Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: olofmilosevic on October 30, 2010, 09:54:47 PM

Title: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: olofmilosevic on October 30, 2010, 09:54:47 PM
Two shocking decisions by MON! Fantastic footballers let go!
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: spangley1812 on October 30, 2010, 09:58:48 PM
Both of these players wanted to go, Davis is no loss and Cahill at the time could not see past Mellberg and Laursen
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: hilts_coolerking on October 30, 2010, 09:59:13 PM
Clinton Morrison signed in exchange for Andy Johnson and 4 million quid.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Toronto Villa on October 30, 2010, 09:59:42 PM
Oh no...
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: lovejoy on October 30, 2010, 10:04:39 PM
Samuel Eto'o and €40mill for Ibrahimovic
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Somniloquism on October 30, 2010, 10:05:19 PM
Two shocking decisions by MON! Fantastic footballers let go!

With Steve Davis, Hodgson also "let go". He is doing it in Scotland but Alan Thompson was a massive player up there as well.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: spangley1812 on October 30, 2010, 10:10:31 PM
Glen Johnson £17million from Portsmouth to Liverpool
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: TheTimVilla on October 30, 2010, 10:10:56 PM
Two shocking decisions by MON! Fantastic footballers let go!

lolz, pwned, etc
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: saunders_heroes on October 30, 2010, 10:20:47 PM
Cahill was definitely a disastrous sale, but Davis was as average as they come. No loss there.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Pete3206 on October 30, 2010, 10:37:08 PM
Cahill yes, Davies no
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Shrek on October 30, 2010, 11:06:23 PM
Cahill wouldn't get in the team now, but would have saved us millions if he had stayed!
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: olaftab on October 30, 2010, 11:23:56 PM
Cahill may be but not thr best defender amongst our current CB's. Davies ...wish him best of luck but not good enough.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: pauliewalnuts on October 31, 2010, 12:05:36 AM
Davis was no great loss.

Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: pauliewalnuts on October 31, 2010, 12:07:57 AM
Both of these players wanted to go, Davis is no loss and Cahill at the time could not see past Mellberg and Laursen

Cahill wanted to go - because he wasn't getting a look in.

The fact that the didn't get a look in, and MON went and spent 30 million pounds on centre backs, 9m worth of which is currently pubbing  around in the championship at Leicester, says a lot about his judgement of Cahill.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: hawkeye on October 31, 2010, 12:56:30 AM
Cahill -mistake, Davis had his hair done and bought the white boots
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: darren woolley on October 31, 2010, 01:23:15 AM
It was a big mistake getting rid of Cahill not Davis.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Chris Smith on October 31, 2010, 08:21:52 AM
Neither had the bottle to stay and fight for their place so fuck 'em.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Matt C on October 31, 2010, 09:05:29 AM
To be fair Bolton have been good for Cahill, right club at the right time. Would he have developed at the same rate by staying? Doubt it.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Rip Van We Go Again on October 31, 2010, 09:23:50 AM
Steven Davis may do okay at Rangers in their tinpot league, but he was well below par at Fulham.
No loss at all.

Selling Cahill was a mistake.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: Dante Lavelli on October 31, 2010, 05:26:29 PM
Cahill is a good example of how/where we need to use loans more for our youngsters.
I feel that Brad Jnr and Delf could do with a long stint abroad.  It would allow them to develop their game without risk to villa's form.

In addition they will not get bored and demand to leave a la Cahill.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: LeeB on October 31, 2010, 07:13:56 PM
There was a fairly intelligent Bolton fan who called 5 Live the other week who said that despite popular opinion it was Zat Knight who's been their star defender under Coyle.

I'm with Chris on this, it's easy to knock O'Neill but Cahill didn't want to wait for his chance and was sold. If he'd have hung on six months he'd have been playing anyway. Shit happens, you move on.

And I also think big Zat was better than he 's given credit for.
Title: Re: steven davis and gary cahill
Post by: SoccerHQ on October 31, 2010, 08:38:40 PM
I liked Cahill and don't think we should've sold him at the time. I think Clark is a better prospect though.

Davis didn't last long at Fulham did he?
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal