007    2010    Nor    
Bache, Joe    Inside-forward    474    184    2.57    1900    1915    Eng    Captain of 'renaissance' side of 1909-14.
Shaw, Gary    Striker    213    79    2.70    1979    1988    zzz    A marvellous player whose career was blighted by injury.
Leonard, Keith    Centre-forward    47    17    2.76    1972    1975    zzz    Promising career blighted by injury.
Deehan, John    Striker    139    50    2.78    1975    1979    zzz    
Cowan, John    Wing-forward    70    25    2.80    1895    1899    zzz    Brother of James.
McParland, Peter    Wing-forward    341    121    2.82    1954    1962    NI    
Walsh, Dave    Centre-forward    114    40    2.85    1951    1955    Ire    
Chester, Reg    Wing-forward    97    34    2.85    1924    1935    zzz    
Graydon, Ray    Wing-forward    232    81    2.86    1971    1977    zzz    
Rideout, Paul    Centre-forward    63    22    2.86    1983    1985    zzz    
Walters, Joey    Forward    122    42    2.90    1906    1912    zzz    
Yorke, Dwight    Centre-forward    287    98    2.93    1990    1998    Tri    
Saunders, Dean    Centre-forward    144    49    2.94    1992    1995    Wal    
Dixon, Johnny    Forward    430    144    2.99    1946    1961    zzz    Captain of 1957 Cup-winning side.

 John Lerwill - Key AV Players - Clicky (http://www.lerwill-life.org.uk/astonvilla/avkeyplayers.htm)

Feel free to categorise his record as “only a slightly better record than Simon Stainrod” if you like but would you would choose that particular definition for any of the other players listed below John Carew?
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 27, 2011, 11:15:56 AM
Can we just agree that Carew was an improvement on what we had (Baros) but not as good as what we have now (Bent)?

I wish Carew all the best, so long as he signs for someone other than bloody Stoke.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Dave Cooper please on April 27, 2011, 11:26:17 AM


Feel free to categorise his record as “only a slightly better record than Simon Stainrod” if you like but would you would choose that particular definition for any of the other players listed below John Carew?

No, because I only did it because I had a bet with myself that you would answer by quoting another load of statistics at me whereas the only meaningful one is that Carew has been utter garbage for about the last 12 months.
And I won.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Concrete John on April 27, 2011, 11:41:39 AM
Can we just agree that Carew was an improvement on what we had (Baros) but not as good as what we have now (Bent)?

Sensible words.

He was a good signing for us, one of MON's best, but his time here has gone and we've got a better goal scorer in now - onwards and upwards!
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 27, 2011, 12:18:28 PM


Feel free to categorise his record as “only a slightly better record than Simon Stainrod” if you like but would you would choose that particular definition for any of the other players listed below John Carew?

No, because I only did it because I had a bet with myself that you would answer by quoting another load of statistics at me whereas the only meaningful one is that Carew has been utter garbage for about the last 12 months.
And I won.

There's something beautifully poignant about that Dave, I'm glad that you won in your head.

Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Dave Cooper please on April 27, 2011, 12:24:23 PM
So am I, it's the small victories that make me happy.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Brend'Watkins on April 27, 2011, 12:35:06 PM
To get this back on a Bent theme....

Is there anybody who would swap Bent for Torres or Carroll.  Or, Rooney apart, is there any other forward in the league you would swap him for?

I wouldn't.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on April 27, 2011, 12:40:59 PM
I wouldn't either.

I found it gobsmacking when we bought Bent, how many in the media were suggesting we'd overpaid etc etc, but then Liverpool make Andy Carroll the sixth or sevnth most expensive striker ever, paying 35 million pounds for a player with half a season in the PL and a season in the CCC behind him, and it was lauded as a great deal.
Title: Re: Which Club Had The Better Deal?
Post by: Villa'Zawg on April 27, 2011, 12:43:03 PM
Nor me, he's perfect for us.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal