Gasperini.
What I dont want is Gerrard, Lampard, Terry.
The Ajax bloke, have already forgotten his name. But him. Or somebody fancy from somewhere like Germany.
Definitely not any roll of the dice Sherwood-type manager like Lampard, Gerrard or Terry.
Can we get a merge, please mods?
I would like Hassenhutti from Southampton, who punch above their weight and have a recognisable system that could suit the squad.
Would not be surprised if we ended up with Nuno, who did well at Wolves and would make us more solid.
What’s Eddie Howe doing?No thanks. Boring.
What’s Eddie Howe doing?
That lad at Mainz might be an idea. If not, Guardiola or Klopp.
Nobody thanks. Happy to work through this bad patch and come out the other side.
That lad at Mainz might be an idea. If not, Guardiola or Klopp.
Part of my reasoning for still not being fully convinced that Smith should go is my worry that we will end up with Gerrard, Lampard or Terry.
A simple test should be "would Lerner have appointed him"? If the answer is "yes", then don't be so bloody stupid.
Attainable or not, here's some of the leading unemployed managers...
Antonio Conte
Zidane
Ernesto Valverde
Paulo Fonseca
Diego Martinez
Lucien Favre
Andre Villas-Boas
Quique Setien
Part of my reasoning for still not being fully convinced that Smith should go is my worry that we will end up with Gerrard, Lampard or Terry.
A simple test should be "would Lerner have appointed him"? If the answer is "yes", then don't be so bloody stupid.
This is so key, it’s not just a case of get Smith out (however terrible the football is at the moment). I don’t watch enough football that’s not Villa to know who to go for though. I really hope that the Villa hierarchy do, I have some trust in them and this is their biggest decision to date.
Id take fonseca or nuno if spurs sack him.Nuno? No way, dull is dishwater and loves a back five with wing backs. Fuck no!!
Nuno is still a execllent manager just been thrown under the bus by levy
Part of my reasoning for still not being fully convinced that Smith should go is my worry that we will end up with Gerrard, Lampard or Terry.
A simple test should be "would Lerner have appointed him"? If the answer is "yes", then don't be so bloody stupid.
This is so key, it’s not just a case of get Smith out (however terrible the football is at the moment). I don’t watch enough football that’s not Villa to know who to go for though. I really hope that the Villa hierarchy do, I have some trust in them and this is their biggest decision to date.
Welcome, Roy Hodgson.
Preferred : Lucien Favre
More likely : Stevie G
No thanks : Eddie Howe
Luciene Favre.
Paulo Fonseca
Frank Lampard
Eddie Howe
Get the feeling all four would be interviewed or at least approached via agents to see what they're thinking.
Pros and cons for all of those of course but when you're a bottom 6 team you're not going to get an amazing manager tbh unless you luck out on a Pochettino type (who Southampton got when they were 19th).
Preferred : Lucien Favre
More likely : Stevie G
Who we will actually end up with : Eddie Howe
Mick McCarthy is availableFucking hell.
Gareth Southgate.
Remi Garde is looking for work...
We'll stick for a few more weeks yet. Smith have bought enough credit with the owners to be given the chance.
Mick McCarthy is availableFucking hell.
This is supposed to be wishful thinking. Nuno, Southgate, Garde, Big Mick, where’s Curbishly these days?
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
Whisper it quietly but I actually think Terry would do a good job too, but I don't want him as our manager.
There is no question he is close to the sack. Who do you fancy? For me there is no british managers id take other than rodgers and we cant get him for obvious reasons. I mean i dont think potter is the answer either and i doubt he will come.
So that leaves looking at a international managed whoch i would be happy with.
[/quot
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax. I’ll bet the Holte won’t want Smith out. It’s losing run of four, amid three years of remits being continually met. You continue to moan loudly, your right - the owners won’t be listening.
If you want a big name manager how about seeing who is doing well in the Sri Lankan premier league ?
Alternatively we could go for Ioan Llywelyn, manager of Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch.
Favre would be my second choice.
There is no question he is close to the sack. Who do you fancy? For me there is no british managers id take other than rodgers and we cant get him for obvious reasons. I mean i dont think potter is the answer either and i doubt he will come.
So that leaves looking at a international managed whoch i would be happy with.
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax...
Shakey as caretaker until the end of the season and then through mega millions at Pep.
Favre would be my second choice.
Brett ?
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
And yet on another thread you’re calling for a big name? He’s the manager of the national side, how big a name is it you want?
I always get fearfull when theses threads appear. Mainly that the owners will be daft enough to take the suggestions seriously.
There is no question he is close to the sack. Who do you fancy? For me there is no british managers id take other than rodgers and we cant get him for obvious reasons. I mean i dont think potter is the answer either and i doubt he will come.
So that leaves looking at a international managed whoch i would be happy with.
[/quot
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax. I’ll bet the Holte won’t want Smith out. It’s losing run of four, amid three years of remits being continually met. You continue to moan loudly, your right - the owners won’t be listening.
Poisonous? What are you waffling about? Four straight defeats, 7 conceded in the last two make it 10 in three. Losing a game in last 10 minutes before being 2 up?
Playing dreadful football. Making poor subs and playing players like young in a position that he doesnt play. Sticking with a system thats utterly failed (5 at the back) players not playing for the manager showing little passion or heart.
Need i go on? You continue to bury your head in the sand and think eveything is ok because he a villa fan but dont you dare tell me and other fans we are being poisonous because we feel deans times up.
Remi Garde if he’s not too busy hijacking our trawlers
'Poisonous' is a bit strong, Richard.
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax. I’ll bet the Holte won’t want Smith out. It’s losing run of four, amid three years of remits being continually met. You continue to moan loudly, your right - the owners won’t be listening.
I was sat in the Holte. I sadly want Smith to go. He's not up to it.
It’s amazing isn’t it. “Everyone” sat around you. I expect the ones who are behind Smith probably keep their opinions to themselves.
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax. I’ll bet the Holte won’t want Smith out. It’s losing run of four, amid three years of remits being continually met. You continue to moan loudly, your right - the owners won’t be listening.
There were more West Ham fans left in the Witton at the final whistle today, by a factor of about 4-1. I reckon there were about 10K fans left in Villa Park at the end in total, and the ones who did stick it out let their feelings be known. Everybody sat around me was unanimous in their decision that it was time for Smith to go.
I would like Hassenhutti from Southampton, who punch above their weight and have a recognisable system that could suit the squad.
Would not be surprised if we ended up with Nuno, who did
well at Wolves and would make us more solid.
Why does it matter if Dean is or isn’t a Villa fan? I don’t understand, I couldn’t care who our manager supports or supported when he was young, I want the best manager we could have.Spot on. It should have absolutely no bearing on who we hire or who we fire.
It’s amazing isn’t it. “Everyone” sat around you. I expect the ones who are behind Smith probably keep their opinions to themselves.
You represent a vocal, poisonous minority, like the people getting headlines for saying covid’s a hoax. I’ll bet the Holte won’t want Smith out. It’s losing run of four, amid three years of remits being continually met. You continue to moan loudly, your right - the owners won’t be listening.
There were more West Ham fans left in the Witton at the final whistle today, by a factor of about 4-1. I reckon there were about 10K fans left in Villa Park at the end in total, and the ones who did stick it out let their feelings be known. Everybody sat around me was unanimous in their decision that it was time for Smith to go.
I'm clearly the best fan on here and I want him gone. So that settles that.
'Poisonous' is a bit strong, Richard.
All apologies.
I just think that the majority of fans don’t want Smith out yet and that the internet is such a potentially harmful tool to enforce knee -jerk decisions. So I’m suggesting that the positive vote for ‘Smith Out’ doesn’t really reflect Villa fans views.
I firmly believe the club is moving in the right direction and this is just a bad patch caused by Grealish leaving, injuries, a very poor start from Buendia, Mings’ loss of form and not having yet found the right formation post-Grealish. I think at this juncture it would be a terrible mistake to sack Smith - and yes, it does count that he’s a Villa fan and a good fit.
Again, though, I apologise if my choice of words was harsh. Sorry.
I'm clearly the best fan on here and I want him gone. So that settles that.
oh yeh show us your programmes and badges Love :D
'Poisonous' is a bit strong, Richard.
All apologies.
I just think that the majority of fans don’t want Smith out yet and that the internet is such a potentially harmful tool to enforce knee -jerk decisions. So I’m suggesting that the positive vote for ‘Smith Out’ doesn’t really reflect Villa fans views.
I firmly believe the club is moving in the right direction and this is just a bad patch caused by Grealish leaving, injuries, a very poor start from Buendia, Mings’ loss of form and not having yet found the right formation post-Grealish. I think at this juncture it would be a terrible mistake to sack Smith - and yes, it does count that he’s a Villa fan and a good fit.
Again, though, I apologise if my choice of words was harsh. Sorry.
I'm clearly the best fan on here and I want him gone. So that settles that.
oh yeh show us your programmes and badges Love :D
Merch is for day trippers.
none of the wingers have been fit for more than ten minutes yet..'Poisonous' is a bit strong, Richard.
All apologies.
I just think that the majority of fans don’t want Smith out yet and that the internet is such a potentially harmful tool to enforce knee -jerk decisions. So I’m suggesting that the positive vote for ‘Smith Out’ doesn’t really reflect Villa fans views.
I firmly believe the club is moving in the right direction and this is just a bad patch caused by Grealish leaving, injuries, a very poor start from Buendia, Mings’ loss of form and not having yet found the right formation post-Grealish. I think at this juncture it would be a terrible mistake to sack Smith - and yes, it does count that he’s a Villa fan and a good fit.
Again, though, I apologise if my choice of words was harsh. Sorry.
Is 10 games into the season and with £80m of wingers in the squad the right time to be toying around with wingerless formations though?
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
And yet on another thread you’re calling for a big name? He’s the manager of the national side, how big a name is it you want?
Are you seriously calling gareth southgate a big name?
What’s Eddie Howe doing?
none of the wingers have been fit for more than ten minutes yet..'Poisonous' is a bit strong, Richard.
All apologies.
I just think that the majority of fans don’t want Smith out yet and that the internet is such a potentially harmful tool to enforce knee -jerk decisions. So I’m suggesting that the positive vote for ‘Smith Out’ doesn’t really reflect Villa fans views.
I firmly believe the club is moving in the right direction and this is just a bad patch caused by Grealish leaving, injuries, a very poor start from Buendia, Mings’ loss of form and not having yet found the right formation post-Grealish. I think at this juncture it would be a terrible mistake to sack Smith - and yes, it does count that he’s a Villa fan and a good fit.
Again, though, I apologise if my choice of words was harsh. Sorry.
Is 10 games into the season and with £80m of wingers in the squad the right time to be toying around with wingerless formations though?
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
And yet on another thread you’re calling for a big name? He’s the manager of the national side, how big a name is it you want?
Are you seriously calling gareth southgate a big name?
How about you tell us these big names of yours then?
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
And yet on another thread you’re calling for a big name? He’s the manager of the national side, how big a name is it you want?
Are you seriously calling gareth southgate a big name?
How about you tell us these big names of yours then?
Francisco Javier García Pimienta
[/quote
Deleted. That wasn’t even half funny. I’m going to bed, you will be relieved to hear
Gareth Southgate.
If we want a cure for insomnia then a good shout. Just bring your pjs slippers and pillows to villa park
And yet on another thread you’re calling for a big name? He’s the manager of the national side, how big a name is it you want?
Are you seriously calling gareth southgate a big name?
How about you tell us these big names of yours then?
Brendan Rodgers is about as likely as Thomas Tuchel.
Brendan Rodgers is about as likely as Thomas Tuchel.
Maybe him turning down Spurs was inspired by the thought of working with Levy and no money. I know I'm straw clutching.
A big “no” to Martinez and Koeman. Terrible options.
Koeman is a shockingly poor manager. You really wouldn't take him.
I would imagine that Eddie Howe would be a name that would be mentioned if Smith were to go
Koeman is a shockingly poor manager. You really wouldn't take him.
Not my 1st choice. That would be fonseca
This is a VERY wishful thinking thread!!
I really don't think we'd attract anyone considered "top" that hasn't had previous baggage so someone like Koeman would be the best we could get.
However, if they pull the trigger I think it would be Terry.
Don't recognise the tune to that Drummond, but it scans well.
This is a VERY wishful thinking thread!!
I really don't think we'd attract anyone considered "top" that hasn't had previous baggage so someone like Koeman would be the best we could get.
However, if they pull the trigger I think it would be Terry.
I think they would target Gerard. Been rumours about us watching him etc even when Smith looked safe as houses.
I think they would end up with Terry though. And he'd do a very good job.
If it came to it the only British based Manager I’d consider would be Potter. Everyone else is either too young, too old or too shit. I’m not sure Potter would be interested either at this stage.
We need a decent foreign manager/coach who can take the work that’s being done across the club at all levels and create something from it. The Ajax bloke sounds like he’d fit quite well and this lad at Mainz.
Gerrard, Lampard or Terry would be mug appointments. They haven't done anything. The Villa job is not one where anyone can/should learn the ropes.
Potter is on the up.
Howe kept going down.
Koeman is a no.
Gerrard, please no, I detest him.
Lampard is too inexperienced and unproven.
Fonseca will go to Spurs.
Conte will wait for Man Utd or similar.
Frank?
The Ajax bloke won't come.
Terry, no thanks.
Shakespeare, no thanks.
Don't recognise the tune to that Drummond, but it scans well.
Potter is on the up.
Howe kept going down.
Koeman is a no.
Gerrard, please no, I detest him.
Lampard is too inexperienced and unproven.
Fonseca will go to Spurs.
Conte will wait for Man Utd or similar.
Frank?
The Ajax bloke won't come.
Terry, no thanks.
Shakespeare, no thanks.
Anyone you do want 😂
Lampard/Terry dream team, with Jody Morris as coach, and Vinny Jones and Denis Wise in as consultants.
Lampard/Terry dream team, with Jody Morris as coach, and Vinny Jones and Denis Wise in as consultants.
Could we not find a role for Ken Bates?
I dont blame nuno. Levy hung him out to dry
Spurs apparently want Conte. Fuck me I hope they don't pull that one off.
Spurs apparently want Conte. Fuck me I hope they don't pull that one off.
He won't go there without a budget.
Think it’s fair to say by this thread that if Dean does get sacked there is no overwhelming favourite to come in :-)
However, for me the most important part of a CEO role is to spot that moment that a manager goes from trying to win at all costs to going into 100% job preservation mode, we have seen it with Bruce, Lambert, McLeish & in each case they were allowed to fester in that approach for months….if Purslow thinks Dean has hit that point the trigger should be pulled. Equally the board should always have a list of achievable targets to take over.
Nuno sacked then . Who they after? Fonseca
Nuno sacked then . Who they after? Fonseca
Conte apparently
Be quite a coup for them to be honest.
Spurs acting quick unlike us who continue to back a manager that has a miserable record in the last 29 games
You think we can keep onto bailey if we finish 15th this year? He will be gone very quickly. Need to act now and get a proper elite manager in
Nuno sacked then . Who they after? Fonseca
Conte apparently
Be quite a coup for them to be honest.
Nuno sacked then . Who they after? Fonseca
Conte apparently
Be quite a coup for them to be honest.
Spurs acting quick unlike us who continue to back a manager that has a miserable record in the last 29 games
You think we can keep onto bailey if we finish 15th this year? He will be gone very quickly. Need to act now and get a proper elite manager in
[/quoNuno sacked then . Who they after? Fonseca
Conte apparently
Be quite a coup for them to be honest.
Spurs acting quick unlike us who continue to back a manager that has a miserable record in the last 29 games
You think we can keep onto bailey if we finish 15th this year? He will be gone very quickly. Need to act now and get a proper elite manager in
I see DS has the same record as Nuno , 5 defeats in 7 games .. I would imagine he needs a win at Soton.
he used to frustrate me last season with the late subs always Trez for El Ghazi or El Ghazi for Trez , no change of formation or tactics but I had faith he could sort it but he has made some crazy decisions this season and it does not look a happy camp . I mean Bailey taking throw ins and the Ashley Young sub left me well perplexed and what's with all these injured players in training etc.
I do think we miss that midfield general with some muscle , the bissoma type or whatever as the midfield is useless.
Lampard/Terry dream team, with Jody Morris as coach, and Vinny Jones and Denis Wise in as consultants.
Could we not find a role for Ken Bates?
For me
Favre, Gaultier and Potter
My fear of what it would be
Lampard, Gerrard, Howe
I don’t get the Fonseca attraction. My knowledge is limited to wiki but it is an average CV at best.
Getting Roma to 5th doesn’t strike me as success and winning the Ukrainian league must be like managing in Scotland.
JT WONT be coming in
I'd go all put to bring Nuno to the Club Immediately. Done a fantastic job for Wolves and has European experience . The Tottenham job was always going to end like that with Kane sulking. Fantastic opportunity for us
JT WONT be coming in
Ta mate. Now rule out Gerrard and Lampard, please, and I can relax a bit.
Think Gerrard will hold out for the Everton gig
I'd go all put to bring Nuno to the Club Immediately. Done a fantastic job for Wolves and has European experience . The Tottenham job was always going to end like that with Kane sulking. Fantastic opportunity for us
Would rather him than the Twatty Trio of Gerrard, Lampard or Terry, but isn't he a bit dull? Also, does anyone know if he plays five at the back? If so, I'm out.
If we sack Smith and get it wrong, we'll be in danger of being relegated.
I don’t get the Fonseca attraction. My knowledge is limited to wiki but it is an average CV at best.
Getting Roma to 5th doesn’t strike me as success and winning the Ukrainian league must be like managing in Scotland.
I'm looking forward to the meltdown on here when there's a realisation that the new manager isn't Conte or the guy from Ajax.
Nuno? A man handed his arse tactically by Ole Gunnar Solskjaer? Nah
Despite it not working out at Spurs, would be very odd if we had managerial vacancy in next two weeks and didn't interview Nuno.
I think he could be decent fit for the players we have. Ultimately he finished 7th twice with newly promoted side and last season they had their best player out for three more months than what we did with G***lish so results always going to decline.
Also has good european experience with Valencia and Porto.
Perhaps he'll want a break now or manage in another league though.
Nuno? A man handed his arse tactically by Ole Gunnar Solskjaer? Nah
More like the spurs players couldnt give a toss
Smith tactically outwitted ole doesnt mean smiths any good
I'm looking forward to the meltdown on here when there's a realisation that the new manager isn't Conte or the guy from Ajax.
You're hoping we don't get a good manager so you can enjoy the misery of your fellow fans? Bit weird.
I am flabbergasted Spurs appears to have hooked Conte. What has Levy promised him as a transfer budget, I wonder. It'll have to be a lot so very bad for us with presumably both Spurs and Newcastle outspending us next couple of seasons.
I'm looking forward to the meltdown on here when there's a realisation that the new manager isn't Conte or the guy from Ajax.
You're hoping we don't get a good manager so you can enjoy the misery of your fellow fans? Bit weird.
Not at all.
Just think some will be outraged that we couldn't land a manager of that calibre.
Which I don't think we will.
Oh, and welcome back SB. 👋
I am flabbergasted Spurs appears to have hooked Conte. What has Levy promised him as a transfer budget, I wonder. It'll have to be a lot so very bad for us with presumably both Spurs and Newcastle outspending us next couple of seasons.
Conte turned them down in the summer because they wouldn't give him the budget/control he wanted. Seems to have been a very expensive mistake by Levy. It's a funny one, either OGS or Nuno was likely to lose their job at weekend, if Spurs end up with a far superior coach then maybe was worth it.
The likes of Kane, Ndombele and Alli are in for a fair old shock if they do get Conte.
lets go leftfield for someone like Xabi Alonso
I'm looking forward to the meltdown on here when there's a realisation that the new manager isn't Conte or the guy from Ajax.
You're hoping we don't get a good manager so you can enjoy the misery of your fellow fans? Bit weird.
Not at all.
Just think some will be outraged that we couldn't land a manager of that calibre.
Which I don't think we will.
We should, at least, try to get the best manager available. If they say "no", so what?
Houllier, McLeish, Lambert, Sherwood, Garde, Di Matteo and Bruce were all realistic appointments.
I'd rather we appoint someone unrealistic.
I want the rest of football, just for once, to be saying "how the fuck have they appointed him", rather than "why the fuck have they appointed him"?
My only problem with Potter is I can't hear his name in any voice other than Alan Rickman's.
I think it's time we stopped looking at 'local' people. Manchester United didn't get where they are today by avoiding Norwegians. What about that fella who managed Wimbledon in wellies back in the day?
I think it's time we stopped looking at 'local' people. Manchester United didn't get where they are today by avoiding Norwegians. What about that fella who managed Wimbledon in wellies back in the day?
The Rise and Fall of Egil Olsen
I’ve got an original claret and blue bar scarf and a Charlie Aitken shirt which makes me the best fan everI'm clearly the best fan on here and I want him gone. So that settles that.
oh yeh show us your programmes and badges Love :D
Merch is for day trippers.
careful sir or I will whip you with my half and half scarf
I'm loathe to post on this thread but if we're to go 3 at the back and if not Southagte then Chris Wilder knows exactly how to bring that system forward.
He's similarly to Dean Smith in values I rather keep Smith but wouldn't be surprised or discouraged to have Chris Wilder in.
He would get the best out of Danny Ings and Watkins as a partnership
I'm loathe to post on this thread but if we're to go 3 at the back and if not Southagte then Chris Wilder knows exactly how to bring that system forward.1. We don't want 3 at the back.
He's similarly to Dean Smith in values I rather keep Smith but wouldn't be surprised or discouraged to have Chris Wilder in. Though would be very sad if that was the change as Dean for me is far more suited to Villa
Wilder would get the best out of Danny Ings and Watkins as a partnership
I'm loathe to post on this thread but if we're to go 3 at the back and if not Southagte then Chris Wilder knows exactly how to bring that system forward.
He's similarly to Dean Smith in values I rather keep Smith but wouldn't be surprised or discouraged to have Chris Wilder in. Though would be very sad if that was the change as Dean for me is far more suited to Villa
Wilder would get the best out of Danny Ings and Watkins as a partnership
Imagine If we had bought Brewsters Millions for 20 million
That lad at Mainz might be an idea. If not, Guardiola or Klopp.Bo Svensson.
That lad at Mainz might be an idea. If not, Guardiola or Klopp.Bo Svensson.
I’ve got an original claret and blue bar scarf and a Charlie Aitken shirt which makes me the best fan everI'm clearly the best fan on here and I want him gone. So that settles that.
oh yeh show us your programmes and badges Love :D
Merch is for day trippers.
careful sir or I will whip you with my half and half scarf
Despite it not working out at Spurs, would be very odd if we had managerial vacancy in next two weeks and didn't interview Nuno.Nuno was interviewed by both Everton and Palace and both rejected him because he didn't 'get' their project and made crazy demands on issues around coaching personnel. Apparently.
I think he could be decent fit for the players we have. Ultimately he finished 7th twice with newly promoted side and last season they had their best player out for three more months than what we did with G***lish so results always going to decline.
Also has good european experience with Valencia and Porto.
Perhaps he'll want a break now or manage in another league though.
The Southampton manager has done well for a while and who knows what he could achieve with a bigger budget.
He’s also experienced enough to steer us away from the relegation zone where we will soon find ourselves.
I’m sure he’d be tempted as he must be frustrated at not being able to hang onto his best players and build a stronger team.
His dress sense is a tad questionable, though.
Could be a good compromise candidate between the “I don’t want Terry/Lampard/Gerrard” brigade and the “”let’s get Conte/ Hag/Zidane” crew.
Nuno...fired by both Wolves and Spurs in the last 6 months and a realistic option to replace Smith??
Grealish has been a colossal loss......
Pretty sure Nono will be taking his dosh and an extended break on the Algarve.Nuno...fired by both Wolves and Spurs in the last 6 months and a realistic option to replace Smith??
Grealish has been a colossal loss......
It's a no from me.
Pretty sure Nono will be taking his dosh and an extended break on the Algarve.Nuno...fired by both Wolves and Spurs in the last 6 months and a realistic option to replace Smith??
Grealish has been a colossal loss......
It's a no from me.
Madness to hire him.
The Southampton manager has done well for a while and who knows what he could achieve with a bigger budget.
He’s also experienced enough to steer us away from the relegation zone where we will soon find ourselves.
I’m sure he’d be tempted as he must be frustrated at not being able to hang onto his best players and build a stronger team.
His dress sense is a tad questionable, though.
Could be a good compromise candidate between the “I don’t want Terry/Lampard/Gerrard” brigade and the “”let’s get Conte/ Hag/Zidane” crew.
Think that would be a sensible appointment if Dean does go. Has experience of the league (not always required) and has been through some tougher times as well as good runs of form, so will has a somewhat proven record of managing a side where we currently find ourselves.
Has got a habit of conceding 9 goals in a game once a season though!!
At least spurs pulling the trigger early. Unlike us who will do it too late then new guy would be under huge pressure from the start.
Smith should have been sacked last night simple as that and the search should have started. His points return is poor and he can have no complaints in my view. I hold no ill feelings towards him and wish him well. But a new approach is needed asap
Demitri has been summing up my feelings as well, though I must say peaks at this thread make me more cautious. Lampard? Gerrard? Are we ever going to be at the vanguard of this god damn sport? We have every advantage an up and coming club could hope for, and we keep settling for old-fashioned, for British mediocrity, for back-to-basics. We're screaming, screaming for a revolutionary presence like a Pochettino or a Klopp, and we keep settling for this BBC 1 rubbish.
If we sack Smith and get it wrong, we'll be in danger of being relegated.
Demitri has been summing up my feelings as well, though I must say peaks at this thread make me more cautious. Lampard? Gerrard? Are we ever going to be at the vanguard of this god damn sport? We have every advantage an up and coming club could hope for, and we keep settling for old-fashioned, for British mediocrity, for back-to-basics. We're screaming, screaming for a revolutionary presence like a Pochettino or a Klopp, and we keep settling for this BBC 1 rubbish.
Precisesly.
But we should also remember that we've "gone foreign" before and it hasn't worked. Therefore it never will.
I don't know enough about how other top clubs in Europe run their organisations, but we clearly have a philosophy now in terms of investing in youth, analytics-based recruitment, buying young players with values that will rise (for the most part), and an entire infrastructure geared towards that process.
Dean's job is 'head coach' and not 'manager' for a reason. Would any of the top managerial candidates in Europe be interested in working in this sort of environment, or would they want to rip it all up and start again, insisting it's all done "my way" like the manager role has traditionally done?
I don't know enough about how other top clubs in Europe run their organisations, but we clearly have a philosophy now in terms of investing in youth, analytics-based recruitment, buying young players with values that will rise (for the most part), and an entire infrastructure geared towards that process.
Dean's job is 'head coach' and not 'manager' for a reason. Would any of the top managerial candidates in Europe be interested in working in this sort of environment, or would they want to rip it all up and start again, insisting it's all done "my way" like the manager role has traditionally done?
Fair point but I think ‘head coach’ is a pretty European structure anyway so it should be manageable with most candidates.
I don't know enough about how other top clubs in Europe run their organisations, but we clearly have a philosophy now in terms of investing in youth, analytics-based recruitment, buying young players with values that will rise (for the most part), and an entire infrastructure geared towards that process.
Dean's job is 'head coach' and not 'manager' for a reason. Would any of the top managerial candidates in Europe be interested in working in this sort of environment, or would they want to rip it all up and start again, insisting it's all done "my way" like the manager role has traditionally done?
Fair point but I think ‘head coach’ is a pretty European structure anyway so it should be manageable with most candidates.
I'd go further and say it's what most would expect. The big advantage we offer is we consult with the Head Coach on purchases and he will have the first and final call.
Can’t believe nobody has said African car reverser for manager yet? WTF people. Shame on you...
I'd go all put to bring Nuno to the Club Immediately.
Things have been going wrong for a year now but now is not the time to ditch the manager. A lot of Villa's woes are not his fault. If we want a team of International players we have to expect them to go and play for their country and miss the odd game or two. Not the managers fault. Injuries can happen at any time. Not the managers fault. Loss of form, Covid, personal issues etc not the managers fault. Of course he is not blameless. 5 at the back was a disastrous plan. However there remains no clear improvement available so stick with him. Rally round, work harder, train better and hope for a change of luck next time out.
Smith has had more success than both Lambert and BruceThings have been going wrong for a year now but now is not the time to ditch the manager. A lot of Villa's woes are not his fault. If we want a team of International players we have to expect them to go and play for their country and miss the odd game or two. Not the managers fault. Injuries can happen at any time. Not the managers fault. Loss of form, Covid, personal issues etc not the managers fault. Of course he is not blameless. 5 at the back was a disastrous plan. However there remains no clear improvement available so stick with him. Rally round, work harder, train better and hope for a change of luck next time out.
Pretty much what I heard about Lambert and Bruce.
Let’s not pollute this thread by debating whether he should or shouldn’t be replaced there’s plenty of threads for that.
The owners should try to secure the best manager out there. Money should be put on the table. Aim high. Take Conte from under Spurs noses. Pay the money.
Lets stay clear of NunoNailed on for Newcastle along with his super agent to exploit them & their many £billions.
A big “no” to Martinez and Koeman. Terrible options.
Both better than smith. Koeman is a huge name id take him. That barcelona club is in a complete mess he was destined to fail this year with all the restrictions there at the mo
It's a wonderful thought.The owners should try to secure the best manager out there. Money should be put on the table. Aim high. Take Conte from under Spurs noses. Pay the money.
Imagine if that happened!!!!!
David Moyes
David Moyes
Exactly.
I dropped him in as a bit of fun but thigs have worked out so well for the guy.
Right place right time and all that but there's no escaping the fact that the players have responded positively to his leadership.
Imagine saying his name on here in 2016 or 2017 and the reaction on here, would've probably been worse than what Bruce got.
Just shows sometimes managers can fit certain clubs and it's purely about timing sometimes.
Roberto Martinez is an interesting suggestion though. Poor at Everton after they were Moyesed into terrible football and he tried to un-Moyes them to get them to play more attractive football. A bit like putting lipstick on a pig. I wonder what he would do with the likes of Bailey, Watkins, Traore in terms of creativity.
The owners should try to secure the best manager out there. Money should be put on the table. Aim high. Take Conte from under Spurs noses. Pay the money.
Imagine if that happened!!!!!
Roberto Martinez is an interesting suggestion though. Poor at Everton after they were Moyesed into terrible football and he tried to un-Moyes them to get them to play more attractive football. A bit like putting lipstick on a pig. I wonder what he would do with the likes of Bailey, Watkins, Traore in terms of creativity.
There was a time I’d love to have him as our manager. To be perfectly honest I have no idea where he manages at the moment or is even still managing.
As regards Moyes, I would have worried he would have been proper dull appointments but he’s actually got West Ham playing entertaining football. He’s managed to retain that very solid defensive approach but has some very good attacking talent in his team and they are a good team to watch.
I think literally the only name I’ve read that makes me think might be worth changing is Christophe Galtier - read a piece about him in the summer that made him seem a decent option - though I would be a little concerned that one of the bigger French clubs never seems to have taken plunge with him.
Roberto Martinez is an interesting suggestion though. Poor at Everton after they were Moyesed into terrible football and he tried to un-Moyes them to get them to play more attractive football. A bit like putting lipstick on a pig. I wonder what he would do with the likes of Bailey, Watkins, Traore in terms of creativity.
Roberto Martinez is an interesting suggestion though. Poor at Everton after they were Moyesed into terrible football and he tried to un-Moyes them to get them to play more attractive football. A bit like putting lipstick on a pig. I wonder what he would do with the likes of Bailey, Watkins, Traore in terms of creativity.
There was a time I’d love to have him as our manager. To be perfectly honest I have no idea where he manages at the moment or is even still managing.
As regards Moyes, I would have worried he would have been proper dull appointments but he’s actually got West Ham playing entertaining football. He’s managed to retain that very solid defensive approach but has some very good attacking talent in his team and they are a good team to watch.
Martinez is Head Coach of Belgium Ian.
Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Daily Mail linking Fonseca.
Fonseca would be a superb appointment. That would be a massive coup.
Get him in!!
does not hang around for long eitherFonseca would be a superb appointment. That would be a massive coup.
Get him in!!
What makes you think he’ll be a success Demitri? His record looks pretty average to me.
But look at the difference in how decisively they have acted, Conte is right up there has won titles in a Italy and England. Smith managed Brentford.Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Daily Mail linking Fonseca.
But look at the difference in how decisively they have acted, Conte is right up there has won titles in a Italy and England. Smith managed Brentford.Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Spurs are acting like a big club.
I like Conte but there's no doubt he has the habit of imploding after a few seasons when he doesn't get his way which I think is one of the reasons Man U haven't gone in for him when he's been batting his eyelashes at them. There's a clip doing the rounds of him literally manhandling one of his coaching staff and pushing him down the pitch during a match and while it appeals to the "moar passion" lot, it can't be good for team morale. Levy and Conte? Can't see that lasting.
I like Conte but there's no doubt he has the habit of imploding after a few seasons when he doesn't get his way which I think is one of the reasons Man U haven't gone in for him when he's been batting his eyelashes at them. There's a clip doing the rounds of him literally manhandling one of his coaching staff and pushing him down the pitch during a match and while it appeals to the "moar passion" lot, it can't be good for team morale. Levy and Conte? Can't see that lasting.
On the flip side, if he wins a couple of pots in the short term and keeps building Spurs profile, attracts some top players, it's worth it.
Fonseca would be a superb appointment. That would be a massive coup.
Get him in!!
What makes you think he’ll be a success Demitri? His record looks pretty average to me.
I like Conte but there's no doubt he has the habit of imploding after a few seasons when he doesn't get his way which I think is one of the reasons Man U haven't gone in for him when he's been batting his eyelashes at them. There's a clip doing the rounds of him literally manhandling one of his coaching staff and pushing him down the pitch during a match and while it appeals to the "moar passion" lot, it can't be good for team morale. Levy and Conte? Can't see that lasting.
On the flip side, if he wins a couple of pots in the short term and keeps building Spurs profile, attracts some top players, it's worth it.
Hasenhutll would be very meh, IMO, a lot of Southampton fans want him gone and he loses 9-0 every year. Svenssson seems to be getting suggested on the basis of four good months at top flight level. He could be good or he could just be having a good run before he gets found out like Chris Wilder. Would be a massive gamble.
But look at the difference in how decisively they have acted, Conte is right up there has won titles in a Italy and England. Smith managed Brentford.Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Spurs are acting like a big club.
Hasenhutll would be very meh, IMO, a lot of Southampton fans want him gone and he loses 9-0 every year. Svenssson seems to be getting suggested on the basis of four good months at top flight level. He could be good or he could just be having a good run before he gets found out like Chris Wilder. Would be a massive gamble.
Dean Smith had never finished higher than 9th in the Championship when we brought him in. He was a gamble and has done OK, up to a point. I think with the owners we have we can trust them to do the right thing.
There is no way Potter would leave a safe place high up in the table for Villa at the moment. For one thing we would never give him the latitude Brighton have given him (was it 4 home wins in a whole year?). I think his next job will be a bigger step up.Of course Potter would come for the right offer.
I'm in the stick camp as the last few managerial appointments have left me underwhelmed (Garde, Sherwood, Black, McLeish, Di Matteo, Lambert). Bruce at the time was a reasonable decision but not been enthused since Martin O'Neill if I'm honest.
There is no way Potter would leave a safe place high up in the table for Villa at the moment. For one thing we would never give him the latitude Brighton have given him (was it 4 home wins in a whole year?). I think his next job will be a bigger step up.Of course Potter would come for the right offer.
I'm in the stick camp as the last few managerial appointments have left me underwhelmed (Garde, Sherwood, Black, McLeish, Di Matteo, Lambert). Bruce at the time was a reasonable decision but not been enthused since Martin O'Neill if I'm honest.
But look at the difference in how decisively they have acted, Conte is right up there has won titles in a Italy and England. Smith managed Brentford.Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Spurs are acting like a big club.
In comparison to us it is.But look at the difference in how decisively they have acted, Conte is right up there has won titles in a Italy and England. Smith managed Brentford.Spurs showing how to do it with Conte.Is that the team that’s had 3 managers in the last 12 months and declined with every appointment?
Spurs are acting like a big club.
They were in 'advanced talks' with Conte, Gattuso and Fonseca in the summer, on the verge of appointing each of them only for the talks to collapse through lack of agreement on policy and fan backlash respectively. They then appointed Nuno. Now they've gone back to Conte and clearly given him what he asked for but didn't get last time. Not sure that's particuarly decisive really.
Daily Mail linking Fonseca.
Not amazed with his CV but he doesn't seem to like five at the back and he isn't Frank Terrard. Get him in.
I'm not expecting an elite manager who has won lots of trophies but I do want someone who has shown they can address the problems we have currently, someone who
- has shown consistency at the top level, over the course of a season or two has demonstrated that they can deal with the ups and downs of injuries and player departures and barring the odd blip has been able to avoid any horror runs, finishing comfortably top half at least
- has shown flexibility in terms of squad rotation and tactics, with strong game management
- has produced teams that have a clear identity, a way they seek to create chances that isn't reliant on set pieces or one world class player
Daily Mail linking Fonseca.
Not amazed with his CV but he doesn't seem to like five at the back and he isn't Frank Terrard. Get him in.
Same here, don't see it with his record and didn't even win the league with Porto after they had won the previous 2. Would prefer Favre (or Svensson).
There is no way Potter would leave a safe place high up in the table for Villa at the moment. For one thing we would never give him the latitude Brighton have given him (was it 4 home wins in a whole year?). I think his next job will be a bigger step up.
I'm in the stick camp as the last few managerial appointments have left me underwhelmed (Garde, Sherwood, Black, McLeish, Di Matteo, Lambert). Bruce at the time was a reasonable decision but not been enthused since Martin O'Neill if I'm honest.
I honestly don't know if he would. Brighton gave him a 6 year contract a while back and he's got them well on course for being a top 10 club. Jumping to us would be a massive gamble for him and not one I'm convinced he'd take for a bit more cash in his back pocket.There is no way Potter would leave a safe place high up in the table for Villa at the moment. For one thing we would never give him the latitude Brighton have given him (was it 4 home wins in a whole year?). I think his next job will be a bigger step up.Of course Potter would come for the right offer.
I'm in the stick camp as the last few managerial appointments have left me underwhelmed (Garde, Sherwood, Black, McLeish, Di Matteo, Lambert). Bruce at the time was a reasonable decision but not been enthused since Martin O'Neill if I'm honest.
If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
Strong flour, salt and lots of Olive Oil. Rosemary.If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
Daily Mail linking Fonseca.
Not amazed with his CV but he doesn't seem to like five at the back and he isn't Frank Terrard. Get him in.
Same here, don't see it with his record and didn't even win the league with Porto after they had won the previous 2. Would prefer Favre (or Svensson).
If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
Every manager is a gamble. But one of the most sought after managers in Europe would clearly be less so than a 0-9 expert like Hassenhutl or a managerial novice like Frank Terrard.
Fonseca would be a huge risk and could take us down.
There’s absolutely no way of knowing how he will fair in the premier league, especially if he is taking over a team in the relegation zone. We know he hasn’t managed in the premier league but has he ever had to “turn around” a team?
I’d much rather we went after Hasenhuttl who would almost guarantee us safety and then hopefully progression thereafter.
If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
It doesn't matter, he's shiny and sparkly and new and sounds exotic.
Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.
And missed out on Moyes
And missed out on Moyes
I think there's a fair bit of revisionism around Moyes all over the place right now. He's been excellent in the last 18months so there's no shock people are suddenly hugely supportive of him but people need to remember why he wasn't flying high:
Took the champions to 7th having spent the best part of £100m
Had Real Sociedad in relegation battles 2 years running
Got Sunfderland relegated, and they stillhaven't rcovered from it
Just about dragged West Ham to safety but wasn't considered good enough to keep the job
Since hten he got the job back, repeated the tirkc of saving them and has done brilliantly but there's no point before this run where you'd look at any of those achievements and think he was the best man to turn you into top 6 challengers.
Not sure Fonseca is the mythical "next level" candidate though. He record is on a par with the likes of Gerrard and Lampard.
Not sure Fonseca is the mythical "next level" candidate though. He record is on a par with the likes of Gerrard and Lampard.
I trust the board to come up with the right chap though. He's got to fit in with the board's long term view in terms of style of play, way of working and possibility of taking us up a level. I think it's very clear at the moment that that man is not Dean Smith. I'll be grateful to Smith for taking us up and keeping us in the Premier League, but we can't be sentimental, and need to start catching and overtaking the likes of Arsenal, Spurs and West Ham to get into the European spots.
Not sure Fonseca is the mythical "next level" candidate though. He record is on a par with the likes of Gerrard and Lampard.
I trust the board to come up with the right chap though. He's got to fit in with the board's long term view in terms of style of play, way of working and possibility of taking us up a level. I think it's very clear at the moment that that man is not Dean Smith. I'll be grateful to Smith for taking us up and keeping us in the Premier League, but we can't be sentimental, and need to start catching and overtaking the likes of Arsenal, Spurs and West Ham to get into the European spots.
gazing longingly at Graham Potter then appointing Lampard or Gerrard (what, was Owen Hargreaves unavailable?),
Sounds a bit like Dean. But Dean has beaten the big boys.If the Fonseca rumours are true that's somewhat encouraging, not necessarily because he's the answer but it's the right profile.What is his brand of football?
Attacking, possession based football. Quite lovely when it works but often it does not as his stats make clear. Poor big game record at Roma. Plays 4-2-3-1 or 3-4-1-2. To be fair some lay more blame at the door of Monchi for his rather hopeless wheeling and dealing, arguing Fonseca suffered from a weaker Roma side than typical.
Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Good point.Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Dick already failed at Arsenal, didn't he? Not aware of Fonseca having failed anywhere.
Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Dick already failed at Arsenal, didn't he? Not aware of Fonseca having failed anywhere.
Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Dick already failed at Arsenal, didn't he? Not aware of Fonseca having failed anywhere.
poison chalice, he did ok considering, he has won 4 Europa League titles.Unai Emre to Newcastle- a very good move if they pull this off.Quite. We should gate crash this one.
Dick already failed at Arsenal, didn't he? Not aware of Fonseca having failed anywhere.
did he fail at Arsenal, or were the Tarquins just not patient enough because they are massively entitled? And he had a funny accent.
I think I might stab myself violently through the heart.
I think I might stab myself violently through the heart.
Can you stab yourself in the heart non-violently?!
I think I might stab myself violently through the heart.
Can you stab yourself in the heart non-violently?!
There seem to have been surprisingly few studies carried out.
Absolutely this. When Spurs (5 points ahead of us??) go for and get Conte, we dither about Potter, Howe and staggeringly Chris Wilder!! Hopefully the people who make the decisions are a lot more ambitious then that!!Fonseca would be a huge risk and could take us down.
There’s absolutely no way of knowing how he will fair in the premier league, especially if he is taking over a team in the relegation zone. We know he hasn’t managed in the premier league but has he ever had to “turn around” a team?
I’d much rather we went after Hasenhuttl who would almost guarantee us safety and then hopefully progression thereafter.
This line of argument is why useless twats like Bruce and Big Sam keep getting jobs.
Only when our eyes meet.I think I might stab myself violently through the heart.
Can you stab yourself in the heart non-violently?!
Nobody thanks. Happy to work through this bad patch and come out the other side.
I think it might be a Terry/Lampard double act.
I think it could be Terry too.
I think it could be Terry too.
Apart from all the fuss they made in the summer when they missed out on him, you mean?
I think it could be Terry too.
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
I think it could be Terry too.
Won’t be JT
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
I think it could be Terry too.
Won’t be JT
Interesting you are so sure of that Vinnie. In many ways he makes a lot of sense, knows the squad, club, big name so could attract players, was obviously influential behind the scenes with our defenders, and would almost certainly look to work with a reputable coaching team. Don't get me wrong, he's not in my top 3-4 choices, but he'd be a choice I would understand the club making.
... If Smith does go soon, I hope whoever we go for includes the backroom team they wantThat is usually the deal, isn't it?
Not sure Fonseca is the mythical "next level" candidate though. He record is on a par with the likes of Gerrard and Lampard.
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?Yes
100%Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?Yes
Actually Levy has made them a laughing stock with his stubborn bargaining position and it’s backfired on him. Maybe the idiots that own Spurs should look at his positionDoesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Conte was their first choice in the summer until he walked away from talks. Spurs appear to have found a way to shell out another £15m to Nuno and Mendes to reach the conclusion that they should have given Conte what he wanted at first.
You could argue it's a shambles. You could also argue that Levy has done well to swallow his pride and cough up to get their man eventually. They could easily make top 4 from where they are still this season with a decent run of form.
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Yes.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Yes. Also jealous that they have acted and we are still dithering.
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Yes.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Yes. Also jealous that they have acted and we are still dithering.
are we dithering though? We are giving him a chance to fix the issue. And going into the season everyone agreed he should get a chance to improve on last year. It's 4 shit defeats now after beating Man U. Dithering would be firing him in January if this trend continues.
I would imagine, as reported, we aren't dithering we're looking at options whilst remaining open to the idea that Dean could turn it round.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Yes.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Yes. Also jealous that they have acted and we are still dithering.
are we dithering though? We are giving him a chance to fix the issue. And going into the season everyone agreed he should get a chance to improve on last year. It's 4 shit defeats now after beating Man U. Dithering would be firing him in January if this trend continues.
Exactly. Just as Tottenham were almost certainly in touch with Conte well before the defeat against Man U.
I would imagine, as reported, we aren't dithering we're looking at options whilst remaining open to the idea that Dean could turn it round.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Yes.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Yes. Also jealous that they have acted and we are still dithering.
are we dithering though? We are giving him a chance to fix the issue. And going into the season everyone agreed he should get a chance to improve on last year. It's 4 shit defeats now after beating Man U. Dithering would be firing him in January if this trend continues.
Should be done well before January if results keep going as they are but, I stress again, only if we can get a top manager in that can also attract top players.been a long while since we've had a top manager.
Should be done well before January if results keep going as they are but, I stress again, only if we can get a top manager in that can also attract top players.been a long while since we've had a top manager.
I don't know enough about him.Should be done well before January if results keep going as they are but, I stress again, only if we can get a top manager in that can also attract top players.been a long while since we've had a top manager.
Would you class Fonseca as a top manager, I really don't know?
No debate with Conte but that one has flown the nest!
I think the biggest problem we have is the coaching team, which enables to remove the head coach with out affecting the rest of the structure ,therefore any replacement is going to have to slot in seamlessly ,this could be problematic.Apart from all the fuss they made in the summer when they missed out on him, you mean?
Him and half a dozen others. Rumour is Yosser Hughes turned it down.
Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Do you not recall all of the managers they didn’t get before ending up with Nuno? It was a fucking gong show as managerial appointments go
Yes.Doesn’t anyone else feel just that little bit jealous that clubs like Spurs can just go out there and get in a top class manager, with the minimum of fuss?
Yes. Also jealous that they have acted and we are still dithering.
are we dithering though? We are giving him a chance to fix the issue. And going into the season everyone agreed he should get a chance to improve on last year. It's 4 shit defeats now after beating Man U. Dithering would be firing him in January if this trend continues.
It’s 4 defeats! It’s a year long downturn and 19 goals let in this season. Defending as bad as the season we came up.
We could probably work around experimenting with trying to fit Watkins and Ings in a front 2/3 and having that missfire.
But our defensive brittleness is much more of a concern.
Bert worked harder as the season went on, and is a very under rated player for me, but you can't carry him and Bailey in the same side. He's a bit like El Ghazi too, a 1 good game in 3 (el Ghazi being about 4 or 5). Actually think Bert at 10 is probably a better option than Buendia.
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
The more I read about him, the more I think he's pretty much the type we should be going for. He quit Roma because they didn't keep the promises of investing; his second season was tarnished by injuries in the second half of the season. He'd get us very organised, understands tactics and has a very impressive win rate pretty much everywhere he's been.
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
Leave it mate, I've set my heart on him now and don't want anyone spoiling it by doing research or bringing facts into things.
For me, he meets the three key criteria:
1. Not being Frank Lampard
2. Not being John Terry
3. Not being Steven Gerrard
Will be gutted if Dick's decision to turn Newcastle down means they go back in for Fonseca, after all.
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
Leave it mate, I've set my heart on him now and don't want anyone spoiling it by doing research or bringing facts into things.
For me, he meets the three key criteria:
1. Not being Frank Lampard
2. Not being John Terry
3. Not being Steven Gerrard
Will be gutted if Dick's decision to turn Newcastle down means they go back in for Fonseca, after all.
What if he plays *dramatic music* 5-3-2?!
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
Leave it mate, I've set my heart on him now and don't want anyone spoiling it by doing research or bringing facts into things.
For me, he meets the three key criteria:
1. Not being Frank Lampard
2. Not being John Terry
3. Not being Steven Gerrard
Will be gutted if Dick's decision to turn Newcastle down means they go back in for Fonseca, after all.
What if he plays *dramatic music* 5-3-2?!
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
Leave it mate, I've set my heart on him now and don't want anyone spoiling it by doing research or bringing facts into things.
For me, he meets the three key criteria:
1. Not being Frank Lampard
2. Not being John Terry
3. Not being Steven Gerrard
Will be gutted if Dick's decision to turn Newcastle down means they go back in for Fonseca, after all.
What if he plays *dramatic music* 5-3-2?!
Why must you do this to me?
I don't know he has that 1 defensive move where he tries to clear it and seems to hoof the ball 200m in the air - presumably in the hope the whistle blows for full time before it comes back down.Bert worked harder as the season went on, and is a very under rated player for me, but you can't carry him and Bailey in the same side. He's a bit like El Ghazi too, a 1 good game in 3 (el Ghazi being about 4 or 5). Actually think Bert at 10 is probably a better option than Buendia.
I've always thought that Bert should be a 10. It's not that he won't defend, it's that he can't. He has an awful lot to offer going forward though.
Bert worked harder as the season went on, and is a very under rated player for me, but you can't carry him and Bailey in the same side. He's a bit like El Ghazi too, a 1 good game in 3 (el Ghazi being about 4 or 5). Actually think Bert at 10 is probably a better option than Buendia.
I've always thought that Bert should be a 10. It's not that he won't defend, it's that he can't. He has an awful lot to offer going forward though.
Bert worked harder as the season went on, and is a very under rated player for me, but you can't carry him and Bailey in the same side. He's a bit like El Ghazi too, a 1 good game in 3 (el Ghazi being about 4 or 5). Actually think Bert at 10 is probably a better option than Buendia.
I've always thought that Bert should be a 10. It's not that he won't defend, it's that he can't. He has an awful lot to offer going forward though.
I remember watching an interview with ex-England cricket captain Nasser Hussain, where he was saying that all he would hear at selection meetings when he first took over the job was about what players couldn't do as opposed to what they were actually good at. He said he looked to change that mentality and make the most of what players were good at.
Traore's defending did get exposed at times last season, particularly against the better sides and better attacking full-backs. I suppose it is a case of trying to improve the former side of his game without impacting on the latter.
Not sure Fonseca is the mythical "next level" candidate though. He record is on a par with the likes of Gerrard and Lampard.
The more I read about him, the more I think he's pretty much the type we should be going for. He quit Roma because they didn't keep the promises of investing; his second season was tarnished by injuries in the second half of the season. He'd get us very organised, understands tactics and has a very impressive win rate pretty much everywhere he's been.
He won't come cheap, rumours are he's likely to get paid £6m a year but I can see our owners going for it. Nothing in the press over here but the way we do business that's only to be expected. Gerrard or Lampard? They wish! I'd rather promote Mark Delaney. We just need the Jail Bars to confirm the appointment of Dick Emery.
Traore is really really good at a hooked looping clearance across his own penalty area isn't he?
Re: Fonseca, I obviously know nothing about him because life's too short, but surely you've got to be winning the league at Porto?
Leave it mate, I've set my heart on him now and don't want anyone spoiling it by doing research or bringing facts into things.
For me, he meets the three key criteria:
1. Not being Frank Lampard
2. Not being John Terry
3. Not being Steven Gerrard
Will be gutted if Dick's decision to turn Newcastle down means they go back in for Fonseca, after all.
What if he plays *dramatic music* 5-3-2?!
Why must you do this to me?
Ha ha, even you would have to find it hilarious if it panned out that way 😂
I’m not sure you’d ever get over it, either
Fonseca did fairly well at Roma, who are pinballing about in their usual style. Was unlucky to lose Zaniolo to a long-termer (as Mou has been to lose Spinazzola), and 5th-7th is about their level given the competition. Nowhere near the squad Lampard had at Chelsea, for instance.
Fonseca did fairly well at Roma, who are pinballing about in their usual style. Was unlucky to lose Zaniolo to a long-termer (as Mou has been to lose Spinazzola), and 5th-7th is about their level given the competition. Nowhere near the squad Lampard had at Chelsea, for instance.
Perhaps but Lampard took over in the year they had the transfer ban and was responsible for blooding all the youngster that Tuchel has benefitted from. It only went pear-shaped when he had money
Fonseca did fairly well at Roma, who are pinballing about in their usual style. Was unlucky to lose Zaniolo to a long-termer (as Mou has been to lose Spinazzola), and 5th-7th is about their level given the competition. Nowhere near the squad Lampard had at Chelsea, for instance.
Perhaps but Lampard took over in the year they had the transfer ban and was responsible for blooding all the youngster that Tuchel has benefitted from. It only went pear-shaped when he had money
He had no choice but to bring in the youngsters, and while he didn't do badly I don't think it's at all fair to say Tuchel is just benefitting off his work - he took the exact squad that Lampard was flailing around with and won the Champions League. Also yes, they had the transfer ban, but their squad wasn't exactly like ours when we got promoted was it? It was still overstuffed with world class players. Fonseca, in my opinion, would have done better than Lampard.
Tuchel did the thing Lampard failed to do which was sort out the defence.Fonseca did fairly well at Roma, who are pinballing about in their usual style. Was unlucky to lose Zaniolo to a long-termer (as Mou has been to lose Spinazzola), and 5th-7th is about their level given the competition. Nowhere near the squad Lampard had at Chelsea, for instance.
Perhaps but Lampard took over in the year they had the transfer ban and was responsible for blooding all the youngsters that Tuchel has benefitted from. It only went pear-shaped when he had money
Fonseca did fairly well at Roma, who are pinballing about in their usual style. Was unlucky to lose Zaniolo to a long-termer (as Mou has been to lose Spinazzola), and 5th-7th is about their level given the competition. Nowhere near the squad Lampard had at Chelsea, for instance.
Perhaps but Lampard took over in the year they had the transfer ban and was responsible for blooding all the youngster that Tuchel has benefitted from. It only went pear-shaped when he had money
He had no choice but to bring in the youngsters, and while he didn't do badly I don't think it's at all fair to say Tuchel is just benefitting off his work - he took the exact squad that Lampard was flailing around with and won the Champions League. Also yes, they had the transfer ban, but their squad wasn't exactly like ours when we got promoted was it? It was still overstuffed with world class players. Fonseca, in my opinion, would have done better than Lampard.
By the same token though Gareth, if Dean Smith, with his record at Villa, was one of the names in the hat that would not inspire me either.
I would prefer Terry to Lampard Soccer. The players openly said he had no tactical plan from week to week.
Slightly concerning is how Jorge Mendes seems to be the go-to for Christian Purslow. There were very strong rumours last season we were about to bring in Lage, the deal only collapsing at the last minute and now Fonseca, another from the Gestifute stable. Must say and although it's early doors, Lage seems to have got the Dingles back on track taking 13 out of a possible 15 points in their last 5 games.
I still hate mid-season appointments.
Apparently Fonseca does like to play with a back 3. Sorry CD. In fact, I don't like it either...maybe for the odd game for tactical reasons but not as a first choice regular selection.
Apparently Fonseca does like to play with a back 3. Sorry CD. In fact, I don't like it either...maybe for the odd game for tactical reasons but not as a first choice regular selection.
I have less of an issue with a manager who sets their stall on it and signs players to fit the system. Where it really pisses me off is where managers 'give it a go' with a squad that doesn't suit it. I'm still not a fan because I think you're specifically setting yoursefl up to be weak against 433 and 4231 which are the 2 most common systems in the game right now.
352 and all the derivatives of it exists to outnumber teams playing 442 in the central positions, specifically in midfield. As soon as you lose that dominance it becomes a lot less effective for almost all teams because there are very few genuinely good wingbacks around.
Another impressive win for Erik ten Hag. Trying to put himself in the shop window. Hopefully not the same one that we had the FA Cup nicked from.
Another impressive win for Erik ten Hag. Trying to put himself in the shop window. Hopefully not the same one that we had the FA Cup nicked from.That's very funny👏👏
I know this should go in other football but couldn't resist. Imagine being a Newcastle fan and sacking Steve Bruce, only to appoint Eddie Howe. Blimey, the absolute height of ambition eh?
I know this should go in other football but couldn't resist. Imagine being a Newcastle fan and sacking Steve Bruce, only to appoint Eddie Howe. Blimey, the absolute height of ambition eh?
Howe is a fantastic coach, whether his time out has given him the perspective to mix his want to play on the front foot with coaching a defence remains to be seen, but with the right staff around him, and the right players bought for him, he is a top 6 coach.
It's a big risk for both, but who else would want to walk into a relegation scrap with that squad? Hodgson, maybe. Allardyce, certainly but...that wouldn't work.Yeah, that's my line of thought too. They're not going to attract really top quality managers in the position they're in. Eddie Howe seems a reasonable appointment to me, from their point of view.
I wonder why Newcastle are leaning towards Howe over Fonseca.
Maybe he’s their Dean Smith. Recover them from the mess left by Bruce, get them to a point where the fans think he can take them no further and want another experienced top name in there. That’ll take the rest of this season and all of next then he’ll be goneIt's a big risk for both, but who else would want to walk into a relegation scrap with that squad? Hodgson, maybe. Allardyce, certainly but...that wouldn't work.Yeah, that's my line of thought too. They're not going to attract really top quality managers in the position they're in. Eddie Howe seems a reasonable appointment to me, from their point of view.
I wonder why Newcastle are leaning towards Howe over Fonseca.
I wonder why Newcastle are leaning towards Howe over Fonseca.
Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking! Not a bad gig for either party if he pulls it off - Howe will get plenty of other offers on the back of it, and Newcastle will be in a better position to emulate Manc City, which I assume is their plan.Maybe he’s their Dean Smith. Recover them from the mess left by Bruce, get them to a point where the fans think he can take them no further and want another experienced top name in there. That’ll take the rest of this season and all of next then he’ll be goneIt's a big risk for both, but who else would want to walk into a relegation scrap with that squad? Hodgson, maybe. Allardyce, certainly but...that wouldn't work.Yeah, that's my line of thought too. They're not going to attract really top quality managers in the position they're in. Eddie Howe seems a reasonable appointment to me, from their point of view.
I know this should go in other football but couldn't resist. Imagine being a Newcastle fan and sacking Steve Bruce, only to appoint Eddie Howe. Blimey, the absolute height of ambition eh?
Im just shocked still that it is assumed a done deal that Smith is to be sacked
Im obviously not happy at present and he has made some decisions that have concerned me but far too early to sack him for me
Vinnie, are you saying you think they might get rid, but will take their time appointing the right replacement?
Sounds like a plan to me.
Vinnie, are you saying you think they might get rid, but will take their time appointing the right replacement?
Sounds like a plan to me.
They are NOT happy with how things are going and getting rid is 100% something they have discussed/thought about.
I know of a few managers who have been spoken to but no idea where its all at.
The only thing ive taken away from what ive been told is that unless they can replace Dean with the man they believe delivers our goals and pushes us on then it may drag a bit (eg get to summer and do it then is main man available then)
Vinnie, are you saying you think they might get rid, but will take their time appointing the right replacement?
Sounds like a plan to me.
They are NOT happy with how things are going and getting rid is 100% something they have discussed/thought about.
I know of a few managers who have been spoken to but no idea where its all at.
The only thing ive taken away from what ive been told is that unless they can replace Dean with the man they believe delivers our goals and pushes us on then it may drag a bit (eg get to summer and do it then is main man available then)
Lets be honest, we can't come up with a nailed on realistic candidate so I can understand the club wavering over the selection of a "may do better than Smith" candidate. Plenty in the "maybe would come if he was promised 250m in transfers and 6m a year in salary" range but our we in that market?
There's no doubt there's someone out there who can get us up in the European places but the top guys only come if the funds are there, so you're selecting on potential. A top guy isn't gonna come if you sell your best player and then expect him to replace both him and another 5 players for the same amount of money so i can see us ending up with a guy from a smaller club looking to step up and whom the board can dictate to
There's no doubt there's someone out there who can get us up in the European places but the top guys only come if the funds are there, so you're selecting on potential. A top guy isn't gonna come if you sell your best player and then expect him to replace both him and another 5 players for the same amount of money so i can see us ending up with a guy from a smaller club looking to step up and whom the board can dictate toNah, I think your last assertion is flawed, because they've done the 'manager from a smaller club' thing. The only exception might be Potter, but I suspect they'll be looking more widely than that.
There's no doubt there's someone out there who can get us up in the European places but the top guys only come if the funds are there, so you're selecting on potential. A top guy isn't gonna come if you sell your best player and then expect him to replace both him and another 5 players for the same amount of money so i can see us ending up with a guy from a smaller club looking to step up and whom the board can dictate to
True but alternatively we get in someone now who can at least work out what the hell we want to do in final third e.g. do we keep picking two strikers with one wide or is it purely Watkins or Ings leading the line? Where does Bailey play? Where does Buendia play?!!!! These are questions someone needs to solve sooner or later.
If we can work it out then we should have strong end to the season and so we can kick on next season with reasonably solid final third options all being settled in a coherent style of play.
We're miles off that currently and it's showing on the pitch every week.
There's no doubt there's someone out there who can get us up in the European places but the top guys only come if the funds are there, so you're selecting on potential. A top guy isn't gonna come if you sell your best player and then expect him to replace both him and another 5 players for the same amount of money so i can see us ending up with a guy from a smaller club looking to step up and whom the board can dictate toNah, I think your last assertion is flawed, because they've done the 'manager from a smaller club' thing. The only exception might be Potter, but I suspect they'll be looking more widely than that.
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
We can't compete with the likes of Spurs.
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
Think the long term acceptance he may not be the man to take us to Europe has been the decision made
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
We can't compete with the likes of Spurs.
compete? We made Alex McLeish one of the top paid managers in the world at the time with RL's money. We can compete with any team pretty much when it comes to salary. It's a question of ambition. I would hope Spurs are never more ambitious than us.
I want a manager who is smart enough to not only have different tactics to start a game based on who we are playing. Who is able to use all of his players in the squad. And who is astute enough to change things up at any time during a game if things aren’t going to plan or even if they are and the game status warrants it. And when things don’t go to plan he doesn’t immediately point to the players as the obvious reason why.
And finally doesn’t assume fans are fucking dopes with no knowledge of the finer points of the game. And that like him him, we know 35% possession and no shots on goal isn’t a great stat.
All appears a bit clutching at straws. The inference earlier in the week was that he was gone regardless of the result this weekend Vinnie, now he might get the season if they can't get the right man.
Lose tonight we are in a relegation battle proper. In fact don't win we are, 11pts from 11 games is going to be bottom 5 over a season. There are plenty of good managers out there. Spurs just appointed one who won Serie A last year. If there is one we want act like a club with ambition and go and get them. Pissing about till next summer will just see us go down.
We can't compete with the likes of Spurs.
compete? We made Alex McLeish one of the top paid managers in the world at the time with RL's money. We can compete with any team pretty much when it comes to salary. It's a question of ambition. I would hope Spurs are never more ambitious than us.
Was tongue in cheek. Agree most of a clubs allure is linked to perceived ambition of the owners and available funds (one and the same thing these days). The fact that they are a London club works in Spurs favour to some degree.
What else goes into it? Current squad and position in the league? Youth set up...?
Whatever, Spurs have Conte.
I'd be happy to promote Mark Delaney, with Sid as his assistant.
When smith goes it's going to be a washed up has been or someone with no experience as a manager.
Allardyce or Terry then.
Can't wait
When smith goes it's going to be a washed up has been or someone with no experience as a manager.
Allardyce or Terry then.
Can't wait
Go and get Una Emery now.We've got a project.He wants a project.
Go and get Una Emery now.We've got a project.He wants a project.
We need someone in to lift the place it all feels doom and gloom
The type of impact Tim Sherwood had
I always get Emery mixed up with that guy who stunk Arsenal out a few years ago.
I always get Emery mixed up with that guy who stunk Arsenal out a few years ago.
You mean Unai Emery?
Who is the Favre chap please?
Who is the Favre chap please?
Who is the Favre chap please?
Brett. Former Green Bay Packers Quarterback. Takes a superb long throw.
I think it’ll be Gerrard but I really think we should go balls on the line for Favre.
Who is the Favre chap please?
Thanks SHQ. Sounds interesting.
Can we please not have a 'project' manager, please? I'm already a little frustrated by having mega rich owners and having to scour leagues for the next big thing rather than being allowed to just buy players who are actually good. Get a winner in.
See if we had changed after Arsenal I would fancy some of the shouts but we are now two further (points-less) games into the mire now so I wonder do we need to think of survival instead of the future? They have been too loyal to Dean, really.
See if we had changed after Arsenal I would fancy some of the shouts but we are now two further (points-less) games into the mire now so I wonder do we need to think of survival instead of the future? They have been too loyal to Dean, really.
There are 27 games left not 7
See if we had changed after Arsenal I would fancy some of the shouts but we are now two further (points-less) games into the mire now so I wonder do we need to think of survival instead of the future? They have been too loyal to Dean, really.
There are 27 games left not 7
Yes, but my point is, the longer we leave it the more of a gamble it is.
See if we had changed after Arsenal I would fancy some of the shouts but we are now two further (points-less) games into the mire now so I wonder do we need to think of survival instead of the future? They have been too loyal to Dean, really.
There are 27 games left not 7
Yes, but my point is, the longer we leave it the more of a gamble it is.
I get that mate but it’s two games post Arsenal. It’s hardly a lost cause. It’s no where
See if we had changed after Arsenal I would fancy some of the shouts but we are now two further (points-less) games into the mire now so I wonder do we need to think of survival instead of the future? They have been too loyal to Dean, really.
There are 27 games left not 7
Yes, but my point is, the longer we leave it the more of a gamble it is.
I get that mate but it’s two games post Arsenal. It’s hardly a lost cause. It’s no where
It’s 5 straight defeats and and abysmal record stretching into last season. He has proven with more than enough evidence that outside of a few bright spots he cannot win without Jack Grealish. He’s simply not good enough at this level.
We are already, and we are going to continue to be flirting in around the relegation zone this season.
We just can’t afford to go down.
A manager without premier league experience will take longer to settle. Wolves lost their first three- can we afford to lose another 3-5 games on the spin?
I’d take Hodgson until the summer if who they really want is unwilling to leave mid season.
It makes no sense to give a long contract to our 3/4/5 choice …
If we attract a top class candidate, you have to wonder about their reaction to our recruitment policy. I am guessing most of them will have some players in mind who they want pdq, regardless of youth and resale value.
they're going to get in Ronald Koeman.
ITK.
Koeman is not considered a good coach in the Netherlands. He is solid, but unspectacular, and wouldn't be an improvement on Smith in terms of tactics and adapting to situations during games.
In the Times match report it says that we’ve already held informal talks with Fonseca.he's held talks with everyone recently
I'd test Everton's resolve and go for Rafa.
I'd test Everton's resolve and go for Rafa.Yes let’s fix a problem that Everton have.
I'd test Everton's resolve and go for Rafa.
He and Purslow are not exactly friends. Won't happen.
In the Times match report it says that we’ve already held informal talks with Fonseca.
I'd test Everton's resolve and go for Rafa.
I don’t want yesterdays man. I want tomorrows. A progressive coach with modern ideas on a pattern of play to bring some success. It’s a fine balance between taking a punt on a Terry or Gerrard versus someone more experienced.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
Fluent English apparently.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
Fluent English apparently.
Gerrard wouldn't be a bad shout, other than that he'd see it as a stepping stone to the 'The Mighty Reds YNWA' job.
Bo Svensson - young and up-and-coming - would be a risk.
Fonseca or Favre would be the safe bets.
Potter and Vieira - good but difficult to prise away from current clubs
I don’t understand the stick levelled at Gerrard for managing in a pub league when the media are fawning over Potter who cut his teeth in a league thats almost certainly worse.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
I’m with you on this, I just don’t see the attraction from his CV and everything I’ve read.
I wouldn’t say Fonseca’s record is bad. Isn’t it pretty much one ropey season with Roma? Other than that pretty good.
I hate myself for saying this, but maybe we should get a firefighter in, give him to the end of the season, get rid in May and get the big name when we're hopefully safe and can attract them. I'd be very wary of bringing in a coach with no experience of the PL a month before Christmas. Could be Garde all over again
I hate myself for saying this, but maybe we should get a firefighter in, give him to the end of the season, get rid in May and get the big name when we're hopefully safe and can attract them. I'd be very wary of bringing in a coach with no experience of the PL a month before Christmas. Could be Garde all over again
I retired 11 years ago, but willing to have a crack for the boys 😉
Rodgers that Leicester took from Celtic where he had less opposition than Gerard has at Rangers? I get the point, and accept he'd done well with Swansea and Liverpool, but Gerard might go on to do just as well.
For me Lange needs to identify a coach on an upward trajectory in Europe and go get him in. Simple. He's paid very well to do that too.
I'd test Everton's resolve and go for Rafa.
I don’t want yesterdays man. I want tomorrows. A progressive coach with modern ideas on a pattern of play to bring some success. It’s a fine balance between taking a punt on a Terry or Gerrard versus someone more experienced.
Apart from his voice I am ambivalent on Gerard. He's done well with Rangers, bought well, and gets them up for the big games. He also did some time learning the coaching game first which I think serves him well.
I would sooner go Fonseca a proper up and coming Klopp, but not sure how easy they are to find. Lange has a big job on.
My problem is that I don’t rate or want any of these names that are being banded about. This all smacks of doing your shopping at 5pm on Christmas Eve, taking what’s left rather than what you actually want.I agree. Of the names mention, ten Hag is the only one who strikes me as being a clear upgrade on Smith. He's the face I'd want, and if it means appointing an interim manager (or keeping Smith) until the end of the season, so be it.
My only hope is that the people that we employ on very good money to make such decisions have bigger and better plans than what I’m seeing and hearing. Time to earn those salaries and reputations.
I reckon Ten Haag is destined for top jobs like United, City, Juve or PSG….Then make Villa one of the top jobs. Make him an offer he can't refuse.
Fonseca gives me the jitters. So-so record, no experience of a relegation battle, coming into a club where the defenders don't even understand how to play 5 at the back, presumably non English speaker.
Fluent English apparently.
He's never stayed longer than 18 months. Finished 5th and 7th with Roma. For me, he's the Portuguese Sherwood.
Rodgers that Leicester took from Celtic where he had less opposition than Gerard has at Rangers? I get the point, and accept he'd done well with Swansea and Liverpool, but Gerard might go on to do just as well.
For me Lange needs to identify a coach on an upward trajectory in Europe and go get him in. Simple. He's paid very well to do that too.
I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
wonder what McLeish showed Lerner?I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
Apparently Sherwood got the gig by showing Lerner his Tetris high score.
wonder what McLeish showed Lerner?I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
Apparently Sherwood got the gig by showing Lerner his Tetris high score.
LSDwonder what McLeish showed Lerner?I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
Apparently Sherwood got the gig by showing Lerner his Tetris high score.
wonder what McLeish showed Lerner?I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
Apparently Sherwood got the gig by showing Lerner his Tetris high score.
wonder what McLeish showed Lerner?I've just started a game on football manager as Villa - I reckon a good season for me on there and I'll ping Purslow my cv
Apparently Sherwood got the gig by showing Lerner his Tetris high score.
If the Villa release Smith from his role, hopefully we won’t be considering anybody like Terry (untried as a manager) or Gerrard (manager in a Micky mouse league). If that were the case Purslow needs to go. For a club with the stature of Aston Villa we need to bring in a high profile successful manager already at another club like we did when we brought Ron Atkinson in from Sheff Wed. We need to make a statement appointment, someone who has the personality and skills to carry the team from day 1. There can be no messing about with someone who is only finding their feet in management. For me we need someone like Rodgers and if it means f-cking off Leicester for a second time, so be it. We need to show and Purslow needs to show that we mean business.Absolutely this. Don't get the clamour for Potter. People talk about statement signings in terms of players - I'd like a statement manager. Someone linked with the top jobs in the world (hence me being quite keen on the Ajax chap). Whoever it is, show them we can pump a good £100m in to the side over the summer (again), and a similar amount the following summer. Furnish their bank account with a big, fuck off pay cheque. But it has to be a top tier appointment, someone who has operated at Champions League level successfully.
If the Villa release Smith from his role, hopefully we won’t be considering anybody like Terry (untried as a manager) or Gerrard (manager in a Micky mouse league). If that were the case Purslow needs to go. For a club with the stature of Aston Villa we need to bring in a high profile successful manager already at another club like we did when we brought Ron Atkinson in from Sheff Wed. We need to make a statement appointment, someone who has the personality and skills to carry the team from day 1. There can be no messing about with someone who is only finding their feet in management. For me we need someone like Rodgers and if it means f-cking off Leicester for a second time, so be it. We need to show and Purslow needs to show that we mean business.Absolutely this. Don't get the clamour for Potter. People talk about statement signings in terms of players - I'd like a statement manager. Someone linked with the top jobs in the world (hence me being quite keen on the Ajax chap). Whoever it is, show them we can pump a good £100m in to the side over the summer (again), and a similar amount the following summer. Furnish their bank account with a big, fuck off pay cheque. But it has to be a top tier appointment, someone who has operated at Champions League level successfully.
We have gone from looking for someone to push for Europe to someone to keep us up.
It somewhat limits our options.
F**k it, let’s get Simeone in. He must be bored at Athletico by now, new challenge etc.
Blimey, for the first time ever, we have owners who think nothing of spending £30m on a player and some fans like the idea of Sean Dyche?
Does Dyche cut his cloth accordingly or does he play that way out of choice. They can play good stuff, they ripped Everton to shreds last season.
We need organisation and some real structure and nouse. There's a really good squad here, £100m to spend, 40k every other week. Pressures and opportunities seldom found.
Does Dyche cut his cloth accordingly or does he play that way out of choice. They can play good stuff, they ripped Everton to shreds last season.
We need organisation and some real structure and nouse. There's a really good squad here, £100m to spend, 40k every other week. Pressures and opportunities seldom found.
He wouldn't be my first choice, but at present Smith's presiding over the worst football in the Premier League. Our 'style' is punts out of defence and long throws from Cash. Smith makes Dyche look ike Guardiola.
Does Dyche cut his cloth accordingly or does he play that way out of choice. They can play good stuff, they ripped Everton to shreds last season.
We need organisation and some real structure and nouse. There's a really good squad here, £100m to spend, 40k every other week. Pressures and opportunities seldom found.
He wouldn't be my first choice, but at present Smith's presiding over the worst football in the Premier League. Our 'style' is punts out of defence and long throws from Cash. Smith makes Dyche look ike Guardiola.
He wouldn't be mine either. I think I'm being wooed by the idea that if we could organise ourselves defensively we'd sort out 90% of our problems and climb the table.
F**k it, let’s get Simeone in. He must be bored at Athletico by now, new challenge etc.Sorry mate but the chances of us getting Simeone are about the same as your location: Absolute Zero. He is to Atletico what Fergie was to Utd - if not even more seeing as he played for them too. He’s a title winner and Champs Lg elite level manager and I’m afraid that’s not the pond Villa are fishing in.
I hate Dyche. I don't understand all the righteous indignation around divers and cheats and so on, when there's so much tolerance for managers who preside over 'styles' that wreck the careers of other professionals as Dyche and Pulis do. Should we ask Wesley if we should appoint him? The man's a violence-loving unprofessional smug backwards noxious ginger little gobshite and I don't want him within 1000 miles of VP.
Should be able to pick up the baby faced assassin by Tuesday. Remember the clamour for him on here?
Should be able to pick up the baby faced assassin by Tuesday. Remember the clamour for him on here?
Ahh golden days. Some of us still have our Norwegian versions of our names.
Whoever it is, hope he has the balls to make a cheeky loan offer for that Grealish chap.
The Guardolia of Burnley has won 1 game so far this season.
F**k it, let’s get Simeone in. He must be bored at Athletico by now, new challenge etc.
F**k it, let’s get Simeone in. He must be bored at Athletico by now, new challenge etc.
Yes. Would be the end of the collaborative approach with the players, but that's maybe no bad thing.
Gattuso could be a cheaper (and currently available) version of that.
"Gattuso had a long reputation for hot-headedness dating back to his days as a player, and had made a number of distasteful remarks in the past about racism in Italy, the role of women in football, and gay marriage."
Not sure we'd want that either would we?
F**k it, let’s get Simeone in. He must be bored at Athletico by now, new challenge etc.
Yes. Would be the end of the collaborative approach with the players, but that's maybe no bad thing.
Gattuso could be a cheaper (and currently available) version of that.
He didn't get the Spurs job, despite extensive talks.
"Gattuso had a long reputation for hot-headedness dating back to his days as a player, and had made a number of distasteful remarks in the past about racism in Italy, the role of women in football, and gay marriage."
Not sure we'd want that either would we?
Can we just appoint one of those pissed off looking Italian managers that smokes on the touchline?Cesar Luiz Menotti is still alive!
Can we just appoint one of those pissed off looking Italian managers that smokes on the touchline?
Can we just appoint one of those pissed off looking Italian managers that smokes on the touchline?
Any Italian manager that smokes would do, as he'd be bound to be pissed off looking within a game or two.
The Guardolia of Burnley has won 1 game so far this season.
Yes - exactly. We need to ambitious with our next appointment.
Ronald Koeman is available. Just saying.
Ronald Koeman is available. Just saying.
Have we not discussed him. Please god no.
Koeman would be a meh appointment. I mean better than Gerrard but not the sit up and take notice of Aston Villa choice I'm looking for.
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Mancini will never come. Love it if he did though.
Koeman would be a meh appointment. I mean better than Gerrard but not the sit up and take notice of Aston Villa choice I'm looking for.
There's always Neil Warnock......
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Come on, now.
The chances of getting the manager of European Champions Italy a year out from the World Cup are somewhere between nought and zero.
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Come on, now.
Not a fan?
Didn't he get sacked by Palace after about three games?
Didn't he get sacked by Palace after about three games?
I’d happily take Koeman tomorrow. That he got fired from that fucking dumpster fire in Barcelona should never be held against him.
The chances of getting the manager of European Champions Italy a year out from the World Cup are somewhere between nought and zero.I disagree. I would say somewhere between 0 and -1.
Didn't he get sacked by Palace after about three games?
That was your man De Boer.
Dyche plays horrible football.
Dyche plays horrible football.
Yes, because we look like Brazil 1970 at the moment.....
Dyche plays horrible football.
Yes, because we look like Brazil 1970 at the moment.....
On a random side note, I used to know a chap that owned Rivellino's 1970 World Cup winning shirt!
Dyche plays horrible football.
Yes, because we look like Brazil 1970 at the moment.....
On a random side note, I used to know a chap that owned Rivellino's 1970 World Cup winning shirt!
Roberto Rivellino (or Bob to his mates) by any chance?
Roberto Mancini for me. A serial winner, tactically astute, plays attacking 4-3-3. May be more gettable then thought as although he’s coaching his country, the Premier League is quite addictive for managers. He only went to Italy after a poor spell with Zenit I think it was.
Come on, now.
Not a fan?
We ain't getting him, mate.
Dyche plays horrible football.
Yes, because we look like Brazil 1970 at the moment.....
Have some of you been smoking crack? I have but Sean fucking Dyche?! Seriously, I understand the need for change, but Sean Dyche? Not all change is good change. And I say that as somebody who's technically homeless.
i reckon that sooner rather than later, the current Coventry manager Mark Robins will be manager at a premier league team.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
i reckon that sooner rather than later, the current Coventry manager Mark Robins will be manager at a premier league team.
i reckon that sooner rather than later, the current Coventry manager Mark Robins will be manager at a premier league team.
Probably Norwich
Will Norwich go for Nuno?
i reckon that sooner rather than later, the current Coventry manager Mark Robins will be manager at a premier league team.
Probably Norwich
Isn't Wilder already in the door there?
Yeah, but we find ourselves in a relegations crap and we need to make sure we get out of it before we start thinking of Europe.
Yeah, but we find ourselves in a relegations crap and we need to make sure we get out of it before we start thinking of Europe.
It’s not like it’s March. There’s plenty of time we can get a better long-term prospect in and be miles away from relegation.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
No it’s not March.Yeah, but we find ourselves in a relegations crap and we need to make sure we get out of it before we start thinking of Europe.
It’s not like it’s March. There’s plenty of time we can get a better long-term prospect in and be miles away from relegation.
As much as i think Dean should go if all we can replace him with is managers like Dyche then why bother.That's not all we can replace him with. We'll have our choice of literally hundreds of managers. There are people who are paid a hell of a lot more than us to work out who that should be, but the pool is a lot bigger than Dyce & Potter.
Mancini a year before taking Italy to a world cup they have a realistic chance of winning, seems Geordiesque in its delusion.Of course it won't be Mancini. But a club with our potential should not be accepting we can only get someone out of work at the moment.
It’ll be someone not in work now.
Terry would be an obvious link based on recent history. But there’s a certain amount of bollocksology floating around suggesting that won’t happen. He advised Girlish to leave, according to the twittersphere. Him and ROK. And Sawiris personally intervened to off them both. It would explain the shite timing of their departures if nothing else.
Think it’s highly unlikely that either Rogers or Mancini leave their current jobs to come here.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.
No thanks.
I think I'd be looking to take a bit of a risk with someone like Hjulmand or Bo Svensson.Have you seen Denmark play recently, some of the best football played in europe at international football and they've handled loss of Eriksen with ease.Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
No thanks.
I agree his record wasn't great at all at Mainz but you'd assume Southgate and Martinez will both get decent clubs once they go back into that scene and neither were any great shakes at that level previously.
The criteria will be around who is currently out of work and who would see us as a step up from where they currently are. That rules out a lot a good managers.
Farke is a really strange one. Unplayable in the championship and not too unlike Rodgers in the way his side play, but awful in the prem.
Farke is a really strange one. Unplayable in the championship and not too unlike Rodgers in the way his side play, but awful in the prem.
I suppose in his defence, regarding the prem, he always has his better players sold and never replaced.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.
No thanks.
Have you seen Denmark play recently, some of the best football played in europe at international football and they've handled loss of Eriksen with ease.
I agree his record wasn't great at all at Mainz but you'd assume Southgate and Martinez will both get decent clubs once they go back into that scene and neither were any great shakes at that level previously.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.
No thanks.
Have you seen Denmark play recently, some of the best football played in europe at international football and they've handled loss of Eriksen with ease.
I agree his record wasn't great at all at Mainz but you'd assume Southgate and Martinez will both get decent clubs once they go back into that scene and neither were any great shakes at that level previously.
I have. International football is different and you say so yourself. Southgate and Martinez are just further examples of how different it is.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.
No thanks.
Have you seen Denmark play recently, some of the best football played in europe at international football and they've handled loss of Eriksen with ease.
I agree his record wasn't great at all at Mainz but you'd assume Southgate and Martinez will both get decent clubs once they go back into that scene and neither were any great shakes at that level previously.
I have. International football is different and you say so yourself. Southgate and Martinez are just further examples of how different it is.
Dyche is a dinosaur, 4-4-fucking-2.
And Brighton haven't won in the last 6 either. I don't know who I want. Someone foreign and exciting who I know fuck all about.
We’ve been linked with Kasper Hjulmand He fits that Criteria
Surely he fails on the 'exciting' bit? One material appointment and he didn't even last the season.
No thanks.
Have you seen Denmark play recently, some of the best football played in europe at international football and they've handled loss of Eriksen with ease.
I agree his record wasn't great at all at Mainz but you'd assume Southgate and Martinez will both get decent clubs once they go back into that scene and neither were any great shakes at that level previously.
I have. International football is different and you say so yourself. Southgate and Martinez are just further examples of how different it is.
Both are abject failures. Southgate has had the 2 easiest draws an international competition will ever see and not seen the job through, while Martinez has wasted the most talented international squad in the world over the last ten years. Neither deserve a top club job.
Percy linking us to Gerrard and Hasenhuttl
Percy linking us to Gerrard and Hasenhuttl
Percy linking us to Gerrard and Hasenhuttl
A big no to Slippy G.
Hasenhuttl is a strange one, Saints fans were looking to get rid of him a few weeks back.
Percy linking us to Gerrard and Hasenhuttl
A big no to Slippy G.
Hasenhuttl is a strange one, Saints fans were looking to get rid of him a few weeks back.
We'd only ever be a stepping stone for Gerrard before he gets the Liverpool job.
No ta.
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.Probably,maybe, but I don’t think we should to be the guinea pig club to find out.
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.
Remember Houllier at Anfield, I reckon with him it’ll 10 times as bad.
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.
Remember Houllier at Anfield, I reckon with him it’ll 10 times as bad.
Percy linking us to Gerrard and Hasenhuttl
A big no to Slippy G.
Hasenhuttl is a strange one, Saints fans were looking to get rid of him a few weeks back.
We'd only ever be a stepping stone for Gerrard before he gets the Liverpool job.
No ta.
I admit I haven't read all through the thread but my choice would be Graham Potter of Brighton who seems to be in the Dean Smith mould. Unfortunately, I suspect we will end upwith some foreign chancer using us as a stepping stone to bigger things. Who knows..
The fact they're even thinking about Gerrard is a genuinely terrible sign.
He has not done wonders with Rangers, he's done alright in a league even more tactically behind than when it was being dominated by Alex McLeish. It would be a pathetic, star-struck celebrity appointment.
The fact they're even thinking about Gerrard is a genuinely terrible sign.
I admit I haven't read all through the thread but my choice would be Graham Potter of Brighton who seems to be in the Dean Smith mould. Unfortunately, I suspect we will end upwith some foreign chancer using us as a stepping stone to bigger things. Who knows..
You’d prefer an English chancer?
Personally, I would have no problem with Stevie G. Has done wonders with Rangers (although he has been helped with Celtic going backwards) and is a born winner. I think after managing Rangers for three years he is ready for the Premier League
Well, can safely say that's me told! 😅
Roy Hodgson is the stand out candidate to see us through until the summer. Safe pair of hands who will be respected by the players. Solid job at Crystal Palace and has a great CV
Roy Hodgson is the stand out candidate to see us through until the summer. Safe pair of hands who will be respected by the players. Solid job at Crystal Palace and has a great CV
Roy Hodgson is the stand out candidate to see us through until the summer. Safe pair of hands who will be respected by the players. Solid job at Crystal Palace and has a great CV
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.
Remember Houllier at Anfield, I reckon with him it’ll 10 times as bad.
Roy Hodgson is the stand out candidate to see us through until the summer. Safe pair of hands who will be respected by the players. Solid job at Crystal Palace and has a great CV
It might be a good idea if you tok some time away from here. About a hundeed years should be enough.
How's Mellberg doing in Sweden?
Hasenhuttl would be underwhelming for me. Not exactly brilliant with Southampton and a few really terrible beatings in there too. Not familiar enough with his time in Germany to state whether he has sufficient promise.
I think Nuno would be a decent shout. He built the best Wolves side since the 70s and they only stopped progressing when he lost Jota and then Jimenez. His teams are well organised and very good on the break, which would suit us I think. He was set up to fail at Spurs.
I don’t get the hate for Steven Gerrard. He’s done very well in Scotland. I don’t know if he’s yet ready for PL football, and personally I hope right now we aim much higher and established in Europe. But at some point he will get a chance at this level and I think he’ll do well.
Remember Houllier at Anfield, I reckon with him it’ll 10 times as bad.
Christophe Galtier for me still.
Hasenhuttl would be underwhelming for me. Not exactly brilliant with Southampton and a few really terrible beatings in there too. Not familiar enough with his time in Germany to state whether he has sufficient promise.
He finished 2nd with Leipzig (ahead of Dortmund) so did o.k there.
Have to be honest Ings looked way better at Southampton than he has for us so far so that would be another plus for me.
I think he's a good manager tbh but yes up and down form at Southampton is something you can't just dismiss. They have this season taken 3 wins and a draw from last 4 games and got draws off both Manchester clubs so in little danger of going down.
Probably means it's certain Ward Prowse will end up here next summer aswell.
He has not done wonders with Rangers, he's done alright in a league even more tactically behind than when it was being dominated by Alex McLeish. It would be a pathetic, star-struck celebrity appointment.
yep.
I think Nuno would be a decent shout. He built the best Wolves side since the 70s and they only stopped progressing when he lost Jota and then Jimenez. His teams are well organised and very good on the break, which would suit us I think. He was set up to fail at Spurs.
So a manager that does well until his main player gets injured then falls apart? Hmmm... what about that bloke Dean Smith?
I think Nuno would be a decent shout. He built the best Wolves side since the 70s and they only stopped progressing when he lost Jota and then Jimenez. His teams are well organised and very good on the break, which would suit us I think. He was set up to fail at Spurs.
So a manager that does well until his main player gets injured then falls apart? Hmmm... what about that bloke Dean Smith?
Jimenez was out for way longer last season, pretty sure he got injured around this time 12 months back.
Wouldn't be my first choice but with his managerial experience in last 5-6 years someone we shouldn't discount if they're interested in the job.
Nuno Espirito Santo would be above Frank Terrard but still a fairly bland appointment imo.
Let's get someone amazing, for once, please.
Gerrard beats up DJs for not playing Phil Collins….Phil Collins!
If it was Dick Dale and The Deltones, yes.
But Phil Collins.
A No from me.
Personally I think we should get someone in for 7months because none of names at the moment inspire me to throw 3 year contracts at them. In May we'd be in a much better position to persuade a good candidate to come (providing we stay up)
Personally I think we should get someone in for 7months because none of names at the moment inspire me to throw 3 year contracts at them. In May we'd be in a much better position to persuade a good candidate to come (providing we stay up)
Personally I think we should get someone in for 7months because none of names at the moment inspire me to throw 3 year contracts at them. In May we'd be in a much better position to persuade a good candidate to come (providing we stay up)
I don't see the point of that tbh. We get in Hodgson for 6 months who's more than capable of getting us up to 11th or 12th and then have to start process all again in the summer.
At least now a new manager has six months to properly assess squad rather than have to do it in the summer.
Christophe Galtier for me still.
A sensible suggestion at last. Well done.
Christophe Galtier for me still.
A sensible suggestion at last. Well done.
His poor English may be the stumbling block. Who do we know who's fluent in both French and English? Where's James Toner when you need him.
The bookies have Gerrard as favourite but I still think the job will go to the second favourite Kasper Hjulmand.
Let's hope we have more luck by bringing in a national team coach than we did with Jozef Venglos.
Favre, Fonseca, Potter.
Gerrard would do well, he's not stupid and I think will be a decent manager in the prem, but the Liverpool shit would get tiresome.
Just looked up Fonsecas record and it's pretty good.
I think everyone in Spain and Portugal has to have a release clause, don't they? Doesn't mean that's what they'd really expect us to pay.
I'd love Rúben Amorim, the Sporting Coach but despite the wealth of our owners, our league position would play against us. Oh and he's got a £25m release clause.
I'd love Rúben Amorim, the Sporting Coach but despite the wealth of our owners, our league position would play against us. Oh and he's got a £25m release clause.
We spent more on Scott F Hogan. Spending on a top manager shouldn’t be any different than on a top player. And certainly a better investment than we’ve made on several less than top players in our past.
I'd love Rúben Amorim, the Sporting Coach but despite the wealth of our owners, our league position would play against us. Oh and he's got a £25m release clause.
We spent more on Scott F Hogan. Spending on a top manager shouldn’t be any different than on a top player. And certainly a better investment than we’ve made on several less than top players in our past.
I think Nuno would be a decent shout. He built the best Wolves side since the 70s and they only stopped progressing when he lost Jota and then Jimenez. His teams are well organised and very good on the break, which would suit us I think. He was set up to fail at Spurs.God, no thanks.
We could do a lot worse than Favre, I think. Especially if he could reproduce the job he did for Moenchengladbach.
I thought Favre was the guy who always had a big clock. Then I realised I was confusing him with Flava Flav. ;D
Would take Flava Flav ahead of Stevie G.
Because there isn’t an outstanding candidate, I would give one of the unemployed managers a deal to the end of the season, (we’d have an option for another year). They get a “massive” bonus if they keep us up. All parties should win and be sufficiently motivated.
So take your pick from Nuno/Koeman/Fonseca/Farke
I just feel we will get a better manager in the summer.
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
Don’t want
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Just want someone to play attacking football and get you excited.Don’t want
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Very good list of Noes, Tony. All for different reasons, but I don't think any of them are what we look like we need.
Don’t wantAny of these and Purslows righting his own P45
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Very good list of Noes, Tony. All for different reasons, but I don't think any of them are what we look like we need.
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Probably Kevin McDonald somehow
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Glenn Roeder.
Genuine question. Is Potter a villa fan?
Genuine question. Is Potter a villa fan?
Shakespeare’s gone? I’m hoping the reason Nanny MacPhee and the other one hasn’t yet is because Purslow didn’t realise they actually worked there.Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Probably Kevin McDonald somehow
Ha ha!
I’m surprised Dwight Yorke hasn’t put himself forward yet.
Do we add Potter to the list?Don’t want
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Very good list of Noes, Tony. All for different reasons, but I don't think any of them are what we look like we need.
Do we add Potter to the list?Don’t want
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Very good list of Noes, Tony. All for different reasons, but I don't think any of them are what we look like we need.
As long as the new guy can make decisions in the first half if things are obviously not working and subs before the 65th minute (if needed)?Or buy a DCM and pick the right formation to start with.
If it’s a gamble I recommend the Cov manager.Do we add Potter to the list?Don’t want
Dyche
Gerrard
Lampard
Nuno.
Very good list of Noes, Tony. All for different reasons, but I don't think any of them are what we look like we need.
I think Potter's got something, and it would be interesting to see how he does as a step-up. Gamble, but then we're not appointing a dead-cert any time soon.
Has the rest of the coaches been fired too?
Just Shakespeare so far
So who is our actual manager at the moment?
Glenn Roeder.
Haha. Cue internet meltdown in 3,2,1…
It's going to be Lang pushing for Kasper Hjulmand isn't it? And I just can't see wtf he's done to be anywhere near the reckoning.
I'd be up for Fonseca or Koeman now, without the need to offer them a caveat of "you've only got until summer". If they come in and do really well, say finish top seven or eight or even, stop laughing at the back, win the cup, why would you not want to keep them on?
If they barely avoid relegation, pay them off and get someone better in the summer.
Latest odds
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/aston-villa/next-permanent-manager
I think we need something specific. We've been left behind tactically for two decades now, and it's time to change that. We need someone to modernise us, to get us playing on the front foot, pressing and attacking with conviction and organisation.
Gerrard - wants the Liverpool job in 3 years time. If it’s him then he will have fire in belly to ensure it’s successful or it ultimately will cost him his dream job down the line
Ralf H - experienced and could go on a gear with better ownership backing
Personally I think it’s between those 2
Bruce would never happen, obviously. But imagine the meltdown? It would be biblicalI think we need something specific. We've been left behind tactically for two decades now, and it's time to change that. We need someone to modernise us, to get us playing on the front foot, pressing and attacking with conviction and organisation.
I think we specifically don't need Lampard, Gerrard or, even more specifically, Terry. After that I have no idea. Maybe Steve Bruce?
I think we need something specific. We've been left behind tactically for two decades now, and it's time to change that. We need someone to modernise us, to get us playing on the front foot, pressing and attacking with conviction and organisation.
I think we specifically don't need Lampard, Gerrard or, even more specifically, Terry. After that I have no idea. Maybe Steve Bruce?
Gerrard - wants the Liverpool job in 3 years time. If it’s him then he will have fire in belly to ensure it’s successful or it ultimately will cost him his dream job down the line
Ralf H - experienced and could go on a gear with better ownership backing
Personally I think it’s between those 2
I don't know. Colin is at 50 so worth a £1.Latest odds
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/aston-villa/next-permanent-manager
That's a hugely disappointing list.
Gerrard - wants the Liverpool job in 3 years time. If it’s him then he will have fire in belly to ensure it’s successful or it ultimately will cost him his dream job down the lineFucking hell.
Ralf H - experienced and could go on a gear with better ownership backing
Personally I think it’s between those 2
I think we need something specific. We've been left behind tactically for two decades now, and it's time to change that. We need someone to modernise us, to get us playing on the front foot, pressing and attacking with conviction and organisation.
I think we specifically don't need Lampard, Gerrard or, even more specifically, Terry. After that I have no idea. Maybe Steve Bruce?
As I was saying, just appointing someone based on their famous fecking name would be monumentally small-time.
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Wot he said.Gerrard - wants the Liverpool job in 3 years time. If it’s him then he will have fire in belly to ensure it’s successful or it ultimately will cost him his dream job down the line
Ralf H - experienced and could go on a gear with better ownership backing
Personally I think it’s between those 2
Jesus fucking Christ. Sack Purslow if those are the best he can come up with.
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Isn't Isabella Fonseca the name of Martin Amis's wife?
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Isn't Isabella Fonseca the name of Martin Amis's wife?
Kind of. Isabel, I think.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Let's just wait and see. I'd convinced myself that they were going to stick with Smith this morning, so let's just see what happens.
Because there isn’t an outstanding candidate, I would give one of the unemployed managers a deal to the end of the season, (we’d have an option for another year). They get a “massive” bonus if they keep us up. All parties should win and be sufficiently motivated.
So take your pick from Nuno/Koeman/Fonseca/Farke
I just feel we will get a better manager in the summer.
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Which airline? And what biscuits do you want with this bong?
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Isn't Isabella Fonseca the name of Martin Amis's wife?
Kind of. Isabel, I think.
Ah, yes that's the one. Would still have her over Gerrard in the dugout, nevermind her namesake Paulo.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Surely a manager that suits himself is one that will bring success to Villa? Ultimately that’s his job.
I don’t think he will consider anyone outside of his narrow little orbit
But like Rizzo says we’ll have to wait and see
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Isn't Isabella Fonseca the name of Martin Amis's wife?
Kind of. Isabel, I think.
Ah, yes that's the one. Would still have her over Gerrard in the dugout, nevermind her namesake Paulo.
You don’t get this sort of cerebral, highbrow stuff on Small Heath Alliance.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Surely a manager that suits himself is one that will bring success to Villa? Ultimately that’s his job.
I don’t think he will consider anyone outside of his narrow little orbit
But like Rizzo says we’ll have to wait and see
What about Erik Ten Hag of Ajax? He's supposed to be going to Man Utd though, but it's the sort of the "under the radar" thing our owners would do, to get hold of him.
Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
VT and Eastie convinced its going to be Stevie G
Welcome, Paulo Fonseca.
Paulo's away in Mauritius with Isabella and their three little ones on a mini-break. He gets back to Lisbon at 15.35 on Wednesday.
Isn't Isabella Fonseca the name of Martin Amis's wife?
Kind of. Isabel, I think.
Ah, yes that's the one. Would still have her over Gerrard in the dugout, nevermind her namesake Paulo.
You don’t get this sort of cerebral, highbrow stuff on Small Heath Alliance.
Nothing highbrow about it, mate. She's merely the Uruguayan Karren Brady.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Surely a manager that suits himself is one that will bring success to Villa? Ultimately that’s his job.
I don’t think he will consider anyone outside of his narrow little orbit
But like Rizzo says we’ll have to wait and see
I worry he's a starfucker and we'll end up with fucking Gerrard.
Shit that’s depressing how small time the world see us not really sure that any of them will take us further forwardI don't know. Colin is at 50 so worth a £1.Latest odds
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/aston-villa/next-permanent-manager
That's a hugely disappointing list.
What about Erik Ten Hag of Ajax? He's supposed to be going to Man Utd though, but it's the sort of the "under the radar" thing our owners would do, to get hold of him.
Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Heard something?!
The fact that Shakespeare has gone means that they are pretty close to an appointment.Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Heard something?!
Genuine question. Is Potter a villa fan?
Supposedly
The fact that Shakespeare has gone means that they are pretty close to an appointment.Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Heard something?!
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Surely a manager that suits himself is one that will bring success to Villa? Ultimately that’s his job.
I don’t think he will consider anyone outside of his narrow little orbit
But like Rizzo says we’ll have to wait and see
I worry he's a starfucker and we'll end up with fucking Gerrard.
Bruce would never happen, obviously. But imagine the meltdown? It would be biblicalI think we need something specific. We've been left behind tactically for two decades now, and it's time to change that. We need someone to modernise us, to get us playing on the front foot, pressing and attacking with conviction and organisation.
I think we specifically don't need Lampard, Gerrard or, even more specifically, Terry. After that I have no idea. Maybe Steve Bruce?
My wishlist...
1. Favre
2. Fonseca
3. Rodgers
4. Koeman
Has Dwight Yorke thrown his hat in the ring yet ?
I don’t think he will consider anyone outside of his narrow little orbit
But like Rizzo says we’ll have to wait and see
I dunno John. He's appointed two foreigners to the DoF position, and has gone big on modern types of coaches (with 'mixed' results admittedly). The appointment will show the way the owners and Purslow are thinking though, long term.
Personally, I would have no problem with Stevie G. Has done wonders with Rangers (although he has been helped with Celtic going backwards) and is a born winner. I think after managing Rangers for three years he is ready for the Premier League
He is no more a "born winner" than Bruce, Di Matteo, McLeish or any of the other people we have appointed who had successful playing careers. Being a good player is no guarantee of being a good manager.
He hasn't "worked wonders" at "Rangers". He has spent (by Scottish standards) a fortune and won one out of three league titles, zero cups and zero league cups. The St Johnstone manager has won more in one season and nobody would be suggesting him as a viable candidate.
Appointing Gerrard would be fanwankery of the most servile kind.
Apologies that I keep making this same point and probably will do in the coming days but I really, really don't want that prick as Villa manager.
Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
I’ve said previously I don’t trust Purslow I think he’ll make an easy lazy appointment That suits himself
Looks like we’re gonna find out sooner than I thought If my fears are founded
Personally, I would have no problem with Stevie G. Has done wonders with Rangers (although he has been helped with Celtic going backwards) and is a born winner. I think after managing Rangers for three years he is ready for the Premier League
He is no more a "born winner" than Bruce, Di Matteo, McLeish or any of the other people we have appointed who had successful playing careers. Being a good player is no guarantee of being a good manager.
He hasn't "worked wonders" at "Rangers". He has spent (by Scottish standards) a fortune and won one out of three league titles, zero cups and zero league cups. The St Johnstone manager has won more in one season and nobody would be suggesting him as a viable candidate.
Appointing Gerrard would be fanwankery of the most servile kind.
Apologies that I keep making this same point and probably will do in the coming days but I really, really don't want that prick as Villa manager.
100% my position also.
What is Sven up to these days?
Genuine question…why is there such negativity towards Nuno? When he was Wolves manager, I couldn’t bring myself to dislike him as he always came over well and though he had them playing good football (not that I watched them much at all). Would he really be that bad an option?
Genuine question…why is there such negativity towards Nuno? When he was Wolves manager, I couldn’t bring myself to dislike him as he always came over well and though he had them playing good football (not that I watched them much at all). Would he really be that bad an option?
Wonder if Unai Emery’s excuse for not going to Newcastle was true.
Pure speculation - Matt law says appointment imminent on the basis that Shakespeare has gone.Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Where did you get that info from mate
Genuine question…why is there such negativity towards Nuno? When he was Wolves manager, I couldn’t bring myself to dislike him as he always came over well and though he had them playing good football (not that I watched them much at all). Would he really be that bad an option?
Three words K, 'five', 'three' and 'two'.
Don't know. It might be because I liked Smith so much but not one realistic name mentioned so far has made me feel any kind of excitement.
Pure speculation - Matt law says appointment imminent on the basis that Shakespeare has gone.Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Where did you get that info from mate
Genuine question…why is there such negativity towards Nuno? When he was Wolves manager, I couldn’t bring myself to dislike him as he always came over well and though he had them playing good football (not that I watched them much at all). Would he really be that bad an option?
Three words K, 'five', 'three' and 'two'.
Holy fucking shit. I didn't even know that. Just say NuNO!
Pure speculation - Matt law says appointment imminent on the basis that Shakespeare has gone.Expecting an announcement tomorrow.
Where did you get that info from mate
Looking at how the team spirit imploded - I think the team knew the owners have been on the hunt since the West Ham game.I had a gut instinct the players knew Deano was gone already on Friday, despite us playing better in the second half, for what it's worth, and posted this in another thread.
So a new appointment could be tomorrow as they have had a week.
I reckon they will go for Terry and Lampard.
There's strong rumours it's Kasper Hjulmand who I know next to nowt about.His CV is deeply meh!
I reckon they will go for Terry and Lampard.
Nobody ever goes for co-managers and neither would agree to be an assistant manager (Terry just left because he didn't want to be an assistant manager any more). So that won't happen.
If it did happen, though, would bookies pay out on both or neither?
There's strong rumours it's Kasper Hjulmand who I know next to nowt about.
I reckon they will go for Terry and Lampard.
Nobody ever goes for co-managers and neither would agree to be an assistant manager (Terry just left because he didn't want to be an assistant manager any more). So that won't happen.
If it did happen, though, would bookies pay out on both or neither?
Who were the last co-managers, Houllier and Evans? An utter disaster.
Didn't Venables come in and do something similar with Robson at Boro? That didn't work out too well either.I reckon they will go for Terry and Lampard.
Nobody ever goes for co-managers and neither would agree to be an assistant manager (Terry just left because he didn't want to be an assistant manager any more). So that won't happen.
If it did happen, though, would bookies pay out on both or neither?
Who were the last co-managers, Houllier and Evans? An utter disaster.
Looking at how the team spirit imploded - I think the team knew the owners have been on the hunt since the West Ham game.I had a gut instinct the players knew Deano was gone already on Friday, despite us playing better in the second half, for what it's worth, and posted this in another thread.
So a new appointment could be tomorrow as they have had a week.
Diego Simone for me!!
Diego Simone for me!!
Good historical reference there! ;) Life certainly wouldn't be dull with Simone!Diego Simone for me!!
Now you're talking.
Purslow out, Agrippa in! Gerrard probably supported Mark Antony, the daft twat.
Diego Simone for me!!
He’d be in the top 1 if it was cage fighting
If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
Doubt if Jim White will on Talksport! 🤮If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
I will choose to refrain from it Ian!
Sky Sports understands that there’s no one lined up to take the job.
West Ham 3 Liverpool 1.
Why the hell are Ralph Hassenhuttl's odds so low?
Doubt if Jim White will on Talksport! 🤮If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
I will choose to refrain from it Ian!
There has to be a reason so many are putting so much on him for his odds to tumble so much though. Maybe it is just that mention in the Telegraph. Don't get me wrong though, I don't think he'll be appointed in a million years.Why the hell are Ralph Hassenhuttl's odds so low?
Because people are putting money on him and risk management software at the bookies is adjusting his price accordingly
Sky Sports understands that there’s no one lined up to take the job.
Here we go. I’m sure we will have to go through the usual “in the know” and “my sources tell me” nonsense from idiots on Talksport, SKY and in the media over the coming days.
Sky Sports understands that there’s no one lined up to take the job.
Here we go. I’m sure we will have to go through the usual “in the know” and “my sources tell me” nonsense from idiots on Talksport, SKY and in the media over the coming days.
Gerrard - wants the Liverpool job in 3 years time. If it’s him then he will have fire in belly to ensure it’s successful or it ultimately will cost him his dream job down the line
Ralf H - experienced and could go on a gear with better ownership backing
Personally I think it’s between those 2
Well Vinnie, I hope you're not basing that on inside info because fuck me that's uninspiring. Would prefer Hasenhuttl because for God's sake can we just appoint someone for the job of coach based on them being a coach? If his name wasn't Steven Gerrard no way we'd be looking at the Rangers manager. No way.
Sky Sports understands that there’s no one lined up to take the job.
Here we go. I’m sure we will have to go through the usual “in the know” and “my sources tell me” nonsense from idiots on Talksport, SKY and in the media over the coming days.
If it's true that we have nobody lined up then it's negligent by Purslow et al.
Sky Sports understands that there’s no one lined up to take the job.
Here we go. I’m sure we will have to go through the usual “in the know” and “my sources tell me” nonsense from idiots on Talksport, SKY and in the media over the coming days.
If it's true that we have nobody lined up then it's negligent by Purslow et al.
Hold on. Why would you jump to any conclusions based on what Sky knows or as has been proven a million times what they don’t know?
If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
Gerrard probably supported Mark Antony, the daft twat.
If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
We'll just call him Phil Collins instead.
If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
We'll just call him Phil Collins instead.
There has to be a reason so many are putting so much on him for his odds to tumble so much though. Maybe it is just that mention in the Telegraph. Don't get me wrong though, I don't think he'll be appointed in a million years.Why the hell are Ralph Hassenhuttl's odds so low?
Because people are putting money on him and risk management software at the bookies is adjusting his price accordingly
If it’s Gerrard, can we please remain from calling him Stevie G.
We'll just call him Phil Collins instead.
I can't imagine Stevie G singing about "Another Day in Paradise".
I like what Graham Potter is doing at Brighton. He's also a villa fan.
Susodio.
Susodio.
First job would be for him to try to get Kalinic out on a permanent deal. Might not be easy though, You Can't Hurry Lovre.
Susodio.
First job would be for him to try to get Kalinic out on a permanent deal. Might not be easy though, You Can't Hurry Lovre.
Good historical reference there! ;) Life certainly wouldn't be dull with Simone!Nina??
Another dayAndy Gray in Tannadice
I don't reckon taking another Premier League manager would look small time.The Internet is awash with idiotswho don't realise that Brighton/Southampton to Villa is a step up.
Potter would be the best appointment for the evolution of where we are in my opinion, I just don't think we can get him. Although, the top 4-6 are not changing soon so it might be worth throwing the sink at it to get him before he kicks on, I think he's at least a Rodgers level manager.
Why the hell are Ralph Hassenhuttl's odds so low?
It’s all very exciting though like Christmas Eve in the 70s
Don’t know whether we’ll wake up to Adidas Santiago or Woolworths own brand football boots
It’s all very exciting though like Christmas Eve in the 70s
Don’t know whether we’ll wake up to Adidas Santiago or Woolworths own brand football boots
I asked for a Raleigh Grifter and got a Halfords own brand copy of a Chopper. Hopefully the new manager will be less disappointing.
Joachim Lowe 25/1
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
Joachim Lowe 25/1
Getting him would be a massive coup.
Joachim Low 25/1
he wouldn't want to sniff mineJoachim Low 25/1
For the finger sniffing alone it would be entertaining
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
Joachim Lowe 25/1
Getting him would be a massive coup.
Hope not, as that would mean it was 2006 and I wouldn't be of legal drinking age - and then how would I get through all this?
What about AVB?
Joachim Lowe 25/1
Getting him would be a massive coup.
Hope not, as that would mean it was 2006 and I wouldn't be of legal drinking age - and then how would I get through all this?
Bloody hell, Monty, I had you down as 70+ fella. ;)
Joachim Low 25/1
Wasn't we linked with Thierry Henry before?Summer before Bruce was sacked
Nah.Joachim Lowe 25/1
Getting him would be a massive coup.
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I hope you're right. But if they appoint Gerrard, Lampard or Terry, it will show that they have less of a clue than us. Or, indeed, than any six year old who has ever read "Shoot!" magazine.
They should be looking to appoint someone who makes the world sit up and take notice, not Sherwood mark II.
Nah.Joachim Lowe 25/1
Getting him would be a massive coup.
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
Joachim Low 25/1
Any odds on Diego Martinez?Who?
Terry would be nuts as he's untested. Lampard did pretty well at Derby and not too bad at Chelsea. Whatever your analysis of Scottish football Gerrard has done as well as he possibly can there.
I honestly don't want Gerrard, but we've no idea if he will be as shit as everyone suggests. There's a reasonable chance he would be pretty decent. I don't like the idea of the scouse love in but I think I'd prefer him to, for example, the Danish fella who doesn't seem to have done anything.
Joint managers Diego Simeone and Robert Martinez😉Any odds on Diego Martinez?Who?
Any odds on Diego Martinez?
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I admire your confidence
I still think they’ll blow it And will end up with Mr uninspiring
Ex Granada coach.Any odds on Diego Martinez?
He’s 16/1 on skybet but I've never heard of him.
Any odds on Diego Martinez?
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I admire your confidence
I still think they’ll blow it And will end up with Mr uninspiring
Based on what? Your own gut feeling?
Ex Granada coach.Any odds on Diego Martinez?
He’s 16/1 on skybet but I've never heard of him.
Ex Granada coach.Any odds on Diego Martinez?
He’s 16/1 on skybet but I've never heard of him.
Sound. And what about the coach from Radio Rentals or Rumbelows?
Ex Granada coach.Any odds on Diego Martinez?
He’s 16/1 on skybet but I've never heard of him.
I think a lot of us are feeling a bit deflated about this now. It feels like the end of another false dawn - hopefully its notThis is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I admire your confidence
I still think they’ll blow it And will end up with Mr uninspiring
Based on what? Your own gut feeling?
Yep sorry to be so negative
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I admire your confidence
I still think they’ll blow it And will end up with Mr uninspiring
Any odds on Diego Martinez?
He’s 16/1 on skybet but I've never heard of him.
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I hope you're right. But if they appoint Gerrard, Lampard or Terry, it will show that they have less of a clue than us. Or, indeed, than any six year old who has ever read "Shoot!" magazine.
They should be looking to appoint someone who makes the world sit up and take notice, not Sherwood mark II.
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I hope you're right. But if they appoint Gerrard, Lampard or Terry, it will show that they have less of a clue than us. Or, indeed, than any six year old who has ever read "Shoot!" magazine.
They should be looking to appoint someone who makes the world sit up and take notice, not Sherwood mark II.
Easy to dismiss suggestions. Who then?
Any odds on Diego Martinez?
That's just a randomly generated Spanish manager name. Does he wear a black turtleneck, and did he once manage Valencia three times in one season?
Cant believe people are turning their noses at low. He would be a unbelievable coup. One of the best German national sides in numerous years. Made them absolute beasts defensively and organised. Hard working and a huge name.This is the internet, everyone knows better :)
A manager like low can attract superstars to the club. I doubt we could attract him but if he was interested he is definitely someone we should look at.
Sky will milk it being open until there is a man appointed, simply to drive skybet.
Cant believe people are turning their noses at low. He would be a unbelievable coup. One of the best German national sides in numerous years. Made them absolute beasts defensively and organised. Hard working and a huge name.Your reasoning is years out of date.
A manager like low can attract superstars to the club. I doubt we could attract him but if he was interested he is definitely someone we should look at.
One of four Germans to win a World Cup. The only German ever to be knocked out in the Group Stage. Busted flush. Better than The Three Bellends, obviously, but that's about it.
We're more likely to get John Lowe than Joachim low.
One of four Germans to win a World Cup. The only German ever to be knocked out in the Group Stage. Busted flush. Better than The Three Bellends, obviously, but that's about it.
It's a no from me too.
Also as CDBWF pointed out earlier the Danish manager's record at club level is nothing to write home about so to me that would be a massive gamble.
Cant believe people are turning their noses at low. He would be a unbelievable coup. One of the best German national sides in numerous years. Made them absolute beasts defensively and organised. Hard working and a huge name.He won't be interested - he makes loadsa money as a German porn star.
A manager like low can attract superstars to the club. I doubt we could attract him but if he was interested he is definitely someone we should look at.
It’s all very exciting though like Christmas Eve in the 70s
Don’t know whether we’ll wake up to Adidas Santiago or Woolworths own brand football boots
I asked for a Raleigh Grifter and got a Halfords own brand copy of a Chopper. Hopefully the new manager will be less disappointing.
It’s all very exciting though like Christmas Eve in the 70s
Don’t know whether we’ll wake up to Adidas Santiago or Woolworths own brand football boots
I asked for a Raleigh Grifter and got a Halfords own brand copy of a Chopper. Hopefully the new manager will be less disappointing.
You never really get over it do ya
Cant believe people are turning their noses at low. He would be a unbelievable coup. One of the best German national sides in numerous years. Made them absolute beasts defensively and organised. Hard working and a huge name.He won't be interested - he makes loadsa money as a German porn star.
A manager like low can attract superstars to the club. I doubt we could attract him but if he was interested he is definitely someone we should look at.
Gerrard odds shrinking
This is what makes me laugh about the new manager debate, so many are saying ‘x’ would be a disaster but ‘y’ would be brilliant. We have zero clue. A name, a former player, foreign, British, a current top manager (within reason of who we could realistically get) doesn’t automatically = success
NSWE/Purslow got the right man the last time around so until they show me they can’t make good decisions then I’m backing them to choose the right man for us again now
I hope you're right. But if they appoint Gerrard, Lampard or Terry, it will show that they have less of a clue than us. Or, indeed, than any six year old who has ever read "Shoot!" magazine.
They should be looking to appoint someone who makes the world sit up and take notice, not Sherwood mark II.
Also as CDBWF pointed out earlier the Danish manager's record at club level is nothing to write home about so to me that would be a massive gamble.
Did I? I don't remember that.
That doesn't mean anything other than people are betting on him.
Any odds on Diego Martinez?
That's just a randomly generated Spanish manager name. Does he wear a black turtleneck, and did he once manage Valencia three times in one season?
Oh Monty! He's the Coach being lined up to replace Bielsa at the end of the season. The Chosen One. He's learning English and spending this season studying the PL.
I just think Gerrard would be Houllier MK2 with greater fawning of the red bit of Merseyside.
At least Gerrard has some experience of managing a big football team, even if it is only in the duopoly of Scottish football.
i doubt it was Dean who appointed " our long-haired Pulis-ball genius."Mancini won't come. He lobbied hard to get the Italy job. It's his dream job and he took it with the stated aim of winning the World Cup. No way would he walk out on them now.
which is probably why he has not been bulleted
i hope Deans replacement is a bit more inspired
No to Gerrard, Lampard. Martinez, Southgate . Maybe Woy till end of season until the Big one is available
However, Mancini for me, but would any successful international manager give up the chance of going to the world cup with their team ?
At least Gerrard has some experience of managing a big football team, even if it is only in the duopoly of Scottish football.
Yeah I get that, but then again, McLeish.
At least Gerrard has some experience of managing a big football team, even if it is only in the duopoly of Scottish football.
Yeah I get that, but then again, McLeish.
Out of interest what would people have said if we'd appointed Patrick Vieria in the summer if we'd made the managerial change earlier?
That's probably closest appointment in prem similar to if we get Gerrard in given his status as a player, managing in MLS which is worse than SPL and his record in a big league at Nice was indifferent.
Yet currently I'd say Palace are one of most exciting teams to watch in premier league and they've done that significantly reducing age of their first 11 doing it. Could've easily had another 4-5 points on the board and could comfortably beat us in a few weeks.
That's example of giving untested prem manager a go (as he wasn't even their first choice) but they made some really intelligent signings, have a core of experience and capable prem players and so it's a good fit for where he is in his managerial career.
Our squad is average in some areas but there are some really good players in it aswell so just think we need some new direction on a daily basis and eventually we'll see it again on matchday.
Out of interest what would people have said if we'd appointed Patrick Vieria in the summer if we'd made the managerial change earlier?
That's probably closest appointment in prem similar to if we get Gerrard in given his status as a player, managing in MLS which is worse than SPL and his record in a big league at Nice was indifferent.
Yet currently I'd say Palace are one of most exciting teams to watch in premier league and they've done that significantly reducing age of their first 11 doing it. Could've easily had another 4-5 points on the board and could comfortably beat us in a few weeks.
That's example of giving untested prem manager a go (as he wasn't even their first choice) but they made some really intelligent signings, have a core of experience and capable prem players and so it's a good fit for where he is in his managerial career.
Our squad is average in some areas but there are some really good players in it aswell so just think we need some new direction on a daily basis and eventually we'll see it again on matchday.
Out of interest what would people have said if we'd appointed Patrick Vieria in the summer if we'd made the managerial change earlier?
That's probably closest appointment in prem similar to if we get Gerrard in given his status as a player, managing in MLS which is worse than SPL and his record in a big league at Nice was indifferent.
Yet currently I'd say Palace are one of most exciting teams to watch in premier league and they've done that significantly reducing age of their first 11 doing it. Could've easily had another 4-5 points on the board and could comfortably beat us in a few weeks.
That's example of giving untested prem manager a go (as he wasn't even their first choice) but they made some really intelligent signings, have a core of experience and capable prem players and so it's a good fit for where he is in his managerial career.
Our squad is average in some areas but there are some really good players in it aswell so just think we need some new direction on a daily basis and eventually we'll see it again on matchday.
Its more the dislike of gerrard, rather than his limited experience, i have a problem with.
Rodgers did well up there and has continued it with Leicester. I'll mention the other manager through gritted teeth if you make me!Yes but...Rodgers had done very well at Swansea and Liverpool before going up there. That experience has helped him more than SPL stint at Leicester IMO.
Its more the dislike of gerrard, rather than his limited experience, i have a problem with.
One thing I would say for Gerrard is that plenty of players would want to play and learn off him. For any young midfielder he would be a wet dream.
Cant believe people are turning their noses at low. He would be a unbelievable coup. One of the best German national sides in numerous years. Made them absolute beasts defensively and organised. Hard working and a huge name.Your reasoning is years out of date.
A manager like low can attract superstars to the club. I doubt we could attract him but if he was interested he is definitely someone we should look at.
No only Djemba did. Djemba is selling timeshares in La Palma. Property is hot there currently.I reckon they will go for Terry and Lampard.
Nobody ever goes for co-managers and neither would agree to be an assistant manager (Terry just left because he didn't want to be an assistant manager any more). So that won't happen.
If it did happen, though, would bookies pay out on both or neither?
Who were the last co-managers, Houllier and Evans? An utter disaster.
Did Djemba and Djemba ever go into management?
One thing I would say for Gerrard is that plenty of players would want to play and learn off him. For any young midfielder he would be a wet dream.
Yes, just like all those forwards learned off Diego Maradona during his incredibly successful managerial career.
You are coming out with exactly the kind of fanwank that I'm terrified we will have to put up with if we appoint the diving, DJ-beating wanker.
Its more the dislike of gerrard, rather than his limited experience, i have a problem with.
A lot of people (I’m staring at Dave Woodhall here) disliked John Terry before he came and he couldn’t have conducted himself better. Absolutely first class the minute he walked in to the minute he left
Its more the dislike of gerrard, rather than his limited experience, i have a problem with.
A lot of people (I’m staring at Dave Woodhall here) disliked John Terry before he came and he couldn’t have conducted himself better. Absolutely first class the minute he walked in to the minute he left
What does Percy say?Gerrard
What does Percy say?Gerrard
I apologise in advance for shouting. NO LAMPARD AND NO FUCKING TERRY!
Thanks. That's very worrying.What does Percy say?Gerrard
What does Percy say?Gerrard
Or Hasenhuttl.
I apologise in advance for shouting. NO LAMPARD AND NO FUCKING TERRY!
What does Percy say?Gerrard
Or Hasenhuttl.
Wonder who we will lose 9-0 to?
What formation does Gerrard play at Rangers?
What formation does Gerrard play at Rangers?I’ve read 4-3-3 today but still with emphasis on his 2 fullbacks bombing forward , which he has them doing to great effect
We're supposed to be after a manager nailed on better than Smith. Gerrard would be Billy Mcneil replacing Turner all over again.Jesus wept...
It's basically just a rehash of the nonsensical good player = good manager argument, with added Liverpool fawning.
It's basically just a rehash of the nonsensical good player = good manager argument, with added Liverpool fawning.
Ignoring the fact I think he's a massive tw*t, I could understand it if Gerrard had his team playing attractive football and it was only a question of time before he stepped in at a PL club but from the limited amount I've seen of Rangers, they're very much huff and puff. The other thing is how much coaching does he actually do and would he plan to bring Gary Mac with him.
I think he's more Pullis than Rodgers.
Thanks. That's very worrying.What does Percy say?Gerrard
Gerrard is managing in the equivalent of mid-table Championship level. He's also in a two horse race with a broken Celtic and has only been in the Scottish Prem for what, two seasons? It would be a massive gamble by Purslow and Villa to take him. Other than a bit of European experience, Gerrard is in no way ready to come to the Premier Division in England. Surely, Christian Purslow isn't that daft and NSWE would want a more experienced man in charge.
Hopefully Gerrard will stay at Rangers. His work's not finished up there. Carry on breaking the hater's hearts Stevie G! ;D
I would much rather have someone with premier league experience as a manager. We’re in a tailspin at the moment and bringing someone in who has to find their feet in this league may well make it harder to turn things around.
We absolutely need a new manager bounce.
We're supposed to be after a manager nailed on better than Smith. Gerrard would be Billy Mcneil replacing Turner all over again.I find that insulting to Dean. Dean is much much better than Turner ever was.
We're supposed to be after a manager nailed on better than Smith. Gerrard would be Billy Mcneil replacing Turner all over again.I find that insulting to Dean. Dean is much much better than Turner ever was.
We're supposed to be after a manager nailed on better than Smith. Gerrard would be Billy Mcneil replacing Turner all over again.I find that insulting to Dean. Dean is much much better than Turner ever was.
Yes, Vieira appears to be doing well for Palace, but an appointment like that is like buying a lottery ticket rather than a pension policy. We're above all that.
What does Percy say?Gerrard
Or Hasenhuttl.
Wonder who we will lose 9-0 to?
What formation does Gerrard play at Rangers?
We're supposed to be after a manager nailed on better than Smith. Gerrard would be Billy Mcneil replacing Turner all over again.I find that insulting to Dean. Dean is much much better than Turner ever was.
Gerrard is managing in the equivalent of mid-table Championship level. He's also in a two horse race with a broken Celtic and has only been in the Scottish Prem for what, two seasons? It would be a massive gamble by Purslow and Villa to take him. Other than a bit of European experience, Gerrard is in no way ready to come to the Premier Division in England. Surely, Christian Purslow isn't that daft and NSWE would want a more experienced man in charge.
Loads of owners/CEOs are seduced by big name players. NSWE originally wanted Henry and that would've been a disaster.
Reminds me of years back when Boro got in Bryan Robson. Was a buzz about them for a few years signing Ravanelli and Juninho and getting to those cup finals but all fizzled out in the end and he didn't do much elsewhere as a manager, was apparently too soft from what I read in one of Paul Merson's books compared to likes of Wenger.
What does Percy say?Gerrard
Or Hasenhuttl.
Wonder who we will lose 9-0 to?
Southampton
Yes, Vieira appears to be doing well for Palace, but an appointment like that is like buying a lottery ticket rather than a pension policy. We're above all that.
It’s all a lottery, you can appoint someone with an unsurpassed CV and it just might not happen for a variety of reasons.
If we’re going for a proven manager but with plenty of big game experience, brings through youth, tactically astute but still with something to prove and on an upward curve it’d be Marcello Gallardo.
Edit. It won’t be him but he’ll be at a big European club soon.
Could be Kasper Hjulmand after all then, if Lange know and gets on with him well enough.Gerrard is managing in the equivalent of mid-table Championship level. He's also in a two horse race with a broken Celtic and has only been in the Scottish Prem for what, two seasons? It would be a massive gamble by Purslow and Villa to take him. Other than a bit of European experience, Gerrard is in no way ready to come to the Premier Division in England. Surely, Christian Purslow isn't that daft and NSWE would want a more experienced man in charge.
Loads of owners/CEOs are seduced by big name players. NSWE originally wanted Henry and that would've been a disaster.
Reminds me of years back when Boro got in Bryan Robson. Was a buzz about them for a few years signing Ravanelli and Juninho and getting to those cup finals but all fizzled out in the end and he didn't do much elsewhere as a manager, was apparently too soft from what I read in one of Paul Merson's books compared to likes of Wenger.
Your right, our owners wouldnt of had a clue who Dean Smith was, it seemed like they wanted the razzmatazz of Henry, it would of been a car crash so praise must go to Purslow there.
This time i guess it will be Purslow and Lange rather than the owners having anything to do with it. Hopefully it will be quick as days of debating the potential of Stevie G as our manager could be quite depressing.
The list is somewhat underwhelming! I've no idea who I'd want to replace Deano. As stated earlier though,who we get will show how how ambitious the owners are!
Pellegrini? Hell no
Pellegrini? Hell no
Why?
To be honest I don’t know a lot outside of Villa, so all these names being thrown about I know little, or nothing, about.
I know Pellegrini won the league and cup with ManC, though
Pellegrini? Hell no
Why?
To be honest I don’t know a lot outside of Villa, so all these names being thrown about I know little, or nothing, about.
I know Pellegrini won the league and cup with ManC, though
Look at how it ended up at West Ham. He spent a lot of money and when you look at what Moyes has done with many of those same players, it shows you how poorly Pellegrini did. They were happy to fire him in the end.
Not being ageist* but Pellegrini is 68.
May as well have Hodgson, Colin Wanker, or Joe Biden throw their zimmers in the ring.
*I'm 65 myself next year which is why I'm ruling myself out of applying.
Not being ageist* but Pellegrini is 68.
May as well have Hodgson, Colin Wanker, or Joe Biden throw their zimmers in the ring.
*I'm 65 myself next year which is why I'm ruling myself out of applying.
Pellegrini? Hell no
Why?
To be honest I don’t know a lot outside of Villa, so all these names being thrown about I know little, or nothing, about.
I know Pellegrini won the league and cup with ManC, though
Look at how it ended up at West Ham. He spent a lot of money and when you look at what Moyes has done with many of those same players, it shows you how poorly Pellegrini did. They were happy to fire him in the end.
Blimey, I’d forgotten about WHU.
Thanks for putting me right. Like I said, I don’t know much out of Villa 😂
Pellegrini? Hell no
Why?
To be honest I don’t know a lot outside of Villa, so all these names being thrown about I know little, or nothing, about.
I know Pellegrini won the league and cup with ManC, though
Look at how it ended up at West Ham. He spent a lot of money and when you look at what Moyes has done with many of those same players, it shows you how poorly Pellegrini did. They were happy to fire him in the end.
Blimey, I’d forgotten about WHU.
Thanks for putting me right. Like I said, I don’t know much out of Villa 😂
Aye. Easy to forget sometimes. But he was there for a bit and it didn’t work out at all. Plus he’s almost 70!
Pellegrini? Hell no
Why?
To be honest I don’t know a lot outside of Villa, so all these names being thrown about I know little, or nothing, about.
I know Pellegrini won the league and cup with ManC, though
Look at how it ended up at West Ham. He spent a lot of money and when you look at what Moyes has done with many of those same players, it shows you how poorly Pellegrini did. They were happy to fire him in the end.
Blimey, I’d forgotten about WHU.
Thanks for putting me right. Like I said, I don’t know much out of Villa 😂
Aye. Easy to forget sometimes. But he was there for a bit and it didn’t work out at all. Plus he’s almost 70!
Not that I'm advocating for Pellegrini, but Moyes was at West Ham before and didn't do brilliantly.
Purslow mentioned 'new Head Coach' in terms of having time to adapt. Are any of the so called big names going to want to be called the Manager and have a bit more control? I wonder if this will create any issues.
Bardell seems convinced that it'll be Gerrard. Please God no.
Would any international manager worth his salt come here with a World Cup on the horizon?
Bardell seems convinced that it'll be Gerrard. Please God no.
aye its a nightmare. Imagine if he tries to solve our DM/CM problem by shopping up there. :o
Bardell seems convinced that it'll be Gerrard. Please God no.
aye its a nightmare. Imagine if he tries to solve our DM/CM problem by shopping up there. :o
That's why you have a director of football.
Problem Gerrard has is coming here is basically shit or bust for the Liverpool job. He has to get us out of trouble comfortably this season, then top 8 next or he will have no chance of that job. It's a gamble. He might be better staying at Rangers, winning lots, of then going to Liverpool.
Get Gerard and we're getting relegated.
Get Gerard and we're getting relegated.
Why? Is he worse than Vieira who has less managerial experience than Gerrard. Is he worse than Ranieri, or Frank, or whoever takes up Norwich? I genuinely don’t get why he’s being perceived as having no managerial talent at all. Again I’m not advocating for him as I hope we cast our net wider, but outside of who he is, who he played for and the media obsession that would follow him what makes him so utterly unqualified?
Eddie Howe has just come in from nowhere to odds-on with Betfair. Someone must have placed a big bet.
Eddie Howe has just come in from nowhere to odds-on with Betfair. Someone must have placed a big bet.
Bit nuts to do that given he’s sat in the stands at the Newcastle game yesterday
what about callum Davidson? Won more than gerrard I've heard. Has added"not gerrard" bonus
Eddie Howe now @ 20/21 favourite to be next VILLA manager according to odds checker!
*EDIT- bit late there! 😂
what about callum Davidson? Won more than gerrard I've heard. Has added"not gerrard" bonus
Get him in! Whoever told you about him must be a wise sage indeed.
The question should be "what makes it him qualified"?
The answer seems to be: good playing career, successfully won half as many trophies as St Johnstone, and that's it.
If it wasn't for his big name, nobody would be suggesting him just as nobody is suggesting Callum Davidson.
Eddie Howe feels like a bad idea.
Rather have Hasslehoff than Hasenhuttl. Dreary dull football, Presumably will get the gig because he can make Ings work out. Can't see any other reason to employ him.
The question should be "what makes it him qualified"?
The answer seems to be: good playing career, successfully won half as many trophies as St Johnstone, and that's it.
If it wasn't for his big name, nobody would be suggesting him just as nobody is suggesting Callum Davidson.
I'm starting to get the impression you'd (almost) prefer Boris Johnson as Villa manager than Stevie G. ;)
Can I just shock you? I like Eddie Howe.
Can I just shock you? I like Eddie Howe.
I'm more shocked someone thinks he's having very intimate relations with Amanda Staveley on the other page! That would be one way to errr crack on and get the Newcastle job.
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Burnley was too big a club for him.
He sounds good but 64 maybe a bit old? I said I wanted him earlier but having skimmed his Wikipedia page I see it was actually the bloke that won the league with Lille I was after, not him.
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Be my choice out of the british candidates but you'd really have to pull out the boat in money terms to persuade him we were serious and well, are we? I doubt he'd do it mid-season anyway
Favre on paper is just what we need. Was close to taking Outside in the summer.
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Be my choice out of the british candidates but you'd really have to pull out the boat in money terms to persuade him we were serious and well, are we? I doubt he'd do it mid-season anyway
He's been linked to Man. United today and allegedly has admirers high up at Man. City so I don't think he'll be considering us anytime soon.
Problem Gerrard has is coming here is basically shit or bust for the Liverpool job. He has to get us out of trouble comfortably this season, then top 8 next or he will have no chance of that job. It's a gamble. He might be better staying at Rangers, winning lots, of then going to Liverpool.
https://twitter.com/Fball_Insights_/status/1457097057890615299?t=_8uRWj0cNJzyDemMIVzF_A&s=19
I never realised how much people disliked Purslow but referring to yourself as the 'Fernando Torres of finance' does make you sound like a bellend. Very much comes across as star struck by Gerrard also in the article. If he has his way then I can unfortunately see it happening but let's hope more voices get heard.
Look what happened to him there!https://twitter.com/Fball_Insights_/status/1457097057890615299?t=_8uRWj0cNJzyDemMIVzF_A&s=19
I never realised how much people disliked Purslow but referring to yourself as the 'Fernando Torres of finance' does make you sound like a bellend. Very much comes across as star struck by Gerrard also in the article. If he has his way then I can unfortunately see it happening but let's hope more voices get heard.
I am the Fernando Torres of cleaning frying pans, and I intend to sell myself to Chelsea.
Gerrard is the wrong man for me as well. Very little managrment experience and I wouldn't say that what he has done at Rangers is enough to justify consideration for our job.
We had 2 scouse managers that did ok or was it because their names were both Ron. Villa almost has this supernatural ability to the past. So a scouse manager might just work. Although Ron Saunders was from Birkenhead.
what about callum Davidson? Won more than gerrard I've heard. Has added"not gerrard" bonus
Get him in! Whoever told you about him must be a wise sage indeed.
That’s quite reassuring Marion. I hope Carragher knows his mate as well he thinks.Marion from Barewood a fantasy of yours?
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).
A few more trophies at Rangers? That’s as prestigious as filling a page in a Panini sticker album.
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).
A few more trophies at Rangers? That’s as prestigious as filling a page in a Panini sticker album.
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).
A few more trophies at Rangers? That’s as prestigious as filling a page in a Panini sticker album.
Hardly a challenge when early on in yesterday's game against Rosd County Rangers had 93% possession!
See there was some support for Howe overnight. My main issue with him is that despite spending a fair bit on it he never managed to put out a decent defence. If he was twiddling his thumbs I'd be less against it but the idea of a wage/budget bidding war with Newcastle for him makes me feel cold.
We had 2 scouse managers that did ok or was it because their names were both Ron. Villa almost has this supernatural ability to the past. So a scouse manager might just work. Although Ron Saunders was from Birkenhead.
Actually I read up on this yesterday, and I believe your scouse if you're from Birkenhead, while Liverpool you're a plastic scouser*.
*could be talking bollocks
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).It'll be interesting to see how he goes now that Ange seems to have Celtic up and running. First real pressure he'll have faced.
Ha ha! Well spotted. Just don’t tell Marlon.That’s quite reassuring Marion. I hope Carragher knows his mate as well he thinks.Marion from Barewood a fantasy of yours?
Fried pizza? I’d have been one of themIf you're in Scotland ever, try it. Good number of chippies up there so half a deep fried pizza and chips. Food of the gods
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Be my choice out of the british candidates but you'd really have to pull out the boat in money terms to persuade him we were serious and well, are we? I doubt he'd do it mid-season anyway
He's been linked to Man. United today and allegedly has admirers high up at Man. City so I don't think he'll be considering us anytime soon.
Get Gerard and we're getting relegated.
I don't want Gerrard, if we can't let a Villa fan see out his dream of getting Villa into Europe, I don't want a Liverpool fan living out there Dream of doing well enough at Villa to get the Liverpool job.Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).It'll be interesting to see how he goes now that Ange seems to have Celtic up and running. First real pressure he'll have faced.
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
Get Gerard and we're getting relegated.There's absolutely no way of knowing that. However he could be the next great manager. He could be a total flop. It would be a massive gamble and I don't see how he could be considered a better bet than Smith. Then there would be all the shit surrounding Liverpool. We'd be lost in that particular media wankfest Gerrard gets a big thumbs down from me.
This.I don't want Gerrard, if we can't let a Villa fan see out his dream of getting Villa into Europe, I don't want a Liverpool fan living out there Dream of doing well enough at Villa to get the Liverpool job.Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).It'll be interesting to see how he goes now that Ange seems to have Celtic up and running. First real pressure he'll have faced.
This.I don't want Gerrard, if we can't let a Villa fan see out his dream of getting Villa into Europe, I don't want a Liverpool fan living out there Dream of doing well enough at Villa to get the Liverpool job.Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).It'll be interesting to see how he goes now that Ange seems to have Celtic up and running. First real pressure he'll have faced.
I think they will want someone who will give some of the youth a go. There's not really an outstanding candidate is there?
Get Gerard and we're getting relegated.There's absolutely no way of knowing that. However he could be the next great manager. He could be a total flop. It would be a massive gamble and I don't see how he could be considered a better bet than Smith. Then there would be all the shit surrounding Liverpool. We'd be lost in that particular media wankfest Gerrard gets a big thumbs down from me.
This.I don't want Gerrard, if we can't let a Villa fan see out his dream of getting Villa into Europe, I don't want a Liverpool fan living out there Dream of doing well enough at Villa to get the Liverpool job.Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).It'll be interesting to see how he goes now that Ange seems to have Celtic up and running. First real pressure he'll have faced.
And this again.
We absolutely need someone that can handle pressure. Because after Smith, there will be plenty. He took over at such a low ebb in our recent history and couldn't get us doing any worse. Instead he got us going way easier than the plan. That he clearly understood helped massively.
We need someone who is tried and tested, because we are not a place for someone to learn. The fans have been supportive of Smith, even in some bad times, but the next guy won't have that level of support. There's a good squad of players and expectations are high.
Gerrard can fuck off, I detest him. I'd rather have Lampard, but given how he couldn't get a Chelsea squad organised that's a no. Terry can do one. Howe needs an opportunity but he's going to be a stop gap at Newcastle and it's a no from me.
The Danish guy hasn't got the experience of a big club and the day to day pressure that entails. Emery won't leave Villareal for the Real Villa so soon after committing.
I doubt Rodgers would leave Leicester at this point, though I'd definitely have him. Thomas Frank is an interesting proposition, but I'm not convinced, same with Ralph Hasenhüttl. Fonseca? I don't know enough about him, but there's potential there and he's had Roma...
Gerrard would raise our profile, no doubt about that which could be the thinking behind it. Would need to be backed to the hilt though to attract the sort of players maybe Smith couldn't.Genuine question - Joe aside, would a footballer really want to choose Gerrard over say West Ham, Spurs, Arsenal etc - who we want to be competing with?
I dont want Eddie Howe for the simple reason he looks like he should be related to the Gardners.
Gerrard would raise our profile, no doubt about that which could be the thinking behind it. Would need to be backed to the hilt though to attract the sort of players maybe Smith couldn't.Genuine question - Joe aside, would a footballer really want to choose Gerrard over say West Ham, Spurs, Arsenal etc - who we want to be competing with?
My concern is, the way the clubs is run, a lot of key decisions aren't made by the manager, or at least not alone - so I think that limits us to a Head Coach type manager.
I think some of these appointments in coaching an recruitment were force on Dean to some degree
Remember Houllier's press conference when he joined? When he started talking about Liverpool and how this job wasn't in the same league as Liverpool manager?
Or when we played at Anfield and he tapped the sign over the tunnel? That?
With Gerrard we would be getting that sort of vibe, only much stronger, with the added impetus of the Liverpool job being in his future rather than his past.
No thanks.
Gerrard would raise our profile, no doubt about that which could be the thinking behind it. Would need to be backed to the hilt though to attract the sort of players maybe Smith couldn't.Genuine question - Joe aside, would a footballer really want to choose Gerrard over say West Ham, Spurs, Arsenal etc - who we want to be competing with?
My concern is, the way the clubs is run, a lot of key decisions aren't made by the manager, or at least not alone - so I think that limits us to a Head Coach type manager.
I think some of these appointments in coaching an recruitment were force on Dean to some degree
Probably not given the choice, but if you outbid them then maybe you'd come to us for an extra 40k a week which the others won't pay.
I don't know how much clout gerrard would have to be honest but if the board sanctioned 25m for a midfielder in January, but wouldn't give Smith that money, then he's got an advantage straight away. Doesn't stop him buying the wrong guy or not coaching him as well as Smith though.
I dont want Eddie Howe for the simple reason he looks like he should be related to the Gardners.
And the fact he just became Newcastle manager about 2 days ago?
Not that I want Gerrard but, at the moment, any ambitious manager is going to see Villa as a stepping stone to whatever their dream job is.
I dont want Eddie Howe for the simple reason he looks like he should be related to the Gardners.
And the fact he just became Newcastle manager about 2 days ago?
Not yet
Not that I want Gerrard but, at the moment, any ambitious manager is going to see Villa as a stepping stone to whatever their dream job is.
This
I think the reality is that if he were appointed the fans would be on his case very early and there would, barring some miraculous run, be calls for his head before the end of the season.
Do we really want a manager who would do the dirty on an incumbent club?
We absolutely need someone that can handle pressure. Because after Smith, there will be plenty. He took over at such a low ebb in our recent history and couldn't get us doing any worse. Instead he got us going way earlier than the plan. That he clearly understood helped massively.
We need someone who is tried and tested, because we are not a place for someone to learn. The fans have been supportive of Smith, even in some bad times, but the next guy won't have that level of support. There's a good squad of players and expectations are high.
Gerrard can fuck off, I detest him. I'd rather have Lampard, but given how he couldn't get a Chelsea squad organised that's a no. Terry can do one. Howe needs an opportunity but he's going to be a stop gap at Newcastle and it's a no from me.
The Danish guy hasn't got the experience of a big club and the day to day pressure that entails. Emery won't leave Villareal for the Real Villa so soon after committing.
I doubt Rodgers would leave Leicester at this point, though I'd definitely have him. Thomas Frank is an interesting proposition, but I'm not convinced, same with Ralph Hasenhüttl. Fonseca? I don't know enough about him, but there's potential there and he's had Roma...
Gerrard would raise our profile, no doubt about that which could be the thinking behind it. Would need to be backed to the hilt though to attract the sort of players maybe Smith couldn't.Genuine question - Joe aside, would a footballer really want to choose Gerrard over say West Ham, Spurs, Arsenal etc - who we want to be competing with?
My concern is, the way the clubs is run, a lot of key decisions aren't made by the manager, or at least not alone - so I think that limits us to a Head Coach type manager.
I think some of these appointments in coaching an recruitment were force on Dean to some degree
Probably not given the choice, but if you outbid them then maybe you'd come to us for an extra 40k a week which the others won't pay.
I don't know how much clout gerrard would have to be honest but if the board sanctioned 25m for a midfielder in January, but wouldn't give Smith that money, then he's got an advantage straight away. Doesn't stop him buying the wrong guy or not coaching him as well as Smith though.
Oh he'd raise our profile alright, but I'm pretty certain it would be for all the wrong reasons.
Terry was working under an experienced coach. Gerrard...I mean, I'd love to be wrong, but my first reaction is that it's basically embarrassing, small time starfuckery.
I think every single one of us doesn't want Gerrard for the very reason it's using is to get to Liverpool.I don't. I don't want Gerrard because the sum total of his managerial career today is a moderate amount of domestic success with "Rangers". Which is nowhere near enough to get work as a kitchen porter at Villa Park, let alone the gaffer's job.
The question is, if getting us into Europe gets him that job, is that a sufficient trade off while we climb the ladder.
I think they will want someone who will give some of the youth a go. There's not really an outstanding candidate is there?
"Gerrard has done well with Rangers"
(https://e0.365dm.com/11/06/768x432/Alex-McLeish-Aston-Villa-shirt_2611986.jpg)
"Gerrard has done well with Rangers"
(https://e0.365dm.com/11/06/768x432/Alex-McLeish-Aston-Villa-shirt_2611986.jpg)
If Spurs can get Conte, I'd ask why Villa couldn't get somebody of that ilk too.
Remember Houllier's press conference when he joined? When he started talking about Liverpool and how this job wasn't in the same league as Liverpool manager?
Or when we played at Anfield and he tapped the sign over the tunnel? That?
With Gerrard we would be getting that sort of vibe, only much stronger, with the added impetus of the Liverpool job being in his future rather than his past.
No thanks.
If Spurs can get Conte, I'd ask why Villa couldn't get somebody of that ilk too.
Similar to Man City getting Guardiola, it didn't just happen - it's the end result of months of setting the structue of the club up in such a way that its designed for him, and it sees the people who were previously in charge accepting that they are going to be pushed out of the day-to-day running of the club.
We had 2 scouse managers that did ok or was it because their names were both Ron. Villa almost has this supernatural ability to the past. So a scouse manager might just work. Although Ron Saunders was from Birkenhead.
Actually I read up on this yesterday, and I believe your scouse if you're from Birkenhead, while Liverpool you're a plastic scouser*.
*could be talking bollocks
If Ellesmere Port counts as scouse then you can also include Graham Turner and Joe Mercer.
Terry was working under an experienced coach. Gerrard...I mean, I'd love to be wrong, but my first reaction is that it's basically embarrassing, small time starfuckery.
Gerrard did a year coaching at Liverpool under Klopp didn't he?
"Gerrard has done well with Rangers"
(https://e0.365dm.com/11/06/768x432/Alex-McLeish-Aston-Villa-shirt_2611986.jpg)
Steve Gerrard Gerrard
He’s big and he’s fucking hard
He’s the gaffer at Villa Park
Steve Gerrard Gerrard
On ts the villa fans who called in have said they want Gerrard. One even said he wants Lampard. Jesus
Lampard would be a absolute disaster and ia no upgrade on smith. Id have rather have kept Smith than Lampard.
Hell no to frank
"Gerrard has done well with Rangers"
(https://e0.365dm.com/11/06/768x432/Alex-McLeish-Aston-Villa-shirt_2611986.jpg)
One thing, above all else, is we need to learn from Tottenham and make sure, at least publicly, we get our first choice manager. Once we start offering and being turned down, we are dead in the water. How you do this when going after managers already in a job, asking permission to talk to them then the obvious leaks, I don't know.They think Brighton to Aston Villa is a sideways move? We all love our own clubs equally but that is straight up delusional.
Living locally, I can tell you the Brighton fans have no expectations that he will leave in what they see as a sideways move. Do we really want a manager who would do the dirty on an incumbent club?
Remember Houllier's press conference when he joined? When he started talking about Liverpool and how this job wasn't in the same league as Liverpool manager?
Or when we played at Anfield and he tapped the sign over the tunnel? That?
With Gerrard we would be getting that sort of vibe, only much stronger, with the added impetus of the Liverpool job being in his future rather than his past.
No thanks.
Indeed. Unbearable. Plus, there's no actual evidence that he's seriously much as a manager either. I accept that someone like Pochettino was a gamble for Southampton, but this is surely too much.
We had 2 scouse managers that did ok or was it because their names were both Ron. Villa almost has this supernatural ability to the past. So a scouse manager might just work. Although Ron Saunders was from Birkenhead.
Actually I read up on this yesterday, and I believe your scouse if you're from Birkenhead, while Liverpool you're a plastic scouser*.
*could be talking bollocks
If Ellesmere Port counts as scouse then you can also include Graham Turner and Joe Mercer.
Who was the other scouse Ron?
We had 2 scouse managers that did ok or was it because their names were both Ron. Villa almost has this supernatural ability to the past. So a scouse manager might just work. Although Ron Saunders was from Birkenhead.
Actually I read up on this yesterday, and I believe your scouse if you're from Birkenhead, while Liverpool you're a plastic scouser*.
*could be talking bollocks
If Ellesmere Port counts as scouse then you can also include Graham Turner and Joe Mercer.
Who was the other scouse Ron?
AVB was furious about Sanson being sold wasn't he and essentially walked on Marseille due to it?
On ts the villa fans who called in have said they want Gerrard. One even said he wants Lampard. Jesus
Lampard would be a absolute disaster and ia no upgrade on smith. Id have rather have kept Smith than Lampard.
Hell no to frank
One thing, above all else, is we need to learn from Tottenham and make sure, at least publicly, we get our first choice manager. Once we start offering and being turned down, we are dead in the water. How you do this when going after managers already in a job, asking permission to talk to them then the obvious leaks, I don't know.They think Brighton to Aston Villa is a sideways move? We all love our own clubs equally but that is straight up delusional.
Living locally, I can tell you the Brighton fans have no expectations that he will leave in what they see as a sideways move. Do we really want a manager who would do the dirty on an incumbent club?
AVB would be a disaster, fuck that!
AVB was furious about Sanson being sold wasn't he and essentially walked on Marseille due to it?
AVB would be a disaster, fuck that!
I'm not sure he would, but there's that stain of being a figure of ridicule over here that would be difficult to shift./quote]AVB would be a disaster, fuck that!
I'm not sure he would, but there's that stain of being a figure of ridicule over here that would be difficult to shift.
Also with Unai Emery, a man who appears to be a fine and capable manager, unfortunately in English he has a thin, reedy voice, is a bit goofy and has a kind of Michael Howard 'something of the night' vibe. As shallow as it is, I think that did for him as much as any footballing reason.
A slightly sleazy used car sales man always came into my mind.
I have no recollection of Pellegrini managing West Ham and was unaware that Moyes had been there before.He nearly got them relegated so I wouldn't rule out Dean coming back to Villa Park in the future and being even more successful.
Fucking Steven Gerrard for fucks sake's. It would be mark us down as a second rate feeder club.Yes absolutely. We know if he's comes here it would be a CV tick on the way to fucking Anfield. I will be mortified if he's appointed after his stint at non league management. Surely Purslow is not that daft despite his love for all that is Liverpool?
AVB was furious about Sanson being sold wasn't he and essentially walked on Marseille due to it?
I don't think Gerrard would be right, but I'm a bit surprised by the levels of personal dislike for him on here.Same with me in all respects. In my opinion it would show a lack of ambition by the owners. We don’t need a “buy and hope” style appointment.
To me he just came accross as a combative, excellent midfielder. I'd have no problem with his personality whatsover. His limited management experience is what would primarily put me off and I have to admit "Gerrards Aston Villa" would also grate a bit. I'd expect him to be professional enough not to fall into the fawning over Liverpool trap but I wouldn't have a problem with a few complimentary words here and there building up to a fixture against them. If he had done well enough for Liverpool to then want him as their next manager then surely that means we would be on the right track, which can't be that bad a thing?
So it would be a 'no' from me, but probably not for the same reasons as a number of people seem to have. And if we did go for him I'd be 100% behind him and pretty excited to see what he could achieve.
Betfair is owned by Paddypower, yet Paddypower have suspended betting on Martinez, but you can still get 12/1 on Betfair. Weird.To paraphrase Alistair McGowan's Sven "This Martinez you talk about which one is he?"
Apparently Newcastle haven't got Eddie Howe over the line yet...Wouldn't that be just like Newcastle if they don't?
EmiBetfair is owned by Paddypower, yet Paddypower have suspended betting on Martinez, but you can still get 12/1 on Betfair. Weird.To paraphrase Alistair McGowan's Sven "This Martinez you talk about which one is he?"
Our last 5 seasons, if they happened to them - 2 Championship playoff finals, Premier league survival, then last season what would represent their highest ever league position - would be one of the high points, if not *the* high water mark, in their club's entire history.One thing, above all else, is we need to learn from Tottenham and make sure, at least publicly, we get our first choice manager. Once we start offering and being turned down, we are dead in the water. How you do this when going after managers already in a job, asking permission to talk to them then the obvious leaks, I don't know.They think Brighton to Aston Villa is a sideways move? We all love our own clubs equally but that is straight up delusional.
Living locally, I can tell you the Brighton fans have no expectations that he will leave in what they see as a sideways move. Do we really want a manager who would do the dirty on an incumbent club?
He turned us down before, he can fuck off.Wasn’t that story just media bullshit because he was never actually approached or had an interview but it became truth because it was wrongly repeated so many times…or did we actually approach him and he turned down the option to have an interview?
Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
You think that’s realistic? Why not Pep?
Come on folks we can’t just say “Let’s go and get xxxx” it’s not as simple as that.
He turned us down before, he can fuck off.Wasn’t that story just media bullshit because he was never actually approached or had an interview but it became truth because it was wrongly repeated so many times…or did we actually approach him and he turned down the option to have an interview?
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Their squad is much better than ours though.
Sky sports saying martinez is very high on the list. Wouldnt be the worst appointment and would have some big contacts in belgium.And he has totally wasted the best generation of footballers to emerge in any one country for about 50 years.
But from what i remember in his time in england he coulsnt setup a back four to save his life. Doesnt bode well when you see how we currently defend
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Their squad is much better than ours though.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
And after a couple of transfer windows their best in the squad will be ours.It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Their squad is much better than ours though.
"Gerrard has done well with Rangers"Perrrrrlease - do not need reminding of the TSM. Ever.
(https://e0.365dm.com/11/06/768x432/Alex-McLeish-Aston-Villa-shirt_2611986.jpg)
Yes, I absolutely believe Rogers wouldn't come to us.Controversial I know but I'd go and get Rodgers from Leicester.
He has done everything he can at Leicester, and if he can get that shower up and around the European places, he'd have no trouble doing that with us.
You think that’s realistic? Why not Pep?
Come on folks we can’t just say “Let’s go and get xxxx” it’s not as simple as that.
Jesus! We're Aston Villa and have gazillionaire owners.
Pep could walk into any job on the planet but you seriously think Rodgers, overachieving and bumbling around the top half of the Prem at Leicester wouldn't come to us?!
We need to show some fucking ambition!
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Their squad is much better than ours though.
It is, but what's left for him now? He's a vain fucker, I think with the right conditions he'd take it. Walking out a Villa Park as the chief is a damn sight different to that poxy little soulless bowl.
Villas-Boas is an interesting one. He must be on a very short list of currently unemployed managers who have been reasonably successful at the top level. This comment from a post-Marseille article caught my interestYes, AVB ain't a batshit crazy option, actually.
"He managed to forge such a strong team mentality that even when they were not playing well, they would win games."
If there is one thing we do not do, it is that!
I think we all would want ten haag but there is no chance we could get him. If he isnt interested in spurs he wont come here.
I think he will wait for united job
Never really got Martinez. Did okay at Wigan but I never thought they were an entertaining side.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Their squad is much better than ours though.
And 7 years ago they were a solid Championship club having spent the last decade there or lower.
Squads change quickly, but they've got a shitter ground, shitter training facilities, shitter owners, etc, etc. Everything is ready at the Villa to go way beyond what he can achieve at Leicester.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Leicester are better than us. Alot better and have been for years. Thats the sad reality.
Not going to happen
I enjoy some of the ambition being shown, but I don't think we should be disrespecting other clubs. If we are such a great opportunity, we shouldn't need to belittle Brighton, Leicester or anybody else.
Let's not act like Man Utd fans.
Martinez is a mythical blagger. Don't want him anywhere near the place. I would sooner have Gerrard.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Leicester are better than us. Alot better and have been for years. Thats the sad reality.
Not going to happen
Christ - I'm glad you're not our CEO.
The way you're going on we'd be lucky to tempt Fat Dave away from his role managing a mid-table Sunday League team!
I think we all would want ten haag but there is no chance we could get him. If he isnt interested in spurs he wont come here.
I think he will wait for united job
He'll have a wait then as apparently OGS is safe at United.
I enjoy some of the ambition being shown, but I don't think we should be disrespecting other clubs. If we are such a great opportunity, we shouldn't need to belittle Brighton, Leicester or anybody else.
Let's not act like Man Utd fans.
You're right, of course, but it is Leicester City
And I'm irked by comments I've read in the last week or so by Brighton and Southampton fans that have serious cases of the Rupert Lowes.
He turned us down before, he can fuck off.
Never really got Martinez. Did okay at Wigan but I never thought they were an entertaining side.
I think he's got a bit lucky with a once-in-a-lifetime set of players with Belgium, which has got them where they are today. And he got that job almost immediately after being sacked by Everton for back-to-back 11th place league finishes. I have no doubt he's played his part in Belgium's success, but they're ranked number one without having won anything, and I think even I could keep Belgium in the top 5 in the world given the quality of their squad.
I honestly can't remember enough about how his teams played to know what sort of manager he would be? Do his teams always play the same way? (Didn't the Everton fans protest against him towards the end?
Christ, I thought you were bring serious there for a second.
You know, I think I'd rather have Rooney than fucking Gerrard.
Christ, I thought you were bring serious there for a second.
You know, I think I'd rather have Rooney than fucking Gerrard.
If we really want to be considered a progressive, modern , forward thinking club, why don’t we consider Emma Hayes, the Chelsea women’s manager ? She always comes across as knowing her stuff as a pundit and her side are arguably the best women’s team around.Are you serious? Or am I missing something? I'm good at that.
Go on Villa, how brave are you ?
Nicolò Schira on Twitter:
#AstonVilla are working to convince #RangersGlasgow’s coach Steven #Gerrard to become the new coach of #Villans. Offered 3-years contract. #transfers #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/NicoSchira/status/1457673571359236106
Think he's well connected and a pretty respected journalist, so this is a bit of a worry. Purslow wants Gerrard doesn't he?
I feel sick. Worried Dean and NWSE gave us our Villa back just for us to fuck it up again
Nicolò Schira on Twitter:
#AstonVilla are working to convince #RangersGlasgow’s coach Steven #Gerrard to become the new coach of #Villans. Offered 3-years contract. #transfers #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/NicoSchira/status/1457673571359236106
Think he's well connected and a pretty respected journalist, so this is a bit of a worry. Purslow wants Gerrard doesn't he?
Very, very bad feeling about all this.
The only criteria for the new manager is can we fit his name into the Super John McGinn song?
If not then he's not in contention & I'm not tolerating using Stevie G.
The only criteria for the new manager is can we fit his name into the Super John McGinn song?"He's Zinadine's man, he's better than Zidane"
If not then he's not in contention & I'm not tolerating using Stevie G.
There’s a manager available who is popular with his players, and has taken his last club from mid table in tier two, to mid table in tier one in 3 seasons. In the toughest league on the world. While handling multiple injuries and international travel commitments.Yep, get Deano back , quick ! Please not Gerrard
On ts the villa fans who called in have said they want Gerrard. One even said he wants Lampard. Jesus
Lampard would be a absolute disaster and ia no upgrade on smith. Id have rather have kept Smith than Lampard.
Hell no to frank
I'm listening aswell. In minority but I actually like listening to Danny Murphy. However he's certainly got an issue with us. Him just dismissing the Villa fan who said how well West Ham were doing after battling us in relegation in 19/20 was ridiculous.
Didn't he pen an article a few years back saying he found Villa Park a really drab place to play at compared to likes of Elland Road?
Fair query, Edge, as I know I can be flippant sometimes, but no, on this occasion, absolutely serious. I’d prefer her over Gerrard, Hassenhutl and some of the other dreary journeymen put forward. We would be picking her as a manager / coach, not a player, ex or otherwise, after all.I'd like to see her in the mens game at some point, but betting our billion pound future on the first woman coach in the elite mens game would just be far too risky for me. If she'd works her way up and proves she can successfully manage the egos in the mens dressing room at a very high level, then I'd be perfectly happy to look at her.
Steven Gerrard, I mean to say...
Are we really that small-time? Emery was by all accounts pretty keen on Newcastle, as was Fonseca. They're in the actual relegation zone with Joelinton up front. Everton got Ancellotti! I mean, we couldn't even put in a call to Emery or Fonseca? Or Villas-Boas? Or anyone with a reputation as an actual coach?
Steven Gerrard, I mean to say...
Are we really that small-time? Emery was by all accounts pretty keen on Newcastle, as was Fonseca. They're in the actual relegation zone with Joelinton up front. Everton got Ancellotti! I mean, we couldn't even put in a call to Emery or Fonseca? Or Villas-Boas? Or anyone with a reputation as an actual coach?
Steven Gerrard, I mean to say...I'm with Monty. This is our chance to make a statement. But I reckon Purslow's had his head turned by the 'glamour' of Stevie G.
Are we really that small-time? Emery was by all accounts pretty keen on Newcastle, as was Fonseca. They're in the actual relegation zone with Joelinton up front. Everton got Ancellotti! I mean, we couldn't even put in a call to Emery or Fonseca? Or Villas-Boas? Or anyone with a reputation as an actual coach?
Steven Gerrard, I mean to say...Exactly this - we keep on hearing how ambitious we are as a club, if we appoint Gerrard then we might as well give up now
Are we really that small-time? Emery was by all accounts pretty keen on Newcastle, as was Fonseca. They're in the actual relegation zone with Joelinton up front. Everton got Ancellotti! I mean, we couldn't even put in a call to Emery or Fonseca? Or Villas-Boas? Or anyone with a reputation as an actual coach?
Steven Gerrard, I mean to say...
Are we really that small-time? Emery was by all accounts pretty keen on Newcastle, as was Fonseca. They're in the actual relegation zone with Joelinton up front. Everton got Ancellotti! I mean, we couldn't even put in a call to Emery or Fonseca? Or Villas-Boas? Or anyone with a reputation as an actual coach?
Mods, are we allowed to start a “Gerrard out “ thread before he’s “ in” ?
If so I would like to volunteer.
He may or may not be a good manager. But it's an unbelievably massive risk, and all because Purslow wants to strut around with a Superstar. Why not just appoint Hulk Hogan then? Or Mr. T? If he does come I hope to God we all look stupid, but it would be an embarrassing appointment to begin with.
So he would be ok as Gerrards asssistantHe may or may not be a good manager. But it's an unbelievably massive risk, and all because Purslow wants to strut around with a Superstar. Why not just appoint Hulk Hogan then? Or Mr. T? If he does come I hope to God we all look stupid, but it would be an embarrassing appointment to begin with.
Mr T would be alright until we got into Europe.
Percy saying that the short list will be “ambitious”
Make of that what you will
Carragher said on Sky yesterday that he doesn’t think Gerrard will leave Rangers right now - that although Villa would be very tempting, he wants a couple more trophies and at least one more title before leaving. In his opinion (and he’s obviously close to Gerrard).
So he would be ok as Gerrards asssistantHe may or may not be a good manager. But it's an unbelievably massive risk, and all because Purslow wants to strut around with a Superstar. Why not just appoint Hulk Hogan then? Or Mr. T? If he does come I hope to God we all look stupid, but it would be an embarrassing appointment to begin with.
Mr T would be alright until we got into Europe.
I'd happily boo the fucker to the dugout, and I'm not that sort of person.Why?
You have to question what Purslow is doing to earn his money if he basically decides to appoint his mate rather than somebody actually qualified.
I'd happily boo the fucker to the dugout, and I'm not that sort of person.Why?
I understand why people think he may not be qualified. But why do you hate him?
(not just you - it's a general question)
You have to question what Purslow is doing to earn his money if he basically decides to appoint his mate rather than somebody actually qualified.
Who has he appointed then?
He may or may not be a good manager. But it's an unbelievably massive risk, and all because Purslow wants to strut around with a Superstar. Why not just appoint Hulk Hogan then? Or Mr. T? If he does come I hope to God we all look stupid, but it would be an embarrassing appointment to begin with.
Mr T would be alright until we got into Europe.
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Leicester are better than us. Alot better and have been for years. Thats the sad reality.
Not going to happen
Christ - I'm glad you're not our CEO.
The way you're going on we'd be lucky to tempt Fat Dave away from his role managing a mid-table Sunday League team!
Actually don't really care about that stuff particularly, though obviously doesn't endear him to me. Just on football grounds the thing is pretty embarrassing.
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?
Didn't the bust up with the DJ occur because the DJ kept playing the same song over and over again (think it was something by Kid Creole) that was basically goading Gerrard?
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
To be fair - Villas not for him, as it seems to be a bit of a broken recordHe's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?
Didn't the bust up with the DJ occur because the DJ kept playing the same song over and over again (think it was something by Kid Creole) that was basically goading Gerrard?
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
I don't really want him as manager, but for very differnt reasons to you clearly.
Hate any bollocks notions of a shortlist.Depends who the other 2 are, mind!
It's not a McDonald's vacancy.
Gerrard makes no sense for anyone.
If he takes it, he'll kiss the Liverpool job good bye - simple as that. I can only think of SGT that has gone on to have a career after Villa.
If Klopp came here, his next job would be with Sheffield Wednesday
The DJ thing doesn't bother me at all - sounds like the guy deserves a slap.He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
I don't really want him as manager, but for very differnt reasons to you clearly.
So GBH, racism and sectarianism aren't a problem for you? You don't have to agree but I hope it has cured your bewilderment at why others might not approve of him.
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
I don't really want him as manager, but for very differnt reasons to you clearly.
Purslow needs to recognise that he is not here to help Liverpool.
Nicolò Schira on Twitter:
#AstonVilla are working to convince #RangersGlasgow’s coach Steven #Gerrard to become the new coach of #Villans. Offered 3-years contract. #transfers #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/NicoSchira/status/1457673571359236106
Think he's well connected and a pretty respected journalist, so this is a bit of a worry. Purslow wants Gerrard doesn't he?
Very, very bad feeling about all this.
Didn't the bust up with the DJ occur because the DJ kept playing the same song over and over again (think it was something by Kid Creole) that was basically goading Gerrard?
He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?
Didn't the bust up with the DJ occur because the DJ kept playing the same song over and over again (think it was something by Kid Creole) that was basically goading Gerrard?
The DJ thing doesn't bother me at all - sounds like the guy deserves a slap.He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
I don't really want him as manager, but for very differnt reasons to you clearly.
So GBH, racism and sectarianism aren't a problem for you? You don't have to agree but I hope it has cured your bewilderment at why others might not approve of him.
I've heard there's a shortlist of 5.I hope we choose from the other two unless those names are Allardyce and Pulis.
Gerrard, Martinez and Hjulmand are on it.
I've heard there's a shortlist of 5.I hope we choose from the other two unless those names are Allardyce and Pulis.
Gerrard, Martinez and Hjulmand are on it.
If you have a local DJ you don't like then I'd be getting excited.
In all seriousness though it's one big risk on his part to become successful here to get the Liverpool gig. He has much more of a chance if he stays up there and wins a few more titles. On that basis I don't think he'll come.
If you have a local DJ you don't like then I'd be getting excited.
In all seriousness though it's one big risk on his part to become successful here to get the Liverpool gig. He has much more of a chance if he stays up there and wins a few more titles. On that basis I don't think he'll come.
Depends what money they throw at him. If he's promised 100m for players then why wouldn't he?
Hate any bollocks notions of a shortlist.
It's not a McDonald's vacancy.
Nicolò Schira on Twitter:
#AstonVilla are working to convince #RangersGlasgow’s coach Steven #Gerrard to become the new coach of #Villans. Offered 3-years contract. #transfers #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/NicoSchira/status/1457673571359236106
Think he's well connected and a pretty respected journalist, so this is a bit of a worry. Purslow wants Gerrard doesn't he?
If you have a local DJ you don't like then I'd be getting excited.
In all seriousness though it's one big risk on his part to become successful here to get the Liverpool gig. He has much more of a chance if he stays up there and wins a few more titles. On that basis I don't think he'll come.
Depends what money they throw at him. If he's promised 100m for players then why wouldn't he?
If you have a local DJ you don't like then I'd be getting excited.
In all seriousness though it's one big risk on his part to become successful here to get the Liverpool gig. He has much more of a chance if he stays up there and wins a few more titles. On that basis I don't think he'll come.
Depends what money they throw at him. If he's promised 100m for players then why wouldn't he?
Wrongly, £100m is nothing outlandish these days, when you're target is CL qualification.
Surprised Potter is not getting a mention.
There's no need for that. I'm just not going to cry for someone who seems to have gone out of his way to wind soemone up for a whole night and gets his comeuppanceThe DJ thing doesn't bother me at all - sounds like the guy deserves a slap.He's a ******. He beats up DJs for not playing his sort of music, he tried to cripple George Boateng, he dived to win a free kick that Liverpool scored from to beat us one-nil, he then said "these things even themselves out over the course of a season" before berating the referee when Liverpool had a similar decision go against them the very next week, he wore a T-shirt showing solidarity with a racist teammate, he manages a repulsive football club and refuses to call out their sectarianism. Happy?Not really, no. I'm not going to present a 'case for' but most of that sounds pretty tenuous stuff to me really - the on-field stuff is the sort of stuff that happens all the time. I see who he manages in Scotland is a big issue to you, but that's more your problem than his.
I don't really want him as manager, but for very differnt reasons to you clearly.
So GBH, racism and sectarianism aren't a problem for you? You don't have to agree but I hope it has cured your bewilderment at why others might not approve of him.
In the nicest possible way, you sound like an absolute dickhead here.
Hate any bollocks notions of a shortlist.
It's not a McDonald's vacancy.
What I don't get, if Dean Smith isn't the person to take us to the next level, then in what way is Gerrard (1 cup out of 9 in a piss poor league) any better qualified?
Appointing him would be starfucking, pure and simple.
I don't think Gerrard will be getting the Liverpool job any time soon. Klopp's only 54, I can see him being there for the next ten years at least.
I don't think Gerrard will be getting the Liverpool job any time soon. Klopp's only 54, I can see him being there for the next ten years at least.
Gerrard? No thanks.
No experience of the Prem as a manager [which was a major criticism of Smith]. No experience of English club football as a manager. Plays in a league where he's won 1 trophy, despite being the second biggest team. I'd rather have Fat Frank ... and that is saying something!
It feels like every time we have a managerial vacancy, we have to put up with supporters of all kinds of tinpot clubs saying that Villa should know their place and the idea of them attracting a really top manager is delusional, why would anyone good want to join Villa?This 100%
And just about every time, we prove them right.
It's fucking Leicester mate. We did it before, and if we're serious we could do it again.
Leicester are better than us. Alot better and have been for years. Thats the sad reality.
Not going to happen
Christ - I'm glad you're not our CEO.
The way you're going on we'd be lucky to tempt Fat Dave away from his role managing a mid-table Sunday League team!
Im glad your not our ceo as you would embarass our club by the amount of rejections we would get if you would go for managers like rodgers.
No offence mate but if you think we are getting rodgers i think your in fantasy land.
Why on earth would he give up europe to come to come to a team un 15th and in draedful form? Forget your a villa fan for a second explain why anyone would? They just won a fa cup and have a very strong side.
It makes absolutely zero sense for him ro join us right now
My objection to Stephen Gerrard is not personal or professional . He’s a young manager who has done ok in his short career so far , so may have potential, who knows, and he seems considered and thoughtful in the few interviews I’ve seen him do as a manager.
My objection is to the inevitable Sky led media love in which will follow ( for him , not us) which will lead us to be known as “Stephen Gerrard’s Aston Villa” , in much the same way as we were “John Terry’s Aston Villa” for a few months, only x 10.
The story will be all about him, not Villa. If he succeeds , we will be seen as the mediocre little northern* team who got lucky solely because of his genius. If he struggles, we will have been the basket case who dragged him down and who weren’t worthy of his talents. Either way we lose.
Stevie G’s mighty Villa YNWA …. No thanks
* Northern because the Midlands doesn’t exist to Sky, obviously.
Martinez would be a decent appointment.
Ideally with someone who knows about defending as well as attacking in tow, though.
If we go by statistics in the Prem then Martinez with Everton and Swansea is the best of a pretty poor bunch. That, sadly means you have to ignore his abject failure at Wigwam. Plays quite decent football which may suit our players. Nuno is the second "best" pick from that "pool".
If we are appointing a candidate with no Prem League experience then we need to look at the "big 5" leagues and who's done well there, consistently. I would go for Lucien Favre. Kasper Hjulmand has done nothing at club level, his record in the Bundersleague is terrible, Fonseca seems to be hit and miss. Gerard shouldn't be anywhere near the list.
Is Deano the modern Vic Crowe or Tony Barton?
If we go by statistics in the Prem then Martinez with Everton and Swansea is the best of a pretty poor bunch. That, sadly means you have to ignore his abject failure at Wigwam. Plays quite decent football which may suit our players. Nuno is the second "best" pick from that "pool".
If we are appointing a candidate with no Prem League experience then we need to look at the "big 5" leagues and who's done well there, consistently. I would go for Lucien Favre. Kasper Hjulmand has done nothing at club level, his record in the Bundersleague is terrible, Fonseca seems to be hit and miss. Gerard shouldn't be anywhere near the list.
Is Deano the modern Vic Crowe or Tony Barton?
Was hardly an abject failure at Wigan, they did beat Man City to win the FA Cup. Getting relegated with them was poor but didn't put off Everton too much. I'm struggling to recall why Everton fans were totally against him for a finish.
Definitely a bit of a spoofer, somehow got himself the Belgium job with Henry for whatever reason an assistant. Think he was done a good job there, second best team at last World Cup but their team now ain't what it was. No surprise to me that he would be looking to move on, surely was in the mix for the Spurs and Newcastle jobs of late.
I like Martinez always have
I like his passing and possession based football
I remember the Everton fans moaning about him saying he only had one way to play and couldn’t change from that
Thing is that one way is Ball on the ground short quick passing and movement retain possession that’s his style and he doesn’t deviate
To be honest that will do me
I also think he’s a decent respectful bloke as well and I don’t believe the bullshit that went about him turning us down that was a Whelan PR trick
He might not have won the World Cup with Belgium but hey that’s pretty tough ask no matter you’ve got
He’s been Belgium’s international manager for a few years now I honestly don’t think we are in a position to be turning the likes of Martinez down if it’s a possibility
He has to be a better bet than Lampard Gerard etc
The names we've heard linked with any confidence are Gerrard, Martinez, Hasenhüttl, Fonseca and Mjolnir. Of those, only Fonseca seems like an even remotely exciting. I've definitely been a lot more whelmed in my time.
Edit: oh eff off Lee, that was my line.
If we go by statistics in the Prem then Martinez with Everton and Swansea is the best of a pretty poor bunch. That, sadly means you have to ignore his abject failure at Wigwam. Plays quite decent football which may suit our players. Nuno is the second "best" pick from that "pool".
If we are appointing a candidate with no Prem League experience then we need to look at the "big 5" leagues and who's done well there, consistently. I would go for Lucien Favre. Kasper Hjulmand has done nothing at club level, his record in the Bundersleague is terrible, Fonseca seems to be hit and miss. Gerard shouldn't be anywhere near the list.
Is Deano the modern Vic Crowe or Tony Barton?
Was hardly an abject failure at Wigan, they did beat Man City to win the FA Cup. Getting relegated with them was poor but didn't put off Everton too much. I'm struggling to recall why Everton fans were totally against him for a finish.
Definitely a bit of a spoofer, somehow got himself the Belgium job with Henry for whatever reason an assistant. Think he was done a good job there, second best team at last World Cup but their team now ain't what it was. No surprise to me that he would be looking to move on, surely was in the mix for the Spurs and Newcastle jobs of late.
The names we've heard linked with any confidence are Gerrard, Martinez, Hasenhüttl, Fonseca and Mjolnir. Of those, only Fonseca seems like an even remotely exciting. I've definitely been a lot more whelmed in my time.
Edit: oh eff off Lee, that was my line.
Ha, what are the chances of that? It perfectly serves where I would be with him. I don't think we'd struggle, and we'd probably be nice and neat, but I think we'd just end up treading water a bit.
My objection to Stephen Gerrard is not personal or professional . He’s a young manager who has done ok in his short career so far , so may have potential, who knows, and he seems considered and thoughtful in the few interviews I’ve seen him do as a manager.
My objection is to the inevitable Sky led media love in which will follow ( for him , not us) which will lead us to be known as “Stephen Gerrard’s Aston Villa” , in much the same way as we were “John Terry’s Aston Villa” for a few months, only x 10.
The story will be all about him, not Villa. If he succeeds , we will be seen as the mediocre little northern* team who got lucky solely because of his genius. If he struggles, we will have been the basket case who dragged him down and who weren’t worthy of his talents. Either way we lose.
Stevie G’s mighty Villa YNWA …. No thanks
* Northern because the Midlands doesn’t exist to Sky, obviously.
I strongly disliked him as a player and think he's a miserable prick of a man, but this sums up why the rational me doesn't want him anywhere near us.
Not arsed about the Rangers connection - if they had a really good, proven manager, I'd be happy to take him off them.
But Gerrard hasn't proven himself to be worthy of this step up, much less shown that he'd be worth having to endure the redscouse media circus that would accompany him.
For some reason I had the idea that AVB was a bit of a flop in England, but having looked at his record he has done well virtually everywhere he’s been. I’d be happy with him.
For some reason I had the idea that AVB was a bit of a flop in England, but having looked at his record he has done well virtually everywhere he’s been. I’d be happy with him.
The thing with Dean was he came with the very reputation for football we want yet again. High press, possession football, don’t care who we are playing. Precisely the same as TSM2 at Norwich with far inferior players. And yet both ultimately failed to do that with us. We saw it at times of course. Lambert had us playing some great stuff as did Dean. But what the fuck happens when they get here? Is the club just so big that it sucks the courage right out of them?
The thing with Dean was he came with the very reputation for football we want yet again. High press, possession football, don’t care who we are playing. Precisely the same as TSM2 at Norwich with far inferior players. And yet both ultimately failed to do that with us. We saw it at times of course. Lambert had us playing some great stuff as did Dean. But what the fuck happens when they get here? Is the club just so big that it sucks the courage right out of them?
The thing with Dean was he came with the very reputation for football we want yet again. High press, possession football, don’t care who we are playing. Precisely the same as TSM2 at Norwich with far inferior players. And yet both ultimately failed to do that with us. We saw it at times of course. Lambert had us playing some great stuff as did Dean. But what the fuck happens when they get here? Is the club just so big that it sucks the courage right out of them?
Lambert had us showing glimpses of some great stuff until that horrific Christmas period spooked him
The thing with Dean was he came with the very reputation for football we want yet again. High press, possession football, don’t care who we are playing. Precisely the same as TSM2 at Norwich with far inferior players. And yet both ultimately failed to do that with us. We saw it at times of course. Lambert had us playing some great stuff as did Dean. But what the fuck happens when they get here? Is the club just so big that it sucks the courage right out of them?
Lambert had us showing glimpses of some great stuff until that horrific Christmas period spooked him
I like Martinez always have
I like his passing and possession based football
I remember the Everton fans moaning about him saying he only had one way to play and couldn’t change from that
Thing is that one way is Ball on the ground short quick passing and movement retain possession that’s his style and he doesn’t deviate
To be honest that will do me
I also think he’s a decent respectful bloke as well and I don’t believe the bullshit that went about him turning us down that was a Whelan PR trick
He might not have won the World Cup with Belgium but hey that’s pretty tough ask no matter you’ve got
He’s been Belgium’s international manager for a few years now I honestly don’t think we are in a position to be turning the likes of Martinez down if it’s a possibility
He has to be a better bet than Lampard Gerard etc
But he has done a very good job with Belgium since,
We could do worse than Martinez, though I think I'd just be whelmed, not under or over.That made me laugh more than it should have............Nurse!
We could do worse than Martinez, though I think I'd just be whelmed, not under or over.That made me laugh more than it should have............Nurse!
We could do worse than Martinez, though I think I'd just be whelmed, not under or over.That made me laugh more than it should have............Nurse!
It was an excellent joke, much better than anything Monty could have come up with.
Are we really going to get sniffy about possibly appointing the boss of the number 1 FIFA ranked team in world football ?
Still, he's not Gerrard. So there is that.
For some reason I had the idea that AVB was a bit of a flop in England, but having looked at his record he has done well virtually everywhere he’s been. I’d be happy with him.
Do we know who is running training?
But he has done a very good job with Belgium since,
Really? I think he's underachieved with a 'once in a generation' crop of players.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
To be fair we need to acclimatize to the possibility of Stevie Me to soften the shock if it happens
BRIGHTON 20TH NOVEMBER 4.45P.M.
(https://i.imgur.com/OZPUT5D.gif)
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
To be fair we need to acclimatize to the possibility of Stevie Me to soften the shock if it happens
BRIGHTON 20TH NOVEMBER 4.45P.M.
(https://i.imgur.com/OZPUT5D.gif)
After the 1-1 draw.
It would be akin to DOL running across to Doug to give him the fist to the chest after a draw vs Stoke or whoever the fuck it was against
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Nope nor me, it had to happen. The new manager might not be on the lists doing the rounds!
I hate this time of being a fan, underwhelmed by most of the names
Martinez was not popular at Everton
He failed to win anything with Belgian " Golden generation "
Non of the British names inspire me and god forbid Steevie
It is when you start dreading who could be your worst nightmare, we have been through this with the Scottish one and Bruce
I think I must stop clicking on this thread.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
To be fair we need to acclimatize to the possibility of Stevie Me to soften the shock if it happens
BRIGHTON 20TH NOVEMBER 4.45P.M.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
It isn’t unanimous. I, for example, have a lot of time for him, THOUGH not my first choice. I have no idea who is, mind.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
So he was a crapper Moyes.If we go by statistics in the Prem then Martinez with Everton and Swansea is the best of a pretty poor bunch. That, sadly means you have to ignore his abject failure at Wigwam. Plays quite decent football which may suit our players. Nuno is the second "best" pick from that "pool".
If we are appointing a candidate with no Prem League experience then we need to look at the "big 5" leagues and who's done well there, consistently. I would go for Lucien Favre. Kasper Hjulmand has done nothing at club level, his record in the Bundersleague is terrible, Fonseca seems to be hit and miss. Gerard shouldn't be anywhere near the list.
Is Deano the modern Vic Crowe or Tony Barton?
Was hardly an abject failure at Wigan, they did beat Man City to win the FA Cup. Getting relegated with them was poor but didn't put off Everton too much. I'm struggling to recall why Everton fans were totally against him for a finish.
Definitely a bit of a spoofer, somehow got himself the Belgium job with Henry for whatever reason an assistant. Think he was done a good job there, second best team at last World Cup but their team now ain't what it was. No surprise to me that he would be looking to move on, surely was in the mix for the Spurs and Newcastle jobs of late.
I was looking at his Everton record, and I suspect the fans turned on him because of two back-to-back seasons of 11th place. That's off the back a decade of David Moyes getting them 6-8th every season. They were in the European mix pretty much every year for a decade, and then they weren't.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
It would be akin to DOL running across to Doug to give him the fist to the chest after a draw vs Stoke or whoever the fuck it was against
You're mixing up DOL celebrating a win at Small Heath (1-0, Kevin Phillips) with Alex McLeish punching the air after a 0-0 home draw with Stoke.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helmI'm just sitting in a darkened room contemplating the events of the last 24 hours or so. The europhia from the owners taking over the club and appointing a lifelong Villa fan with a mission to conquer Europe has worn off. But then I remember who these guys are. They were our saviours not so long ago. They saved us from oblivion at the hands of Tony X surely there's a brilliant plan afoot and we're about to be blown away by them once again or else what was the whole point of the last three years? So I'm going to ignore the hype and speculation surrounding such names as Gerrard and Martinez because again if they do that what was the point of the last three years? I live in hope.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Klopp will probably be at Liverpool for another 5 years or. I suspect we'll have at least two, maybe 3 managers in that time. Of the various reasons for thinking Garrard isn't right, the possibility of him moving on to Liverpool at some point isn't a massive concern to me.One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On that there Twitter the Rangers fan sites seem to be taking it seriously...… *shudder*
On that there Twitter the Rangers fan sites seem to be taking it seriously...… *shudder*
Looked at one of their sites yesterday and today, a significant number think it's a realistic prospect plus some saying they wouldn't mind Deano at Ibrox.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On Your first 5 words
I wouldn’t be so sure
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On Your first 5 words
I wouldn’t be so sure
What has he ever done for you to dislike him so much?
I won't accept any criticism of how corporate e is becuse that's part of his job and pretty much every decent ceo will have that.
He's had a handful of big choices to make at Villa:
Sacking Bruce when he did was the right call
Picking Smith as the replacement was the right call
Sacking Pitarch after a slightly disappointing first season back was the right call
Picking Lange as the replacement seems a decent choice to me
Sacking Smith this weekend was the right call
So he's done a good job when needed. On top of that he was very vocal about reforming the youth setup and has followed through on it to fantastic effect. Right now he deserves the benefit of the doubt but you in particular seem to have him down as some shitty chancer who is 1 decision away from showing his true colours. I just don't get it.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On Your first 5 words
I wouldn’t be so sure
What has he ever done for you to dislike him so much?
I won't accept any criticism of how corporate e is becuse that's part of his job and pretty much every decent ceo will have that.
He's had a handful of big choices to make at Villa:
Sacking Bruce when he did was the right call
Picking Smith as the replacement was the right call
Sacking Pitarch after a slightly disappointing first season back was the right call
Picking Lange as the replacement seems a decent choice to me
Sacking Smith this weekend was the right call
So he's done a good job when needed. On top of that he was very vocal about reforming the youth setup and has followed through on it to fantastic effect. Right now he deserves the benefit of the doubt but you in particular seem to have him down as some shitty chancer who is 1 decision away from showing his true colours. I just don't get it.
I think this is a really good post/point. What exactly has he done to deserve the vitriol and, in turn, what exactly has Steven Gerrard done to upset so many people other than do a very good job at the first club he’s cut his teeth at.
Guess I’m a bit old school in that I fully get behind any manager that manages my club.Same here. Just don't fancy any "Stevie G" media circus coming to Villa Park
Steve Gerrard would be the kind of appointment a Tony Xia would make.
Martinez would be a decent appointment.
Ideally with someone who knows about defending as well as attacking in tow, though.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On Your first 5 words
I wouldn’t be so sure
What has he ever done for you to dislike him so much?
I won't accept any criticism of how corporate e is becuse that's part of his job and pretty much every decent ceo will have that.
He's had a handful of big choices to make at Villa:
Sacking Bruce when he did was the right call
Picking Smith as the replacement was the right call
Sacking Pitarch after a slightly disappointing first season back was the right call
Picking Lange as the replacement seems a decent choice to me
Sacking Smith this weekend was the right call
So he's done a good job when needed. On top of that he was very vocal about reforming the youth setup and has followed through on it to fantastic effect. Right now he deserves the benefit of the doubt but you in particular seem to have him down as some shitty chancer who is 1 decision away from showing his true colours. I just don't get it.
I think this is a really good post/point. What exactly has he done to deserve the vitriol and, in turn, what exactly has Steven Gerrard done to upset so many people other than do a very good job at the first club he’s cut his teeth at.
What would be a best decision for Christian Purslow? What's in it for him? Surely it's one that reflects well on him, and that has to be good for us.Gerrard is the celebrity punt, if Purslow is going down that route then I would rather have Lampard because he has more relevant experience although neither inspire me.
Well Purslow looks after the commercial side so appointing someone like Gerrard is undoubtably good for the club on that side but on the playing side who knows? It's like Woodward with Ronaldo. Must have made them a mint re-signing him, but should they have got a midfielder instead?CEO is more than just the Commercial side. The Commercial side can not thrive unless the playing side is doing well.
One thing for sure, this next appointment is going to be extremely divisive. It’s obvious whoever is eventually given the job will have many fans vehemently opposed to their appointment.
Won’t be divisive amongst fans if Gerard gets it as I think it’s pretty much unanimous in that regard
Purslow can't be that stupid, friends with Gerrard or not. Gerrard himself would be well advised to stay with Sevco anyway to build up his experience before Klopp eventually moves on.
On Your first 5 words
I wouldn’t be so sure
What has he ever done for you to dislike him so much?
I won't accept any criticism of how corporate e is becuse that's part of his job and pretty much every decent ceo will have that.
He's had a handful of big choices to make at Villa:
Sacking Bruce when he did was the right call
Picking Smith as the replacement was the right call
Sacking Pitarch after a slightly disappointing first season back was the right call
Picking Lange as the replacement seems a decent choice to me
Sacking Smith this weekend was the right call
So he's done a good job when needed. On top of that he was very vocal about reforming the youth setup and has followed through on it to fantastic effect. Right now he deserves the benefit of the doubt but you in particular seem to have him down as some shitty chancer who is 1 decision away from showing his true colours. I just don't get it.
I think this is a really good post/point. What exactly has he done to deserve the vitriol and, in turn, what exactly has Steven Gerrard done to upset so many people other than do a very good job at the first club he’s cut his teeth at.
It’s not vitriol or hatred I just don’t trust him to make the right decision
I think he’ll make the best one for Christian Purslow
You think it’s irrational that’s fair enough it don’t change my mind
If he gets it right and by that I mean appoint a manager who we think is a significant upgrade on Dean Smith
Feel free to come back and batter me round the head with a wet fish
If you’ve got a nagging feeling about someone you can’t not have the feeling just because someone writes a positive post about them on a message board
you think we’re in safe hands that’s great I’ve got no problem with that
You obviously believe he’ll make the right decision that’s great hope he does
I don’t have that same belief And there’s nothing I can do about it at the moment
On that there Twitter the Rangers fan sites seem to be taking it seriously...… *shudder*
Looked at one of their sites yesterday and today, a significant number think it's a realistic prospect plus some saying they wouldn't mind Deano at Ibrox.
yeah, he'd walk it up there I reckon.
He's done fine. He's not done badly, he's not done spectacularly, he's done OK. We wouldn't be looking at a Rangers manager with this record unless his name was Steven Gerrard, and it strikes me at least as starstruck, immature, hope-over-substance and glamour-dazzled thinking.
Well Purslow looks after the commercial side so appointing someone like Gerrard is undoubtably good for the club on that side but on the playing side who knows? It's like Woodward with Ronaldo. Must have made them a mint re-signing him, but should they have got a midfielder instead?CEO is more than just the Commercial side. The Commercial side can not thrive unless the playing side is doing well.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
I think this is the fear, that the decision will be more celebrity than football related.Well Purslow looks after the commercial side so appointing someone like Gerrard is undoubtably good for the club on that side but on the playing side who knows? It's like Woodward with Ronaldo. Must have made them a mint re-signing him, but should they have got a midfielder instead?CEO is more than just the Commercial side. The Commercial side can not thrive unless the playing side is doing well.
True but that is his background. He negotiated all the deals for Chelsea for instance. That's very important granted and after all provides the money to improve the playing side, but I think its a bit naive that he wouldn't prefer to do that with a "bling" name like Gerrard rather than Mr. Anonymous Smith which may sway his thinking when he's looking for a manager.
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Not me. A change was needed
how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Not me. A change was needed
I prefer the look of Norwich’s reported shortlist to ours that’s for sure.
Danny Ings signing was like some Cold War operation, where we only hear about it in 2051 when it becomes declassified.Yeah I am pinning all my hops on this.
Jeff Stellinghow many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Not me. A change was needed
I prefer the look of Norwich’s reported shortlist to ours that’s for sure.
Is basically the same as there's but we have Gerrard and they have dean smith.how many of you after seeing the list now wish Smith was still at the helm
Not me.
Not me. A change was needed
I prefer the look of Norwich’s reported shortlist to ours that’s for sure.
Lamport
The bloke we've just sacked
The bloke who gets whacked 9 once a season
Where has our shortlist been reported?
If I'm reading this right, Italy have their last World Cup qualifier against Norn Iron on Nov 15.Apparently that's Martinez wants to do
They win that (or match Switzerland's result against Bulgaria) and they're through next year.
I wonder if in that scenario Roberto Mancini might be more receptive; maybe even with the carrot of still being allowed to lead the Azzuri in Qatar. It's pretty much a part time gig, life as an international manager, anyroad. I assume he knows most of his players at this stage.
If he needs to keep an eye on Serie A in the meantime, that's what assistants and video analysis are for.
I haven't seen him linked at all, but him and Rodgers would def qualify as ambitious targets.
If I'm reading this right, Italy have their last World Cup qualifier against Norn Iron on Nov 15.
They win that (or match Switzerland's result against Bulgaria) and they're through next year.
I wonder if in that scenario Roberto Mancini might be more receptive; maybe even with the carrot of still being allowed to lead the Azzuri in Qatar. It's pretty much a part time gig, life as an international manager, anyroad. I assume he knows most of his players at this stage.
If he needs to keep an eye on Serie A in the meantime, that's what assistants and video analysis are for.
I haven't seen him linked at all, but him and Rodgers would def qualify as ambitious targets.
Well Houllier practically treated it as a part time gig. O'Neill wasn't exactly a fixture at Bodymoor Heath either.
But with the nature of the PL now, you couldn't be operating that way.
If the price of getting Mancini was we had to agree to let him head away at the international break in March and again next summer, I'd pay it. I'm sure the massive coaching team he'd want could take training at BH for a few days.
Martinez is a fraud. Never a top ten prem manager.
I'd sooner have Gerrard, and that's saying something.
Feel bound to say I don't think Mancini is leaving the Italy job before the World Cup for anyone. Not Juve, not Real, not nobody.
Thank fuck. How he is still in that gig is perplexing indeed.Feel bound to say I don't think Mancini is leaving the Italy job before the World Cup for anyone. Not Juve, not Real, not nobody.
Neither is Martinez
Lucien Favre is an interesting name but to use an Australian phrase why don't we just go "Balls Out" and throw a shit load of money to get Joachim Lowe.
Lucien Favre is an interesting name but to use an Australian phrase why don't we just go "Balls Out" and throw a shit load of money to get Joachim Lowe.Not a sniff for me.
My sources are telling me that Howard Wilkinson is in pole position.
Lucien Favre is an interesting name but to use an Australian phrase why don't we just go "Balls Out" and throw a shit load of money to get Joachim Lowe.
If the price of getting Mancini was we had to agree to let him head away at the international break in March and again next summer, I'd pay it. I'm sure the massive coaching team he'd want could take training at BH for a few days.
For Mancini, at a push, maybe. For Martinez? Nah.
Feel bound to say I don't think Mancini is leaving the Italy job before the World Cup for anyone. Not Juve, not Real, not nobody.
Neither is Martinez
Feel bound to say I don't think Mancini is leaving the Italy job before the World Cup for anyone. Not Juve, not Real, not nobody.
Neither is Martinez
Can't see the Danish manager wanting to either, seeing as it looks like they will be at the World Cup next year.
Feel bound to say I don't think Mancini is leaving the Italy job before the World Cup for anyone. Not Juve, not Real, not nobody.
Neither is Martinez
Can't see the Danish manager wanting to either, seeing as it looks like they will be at the World Cup next year.
I suspect a Premier League manager earns a fair bit more than the manager of Denmark.
I checked out Roberto Martinez's record in his time with Everton and to be fair it was better than I had remembered.
Does spoonface still work with him?
Re Potter, in a world where back-to-back English managers is a rarity, that'd be back-to-back Brummies. Not saying it's a good thing or a bad thing, but it'd be a thing nonetheless. Bab.You could see the headlines in a few months: “Potter potted”
Favre is my favourite.And mine - with Terry back a defence coach.
Has managed at big clubs, has a reputation for bringing young players through, would surely relish working at Villa.
Too many idiots phoning in WM wanting Gerrard...🙈It has the feeling of inevitability about it. Hope I am wrong.
Too many idiots phoning in WM wanting Gerrard...🙈
If it is Gerrard then we'd all hope for the best (and it would at least be funny to see the reaction of my Rangers mate who's assuring me he'd 'never join yous in a relegation battle'), but fuck it would be underwhelming - and if I were Dean Smith, I wouldn't be too impressed at what the club viewed as an upgrade.
The main issue is that, as David Ornstein said today on the Athletic, the Villa vacancy is viewed as one of the most attractive in football right now. We really could make a push for Emery or someone really serious, a proper statement of intent. To throw it at Gerrard, at this stage...I just can't help but feel it'd go down as yet another missed opportunity in our history.
Trying to be positive about Gerrard and he would command a hell of a lot of respect from the players especially the younger ones, can't argue with his football achievements and he hasn't done a bad job managing at Rangers!
It is just all the Liverpool baggage that he brings with him especially to the PL (yuck)!
Does spoonface still work with him?
Do you mean Platt? No, Italy have Vialli and that bloke who looks like he’s wearing a comedy glasses and ‘tash disguise 🥸
Too many idiots phoning in WM wanting Gerrard...🙈Yep. He was top of the B'ham Mail poll. Unfortunately the general consensus on here is often not reflected by the wider fan base.
If it is Gerrard then we'd all hope for the best (and it would at least be funny to see the reaction of my Rangers mate who's assuring me he'd 'never join yous in a relegation battle'), but fuck it would be underwhelming - and if I were Dean Smith, I wouldn't be too impressed at what the club viewed as an upgrade.Agreed. It's our chance to make a statement. Lets do everything we can to bloody well make one.
The main issue is that, as David Ornstein said today on the Athletic, the Villa vacancy is viewed as one of the most attractive in football right now. We really could make a push for Emery or someone really serious, a proper statement of intent. To throw it at Gerrard, at this stage...I just can't help but feel it'd go down as yet another missed opportunity in our history.
Too many idiots phoning in WM8)wanting Gerrard...🙈
I'd rather have Ali G than Stevie G.Ali G Indadugout!
We have way to much on the line in terms of the need to develop our youth to allow Gerrard to take the reigns. Our bench vs Southampton was a bunch of kids and Gerrard wouldn't have a clue how to get the best out of them.
Damn right, the general consensus on here wanted Smith gone.Too many idiots phoning in WM wanting Gerrard...🙈Yep. He was top of the B'ham Mail poll. Unfortunately the general consensus on here is often not reflected by the wider fan base.
If turns out to be gerrard and its a epic failure i think purslows neck will be on the line.I've read up a bit on him. I think he sounds good, though he's older than the other candidates, which rightly or wrongly, might put us off him. His track record's decent, and he's available.
Friendships and employment in football very rarely work out.
Forget gerrard get favre in
Too many idiots phoning in WM8)wanting Gerrard...🙈
Yeah - I think so, have no idea about him to be honest. But most of the recent are making me seriously depressedFavre is my favourite.And mine - with Terry back a defence coach.
Has managed at big clubs, has a reputation for bringing young players through, would surely relish working at Villa.
Yeah I saw another poll on twitter and he was way ahead.Too many idiots phoning in WM wanting Gerrard...🙈Yep. He was top of the B'ham Mail poll. Unfortunately the general consensus on here is often not reflected by the wider fan base.
I’m not saying that I want him (far from it), but if it Gerrard did become the chosen one then you’d like to think that he’d sort out our shit effort midfield at the very least once and for all. He’d also attract and command respect from the players already here and any coming in. Just saying like.Surely any manager coming in should have there respect - seems a low bar
If turns out to be gerrard and its a epic failure i think purslows neck will be on the line.I've read up a bit on him. I think he sounds good, though he's older than the other candidates, which rightly or wrongly, might put us off him. His track record's decent, and he's available.
Friendships and employment in football very rarely work out.
Forget gerrard get favre in
If turns out to be gerrard and its a epic failure i think purslows neck will be on the line.I've read up a bit on him. I think he sounds good, though he's older than the other candidates, which rightly or wrongly, might put us off him. His track record's decent, and he's available.
Friendships and employment in football very rarely work out.
Forget gerrard get favre in
If turns out to be gerrard and its a epic failure i think purslows neck will be on the line.I've read up a bit on him. I think he sounds good, though he's older than the other candidates, which rightly or wrongly, might put us off him. His track record's decent, and he's available.
Friendships and employment in football very rarely work out.
Forget gerrard get favre in
With the pace we have available I think Favre would do a good job.
If Purslow wants to bring in someone because he played midfield for Liverpool, then Xabi Alonso might be a better choice, ‘they’ reckon he’s going to be the next big thing.
Interesting article about the coach Gerrard has with him at Rangers. Liverpool players thought he was incredibly good, and is widely considered the brains behind the operation. If it is to be him, I think he will do pretty well in fairness. We will be top 10 next season, maybe even this, and I think he would command the respect of the dressing room from day 1.
I don't want him, but don't think the result will be a disaster.
He didn’t do great at Dortmund but the expectation levels there are probably higher.
Trying to be positive about Gerrard and he would command a hell of a lot of respect from the players especially the younger ones...
Interesting article about the coach Gerrard has with him at Rangers. Liverpool players thought he was incredibly good, and is widely considered the brains behind the operation. If it is to be him, I think he will do pretty well in fairness. We will be top 10 next season, maybe even this, and I think he would command the respect of the dressing room from day 1.
I don't want him, but don't think the result will be a disaster.
That's where I'm at. The coach working with him is Michael Beale, went from Liverpool's Youth academy to Brasil before joining up with Stevie G at Ibrox.
He didn’t do great at Dortmund but the expectation levels there are probably higher.
Not so sure about that...
[Wiki] On 22 May 2018, Favre was appointed as manager of Borussia Dortmund, with a contract lasting until 30 June 2020.[40] During his debut season, he became the first-ever manager to remain unbeaten in his first 15 Bundesliga matches with the club.[41] This includes a 4–1 win against RB Leipzig, a 7–0 win against 1. FC Nürnberg, and a 4–0 win against Atlético Madrid.[42] On 3 August 2019, Dortmund won the German Super Cup.[43] He was sacked on 13 December 2020 after a string of poor results, including a 5–1 thumping at home against newly-promoted VfB Stuttgart.[44] Favre finished with a record of 67 wins, 17 draws, and 23 losses.[45]
63% win ratio. I'd be happy with that at Villa.
Surely it should 666%An Omen indeed...
I would rather have Dean Smith than any of the top 8 in the poll on here, or on Sky Bet.
I think we’ve really fucked this up.
Is all very well saying “Smith out” but surely you have to know who you can get instead, and be pretty confident they’re better? I think we’ve been very impatient with a good coach and a very decent man, who has a pretty bad run with injuries in our bad spell.
If you like stats, look at the German 2nd division points totals from 1st to 10th and rejoice in the Tuetonic efficiency.
If those smart arses at Hansa had done the honorable thing and drawn with Holstein it would be 1 - 13If you like stats, look at the German 2nd division points totals from 1st to 10th and rejoice in the Tuetonic efficiency.
That really is a thing of beauty.
I would rather have Dean Smith than any of the top 8 in the poll on here, or on Sky Bet.a decent bloke who did well - has had a poor 2021 with very good players. He hit his ceiling.
I think we’ve really fucked this up.
Is all very well saying “Smith out” but surely you have to know who you can get instead, and be pretty confident they’re better? I think we’ve been very impatient with a good coach and a very decent man, who has a pretty bad run with injuries in our bad spell.
If those smart arses at Hansa had done the honorable thing and drawn with Holstein it would be 1 - 13If you like stats, look at the German 2nd division points totals from 1st to 10th and rejoice in the Tuetonic efficiency.
That really is a thing of beauty.
Interesting article about the coach Gerrard has with him at Rangers. Liverpool players thought he was incredibly good, and is widely considered the brains behind the operation. If it is to be him, I think he will do pretty well in fairness. We will be top 10 next season, maybe even this, and I think he would command the respect of the dressing room from day 1.
I don't want him, but don't think the result will be a disaster.
That's where I'm at. The coach working with him is Michael Beale, went from Liverpool's Youth academy to Brasil before joining up with Stevie G at Ibrox.
Googled him and there were 2 excellent articles on his coaching ability,one on BBC and the other at Coaches Voice.
If you like stats, look at the German 2nd division points totals from 1st to 10th and rejoice in the Tuetonic efficiency.
Mourinho is fucking it up regale with Roma so he could be available. Anyone?
I would rather have Dean Smith than any of the top 8 in the poll on here, or on Sky Bet.
I think we’ve really fucked this up.
Is all very well saying “Smith out” but surely you have to know who you can get instead, and be pretty confident they’re better? I think we’ve been very impatient with a good coach and a very decent man, who has a pretty bad run with injuries in our bad spell.
This is very true - all I would say, is they whoever they appoint needs to show this "continuous improvement" and get us a top-half finish, and continue to develop our players. If they do then this will have been the correct decision, or at least a correct decision.I would rather have Dean Smith than any of the top 8 in the poll on here, or on Sky Bet.
I think we’ve really fucked this up.
Is all very well saying “Smith out” but surely you have to know who you can get instead, and be pretty confident they’re better? I think we’ve been very impatient with a good coach and a very decent man, who has a pretty bad run with injuries in our bad spell.
I have to ask this. How do you know we haven’t got someone lined up that matches your expectations? Your disappointment stems from reading a load of tabloid and/or Twitter clickbait
It would be another media circus!Mourinho is fucking it up regale with Roma so he could be available. Anyone?
The idea is about as appealing as hammering knitting needles through my eyeballs.
Mourinho is fucking it up regale with Roma so he could be available. Anyone?
Percy said the list would be ambitious.
None of the main ones on this alleged shortlist are ambitious
I'm hoping for a Danny Ings like annoucement
If not Favre (and I hope it is), we're going to have to pinch somebody from another club. Pochettino doesn't look happy at PSG (like I'd know), perhaps Purslow could smarm him in?
I am aware that there is zero chance of this happening.
Dont think that's a bad shoutIf not Favre (and I hope it is), we're going to have to pinch somebody from another club. Pochettino doesn't look happy at PSG (like I'd know), perhaps Purslow could smarm him in?
I am aware that there is zero chance of this happening.
Could do worse then Emery considering he was about to jack in CL club for one at bottom of this league before changing his mind right at the last minute so he is open to offers and don't think he's signed a new deal there since.
Would actually make sense as we want to be in europa league sooner or later and he's a master at winning that competition, think he's won it 4 times in last 8 years or something daft and also got Arsenal to the final.
I would rather have Dean Smith than any of the top 8 in the poll on here, or on Sky Bet.
I think we’ve really fucked this up.
Is all very well saying “Smith out” but surely you have to know who you can get instead, and be pretty confident they’re better? I think we’ve been very impatient with a good coach and a very decent man, who has a pretty bad run with injuries in our bad spell.
I have to ask this. How do you know we haven’t got someone lined up that matches your expectations? Your disappointment stems from reading a load of tabloid and/or Twitter clickbait
It won’t be the Ajax dude. He’ll stay there until the summer then join Man U.
It won’t be the Ajax dude. He’ll stay there until the summer then join Man U.
Yeah, also pretty certain he's not going to turn down the chance to manage Marvolous Nekamba.It won’t be the Ajax dude. He’ll stay there until the summer then join Man U.
Nah he's not glam enough for the United board.
If you like stats, look at the German 2nd division points totals from 1st to 10th and rejoice in the Tuetonic efficiency.That's wonderful. They should dock Hansa 2pts for inefficiency.
Erik Ten Hag applies his tactics with a flexible formation in the form of 4-3-3 and 4-3-2-1, with three attacking midfielders who join one attacker at the higher position and three defensive midfield who forms tandem with four defenders.Yeah, also pretty certain he's not going to turn down the chance to manage Marvolous Nekamba.It won’t be the Ajax dude. He’ll stay there until the summer then join Man U.
Nah he's not glam enough for the United board.
I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
Joe aside, I think most of those that have posted their comments like Mings, Targett and McGinn have their ceilings too - and there probably at them.I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off too calling dean the goat and fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
It won’t be the Ajax dude. He’ll stay there until the summer then join Man U.
or we'll appoint him and pip donny from manyoo. 8)
I think I asked this the other day but, why couldn’t we get TenHaag if we wanted him?I know - are we really that far off Spurs who were linked with him? I would argue we're better ran, and there is no shortage of investment.
He’s not done enough to get one of the really big jobs, none of them are available anyway and we can pay him a lot more and give him a bigger budget than he’s got, albeit probably as a stepping stone to one of the huge European jobs It’s not like Ajax keep hold of people they want to is it? their turnover rate is huge.
And he plays 4-3-3 which will fit Deans players.
I think I asked this the other day but, why couldn’t we get TenHaag if we wanted him?I agree. I don't get what's supposedly stopping us from getting him. Even a club like Norwich or Brentford could offer him higher wages and a bigger transfer budget than he'll ever see at Ajax. And for the really big jobs, there's no way they're taking a punt on someone who's not proven in the English/Spanish/Italian/German leagues.
He’s not done enough to get one of the really big jobs, none of them are available anyway and we can pay him a lot more and give him a bigger budget than he’s got, albeit probably as a stepping stone to one of the huge European jobs It’s not like Ajax keep hold of people they want to is it? their turnover rate is huge.
And he plays 4-3-3 which will fit Deans players.
If I'm Wes or Nassef - I'm wanting a good reason why people of this calibre atent on the list. Surely they don't get to be billionaires by not pushing for the best.I think I asked this the other day but, why couldn’t we get TenHaag if we wanted him?I agree. I don't get what's supposedly stopping us from getting him. Even a club like Norwich or Brentford could offer him higher wages and a bigger transfer budget than he'll ever see at Ajax. And for the really big jobs, there's no way they're taking a punt on someone who's not proven in the English/Spanish/Italian/German leagues.
He’s not done enough to get one of the really big jobs, none of them are available anyway and we can pay him a lot more and give him a bigger budget than he’s got, albeit probably as a stepping stone to one of the huge European jobs It’s not like Ajax keep hold of people they want to is it? their turnover rate is huge.
And he plays 4-3-3 which will fit Deans players.
I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off, too, calling dean the goat, yet fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
Something happened in the summer with coaches leaving. As for the rat who says he is villa well fuck him Terry love him or hate him is a fantastic defensive coach. It seemed that Dean became a bit isolated without his usual support. We will never know but whoever caused the behind the scenes problems in the summer is the root of the problemYeah - from bits I have read from all these ITK twats is he was encouraged to update his backroom staff, which is ROK went.
I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off, too, calling dean the goat, yet fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
Absolutely. I’d be more impressed if they just apologised for ‘being shit’ and saying they should be the ones being sacked.
And yes, Grealish above all others can absolutely fuck off. The second he signed that Man $ity contract it was the death knell for Dean.
what’s a penarse.I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off, too, calling dean the goat, yet fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
Absolutely. I’d be more impressed if they just apologised for ‘being shit’ and saying they should be the ones being sacked.
And yes, Grealish above all others can absolutely fuck off. The second he signed that Man $ity contract it was the death knell for Dean.
Gabby having a pop at the fans as well and that penarse backing him up. Classy.
what’s a penarse.I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off, too, calling dean the goat, yet fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
Absolutely. I’d be more impressed if they just apologised for ‘being shit’ and saying they should be the ones being sacked.
And yes, Grealish above all others can absolutely fuck off. The second he signed that Man $ity contract it was the death knell for Dean.
Gabby having a pop at the fans as well and that penarse backing him up. Classy.
ok who is the Peensrse?what’s a penarse.I just hope to goodness that they have done their homework prior to the departure of Dean. As astute businessmen I would assume they have done their homework and come up with a manager that can take us forward. Oh and one last thing to the players.....Take a fuckin look at yourselves in the mirror.
It's driving me mad seeing them post on social media about their affinity for Dean.
You could've just defended for 15 minutes against Wolves three weeks ago and none of this happens. Greasy Joe can fuck off, too, calling dean the goat, yet fawning over pep like a desperate stripper.
Absolutely. I’d be more impressed if they just apologised for ‘being shit’ and saying they should be the ones being sacked.
And yes, Grealish above all others can absolutely fuck off. The second he signed that Man $ity contract it was the death knell for Dean.
Gabby having a pop at the fans as well and that penarse backing him up. Classy.
Peenarse
John Terry sending subliminal messages on Instagram.
John Terry sending subliminal messages on Instagram.
Mail reporting we're approaching Gerrard officially.FFS
If Terry were to return as defensive coach it would suggest that he left for other reasons than to pursue a job as manager. It won't happen in my view.Favre is my favourite.And mine - with Terry back a defence coach.
Has managed at big clubs, has a reputation for bringing young players through, would surely relish working at Villa.
I’d rather Terry than Gerrard, I’d at least have some confidence of him understanding and solving the problems that led to DS sacking.Yeah - I think he gets the club, albeit its not his club
Very much hoping Rangers tell us to sod off. Gerrard does absolutely nothing for me.I know - winning the league with Rangers is like winning it with Man City - meaningless as the deck is stacked in your favour.
he'll do 2-2.5 years and we will be top half at the end of that.
It’s going to be Gerrard isn’t it?
What a massive lack of imagination from the Board.
Not as against him as some, but even so this could have been our moment and I don’t think we’ve taken it.
he'll do 2-2.5 years and we will be top half at the end of that.
Be still my beating heart.
It’s going to be Gerrard isn’t it?This just seems really fucking lazy - hope I am wrong, but this just feels typical Villa - do all the hard work and then fuck it up.
What a massive lack of imagination from the Board.
Not as against him as some, but even so this could have been our moment and I don’t think we’ve taken it.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.TBF Sam Allardyce has achieved much more as a manager than he has
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.TBF Sam Allardyce has achieved much more as a manager than he has
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
Very much hoping Rangers tell us to sod off.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
Surely an approach, if it’s even true because nobody else is reporting it, doesn’t mean he will be the manager. First it has to be granted. Second there will other candidates we will approach.
100% record as England manager ;DWe shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.TBF Sam Allardyce has achieved much more as a manager than he has
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
What a ridiculous comparison. Allardyce has been a manager for 30 years and won precisely fuck all.
I think Gerrard is number one choice anyway.
I think Gerrard is number one choice anyway.
I’d find it really strange if we’d planned for that, it would seem to be just as big a risk as giving Dean another 10 games.
Exactly - IMO this takes us further backwards. Apparently he likes more control then a "head coach" role. which kinda pisses in the face of what were trying to do.I think Gerrard is number one choice anyway.
I’d find that really strange if we’d planned for that, it would seem to be just as big a risk as giving Dean another 10 games.
Surely an approach, if it’s even true because nobody else is reporting it, doesn’t mean he will be the manager. First it has to be granted. Second there will other candidates we will approach.
Depends if it's one of those "shortlist of one" scenarios.
I think Gerrard is number one choice anyway. If he/Rangers reject interesting who we go for next.
So for some of the wealthiest owners in world football, our Chief Exec has managed so narrow it down to a bloke who manages in a pub league with no other experience. Shit show from Purslow if true.Exactly this. Will lose a lot of faith in the board if this is true.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Shit didn’t realise Rangers won the champions league 😂.We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Every domestic honour more than twice over bar the big one, European cup, UEFA cup and European Super cup. But yeah - not much
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Side note: the odd mention of Lampard bringing through youth at Chelsea, wasn't this because they had an embargo so he had no choice?
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Discounting his playing career, because it's completely irrelevant, he has won one trophy. In three years.
Not sure if I've mentioned it, but St Johnstone manager Callum Davidson won twice as many trophies in one year.
The idea that Gerrard is in any way a successful manager stems back, yet again, to pathetic Liverpool fanwankery.
I'm well aware of how long it is since Villa last won a trophy, that's why I'd rather we appointed the best manager possible to end the drought, rather than getting gooey-eyed with excitement over someone because they used to play for Liverpool.
Side note: the odd mention of Lampard bringing through youth at Chelsea, wasn't this because they had an embargo so he had no choice?
But that’s why he got the job, he’d done well at Derby bringing through young players and that was what Chelsea needed in those circumstances
He’d make more sense as an appointment than Gerrard. But not much
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Discounting his playing career, because it's completely irrelevant, he has won one trophy. In three years.
Not sure if I've mentioned it, but St Johnstone manager Callum Davidson won twice as many trophies in one year.
The idea that Gerrard is in any way a successful manager stems back, yet again, to pathetic Liverpool fanwankery.
I'm well aware of how long it is since Villa last won a trophy, that's why I'd rather we appointed the best manager possible to end the drought, rather than getting gooey-eyed with excitement over someone because they used to play for Liverpool.
I wasn’t suggesting for one minute that Gerrard would be a good choice - I was merely countering the suggestion (ludicrous in my view) that he is not a “winner”
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Discounting his playing career, because it's completely irrelevant, he has won one trophy. In three years.
Not sure if I've mentioned it, but St Johnstone manager Callum Davidson won twice as many trophies in one year.
The idea that Gerrard is in any way a successful manager stems back, yet again, to pathetic Liverpool fanwankery.
I'm well aware of how long it is since Villa last won a trophy, that's why I'd rather we appointed the best manager possible to end the drought, rather than getting gooey-eyed with excitement over someone because they used to play for Liverpool.
I wasn’t suggesting for one minute that Gerrard would be a good choice - I was merely countering the suggestion (ludicrous in my view) that he is not a “winner”
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Discounting his playing career, because it's completely irrelevant, he has won one trophy. In three years.
Not sure if I've mentioned it, but St Johnstone manager Callum Davidson won twice as many trophies in one year.
The idea that Gerrard is in any way a successful manager stems back, yet again, to pathetic Liverpool fanwankery.
I'm well aware of how long it is since Villa last won a trophy, that's why I'd rather we appointed the best manager possible to end the drought, rather than getting gooey-eyed with excitement over someone because they used to play for Liverpool.
I wasn’t suggesting for one minute that Gerrard would be a good choice - I was merely countering the suggestion (ludicrous in my view) that he is not a “winner”
Fair enough, but there is no evidence that he is "a winner" in managerial terms. Certainly not more so than, say, Alex McLeish, who won eight trophies in five years at Ibrox.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Discounting his playing career, because it's completely irrelevant, he has won one trophy. In three years.
Not sure if I've mentioned it, but St Johnstone manager Callum Davidson won twice as many trophies in one year.
The idea that Gerrard is in any way a successful manager stems back, yet again, to pathetic Liverpool fanwankery.
I'm well aware of how long it is since Villa last won a trophy, that's why I'd rather we appointed the best manager possible to end the drought, rather than getting gooey-eyed with excitement over someone because they used to play for Liverpool.
I wasn’t suggesting for one minute that Gerrard would be a good choice - I was merely countering the suggestion (ludicrous in my view) that he is not a “winner”
Fair enough, but there is no evidence that he is "a winner" in managerial terms. Certainly not more so than, say, Alex McLeish, who won eight trophies in five years at Ibrox.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Every domestic honour more than twice over bar the big one, European cup, UEFA cup and European Super cup. But yeah - not much
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Every domestic honour more than twice over bar the big one, European cup, UEFA cup and European Super cup. But yeah - not much
I was under the impression that we were thinking of him as a manager?
All depends on the expectations. Will Gerrard come if the job doesn't have a large budget? No. Will he come if he thinks he won't be backed... no. So from that respect I think he's going to be ok. He's not who I'd want, but I think he'll do 2-2.5 years and we will be top half at the end of that.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Every domestic honour more than twice over bar the big one, European cup, UEFA cup and European Super cup. But yeah - not much
I was under the impression that we were thinking of him as a manager?
Perhaps we are all getting confused with terminology
If we can agree that Gerrard has a “winner’s mentality” would that help?
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
Every domestic honour more than twice over bar the big one, European cup, UEFA cup and European Super cup. But yeah - not much
I was under the impression that we were thinking of him as a manager?
Perhaps we are all getting confused with terminology
If we can agree that Gerrard has a “winner’s mentality” would that help?
I'm worried that we might not have our Villa back if we appoint Gerrard.
I've no doubt he'll say he loved Villa Park, massive club etc but the reality is he'll be using us as a stepping stone to another club. Which fucks me off.
I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Agreed, I can’t believe they’d sack a popular coach for an underwhelming replacement, surely.I think Gerrard is number one choice anyway.
I’d find it really strange if we’d planned for that, it would seem to be just as big a risk as giving Dean another 10 games.
I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Completely agree, he has not had the experience of dealing with a run of defeats for example, because in Scotland managing Rangers that’s almost impossible.I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Appointing a scouser to manage Villa would just be a hard pill to swallow. But that’s a personal issue.
The bigger issue for me is why Gerrard the manager? He is an untested quantity at the PL level, he has limited experience as a manager full stop, he has not yet shown he can handle the pressure commensurate with a club like Villa - basically it would be another Lambert like appointment (he had done well at Norwich etc) and IMO would be a disaster. Rangers are a big club in a tin pot league - success there at best is akin to success in the Championship.
I just don’t get the appeal.
Surely to god, we have higher ambition.
I'd hope so.I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Appointing a scouser to manage Villa would just be a hard pill to swallow. But that’s a personal issue.
The bigger issue for me is why Gerrard the manager? He is an untested quantity at the PL level, he has limited experience as a manager full stop, he has not yet shown he can handle the pressure commensurate with a club like Villa - basically it would be another Lambert like appointment (he had done well at Norwich etc) and IMO would be a disaster. Rangers are a big club in a tin pot league - success there at best is akin to success in the Championship.
I just don’t get the appeal.
Surely to god, we have higher ambition.
Get Potter in and get him to bring Bissouma with him
I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Appointing a scouser to manage Villa would just be a hard pill to swallow. But that’s a personal issue.
The bigger issue for me is why Gerrard the manager? He is an untested quantity at the PL level, he has limited experience as a manager full stop, he has not yet shown he can handle the pressure commensurate with a club like Villa - basically it would be another Lambert like appointment (he had done well at Norwich etc) and IMO would be a disaster. Rangers are a big club in a tin pot league - success there at best is akin to success in the Championship.
I just don’t get the appeal.
Surely to god, we have higher ambition.
I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Appointing a scouser to manage Villa would just be a hard pill to swallow. But that’s a personal issue.
The bigger issue for me is why Gerrard the manager? He is an untested quantity at the PL level, he has limited experience as a manager full stop, he has not yet shown he can handle the pressure commensurate with a club like Villa - basically it would be another Lambert like appointment (he had done well at Norwich etc) and IMO would be a disaster. Rangers are a big club in a tin pot league - success there at best is akin to success in the Championship.
I just don’t get the appeal.
Surely to god, we have higher ambition.
Dean Smith had never managed in the Premier league, never had the pressure of managing a big club, but virtually everyone welcomed him with open arms. Was it because he was a Villa fan? Dean had never got a team promoted and his highest finish was 11th. That appointment turned out ok. I am not saying that I want SG as manager / head coach, but some of the things I read are strange considering we took a gamble on (at the time) a mid championship manager.
Get Potter in and get him to bring Bissouma with him
Get Potter in and get him to bring Bissouma with him
Better be quick then...
Fonseca has a decent record at a few different clubs including in a big league.
Favre has a longcrecord if good football development of youth players and reasonable success.
Gerrard has 1 trophy in 3 seasons in a 2 horse race, has his own fans questioning the style of play and comes across as very much relying on his reputation as a player.
No comparison between the three comes out with Gerrard on top other than his playing career.
Get Potter in and get him to bring Bissouma with him
Look at the list if managers who were on the list for Tottenham, then for Norwich then us and tell me statuswise who we are nearer to.
Sacking Smith without a clear strategy for what we do next is irresponsible, dumb and pointless. If there was a strategy and that strategy was to bring in an unproven manager who happens to be a mate of Purslow then it's a huge risk to take. If it does turn out to be a huge mistake Mr Purslow will exit the club with his mate Stevie G and they'll both walk away with a handsome pay off but I guess that's my cynical side talking. NWSE have been great until now and I'm hoping that they can pull a rabbit out of the bag and surprise us all. Surely they aren't about to allow Christian Purslow to roll the dice and gamble away all their hard work and derail their long term goals and ambitions for the club?This makes the point better than my angry ranting.
I'm worried that we might not have our Villa back if we appoint Gerrard.
I've no doubt he'll say he loved Villa Park, massive club etc but the reality is he'll be using us as a stepping stone to another club. Which fucks me off.
I thought having “our Villa back” was more linked to owners than any head coach? I’m not sure what “having our Villa back” means. We haven’t got Villa back if SG is head coach, but we did with Dean? Is it because Dean is a Villa fan, or a head coach some people like?
Look at the list if managers who were on the list for Tottenham, then for Norwich then us and tell me statuswise who we are nearer to.Exactly
Fonseca has a decent record at a few different clubs including in a big league.
Favre has a longcrecord if good football development of youth players and reasonable success.
Gerrard has 1 trophy in 3 seasons in a 2 horse race, has his own fans questioning the style of play and comes across as very much relying on his reputation as a player.
No comparison between the three comes out with Gerrard on top other than his playing career.
But all of those are unknown quantities. Someone clever should be able to find me the Remi Garde thread on here where I’m fairly certainly some would have spoken highly about his 50% win record at Lyon and his cup win.
There’s no way on this planet we should write off anyone that sits in that dugout. You can’t possibly know how working with better players in a league he knows might turn out. Some of the comments I’m reading are a bordering on the offensive to someone yet to walk through the door. I really hope, if he does come, we see a few eggs on faces come May
Dean Smith had never managed in the Premier league, never had the pressure of managing a big club, but virtually everyone welcomed him with open arms. Was it because he was a Villa fan?
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.I'm not making an equivalence, just recalling when the club seemingly listened to fan opinion and turned up with an even worse option.
I am not advocating that we should go for fat Frank but surely Lanpard with, a track record of introducing young players, experience of managing in the Premier League, including earning a Champions league place with that young team and then, signing players that formed the basis of the team that Tuchel won the Champions league with would be the better option. The only thing he doesn't have is being Purslows mate.
And before you shout me down please read again I am NOT advocating Lampard just making a comparison
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
This isn't true. Gerrard is way ahead on every fan poll I've seen. Unfortunately.I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
I suppose Rafa isn't pulling up any trees at Everton, nor did Ancelotti and Koeman. That's some big names. Mourinho has pretty much failed everywhere since he made his name, the much fabled Bielsa isn't making Leeds much better than last season.
Whoever we get is no guarantee.
I must admit the only nagging feeling I have with Gerrard is the circus with the Liverpool connection.
Yeah - I think it's that tragic thing of everyone will be telling us what a good appointment it is and how lucky we are to have someone that is a Liverpool legend.This isn't true. Gerrard is way ahead on every fan poll I've seen. Unfortunately.I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
The reality is sentiment here is very often different to that of more casual fans on the terraces. This may partly be due to an element of 'group think' that happens in any forum (yes I know we have diverse opinions) and maybe because it's possible that people who spend hours debating on forums take a more considered view than more casual fans. It's easy for someone to get swept along in the 'unbeaten Stevie G' hype without looking deeeper into the merits of the appointment.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllierMaybe that's why
The point for me is we’re meant to be ambitious.
Percy said the list would be.
This isn’t ambitious
This isn’t we’ll thought out
This is taking a huge gamble when we don’t need to
This says to me the Dream of becoming an elite club is just CP bullshit
I don't see the equivalence with McLiesh. Being relegated at Small Heath in your previous gig is an appalling measure what makes you good enough to manage us.
For me the equivalence is how many fans are against them from the start. McLeish was never accepted by a big chunk of the fanbase and I think Gerrard would have the same problem.
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
He was the top choice on a Twitter poll conducted by the local rag.
Put much better than my angry bulleted listThe point for me is we’re meant to be ambitious.
Percy said the list would be.
This isn’t ambitious
This isn’t we’ll thought out
This is taking a huge gamble when we don’t need to
This says to me the Dream of becoming an elite club is just CP bullshit
I think that is what is most deflating about these rumours (and let's hope there's no more to it than that).
Dean got us up and kept us up. We're supposed to now be the most attractive vacancy in the world, with wealthy, ambitious owners, an underachieving squad, the best academy in the county and world class facilities.
Even the people that want (or at least would tolerate) Gerrard can surely not spin this as an ambitious move? He's hardly a coup, he's not sought after by anyone else and his reputation comes from his days as a player. If he turned up managing a team in the Championship, would anybody be shocked? That seems like the most natural next step from where he is.
It's not ambitious, it's easy. It will get attention, but in the most shallow way.
Let's hope he's just one of a few options, or even better, just a red herring that the club have leaked.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
I suppose Rafa isn't pulling up any trees at Everton, nor did Ancelotti and Koeman. That's some big names. Mourinho has pretty much failed everywhere since he made his name, the much fabled Bielsa isn't making Leeds much better than last season.
Whoever we get is no guarantee.
True enough but the circumstances are completely different. We were asking Dean to stabilise the club in the championship. He did that and much more. He earned the right to manage his boyhood club in the PL and for my money came damn close to making us the club that the owners had stated they would make us when he had us within touching distance of the very top albeit fleetingly. There's just no comparison in bringing in Gerrard. He has not earned the right to manage one of Englands major clubs. And I can't agree with others who are comfortable with him using us as a stepping stone to Anfield. I can't accept that for one moment. Dean's dream was to take his club Aston Villa to greatness then probably retire upstairs to enjoy watching us win things.I don't get this concern over Villa being used as a stepping stone.
Anyone, player or manager will attract interest if they perform well as has always been the case so why worry?
Whoever takes over and is hopefully successful will get noticed by the next level of team. Its the way its always been.
Exactly! Gerrard would have to make us into a top 6 club for Liverpool to be interested in him. And if he did do that and left, we’d be able to attract an elite manager as Spurs have done.
Appointing a scouser to manage Villa would just be a hard pill to swallow. But that’s a personal issue.
The bigger issue for me is why Gerrard the manager? He is an untested quantity at the PL level, he has limited experience as a manager full stop, he has not yet shown he can handle the pressure commensurate with a club like Villa - basically it would be another Lambert like appointment (he had done well at Norwich etc) and IMO would be a disaster. Rangers are a big club in a tin pot league - success there at best is akin to success in the Championship.
I just don’t get the appeal.
Surely to god, we have higher ambition.
Dean Smith had never managed in the Premier league, never had the pressure of managing a big club, but virtually everyone welcomed him with open arms. Was it because he was a Villa fan? Dean had never got a team promoted and his highest finish was 11th. That appointment turned out ok. I am not saying that I want SG as manager / head coach, but some of the things I read are strange considering we took a gamble on (at the time) a mid championship manager.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Maybe, but I am not sure this place is representative of all fans.
Not just here, almost everywhere you look the concensus is that he's a bad choice, for a number of reasons.
He was the top choice on a Twitter poll conducted by the local rag.
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
They key to it is mostly the strength of the owners at any club, and doing well/being lucky with transfers. I strongly suspect that without Soucek and Rice, Moyes and West Ham would be on a par with us in terms of style of play and results. We lost Grealish, and Smith just couldn't handle not having him.
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
Are you only talking about the 11 games this season, and not the ones missed from previous years ?There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
They key to it is mostly the strength of the owners at any club, and doing well/being lucky with transfers. I strongly suspect that without Soucek and Rice, Moyes and West Ham would be on a par with us in terms of style of play and results. We lost Grealish, and Smith just couldn't handle not having him.
I suspect Moyes would be given longer than 11 games to prove he could cope without Rice though?
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
They key to it is mostly the strength of the owners at any club, and doing well/being lucky with transfers. I strongly suspect that without Soucek and Rice, Moyes and West Ham would be on a par with us in terms of style of play and results. We lost Grealish, and Smith just couldn't handle not having him.
I suspect Moyes would be given longer than 11 games to prove he could cope without Rice though?
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
They key to it is mostly the strength of the owners at any club, and doing well/being lucky with transfers. I strongly suspect that without Soucek and Rice, Moyes and West Ham would be on a par with us in terms of style of play and results. We lost Grealish, and Smith just couldn't handle not having him.
If the shortlist is truly:It is slightly better than a previous shortlist that had Mcleish on it!
Gerrard
Martinez
Kasper Hjulmand
Hasenhuttl
Then we should be sacking whichever fucker came up with it.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
But then i give you mcleish, Lambert and sherwood!
If the shortlist is truly:It is slightly better than a previous shortlist that had Mcleish on it!
Gerrard
Martinez
Kasper Hjulmand
Hasenhuttl
Then we should be sacking whichever fucker came up with it.
Now that really was a fucker who really needed sacking.
Maybe they should appoint 3 managers to replace Dean?Like what you did there
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
They key to it is mostly the strength of the owners at any club, and doing well/being lucky with transfers. I strongly suspect that without Soucek and Rice, Moyes and West Ham would be on a par with us in terms of style of play and results. We lost Grealish, and Smith just couldn't handle not having him.
I suspect Moyes would be given longer than 11 games to prove he could cope without Rice though?
Smith had 40 games without Grealish and we won 9 of them.
CouldN'T care less, ADS. CouldN'T. Shaking my head here.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Unfortunately...DOL and MON weren't Brits either...an honorary Brit in the case of MON (MBE/OBE!)
I've been reading articles written by former playmates of Stevie G. (Chris Sutton, Danny Murphy, Charlie Nicholas) amongst others. Almost to a man they dismiss us as not big enough to tempt him away from a massive club like Rangers. Murphy: "there's only so much he can achieve at Villa. The ceiling is too low for him" Nicholas: "there's a massive rebuilding job to be done there. Stevie needs a ready made squad" I could go on. My point is we're being belittled and laughed off in public by these I'll informed tossers and it's starting to boil my piss. Thanks a lot Purslow.
I don't think he'll be too bad, I really don't. I think he'll command respect of the dressing room, and some players will really thrive under him.
Targett might be in trouble though. And we'll buy a well drilled holding midfielder in Jan for sure. The double pivot 6 I expect will become a feature away from home most weeks.
Agreed .That's why I called them ill informed tossers.I've been reading articles written by former playmates of Stevie G. (Chris Sutton, Danny Murphy, Charlie Nicholas) amongst others. Almost to a man they dismiss us as not big enough to tempt him away from a massive club like Rangers. Murphy: "there's only so much he can achieve at Villa. The ceiling is too low for him" Nicholas: "there's a massive rebuilding job to be done there. Stevie needs a ready made squad" I could go on. My point is we're being belittled and laughed off in public by these I'll informed tossers and it's starting to boil my piss. Thanks a lot Purslow.
Is that not even bigger reason for wanting him?
As for massive rebuilding job - is there bollocks. Add a proper midfield player to this squad and perhaps an upgrade on Targett and we have a very good squad
I have to admit that part of me wants Gerrard to take it on just to piss Danny Murphy off.I've been reading articles written by former playmates of Stevie G. (Chris Sutton, Danny Murphy, Charlie Nicholas) amongst others. Almost to a man they dismiss us as not big enough to tempt him away from a massive club like Rangers. Murphy: "there's only so much he can achieve at Villa. The ceiling is too low for him" Nicholas: "there's a massive rebuilding job to be done there. Stevie needs a ready made squad" I could go on. My point is we're being belittled and laughed off in public by these I'll informed tossers and it's starting to boil my piss. Thanks a lot Purslow.
Is that not even bigger reason for wanting him?
As for massive rebuilding job - is there bollocks. Add a proper midfield player to this squad and perhaps an upgrade on Targett and we have a very good squad
I don't think he'll be too bad, I really don't. I think he'll command respect of the dressing room, and some players will really thrive under him.
Targett might be in trouble though. And we'll buy a well drilled holding midfielder in Jan for sure. The double pivot 6 I expect will become a feature away from home most weeks.
We shouldn’t write off any* manager off before they’ve even walked through the door.
There’s a selection of the fan base that continue to have the temerity to write people off before they’ve had chance to prove themselves. Those that scoff at what Gerrard has achieved had absolutely no problem welcoming Dean Smith with open arms despite having never finished above 11th in the Championship.
Those that claim they dislike the Liverpool connection will be the same people that will foam at the mouth when Grealish doesn’t clap the Holte end when he reappears in November. It’s blinkered, it’s weird, it’s not what we should be about. I get people have opinions and that’s what makes reading and participating in fan forums good but please let’s just get behind whoever is appointed.
FWIW I think Gerrard is a winner, he commands respect, he would bring with him a top class coaching set up and, if it happens, we should get right fucking behind him.
*everyone except Sam Allardyce
For a winner he hasn't, y'know, won much.
With Liverpool - FA cup (x2), Football League Cup (x3), FA Charity Shield, European Cup, UEFA Cup, European Super Cup
But apart from that…what have the Romans done for us?
And since 1996 we have won…what exactly?
Thinking if it is Gerrard what sort of short term draw that would provide to the recruitment of players? We saw in the summer attempts to get Ward-Prowse and Smith Rowe without much success. If the draw is being able to work under someone who was a world class midfielder then perhaps it may help us make that step up.Think the issue was more the sub-standard and embarrassing offers we made for their players that was the issue
We unfortunately aren't in a position to get a Conte or a Klopp, we don't have that draw. Aston Villa brutally I am afraid is a mid table club in the eyes of the nation despite what we think. Maybe with Gerrard that may help bring that media profile up and therefore allow us to attract the next step of players we couldn't have previously recruited.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Villa's a great club and very traditional. This is a strength but at times it is a weakness- especially with why we sort of have fallen behind since the likes of Wenger, rocked up at Arsenal in the mid 90s. When we have gone continental it hasn't worked out. I remember the 'frog' comments with Houllier and Garde and that dreadful secret santa video in 2015. You only have to look at some of the Scottish stuff too with McLeish and Lambert (even in this thread above somebody says he doesn't want a Scott as manager!). Why should it matter where a manager is from? Judge people on their CV/competency not where they are from
The trouble with judging Gerrard tactically is that the step-up from Scotland to the English top ten is so enormous that you can't make any judgements. He likes to attack in numbers? Well yeah, he's at Rangers, that happens anyway. From what I've seen most of their goals come from some form of working it wide and getting yer crosses in, which really won't hack it in the same way in England. Of course, he'd also have better players.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Villa's a great club and very traditional. This is a strength but at times it is a weakness- especially with why we sort of have fallen behind since the likes of Wenger, rocked up at Arsenal in the mid 90s. When we have gone continental it hasn't worked out. I remember the 'frog' comments with Houllier and Garde and that dreadful secret santa video in 2015. You only have to look at some of the Scottish stuff too with McLeish and Lambert (even in this thread above somebody says he doesn't want a Scott as manager!). Why should it matter where a manager is from? Judge people on their CV/competency not where they are from
To be fair I think the poster above says he doesn't want a manager from the Scottish leagues, rather than not wanting somebody who is Scottish. The inference being that the level is so low there.
There's no alchemy to management. Right place, right face, right time is as good as it gets.
Moyes is a busted flush after the Man United experience, struggles with Sunderland, toils with West Ham first time, flops abroad. And now looks like Moyes of Everton vintage again. How?
Mourinho, one of the greats. Does well at Chelsea for a 2nd time, reasonably well at Man United, flops badly at Spurs.
As has been pointed out, you think you lessen your chances of risk by getting what appears to be the best quality. But unless you're picking managers off the very, very top shelf, how do you guarantee it?
I don't know if Gerrard will be any good. He has some qualities and he has some doubts. I could care less about Liverpool or what people think somebody else did 10 years ago and how thats in anyway relevant. He's a gamble, a big one. But to be honest, I've not come across a name who isn't.
I was one who believed after Friday night that it was time for Dean to go, the team has looked so frail and off the pace particularly the last 3 games that the fear was that continuing into Brighton game would see the crowd turn and Dean 100% wouldn’t have deserved that reaction.
Gerrard wouldn’t be my choice but should he take over like all managers (obv not Allardyce or Pulis lol) I will get behind them totally and we move on - my worry with Gerrard is 3/4 games in we play Liverpool and if that turns into a crowd waving love in he will have lost some of our fans very quickly. Add that to playing Man City in the same run and the circus that will be around Jack it’ll be an icky spell.
I was one who believed after Friday night that it was time for Dean to go, the team has looked so frail and off the pace particularly the last 3 games that the fear was that continuing into Brighton game would see the crowd turn and Dean 100% wouldn’t have deserved that reaction.
Gerrard wouldn’t be my choice but should he take over like all managers (obv not Allardyce or Pulis lol) I will get behind them totally and we move on - my worry with Gerrard is 3/4 games in we play Liverpool and if that turns into a crowd waving love in he will have lost some of our fans very quickly. Add that to playing Man City in the same run and the circus that will be around Jack it’ll be an icky spell.
He'd obviously get a good reception from the Liverpool fans, but I'd hope he'd be intelligent enough to learn from Houllier's mistakes and leave it at a polite wave to the crowd. "Obviously I played my entire career at Liverpool and so it will always be special to me, but I'm Aston Villa manager now, and I'll be doing my best to get one over on Jurgen at the weekend. There's no room for sentiment in football and I'll be busting a gut to make sure we beat the Scouse twats."
There, not hard!
I was one who believed after Friday night that it was time for Dean to go, the team has looked so frail and off the pace particularly the last 3 games that the fear was that continuing into Brighton game would see the crowd turn and Dean 100% wouldn’t have deserved that reaction.
Gerrard wouldn’t be my choice but should he take over like all managers (obv not Allardyce or Pulis lol) I will get behind them totally and we move on - my worry with Gerrard is 3/4 games in we play Liverpool and if that turns into a crowd waving love in he will have lost some of our fans very quickly. Add that to playing Man City in the same run and the circus that will be around Jack it’ll be an icky spell.
He'd obviously get a good reception from the Liverpool fans, but I'd hope he'd be intelligent enough to learn from Houllier's mistakes and leave it at a polite wave to the crowd. "Obviously I played my entire career at Liverpool and so it will always be special to me, but I'm Aston Villa manager now, and I'll be doing my best to get one over on Jurgen at the weekend. There's no room for sentiment in football and I'll be busting a gut to make sure we beat the Scouse twats."
There, not hard!
Maybe I'm misreading the app but has someone put £500 on Ralf Rangnick on Betfair Exchange? Hopefully someone with inside info!
The point for me is we’re meant to be ambitious.
Percy said the list would be.
This isn’t ambitious
This isn’t we’ll thought out
This is taking a huge gamble when we don’t need to
This says to me the Dream of becoming an elite club is just CP bullshit
If people are already resenting SG for lapping up an Anfield reception that might need even happen I find that rather odd and I bet my entire life savings on the fans of Dean Smiths next club not having an issue with it.
It's very hard to judge anything looking at their squad. It's a different world with loads of free transfers and a "big" signing of 6m. Doesn't seem to play the youth much though.
[quote author=amfy link=topic=62559.msg4071386#msg4071386 date=
If they don’t have someone ready to come in & start working with the team, the timing of the sacking (before the international break) is irrelevant, and any time up to near Christmas would have done just as well.
It's very hard to judge anything looking at their squad. It's a different world with loads of free transfers and a "big" signing of 6m. Doesn't seem to play the youth much though.
Yeah I think they've got some RB called Tavernier who basically was squad player at likes of Wigan down here and he scored 20 a season or something.
Get the feeling he'd also want to spunk 20m + on that Morelos guy who we were linked with about 18 months back.
We have good players here so I'd rather get them all motivated again and just see him sign half the Rangers 11 and then we realise 12 months later they're not good enough for where we want to go.
But spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
In order to respond to Risso from the reflection thread where I didn’t want to continue a conversation about the merits of the timing of the sacking.....
The difference it would have made is that someone would be working with the team today towards the next fixture. Maybe there’ll be an appointment in the next day or so, & that would still give us 10 days or so for a new manager to begin to work with them, but if it drags on with no one in place, that’s 2 weeks where we could have re-grouped wasted.
If they don’t have someone ready to come in & start working with the team, the timing of the sacking (before the international break) is irrelevant, and any time up to near Christmas would have done just as well. In fact, right now feels like a time of drift because we (incl the players) don’t even have a game to place immediate focus on.
It isn’t a great thing to have been sounding people out behind a current managers back, but I do see other clubs appoint pretty quickly after a sacking.
There are cutbacks and there are crosses. Gerrard's Rangers are majority deep crosses and incompetent defending. I know - there's a Youtube video of every goal from their title winning season.
The fact is there is no evidence whatsoever that Gerrard deserves to manage the fourth richest club in England, currently in need of a crisis rebuild and a proper football identity imposed on the training pitch. None at all. Other than his name is Steven Gerrard, which I'm sure counts for some.
Spurs had already appointed Conte by now, for comparison, after sacking Nuno. We are still apparently working down a list. I really thought they would have had someone lined up, else as Amfy says, the timing is just wasted.
It's would be on another level to Smith or indeed Houllier or DOL. He's Mr Liverpool. Not his fault, but we'd become the scousers 2nd team overnight and conversely hated by everyone else. Marketing man's dream and his first trip back would be wall to wall with articles in the papers along the lines of "I went to Scotland because I couldn't face Managing against Liverpool"
Yes Ads, let's generalise from one goal. Guardiola's style is all about swinging in those deep crosses. Must be why he signed all those big men.
Perfectly put. And rightly so. I just can not bring myself to accept that Aston Villa could be treated as a stepping stone for anyone for any club in the world. People can think what they want of me for saying that but it's been ingrained in my DNA by generations of my predecessors.If people are already resenting SG for lapping up an Anfield reception that might need even happen I find that rather odd and I bet my entire life savings on the fans of Dean Smiths next club not having an issue with it.
People are apprehensive about the entire footballing world treating Aston Villa as second fiddle and a mere vehicle for the future career ambitions of a man who has thus far achieved very little in management. Nothing more, nothing less.
Oh for the days when Aston Villa becomes a vehicle for career aspirations. The last one was Taylor and 31 years ago, before my Villa supporting days had even started.
There are cutbacks and there are crosses. Gerrard's Rangers are majority deep crosses and incompetent defending. I know - there's a Youtube video of every goal from their title winning season.
The fact is there is no evidence whatsoever that Gerrard deserves to manage the fourth richest club in England, currently in need of a crisis rebuild and a proper football identity imposed on the training pitch. None at all. Other than his name is Steven Gerrard, which I'm sure counts for some.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Unfortunately...DOL and MON weren't Brits either...an honorary Brit in the case of MON (MBE/OBE!)
I haven’t logged on for years and never post BUT M’ON is from NI. So is British… but that’s a debate for another time!
Spurs had already appointed Conte by now, for comparison, after sacking Nuno. We are still apparently working down a list. I really thought they would have had someone lined up, else as Amfy says, the timing is just wasted.
There are cutbacks and there are crosses. Gerrard's Rangers are majority deep crosses and incompetent defending. I know - there's a Youtube video of every goal from their title winning season.
The fact is there is no evidence whatsoever that Gerrard deserves to manage the fourth richest club in England, currently in need of a crisis rebuild and a proper football identity imposed on the training pitch. None at all. Other than his name is Steven Gerrard, which I'm sure counts for some.
I think you need to add complexity to see why what Gerrard is doing at Rangers isn't particularly impressive. Crossing in a league like the premier league means creating an overload on the wing to create space to pick a cross, it then requires movement in the box (that's been worked on in training) to get an unopposed run at the ball that is delivered into the right area. There's a lot of tactical awareness involved in becoming consistently good at it.
In scotland, and other weaker leagues, the standards are far lower so you can achieve similar results much more 'off the cuff' because chances are defenders will make mistakes and when you're 1 of 2 clubs that have most of the decent players in the league the gulf in quality means you'll just bludgeon teams by having some fairly basic tactics to take advantage of your strengths.
It may be that Gerrard has a brilliant grasp of this and has far more complex tactical options in reserve that he doesn't need to use but there's literally no evidence to show as much.
Compare that to people like Favre, Emery, Fonseca, etc there's footage of their teams doing all of the things you need to do to create chances in the premier league. Maybe you want to dismiss that as better players doing better things but then you create a new argument of them all having experience of handling squads full of players of that standard, Gerrard doesn't have that.
Final point Rangers were humiliated by Malmo in the summer in what was probably the biggest tie Gerrard has managed, that suggests he still has a lot to learn before he's ready to be playing tough games every week rather than a handful of them all year.
There are cutbacks and there are crosses. Gerrard's Rangers are majority deep crosses and incompetent defending. I know - there's a Youtube video of every goal from their title winning season.
The fact is there is no evidence whatsoever that Gerrard deserves to manage the fourth richest club in England, currently in need of a crisis rebuild and a proper football identity imposed on the training pitch. None at all. Other than his name is Steven Gerrard, which I'm sure counts for some.
I think you need to add complexity to see why what Gerrard is doing at Rangers isn't particularly impressive. Crossing in a league like the premier league means creating an overload on the wing to create space to pick a cross, it then requires movement in the box (that's been worked on in training) to get an unopposed run at the ball that is delivered into the right area. There's a lot of tactical awareness involved in becoming consistently good at it.
In scotland, and other weaker leagues, the standards are far lower so you can achieve similar results much more 'off the cuff' because chances are defenders will make mistakes and when you're 1 of 2 clubs that have most of the decent players in the league the gulf in quality means you'll just bludgeon teams by having some fairly basic tactics to take advantage of your strengths.
It may be that Gerrard has a brilliant grasp of this and has far more complex tactical options in reserve that he doesn't need to use but there's literally no evidence to show as much.
Compare that to people like Favre, Emery, Fonseca, etc there's footage of their teams doing all of the things you need to do to create chances in the premier league. Maybe you want to dismiss that as better players doing better things but then you create a new argument of them all having experience of handling squads full of players of that standard, Gerrard doesn't have that.
Final point Rangers were humiliated by Malmo in the summer in what was probably the biggest tie Gerrard has managed, that suggests he still has a lot to learn before he's ready to be playing tough games every week rather than a handful of them all year.
Or you rely on rank bad defending like Man City did at the weekend.
I appreciate the point that there's a difference in quality, but ultimately however you frame a cross, you're always playing percentages.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Unfortunately...DOL and MON weren't Brits either...an honorary Brit in the case of MON (MBE/OBE!)
I haven’t logged on for years and never post BUT M’ON is from NI. So is British… but that’s a debate for another time!
NI is part of the UK (and I guess EU these days...) not Britannia. Please post more!
It's about style. I watched every Rangers goal from that league season, like I said. I don't think you can rely on that strategy in the league. It's not about the crosses themselves, it's about the type of crosses and the extent to which they rely on poor defending.
Average cross conversion rate in the Premier League is one percent. That suggests that the Gerrard style of crosses, from what I've seen, isn't the best strategy.
It's about style. I watched every Rangers goal from that league season, like I said. I don't think you can rely on that strategy in the league. It's not about the crosses themselves, it's about the type of crosses and the extent to which they rely on poor defending.
But if you've got some Wigan kid doing it who has never played higher than League 1, it sort of cuts both ways. And if it works...why would you do anything else?
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
God help us if he does any good. There will be sporadic fighting breaking out in the back lol
He has managed in Europe a bit, he's had 3 years experience akin to the Championship/league 1 and he's done well enough. He's not going to please many with his appointment, but I think he will suprise a few if he gets his coaching team right.
It's gonna happen int it? Potter probably won't leave mid-season. Hasenhuttl hasn't the stardust. Gary McCallister back ;D
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
It's about style. I watched every Rangers goal from that league season, like I said. I don't think you can rely on that strategy in the league. It's not about the crosses themselves, it's about the type of crosses and the extent to which they rely on poor defending.
But if you've got some Wigan kid doing it who has never played higher than League 1, it sort of cuts both ways. And if it works...why would you do anything else?
Quite, which is why my main point is it's impossible really to draw conclusions from his time at Rangers. And given that it's impossible to draw such conclusions, from either his managerial or playing careers, as to why he should take over the fourth or fifth richest club in England at such a time, then what can possibly be the justification for approaching him?
It's gonna happen int it? Potter probably won't leave mid-season. Hasenhuttl hasn't the stardust. Gary McCallister back ;D
McAllister did a very good job for us in difficult circumstances that time.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
I wonder what line of thinking makes them think Dean Smith didn't have it in his locker to take us to the next level (something I agree on, reluctantly), but Steven Gerrard does?
It would be an absolutely boneheaded appointment on all levels.
Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Unfortunately...DOL and MON weren't Brits either...an honorary Brit in the case of MON (MBE/OBE!)
I haven’t logged on for years and never post BUT M’ON is from NI. So is British… but that’s a debate for another time!
NI is part of the UK (and I guess EU these days...) not Britannia. Please post more!
Simon Jordan talking sense:spot on.
Hot favourite Steven Gerrard is not ready for the Aston Villa job, according to pundit Simon Jordan.
The Rangers boss is the front-runner to succeed Dean Smith at Villa Park in what would be his first Premier League manager’s role, having led the Gers to the Scottish Premiership title last season.
It appears Gerrard would be a popular choice among fans, but former Crystal Palace owner Jordan believes Villa should be targeting a more established manager.
But he suspects Rangers will be powerless to prevent Gerrard moving on should he opt to return to the Premier League, where he achieved iconic status as a player.
“Gerrard will probably have a release clause [in his contract],” said Jordan on talkSPORT this morning.
“Rangers can play hard ball as much as they want but if there is a release clause in Steven Gerrard’s contract, which will be compensation-based, Rangers will be whistling down the wind about what they can and can’t do.
“For me, it would be a strange appointment because, despite his achievements in Scotland, we’re talking about a potentially good manager.
“We’re talking about a potential elite manager, a potential Premier League manager.
“And if Aston Villa want reality rather than potential, then then they should go for an established manager.
“If Tottenham [who have just hired Antonio Conte] are an elite club, then why can’t Aston Villa [be], with their wealth and ownership and the size and scale of their club.
“Gerrard is a great name on paper, Gerrard will give them recognisability.
“But the real pull will be winning games and being near the top of the Premier League.
“If they’re building a media business alongside the football operation, then I get the Gerrard equation.
“Villa are pushing to be an elite club now, which is the reason why they’ve taken Dean out.
“But if you’re going for Gerrard, you’re going for an element of potential. It worries me that it’s too early for Gerrard, he hasn’t finished the job at Rangers, and Villa is probably a job that requires a different set of hands.
“I think he is not at the level yet where he will take Villa to the level where they want to be at.”
It might have been me and I want a blanket ban on Scots. Docherty, McLeish and Lambert weren’t from the Scottish leagues, all disastrous in their own way. Ferguson and Dalglish are the only successful Scottish managers of the last 50 years. Every other one barely aspires to mediocre. Scottish coaches are shite. And just to put the fly on the shit, Eric fucking Black.Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Villa's a great club and very traditional. This is a strength but at times it is a weakness- especially with why we sort of have fallen behind since the likes of Wenger, rocked up at Arsenal in the mid 90s. When we have gone continental it hasn't worked out. I remember the 'frog' comments with Houllier and Garde and that dreadful secret santa video in 2015. You only have to look at some of the Scottish stuff too with McLeish and Lambert (even in this thread above somebody says he doesn't want a Scott as manager!). Why should it matter where a manager is from? Judge people on their CV/competency not where they are from
To be fair I think the poster above says he doesn't want a manager from the Scottish leagues, rather than not wanting somebody who is Scottish. The inference being that the level is so low there.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
There are big questions marks over him.
But in my gut I feel no better or worse about him than Potter or Fonseca. They all pose huge risks. This is a massive gamble, regardless, and there is no single candidate.
Take ten Hag. Looks a good manager. But so did De Boer and he flopped in Italy and Palace. What if that mighty 72% win record counts for as little as De Boer's 4 consecutive titles and 61% win ratio?
It's all risk. There is no golden ticket here.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
There are big questions marks over him.
But in my gut I feel no better or worse about him than Potter or Fonseca. They all pose huge risks. This is a massive gamble, regardless, and there is no single candidate.
Take ten Hag. Looks a good manager. But so did De Boer and he flopped in Italy and Palace. What if that mighty 72% win record counts for as little as De Boer's 4 consecutive titles and 61% win ratio?
It's all risk. There is no golden ticket here.
Of course it's all a risk. Conte would be a risk. Klopp would too. The question is to what degree, and while I recognise that Fonseca LBV and The Boy Who xG'd represent greater risks than I'd like, I think Gerrard represents a clear level beyond.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
There are big questions marks over him.
But in my gut I feel no better or worse about him than Potter or Fonseca. They all pose huge risks. This is a massive gamble, regardless, and there is no single candidate.
Take ten Hag. Looks a good manager. But so did De Boer and he flopped in Italy and Palace. What if that mighty 72% win record counts for as little as De Boer's 4 consecutive titles and 61% win ratio?
It's all risk. There is no golden ticket here.
Of course it's all a risk. Conte would be a risk. Klopp would too. The question is to what degree, and while I recognise that Fonseca LBV and The Boy Who xG'd represent greater risks than I'd like, I think Gerrard represents a clear level beyond.
Yes Gerrard is the biggest gamble of all.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
People listen to Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
Simon Jordan gets it.Indeed. He's got a soft spot for us, anyway, and he usually talks sense.
Like he always does with us.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
People listen to Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.
And play 3-5-2.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
Those "positives" are all absolute nonsense.
✔Winner played and won at highest level
Complete irrelevance, see Bruce, Di Matteo, Sherwood, etc.
✔huge name in the game
So was Diego Maradona, didn't make him a good manager
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
If they're so excellent why have they won less than St Johnstone?
✔mccalister knows the club
So do Eric Black and Kevin MacDonald, should we bring them back?
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
Absolute drivel, and what evidence do you have of any "nonsense" from Mings?
✔passion - no one can question that
Great news! If we are appointing a manager based on traits that were considered vital by Little Englander Chairmen in about 1973. Exactly the same logic that would have made Tim Sherwood seem an ideal candidate.
✔can attract massive names to the club
We are Aston Villa and we have loads of money. Our Board should be able to do that. If it is just based on the Gerrard name, how many megastars play for "Rangers"? Did Ronaldo consider joining Derby County because Rooney is there?
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
That's not a strong argument.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
I'm willing to bet some money that most of the people who'd voted for him in that poll would have done so for some variation on 'he's a winner'.And many would be of the mindset that Dean shouldn’t have gone because it was only 5 games, and we sold our best player so it wasn’t his fault etc.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
Liverpool fans? Blues fans, Baggies fans? The world and their dog can vote on that, unfortunately.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
Maybe the hierarchy are thinking the season ticket waiting list is getting out of hand and are looking to appoint Gerrard to reduce it. Can't think of another reason tbh.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
That's not a strong argument.
Well….nearly 1500 voted that they’d want him and all must have their own reasons. As I said, going to go and sit on the fence for a bit and see what happens.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
Gerrard's is in the Scottish Premiership so pretty much no jobs.
All really good points.
I think fundamentally, we all want what is right for Aston Villa. We’re all on the same page with that even though they’ll be some in the for Gerrard camp and some in the against.
I probably won’t post again about it given I’ll get behind whoever gets the job but some really strong arguments for and against.
I admire the sentiment, but there really aren't any good arguments in favour.
Check the Birmingham Live poll. Plenty want Gerrard
Liverpool fans? Blues fans, Baggies fans? The world and their dog can vote on that, unfortunately.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
Gerrard's is in the Scottish Premiership so pretty much no jobs.
Having lived and worked in Glasgow in the past, I think there is a misconception south of the border about how difficult managing the Old Firm teams is.
Yes the standard is not the same as the Premier League in England, but the pressure to win every game they play is immense and there is no escape from it in and around the city.
I would equate it to managing a club like us in the Championship which proved pretty difficult at times. For every Gerrard, Rodgers and O'Neill who have had varying levels of success up there, there have been some absolute disasters who have sunk.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
Those "positives" are all absolute nonsense.
✔Winner played and won at highest level
Complete irrelevance, see Bruce, Di Matteo, Sherwood, etc.
✔huge name in the game
So was Diego Maradona, didn't make him a good manager
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
If they're so excellent why have they won less than St Johnstone?
✔mccalister knows the club
So do Eric Black and Kevin MacDonald, should we bring them back?
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
Absolute drivel, and what evidence do you have of any "nonsense" from Mings?
✔passion - no one can question that
Great news! If we are appointing a manager based on traits that were considered vital by Little Englander Chairmen in about 1973. Exactly the same logic that would have made Tim Sherwood seem an ideal candidate.
✔can attract massive names to the club
We are Aston Villa and we have loads of money. Our Board should be able to do that. If it is just based on the Gerrard name, how many megastars play for "Rangers"? Did Ronaldo consider joining Derby County because Rooney is there?
Its just too difficult to decifer wether Gerrard is ready for the step up to the Premier League based on what he's done at Rangers due to the domestic competition being nowhere near any good.
But out of curiosity I had a look at his record in Europe were he's arguably playing against teams on par with Rangers and its miles ahead of what I was expecting to see.
Played 53
Won 26
Drew 17
Lost 10
I still dont want him though.
As it said on my old (very old) passport in the 80's: The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland.Why do we always tend to go British? In the last 20 years i believe the only non brits we had were RDM, garde and houllier
Unfortunately...DOL and MON weren't Brits either...an honorary Brit in the case of MON (MBE/OBE!)
I haven’t logged on for years and never post BUT M’ON is from NI. So is British… but that’s a debate for another time!
NI is part of the UK (and I guess EU these days...) not Britannia. Please post more!
Mate it’s GB & NI
Also NI part of the UK
We are British and can be Irish also if we choose but that only came about after good Friday agreement
Hate to be a pedant but there’s an awful lot of angry loyalists over here who would wave their fist at you on this (and maybe burn some buses)
😂🤣
Anyways
No thanks to Gerard and give me Ten Haag
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
Gerrard's is in the Scottish Premiership so pretty much no jobs.
Having lived and worked in Glasgow in the past, I think there is a misconception south of the border about how difficult managing the Old Firm teams is.
Yes the standard is not the same as the Premier League in England, but the pressure to win every game they play is immense and there is no escape from it in and around the city.
I would equate it to managing a club like us in the Championship which proved pretty difficult at times. For every Gerrard, Rodgers and O'Neill who have had varying levels of success up there, there have been some absolute disasters who have sunk.
I lived in Scotland for ten years, and I agree with you. Rodgers, O'Neill and Smith proved time and again that they were up to it. Gerrard hasn't.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
Those "positives" are all absolute nonsense.
✔Winner played and won at highest level
Complete irrelevance, see Bruce, Di Matteo, Sherwood, etc.
✔huge name in the game
So was Diego Maradona, didn't make him a good manager
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
If they're so excellent why have they won less than St Johnstone?
✔mccalister knows the club
So do Eric Black and Kevin MacDonald, should we bring them back?
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
Absolute drivel, and what evidence do you have of any "nonsense" from Mings?
✔passion - no one can question that
Great news! If we are appointing a manager based on traits that were considered vital by Little Englander Chairmen in about 1973. Exactly the same logic that would have made Tim Sherwood seem an ideal candidate.
✔can attract massive names to the club
We are Aston Villa and we have loads of money. Our Board should be able to do that. If it is just based on the Gerrard name, how many megastars play for "Rangers"? Did Ronaldo consider joining Derby County because Rooney is there?
What a load of negative waffle.
So you throw a couple bad examples like bruce out there and suddenly its nonsense. For every bruce there is a Guardiola……………..
Its just too difficult to decifer wether Gerrard is ready for the step up to the Premier League based on what he's done at Rangers due to the domestic competition being nowhere near any good.
But out of curiosity I had a look at his record in Europe were he's arguably playing against teams on par with Rangers and its miles ahead of what I was expecting to see.
Played 53
Won 26
Drew 17
Lost 10
I still dont want him though.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
Those "positives" are all absolute nonsense.
✔Winner played and won at highest level
Complete irrelevance, see Bruce, Di Matteo, Sherwood, etc.
✔huge name in the game
So was Diego Maradona, didn't make him a good manager
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
If they're so excellent why have they won less than St Johnstone?
✔mccalister knows the club
So do Eric Black and Kevin MacDonald, should we bring them back?
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
Absolute drivel, and what evidence do you have of any "nonsense" from Mings?
✔passion - no one can question that
Great news! If we are appointing a manager based on traits that were considered vital by Little Englander Chairmen in about 1973. Exactly the same logic that would have made Tim Sherwood seem an ideal candidate.
✔can attract massive names to the club
We are Aston Villa and we have loads of money. Our Board should be able to do that. If it is just based on the Gerrard name, how many megastars play for "Rangers"? Did Ronaldo consider joining Derby County because Rooney is there?
Spot on.
The positives on Gerrard
✔Winner played and won at highest level
✔huge name in the game
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
✔mccalister knows the club
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
✔passion - no one can question that.
✔can attract massive names to the club
The negatives
❌could use us a stepping stone
❌ no experience in england
❌liverpool wankfest when we play them
Those "positives" are all absolute nonsense.
✔Winner played and won at highest level
Complete irrelevance, see Bruce, Di Matteo, Sherwood, etc.
✔huge name in the game
So was Diego Maradona, didn't make him a good manager
✔has a excellent coaching team around him
If they're so excellent why have they won less than St Johnstone?
✔mccalister knows the club
So do Eric Black and Kevin MacDonald, should we bring them back?
✔gerrards tough. He wont take no nonsense from someone like mings
Absolute drivel, and what evidence do you have of any "nonsense" from Mings?
✔passion - no one can question that
Great news! If we are appointing a manager based on traits that were considered vital by Little Englander Chairmen in about 1973. Exactly the same logic that would have made Tim Sherwood seem an ideal candidate.
✔can attract massive names to the club
We are Aston Villa and we have loads of money. Our Board should be able to do that. If it is just based on the Gerrard name, how many megastars play for "Rangers"? Did Ronaldo consider joining Derby County because Rooney is there?
What a load of negative waffle.
So you throw a couple bad examples like bruce out there and suddenly its nonsense. For every bruce there is a Guardiola.
Well, quite. Good players can make good managers or terrible ones. So discussing how good a candidate was as a player provides no clue as to how good a manager is and is, therefore, a complete irrelevance.
Bruce was appointed at a time when he seemed the best bet. RDM had a good CV amd didnt he win the CL with chelsea? Oh dear that must have slipped your mind.
Not really, I can't say I've given it too much thought. Both were good players and terrible managers, for Aston Villa. So, again, being a good player provides no evidence that anyone will be a good manager. Both Brian Little and David O'Leary were great players, if you want further examples. One was a successful Villa manager, the other, not so much. So, again, playing career is irrelevant.
Yeah eric black and k mac are the same aren't they. Remind us where they currently are at the moment??
I've no idea and even less interest. I don't see knowing the Villa as any great guarantee of success (or failure). In any case there is probably only one player who played under McAllister and he now plays in a different position.
Well gerarrd won them the scittish league with the help of his backroom team didnt he? And has made some really poor players look half decent.
They have won one out of three leagues in a league that only two teams can win. Add in zero out of six cups. Unless you think the St Johnstone manager and coaching staff should be viable candidates for Villa then there is no argument that Gerrard and pals should be considered other than pure Liverpool starfucking.
Nothing wrong with abit of passion from a manager not sure why so negative about a bit of passion.
I'm not negative about it, it's just meaningless, like saying we should appoint a manager who has hopes, fears or kidneys. 99% of managers have "passion". Not all of them display it by jumping up and down on the touchline but that's hardly relevant.
You are away rangers is a small league and they dont ahve the budgets of premier league clubs?? So how do you expect them to attract the superstars you are referring to?? Explain that to us?
Well, quite. So it isn't a manager that attracts players, but the league and the club doing the bidding. Exactly as I was saying. The fact that our manager was a great player will be as irrelevant in attracting players as it was when we were managed by all those other great players who, generally, didn't attract star names. Gerard Houllier had no playing career to speak of and, arguably, signed a bigger name than any of the others in Darren Bent.
Learning on the job especially at the top level is always going to be hard to do. That’s the biggest risk in all of this. But the board will have seen Vieira start to do it at Palace without significant experience most recently. Gerrard will certainly raise the profile of the club and possibly attract a certain type of footballer. We all hope that if it is him more than anything he finds the ability quickly to perform as a PL manager. All of the other stuff around him is just noise.
Vieira is on his third club.
One of those was in MLS so pretty much two jobs he's had in his career.
Gerrard's is in the Scottish Premiership so pretty much no jobs.
Having lived and worked in Glasgow in the past, I think there is a misconception south of the border about how difficult managing the Old Firm teams is.
Yes the standard is not the same as the Premier League in England, but the pressure to win every game they play is immense and there is no escape from it in and around the city.
I would equate it to managing a club like us in the Championship which proved pretty difficult at times. For every Gerrard, Rodgers and O'Neill who have had varying levels of success up there, there have been some absolute disasters who have sunk.
I lived in Scotland for ten years, and I agree with you. Rodgers, O'Neill and Smith proved time and again that they were up to it. Gerrard hasn't.
Its just too difficult to decifer wether Gerrard is ready for the step up to the Premier League based on what he's done at Rangers due to the domestic competition being nowhere near any good.
But out of curiosity I had a look at his record in Europe were he's arguably playing against teams on par with Rangers and its miles ahead of what I was expecting to see.
Played 53
Won 26
Drew 17
Lost 10
I still dont want him though.
I'm guessing this includes Europa league matches against teams we've never heard of (and probably division 2 standard). What's his record in the champions league group stages?
Gaultier, Favre, Fonseca in that order for me
Gut feeling - Gerrard
Well, if it's Gerrard then I guess we'll just have to get behind him. Can't say that I'm overly enthusiastic about the appointment, but it could be much worse.Gaultier, Favre, Fonseca in that order for me
Gut feeling - Gerrard
As its now clear, looking like my gut was accurate
Could Dean Smith have done at Rangers what Gerrard has done over the last couple of years?
I reckon so.
Could Gerrard have done at Villa what Dean Smith has managed over the last couple of years?
I doubt it.
Gerrard is NOT an upgrade on Smith. No way.
Its just too difficult to decifer wether Gerrard is ready for the step up to the Premier League based on what he's done at Rangers due to the domestic competition being nowhere near any good.
But out of curiosity I had a look at his record in Europe were he's arguably playing against teams on par with Rangers and its miles ahead of what I was expecting to see.
Played 53
Won 26
Drew 17
Lost 10
I still dont want him though.
I'm guessing this includes Europa league matches against teams we've never heard of (and probably division 2 standard). What's his record in the champions league group stages?
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
Could Dean Smith have done at Rangers what Gerrard has done over the last couple of years?
I reckon so.
Could Gerrard have done at Villa what Dean Smith has managed over the last couple of years?
I doubt it.
Gerrard is NOT an upgrade on Smith. No way.
Impossible to say either way though Andy. I don't think that getting a team with Grealish, McGinn, Mings, El Ghazi and Abraham out of the Championship is much more of an achievement than winning the title in Scotland with Rangers though.
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
That's a blag account with a Russian singer as its profile picture.
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
That's a blag account with a Russian singer as its profile picture.
Could Dean Smith have done at Rangers what Gerrard has done over the last couple of years?
I reckon so.
Could Gerrard have done at Villa what Dean Smith has managed over the last couple of years?
I doubt it.
Gerrard is NOT an upgrade on Smith. No way.
Impossible to say either way though Andy. I don't think that getting a team with Grealish, McGinn, Mings, El Ghazi and Abraham out of the Championship is much more of an achievement than winning the title in Scotland with Rangers though.
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
That's a blag account with a Russian singer as its profile picture.
In fact, the pictufe is the lolololol man if you know your memes. Died in 2012. Some sad twats about on Twitter.
Could Dean Smith have done at Rangers what Gerrard has done over the last couple of years?
I reckon so.
Could Gerrard have done at Villa what Dean Smith has managed over the last couple of years?
I doubt it.
Gerrard is NOT an upgrade on Smith. No way.
Impossible to say either way though Andy. I don't think that getting a team with Grealish, McGinn, Mings, El Ghazi and Abraham out of the Championship is much more of an achievement than winning the title in Scotland with Rangers though.
Smith managed that in 7 months, it took Gerrard 3 years to get his only meaningful achievement.
Incidentally, if it all goes pear- shaped, no matter who the manager is, how long do they get? Do we make another change in Feb if it looks like we are going to go down??!!
Short of promoting nanny McPhee I don’t see howWell, if it's Gerrard then I guess we'll just have to get behind him. Can't say that I'm overly enthusiastic about the appointment, but it could be much worse.Gaultier, Favre, Fonseca in that order for me
Gut feeling - Gerrard
As its now clear, looking like my gut was accurate
Well, if it's Gerrard then I guess we'll just have to get behind him. Can't say that I'm overly enthusiastic about the appointment, but it could be much worse.Gaultier, Favre, Fonseca in that order for me
Gut feeling - Gerrard
As its now clear, looking like my gut was accurate
Short of promoting nanny McPhee I don’t see howWell, if it's Gerrard then I guess we'll just have to get behind him. Can't say that I'm overly enthusiastic about the appointment, but it could be much worse.Gaultier, Favre, Fonseca in that order for me
Gut feeling - Gerrard
As its now clear, looking like my gut was accurate
Incidentally, if it all goes pear- shaped, no matter who the manager is, how long do they get? Do we make another change in Feb if it looks like we are going to go down??!!
Not before Purslow is sacked. He's probably already got a nice little earner lined up at the FA for when the inevitable day arrives.
Pretty sure O'Neill, for all his faults, isn't a Loyalist. If he wants to think of himself as British or Irish then he can. Suspect he would prefer the latter.
Incidentally, if it all goes pear- shaped, no matter who the manager is, how long do they get? Do we make another change in Feb if it looks like we are going to go down??!!His role as a CEO is not linked to his shareholder status - ownership and directorship are separate.
Owners get to elect the directors - but as a minority shareholder his say will not be decisive
Not before Purslow is sacked. He's probably already got a nice little earner lined up at the FA for when the inevitable day arrives.
He's a minority shareholder.It might not be as easy as that (not that I have a single clue how that works).
Could Dean Smith have done at Rangers what Gerrard has done over the last couple of years?
I reckon so.
Could Gerrard have done at Villa what Dean Smith has managed over the last couple of years?
I doubt it.
Gerrard is NOT an upgrade on Smith. No way.
Impossible to say either way though Andy. I don't think that getting a team with Grealish, McGinn, Mings, El Ghazi and Abraham out of the Championship is much more of an achievement than winning the title in Scotland with Rangers though.
Smith managed that in 7 months, it took Gerrard 3 years to get his only meaningful achievement.
Yeah but it’s not apples to apples is it? We finished 6th in the league and the play-offs offered us the chance to go up. To win a league then you have to finish first. I’m not saying Gerrard could have done what Dean did, but trying to draw read across conclusions feels skewed.
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
That's a blag account with a Russian singer as its profile picture.
Well that's something. I was about enter the stage of grief called 'at least he's not John Terry'.
But spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
The fact that he’s topping polls in local papers is unbelievableThere are probably more votes coming from our local 'rivals' than our own supporters. He does coach a team in blue after all.
I don’t live in the local area so can’t gauge it but that seems a stretch for me
This makes worrying reading from the Economist's head of sport.
Steven Gerrard “now ready to take up offer” of Aston Villa Manager this week. Compensation close to agreed between two clubs. Did last night’s text from Villa’s most famous fan to Gerrard make a difference? New man to assume role by Friday. More to follow. HA. #AVFC #RangersFC
https://twitter.com/iammrazul/status/1458050034151346176
He's referring to a member of the royal family.
That's a blag account with a Russian singer as its profile picture.
Well that's something. I was about enter the stage of grief called 'at least he's not John Terry'.
You thought nothing of The Economist employing a "Head Of European Sport"? :)
Seeing as Gerrard is clear favourite and, at least, being considered, according to all accounts, should we have a simple Gerrard Yes/No poll?
Seeing as Gerrard is clear favourite and, at least, being considered, according to all accounts, should we have a simple Gerrard Yes/No poll?
Seeing as Gerrard is clear favourite and, at least, being considered, according to all accounts, should we have a simple Gerrard Yes/No poll?
Yes and my vote is no.
But spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
Because we're doing things properly? And we're hardly likely to approach a club with an incumbent manager about a vacancy we don't have.
If rumours are true, we did have an initial conversation with Fonseca, who is, of course out of work.
But spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
Because we're doing things properly? And we're hardly likely to approach a club with an incumbent manager about a vacancy we don't have.
If rumours are true, we did have an initial conversation with Fonseca, who is, of course out of work.
The only person who has any clue about who the manager(s) we are interested in is, and whether we've got them signed up, or have yet to pick up the phone, is Purslow. Everything else is pure speculation.
But spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
Because we're doing things properly? And we're hardly likely to approach a club with an incumbent manager about a vacancy we don't have.
If rumours are true, we did have an initial conversation with Fonseca, who is, of course out of work.
The only person who has any clue about who the manager(s) we are interested in is, and whether we've got them signed up, or have yet to pick up the phone, is Purslow. Everything else is pure speculation.
I'll keep an eye out at the BelfryBut spurs had already interviewed him so the groundwork was done.The point is why were we not working on the replacement before firing Smith?
Because we're doing things properly? And we're hardly likely to approach a club with an incumbent manager about a vacancy we don't have.
If rumours are true, we did have an initial conversation with Fonseca, who is, of course out of work.
The only person who has any clue about who the manager(s) we are interested in is, and whether we've got them signed up, or have yet to pick up the phone, is Purslow. Everything else is pure speculation.
I'm still going to check inbound flights, restaurant reservations and estate agents in Sutton Coldfield though.
So, is that ‘chief sports journalist from the Economist’ post a load of bollocks then?
I can’t keep up.
I'm still going to check inbound flights, restaurant reservations and estate agents in Sutton Coldfield though.
Finally - someone in the media talking some senseSimon Jordan talking sense:spot on.
Hot favourite Steven Gerrard is not ready for the Aston Villa job, according to pundit Simon Jordan.
The Rangers boss is the front-runner to succeed Dean Smith at Villa Park in what would be his first Premier League manager’s role, having led the Gers to the Scottish Premiership title last season.
It appears Gerrard would be a popular choice among fans, but former Crystal Palace owner Jordan believes Villa should be targeting a more established manager.
But he suspects Rangers will be powerless to prevent Gerrard moving on should he opt to return to the Premier League, where he achieved iconic status as a player.
“Gerrard will probably have a release clause [in his contract],” said Jordan on talkSPORT this morning.
“Rangers can play hard ball as much as they want but if there is a release clause in Steven Gerrard’s contract, which will be compensation-based, Rangers will be whistling down the wind about what they can and can’t do.
“For me, it would be a strange appointment because, despite his achievements in Scotland, we’re talking about a potentially good manager.
“We’re talking about a potential elite manager, a potential Premier League manager.
“And if Aston Villa want reality rather than potential, then then they should go for an established manager.
“If Tottenham [who have just hired Antonio Conte] are an elite club, then why can’t Aston Villa [be], with their wealth and ownership and the size and scale of their club.
“Gerrard is a great name on paper, Gerrard will give them recognisability.
“But the real pull will be winning games and being near the top of the Premier League.
“If they’re building a media business alongside the football operation, then I get the Gerrard equation.
“Villa are pushing to be an elite club now, which is the reason why they’ve taken Dean out.
“But if you’re going for Gerrard, you’re going for an element of potential. It worries me that it’s too early for Gerrard, he hasn’t finished the job at Rangers, and Villa is probably a job that requires a different set of hands.
“I think he is not at the level yet where he will take Villa to the level where they want to be at.”
my mate just Whatsapped me and said bring him home......he was talking about Olof MellbergYou just had to do it, didn't you!
I'm not sure if Andy was taking the piss as he usually thinks weirdly :)
UTV
The Doc
my mate just Whatsapped me and said bring him home......he was talking about Olof Mellberg
I'm not sure if Andy was taking the piss as he usually thinks weirdly :)
UTV
The Doc
Pretty sure O'Neill, for all his faults, isn't a Loyalist. If he wants to think of himself as British or Irish then he can. Suspect he would prefer the latter.
Loyal to himself
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
my mate just Whatsapped me and said bring him home......he was talking about Olof Mellberg
I'm not sure if Andy was taking the piss as he usually thinks weirdly :)
UTV
The Doc
If it’s Olaf or Gerrard I’d want Olaf even though it’s too soon for him.
Are we as fans too scared of what happened with the bad appointments of managers since O Neil upto Deano to see this rationally.
We know we have the players to be in a better position than we are. Gerrard is having a bad press on this thread but maybe he will bring fresh ideas and enthusiasm. He may not, but there is no guarantee any appointment.
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Are we as fans too scared of what happened with the bad appointments of managers since O Neil upto Deano to see this rationally.
We know we have the players to be in a better position than we are. Gerrard is having a bad press on this thread but maybe he will bring fresh ideas and enthusiasm. He may not, but there is no guarantee any appointment.
Again this is true but part of getting things right is to judge them.
It's a gamble and, like any gamble, people who study and understand the game/sport and make decisions based statistics and experience win much more often than the people who pick a horse in the grand national because they like the name. The vast majority of people putting Gerrard forward are doing the latter.
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Yep, it's just a stew like Lancashire Hotpot. Nice and filling on a cold evening.
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
I'm still going to check inbound flights, restaurant reservations and estate agents in Sutton Coldfield though.
Forget the Sutton estate agents, Slippy G has his family based in Liverpool.
Purslow bringing in Gerrard would be like when Doug appointed DOL because they'd met previously at the airport.
Purslow bringing in Gerrard would be like when Doug appointed DOL because they'd met previously at the airport.
This does have a whiff of the Ellisian about it.
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Yep, it's just a stew like Lancashire Hotpot. Nice and filling on a cold evening.
I've always assumed (based on nothing) that it's sausage-based. Is it sausage based?
Another lowbrow joke has become available, but it's a genuine question!
I'm hoping the calibre of players we have this time compared to the last relegation will be a big factor in us improving. There was much pleasure in seeing Arsenal struggling last season but in the end finished above us. Chelsea muddled along until they swapped Lampard with Tuchel then went on to win the Champions League with the same players.Are we as fans too scared of what happened with the bad appointments of managers since O Neil upto Deano to see this rationally.
We know we have the players to be in a better position than we are. Gerrard is having a bad press on this thread but maybe he will bring fresh ideas and enthusiasm. He may not, but there is no guarantee any appointment.
Again this is true but part of getting things right is to judge them.
It's a gamble and, like any gamble, people who study and understand the game/sport and make decisions based statistics and experience win much more often than the people who pick a horse in the grand national because they like the name. The vast majority of people putting Gerrard forward are doing the latter.
It’s a gamble not sacking Dean, a gamble keeping him and a gamble whoever replaces him. The timing I think they’ve got right as far too often we have tended to hang in there.
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Yep, it's just a stew like Lancashire Hotpot. Nice and filling on a cold evening.
I've always assumed (based on nothing) that it's sausage-based. Is it sausage based?
Another lowbrow joke has become available, but it's a genuine question!
Nope, it's pieces of lamb with slow-cooked veg like potatoes and carrots, in a stew/cassarole. Usually served with (pickled) red cabbage on the side. I'm certain that everybody would have had something similar in their lives at some point. We used to make a big saucepan full of stuff like that when I was at uni, as it was cheap and filling.
Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Yep, it's just a stew like Lancashire Hotpot. Nice and filling on a cold evening.
I've always assumed (based on nothing) that it's sausage-based. Is it sausage based?
Another lowbrow joke has become available, but it's a genuine question!
Nope, it's pieces of lamb with slow-cooked veg like potatoes and carrots, in a stew/cassarole. Usually served with (pickled) red cabbage on the side. I'm certain that everybody would have had something similar in their lives at some point. We used to make a big saucepan full of stuff like that when I was at uni, as it was cheap and filling.
We all like Dean and wish it had worked out. He wasn't sacked because we weren't top half, he was sacked because we are averaging less than a point per game and were heading for the relegation zone if it continued. We have also had a poor 2018 overall with 18 defeats in 35.Agreed - and if the rest of the season, we don't see progress from where we are now to the top half, the same thing can be fairly landed at the new managers door
He wasn't sacked because he wasn't in the top half, he was sacked because for 11 months we stopped progressing.
Purslow bringing in Gerrard would be like when Doug appointed DOL because they'd met previously at the airport.
This does have a whiff of the Ellisian about it.
Hopefully more Elysian than Ellisian.
2. I work with competitors of the Economist and you'd be amazed at how many staff they have in seemingly unrelated fields so I found the idea totally unsurprising
You're Bonzo Johnson, and I claim my £5.Purslow bringing in Gerrard would be like when Doug appointed DOL because they'd met previously at the airport.
This does have a whiff of the Ellisian about it.
Hopefully more Elysian than Ellisian.
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
His only experience is as an old-school, controls everything manager at Sevco though?
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
His only experience is as an old-school, controls everything manager at Sevco though?
I don't know. Looking at their wiki page, they have all sorts of technical sounding positions, like "Head of Performance Analysis", "Technical Coach", "Head of Preparation" etc so they may think that Gerrard is already working in the same sort of structure that they're trying to create.
so my Glasgow mate rings me up . I obviously ask him , if he is going .
replies Nah
I said do you rate him .. he replies of course I do .
Well down here looks like hes coming .
He replies he aint going nowhere and If he goes there will be riots .
he said they have great results in Europe not that will bother Villa and the football is entertaining .
but as we know hes playing a few poor teams really.
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
His only experience is as an old-school, controls everything manager at Sevco though?
I don't know. Looking at their wiki page, they have all sorts of technical sounding positions, like "Head of Performance Analysis", "Technical Coach", "Head of Preparation" etc so they may think that Gerrard is already working in the same sort of structure that they're trying to create.
But he's above them in the hierarchy. That wouldn't be the case with Lange here.
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
His only experience is as an old-school, controls everything manager at Sevco though?
I don't know. Looking at their wiki page, they have all sorts of technical sounding positions, like "Head of Performance Analysis", "Technical Coach", "Head of Preparation" “ Marching co-ordinator” etc so they may think that Gerrard is already working in the same sort of structure that they're trying to create.
There's no outstanding candidate's & even if there was who's to say they wouldn't end up being shite. There were plenty of people looking at Lambert & thinking he was a perfect fit for us. Personally I never thought Smith was the right man for the job but he proved me wrong, until he hit his ceiling.
Every name in the hat will have question marks against them. I want someone as ambitious as we are, who wants to provide entertainment, develop the young players & can see the bloody obvious.
Whoever we get, I trust the club to get it right & we need to back him too.
The club is very obviously moving away from the old football manager way of doing things, which is why Smith was called "Head Coach" and why they've brought in the new fangled ideas people like Danks and MacPhee. My guess is that they think that somebody younger like Gerrard will be more receptive to that way of working.
His only experience is as an old-school, controls everything manager at Sevco though?
I don't know. Looking at their wiki page, they have all sorts of technical sounding positions, like "Head of Performance Analysis", "Technical Coach", "Head of Preparation" etc so they may think that Gerrard is already working in the same sort of structure that they're trying to create.
But he's above them in the hierarchy. That wouldn't be the case with Lange here.
The've got a Sporting Director, Ross Wilson, who appears to be our version of Lange: https://rangers.vitalfootball.co.uk/rangers-transfers-ross-wilson-steven-gerrard/
The more you read into it, the more it looks a similar set up to Villa with how they're trying to replicate things from the first team down to the kids, and why Purslow probably thinks Gerrard would be a good fit.
Well, from what I’ve been told you can lay the shit out of Gerrard on Betfair as someone I know fairly well connected says whilst he’s on a shortlist the indications are he’s committed to Rangers until at least end of season. Smart money, in his opinion, should be for Potter (hence I’ve stuck £30 on it at 16’s)
Yep, agreed, though I don't think a sacking would be enough. If Gerrard fails, Purslow has to pay the same way that Thomas Cromwell paid for recommending Anne of Cleves.
Like Big Ron. His first game for us as manager was against his old club (Sheffield Wednesday) as well!Well, from what I’ve been told you can lay the shit out of Gerrard on Betfair as someone I know fairly well connected says whilst he’s on a shortlist the indications are he’s committed to Rangers until at least end of season. Smart money, in his opinion, should be for Potter (hence I’ve stuck £30 on it at 16’s)
I hope it is Potter. He's done brilliantly at Swansea and Brighton in view of the limited budgets he's had at his disposal and got them both playing good football.
I feel more sure that we'd enjoy watching a Villa team managed by Potter than anyone else mentioned so far.
Oh, and he's a Villa fan.....
I would fellate all your dads for Potter right now in the face of all this Gerrard bullshit.
Anne of Cleves inspired Gegenpressing, as when she pressed against him Henry thought 'I'm gegen the fuck outta here.'
I would fellate all your dads for Potter right now in the face of all this Gerrard bullshit.
What about my uncle?
I would fellate all your dads for Potter right now in the face of all this Gerrard bullshit.He said he’s alright thanks
Could it be the old trick of leaking out a candidate's name, one that is known wouldn't be popular so that anyone else sounds like a better option.
So Parslow if you are reading this we don’t want SG.Could it be the old trick of leaking out a candidate's name, one that is known wouldn't be popular so that anyone else sounds like a better option.
Or it could be the trick our current Government do, release a statement, see if there is backlash and make a quick u-turn
I would fellate all your dads for Potter right now in the face of all this Gerrard bullshit.He said he’s alright thanks
He & Purslow don't get on.
Male or female I should add.
Yes, Male, Female or Brian would be strangeMale or female I should add.
No need to add Brian.
Went looking through a Rangers forum to see what they make of Gerrard coming here, as you do:
(https://i.ibb.co/k5Sd4KC/Lol.png) (https://ibb.co/k5Sd4KC)
Nice meltdown.
Went looking through a Rangers forum to see what they make of Gerrard coming here, as you do:
(https://i.ibb.co/k5Sd4KC/Lol.png) (https://ibb.co/k5Sd4KC)
Nice meltdown.
Why would you do that to yourself?!
A "Rangers" forum would be like SHA wearing knuckledusters. And it's wearing them, not you.
Also seems our nearest and dearest have been signing up, living out their fever dreams:
(https://i.ibb.co/r0kQdHb/Lol.png) (https://ibb.co/r0kQdHb)
Well, you did it to yourself, and you've actually provided a silver lining to this saga. If we take him we'll pissing them right off. That is a sizeable crumb of comfort. And they could then employ John Terry. A match made in Hades.
The thing that makes me feel worse, is all the people that seem to back want him on-line have pretty shit reasoning.
Things like - "he won't tolerate errors". I think that's bollock's - "you fucked up their Ollie, so now were playing Davis upfront next game"? I can't believe any manager tiolerates errors, but ultimately you're limited by the ability of the players
And people quoting his possession stats - of course Ranges have better possession stats - their playing in a league where Scott Sinclair looked like Pele.
If he comes in, ill obviously support him, but it feels like a massive opportunity missed - and our acceptance of our place. If Spurs can get Conte, we can surely get someone who has down well in a big league
Could it be the old trick of leaking out a candidate's name, one that is known wouldn't be popular so that anyone else sounds like a better option.
Or it could be the trick our current Government do, release a statement, see if there is backlash and make a quick u-turn
Well, you did it to yourself, and you've actually provided a silver lining to this saga. If we take him we'll pissing them right off. That is a sizeable crumb of comfort. And they could then employ John Terry. A match made in Hades.
That is the only positive outcome and perhaps, on some subconscious level, I felt the need to make myself feel better about it if it pisses off Rangers fans.
The speculation on that forum is if prince stevie gets the Villa job and fucks it up, it'll scupper his chances of ever landing the Liverpool job
Well, you did it to yourself, and you've actually provided a silver lining to this saga. If we take him we'll pissing them right off. That is a sizeable crumb of comfort. And they could then employ John Terry. A match made in Hades.
That is the only positive outcome and perhaps, on some subconscious level, I felt the need to make myself feel better about it if it pisses off Rangers fans.
Maybe we could tempt Gerrard to resign, and then not appoint him. Fucking Govan troglodytes.
Adolf Hutter at Monchengladbach might divide opinion (and other things).
The speculation on that forum is if prince stevie gets the Villa job and fucks it up, it'll scupper his chances of ever landing the Liverpool job
Surely he has to try, though? Stay at "Rangers" and they won't give him the job because they considered Sounness a failure.
Adolf Hutter at Monchengladbach might divide opinion (and other things).
But would be a more popular choice than Gerrard.
Or young, eh, English coach Nestor El Maestro who's currently out in Turkey with Göztepe.
The future Potter - with an infinitely cooler name.
I had to check that too.Adolf Hutter at Monchengladbach might divide opinion (and other things).
I had to look that up to check you weren't joking. Unsurprisingly he goes by 'Adi'.
Adolf Hutter at Monchengladbach might divide opinion (and other things).
But would be a more popular choice than Gerrard.
Or young, eh, English coach Nestor El Maestro who's currently out in Turkey with Göztepe.
The future Potter - with an infinitely cooler name.
Went looking through a Rangers forum to see what they make of Gerrard coming here, as you do:
(https://i.ibb.co/k5Sd4KC/Lol.png) (https://ibb.co/k5Sd4KC)
Nice meltdown.
Does he mention Liverpool a lot now as manager of Rangers? Genuine question, as I've no idea.
Does he mention Liverpool a lot now as manager of Rangers? Genuine question, as I've no idea.He still wears his Liverpool shirt in training I've heard.
Went looking through a Rangers forum to see what they make of Gerrard coming here, as you do:
(https://i.ibb.co/k5Sd4KC/Lol.png) (https://ibb.co/k5Sd4KC)
Nice meltdown.
There is some very strange reasoning going on in that thread, a lot of them seem stuck in 90s when half the England team played for them.
If anyone at all in the PL wanted him I’d expect him to have his head turned as, despite them being a huge club, they are hamstrung by the league they are in and cannon fodder every year in Europe. I’d be really surprised if Liverpool appointed him without a step between.
But its still a no from me anyway.
Does he mention Liverpool a lot now as manager of Rangers? Genuine question, as I've no idea.He still wears his Liverpool shirt in training I've heard.
And belts out YNWA in the dressing room before every game
Apparently
Maybe we’re just getting revenge for the year 2000. We seem to be working our way through the main men from the 5 teams who finished above us in the 2000 league table.
If Gerrard comes off we’ll have bagged Roy Keane, John Terry, Gerrard, DO’L and, err, Pires) from the Teams above us that year
Maybe we’re just getting revenge for the year 2000. We seem to be working our way through the main men from the 5 teams who finished above us in the 2000 league table.
If Gerrard comes off we’ll have bagged Roy Keane, John Terry, Gerrard, DO’L and, err, Pires) from the Teams above us that year
Most of the time I saw him he was moaning about the ref And decisions
Proper Warnock moaning as well complaining like fuck especially if the result had gone against
Honestly came over as a total whining entitled nob
Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
“The club want a big name and a strong character and want that individual to make Villa a challenging and intense environment for the players.”
Is that implying Dean wasn’t doing that? Did they think he was too pally with the players?!?
Yes “big name manager” isn’t really true is it.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
Whole thing smacks of improving the corporate image of the club, rather than the resultsYes “big name manager” isn’t really true is it.
He is a 'big name' though in the Sky Sports and tabloid world. If it happens, it will generate a lot of interest and on a global scale as well I would have thought.
I agree with those saying it would be hard to argue that Steven Gerrard is a step up in calibre of manager from Dean Smith. It would therefore raise the question of whether sacking DS was necessary at this point if a significantly better candidate isn't going to be brought in.
Not as much as we laugh at them, though! :DI think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
Better change the club crest to SGAV FC, then, on all the club merchandise.
He' won't last 18 months, and he'll never be Liverpool manager.
Yes “big name manager” isn’t really true is it.
He is a 'big name' though in the Sky Sports and tabloid world. If it happens, it will generate a lot of interest and on a global scale as well I would have thought.
I agree with those saying it would be hard to argue that Steven Gerrard is a step up in calibre of manager from Dean Smith. It would therefore raise the question of whether sacking DS was necessary at this point if a significantly better candidate isn't going to be brought in.
I've changed my mind,I now can't wait to see Gerrard holding aloft the scarf. I also want to see Deano move in the opposite direction to Ibrox.
After years of success at B6 & when Jurgen moves upstairs,Gerrard who is now Villa's most successful manager decides to make the long anticipated move to Anfield.
Villa now looking for a new manager look to the man who's just secured 10 in a row at Ibrox.....Deano returns to a heroes welcome & carries on where Gerrard left off!
I've changed my mind,I now can't wait to see Gerrard holding aloft the scarf. I also want to see Deano move in the opposite direction to Ibrox.
After years of success at B6 & when Jurgen moves upstairs,Gerrard who is now Villa's most successful manager decides to make the long anticipated move to Anfield.
Villa now looking for a new manager look to the man who's just secured 10 in a row at Ibrox.....Deano returns to a heroes welcome & carries on where Gerrard left off!
I've changed my mind,I now can't wait to see Gerrard holding aloft the scarf. I also want to see Deano move in the opposite direction to Ibrox.Brilliant.
After years of success at B6 & when Jurgen moves upstairs,Gerrard who is now Villa's most successful manager decides to make the long anticipated move to Anfield.
Villa now looking for a new manager look to the man who's just secured 10 in a row at Ibrox.....Deano returns to a heroes welcome & carries on where Gerrard left off!
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Adolf Hutter at Monchengladbach might divide opinion (and other things).
I had to look that up to check you weren't joking. Unsurprisingly he goes by 'Adi'.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
Someone in the last few days has said that Dean Smith, and to an extent Jack gave Villa an authenticityTrying to make sense of your last paragraph. Are you saying that if Gerrard is appointed, does well, and come the transfer window signs a top class DM, you will tell that player to “fuck off”?
I think that's some of the reason why I am against this - it feels like starstruck bollocks.
If he's not Stevie G, we wouldn't look at him. If a player comes her cos they want to work under Stevie G, but not Deano - then they can fuck off we don't need players like that
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I think we’ve (Purslow) only been interested in Gerard
I doubt very much anyone else has even been considered past a few mentions in the press
Short list my arse
he’s probably had this in mind for a while and this is on him
Good or bad it’s on him
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
No what I mean is if playing for Villa isn't a bigger draw for him than playing for Stevie G, he can fuck off.Someone in the last few days has said that Dean Smith, and to an extent Jack gave Villa an authenticityTrying to make sense of your last paragraph. Are you saying that if Gerrard is appointed, does well, and come the transfer window signs a top class DM, you will tell that player to “fuck off”?
I think that's some of the reason why I am against this - it feels like starstruck bollocks.
If he's not Stevie G, we wouldn't look at him. If a player comes her cos they want to work under Stevie G, but not Deano - then they can fuck off we don't need players like that
Interesting
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
Unfortunately that couple of hundred on here were 100% right about Bruce and McLeish
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
What better fan bullshit?
Dont talk bollocks mate i am just saying how i will bs with tbe new manager point to me where i have said i am a bettee fan than anyone else?
I'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
Unfortunately that couple of hundred on here were 100% right about Bruce and McLeish
I think everyone on the planet knew mcleish wouldnt work out! But i still gave him.a chance
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
He doesn't deserve a chance. He shouldn't be given one of the biggest jobs in English football and paid millions of pounds for the privilege.
Somebody better qualified deserves that chance.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
He can sing what he likes, within reason.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
He can sing what he likes, within reason.
Simon Jordan says we should be going for the Ajax manager. That would do.I agree with Simon Jordan, not for the first time. Seems a good sort.
I don't think I fair to say that anyone wants to see him fail. He may turn out to be a brilliant manager and I really hope he does. I think we can all agree on thatI'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
It should be Clampy but unfortunately it looks as if we are in the minority.
The apparent determination to see Gerrard fail is quite discouraging
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
What better fan bullshit?
Dont talk bollocks mate i am just saying how i will bs with tbe new manager point to me where i have said i am a bettee fan than anyone else?
About your last ten posts have all been of the "I'm a better fan than those who don't want to cheer for Steven Gerrard" variety.
For what it's worth, if we are talking "better fans", I prefer those that don't applaud it when the club acts like starstruck teenagers when they should be pulling out all the stops to get the best candidate possible.
I'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?Indeed. I'll give any manager that comes to Villa a chance: I gave even Alex McLeish one (chance, that is, you dirty lot!). Still a crap choice, though, but time will tell...
I dont see why anybody wouldn't back our new manager whoever he is, regardless of whatever reservations you may have.
Whoever it may be, they get a chance and they get unconditional support.
I mainly just wanted to join in the megaquote. But I agree, it seems weird that we're in a position where we could pretty much have our pick of unemployed managers, and some employed ones, yet choose someone purely on the basis that the CEO liked them when they were a player.I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
I dont even know what that means but ill be supporting him or whoever is appointed as vllia manager 100%. I backed bruce and mcleish too who were even worse than gerrard.
He deserves a chance and the majority will back him thankfully not like a couple hundred on here.
He doesn't deserve a chance. He shouldn't be given one of the biggest jobs in English football and paid millions of pounds for the privilege.
Somebody better qualified deserves that chance.
But this is the point. We aren’t one of the biggest jobs in English football. We haven’t been one of the biggest jobs in English football for an incredibly long time.
Simon Jordan says we should be going for the Ajax manager. That would do.
I'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
What better fan bullshit?
Dont talk bollocks mate i am just saying how i will bs with tbe new manager point to me where i have said i am a bettee fan than anyone else?
About your last ten posts have all been of the "I'm a better fan than those who don't want to cheer for Steven Gerrard" variety.
For what it's worth, if we are talking "better fans", I prefer those that don't applaud it when the club acts like starstruck teenagers when they should be pulling out all the stops to get the best candidate possible.
Im.not interested in a mythical debate about "being better fan". I dont classify myself better or worse than any fan. What im saying is i will support the new guy like any manager as thats how i roll. Unpopular? Perhaps but that doesnt mean im saying "im a better fan than you" thats just ludicrous and just off subject nonsense that i dont want to engage in.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
He can sing what he likes, within reason.
Sure, but he's the one lecturing other people for not singing for the new manager.
Two kittens die every time someone compares this appointment to McLeish.
McLeish had just relegated Blues. Mcleish was renowned for really awful football. McLeish had just managed that lot over the road and they were relatively glad to see the back of him. It is nothing like McLeish.
SG has gone into a huge football club as a rookie and went undefeated for the entire season and won the league. He’s also presently top of the league this season and have a more than reasonable shout of qualifying for the next stages of the Europa league. If you are against it - fine. Everyone has an opinion, but coming out with nonsense like you won’t support him or he’ll get a cold reception. It’s utterly ludicrous and makes this fan base look embarrassing. Happy to debate this with anyone on here before the Brighton game - normally stand underneath the small TV in the Holte Suite, on the right through the doors as you walk in
It's an interesting stance Bully is taking. He's not going to get behind Gerrard but thinks fans shouldnt applaud the club for choosing him (or acting like starstruck teenagers as he puts it). Do what you want to Billy, but don't tell others how they should react.
So a bit of side note, but something has gone wrong on this chain - as the comments I am linked to aren't what I said - its gone out of sync.I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
I can support the team without supporting the manager.
Will you be singing "Stevie G, he's won more than you"?
He can sing what he likes, within reason.
Sure, but he's the one lecturing other people for not singing for the new manager.
Making stuff up now are you? Where have i said you should sing for the new manager?
I don't think I fair to say that anyone wants to see him fail. He may turn out to be a brilliant manager and I really hope he does. I think we can all agree on thatI'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
It should be Clampy but unfortunately it looks as if we are in the minority.
The apparent determination to see Gerrard fail is quite discouraging
I'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
It should be Clampy but unfortunately it looks as if we are in the minority.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
What better fan bullshit?
Dont talk bollocks mate i am just saying how i will bs with tbe new manager point to me where i have said i am a bettee fan than anyone else?
About your last ten posts have all been of the "I'm a better fan than those who don't want to cheer for Steven Gerrard" variety.
For what it's worth, if we are talking "better fans", I prefer those that don't applaud it when the club acts like starstruck teenagers when they should be pulling out all the stops to get the best candidate possible.
Im.not interested in a mythical debate about "being better fan". I dont classify myself better or worse than any fan. What im saying is i will support the new guy like any manager as thats how i roll. Unpopular? Perhaps but that doesnt mean im saying "im a better fan than you" thats just ludicrous and just off subject nonsense that i dont want to engage in.
You were calling people "embarrassing" for not wanting the new manager in, then implying that I/we shouldn't go to Villa Park unless we support him.
This isn't "mythical", it's in the discussion that I'm quoting.
You have a habit of coming out with this better fan than you bollocks, I've noticed it in your posting style before.
Screaming into a void - that's a really good way of putting it. I've thought that a lotTwo kittens die every time someone compares this appointment to McLeish.
McLeish had just relegated Blues. Mcleish was renowned for really awful football. McLeish had just managed that lot over the road and they were relatively glad to see the back of him. It is nothing like McLeish.
SG has gone into a huge football club as a rookie and went undefeated for the entire season and won the league. He’s also presently top of the league this season and have a more than reasonable shout of qualifying for the next stages of the Europa league. If you are against it - fine. Everyone has an opinion, but coming out with nonsense like you won’t support him or he’ll get a cold reception. It’s utterly ludicrous and makes this fan base look embarrassing. Happy to debate this with anyone on here before the Brighton game - normally stand underneath the small TV in the Holte Suite, on the right through the doors as you walk in
(I say this as a lot of these comments are screaming into a void, let’s have a proper chat about it - I’ll even buy you a beer)
Every Villa fan wants the manager to be a success. Without exception.
You're right. I really don't want him to fail, I just have a bad feeling about it, but hope I am wrong - UTVI don't think I fair to say that anyone wants to see him fail. He may turn out to be a brilliant manager and I really hope he does. I think we can all agree on thatI'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
It should be Clampy but unfortunately it looks as if we are in the minority.
The apparent determination to see Gerrard fail is quite discouraging
I used the phrase “apparent determination” because that is the impression I gleaned from many of the comments
I do agree that we should all want him to be a success
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
Its incredible isnt it? You don't have to like him as a person but bloody hell he deserves a chance.
Embarrassing
What's embarrassing is a club of our stature acting like starstruck teenagers because someone that played for Liverpool flashes a bit of ankle at them.
Na mate not supporting a manager because he isnt your first choice is more embarrassing.
I take it then you wont be going to villa park then if Gerrards appointed?
It’s a early to be going with the better fan than you bullshit
What better fan bullshit?
Dont talk bollocks mate i am just saying how i will bs with tbe new manager point to me where i have said i am a bettee fan than anyone else?
About your last ten posts have all been of the "I'm a better fan than those who don't want to cheer for Steven Gerrard" variety.
For what it's worth, if we are talking "better fans", I prefer those that don't applaud it when the club acts like starstruck teenagers when they should be pulling out all the stops to get the best candidate possible.
Im.not interested in a mythical debate about "being better fan". I dont classify myself better or worse than any fan. What im saying is i will support the new guy like any manager as thats how i roll. Unpopular? Perhaps but that doesnt mean im saying "im a better fan than you" thats just ludicrous and just off subject nonsense that i dont want to engage in.
You were calling people "embarrassing" for not wanting the new manager in, then implying that I/we shouldn't go to Villa Park unless we support him.
This isn't "mythical", it's in the discussion that I'm quoting.
You have a habit of coming out with this better fan than you bollocks, I've noticed it in your posting style before.
You have noticed or made up?
I called out embarassing that theh wouldnt support the managee before he has even been given opportunity. That is embarrassing. And show me where i said fans should stay away from villa park?? Another made up accusation from you.
He deserves a chance simple as that. Just like smith, just like bruce just like mcleish.
Your the one continuing this nonsense debate after i have clarified i am not a better fan your just twisting words to suit your argument. If you dont like what someone says you jump on them. I can see where the bully in your name comes from.
You're right. I really don't want him to fail, I just have a bad feeling about it, but hope I am wrong - UTVI don't think I fair to say that anyone wants to see him fail. He may turn out to be a brilliant manager and I really hope he does. I think we can all agree on thatI'll be honest, i'm not jumping up and down at the thought of him possibly coming in but I'll get behind him and I hope he does a bloody good job. Isn't that what it's all about?
It should be Clampy but unfortunately it looks as if we are in the minority.
The apparent determination to see Gerrard fail is quite discouraging
I used the phrase “apparent determination” because that is the impression I gleaned from many of the comments
I do agree that we should all want him to be a success
If you dont like what someone says you jump on them.
If you dont like what someone says you jump on them.
Which just to be clear, is what you did to me. You are entitled to your view as everyone on here is, but if you want to dish it out, you need to accept it back.
If appointed he deserves a chance and given the same opportunities and respect as smith has.
It wouldnt be the best appointment but not the worst either
If appointed he deserves a chance and given the same opportunities and respect as smith has.
It wouldnt be the best appointment but not the worst either
He wouldn't 'deserve' anything and has the right to nothing. Smith gets a lot of respect for what he's done and the way he's handled himself. Gerrard has done nothing to earn our respect at all.
If appointed he deserves a chance and given the same opportunities and respect as smith has.
It wouldnt be the best appointment but not the worst either
He wouldn't 'deserve' anything and has the right to nothing. Smith gets a lot of respect for what he's done and the way he's handled himself. Gerrard has done nothing to earn our respect at all.
If you dont like what someone says you jump on them.
Which just to be clear, is what you did to me. You are entitled to your view as everyone on here is, but if you want to dish it out, you need to accept it back.
Quite.
Don't brand everyone that disagrees with you "embarrassing" then cry when somebody takes umbrage.
If you dont like what someone says you jump on them.
Which just to be clear, is what you did to me. You are entitled to your view as everyone on here is, but if you want to dish it out, you need to accept it back.
If you dont like what someone says you jump on them.
Which just to be clear, is what you did to me. You are entitled to your view as everyone on here is, but if you want to dish it out, you need to accept it back.
Well if i offended you i apologise as it wasnt meant to be offensive. I accept i may have used strong language with the bollocks word.
Can we get back to spouting nonsense please?Yes! So do we think Nanny McPhee & Dirty Danks get to stay.
I'm happy to move on, can you just do me a small favour and read the following?
https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/you-and-youre-whats-the-difference-and-when-to-use-them/
I'm happy to move on, can you just do me a small favour and read the following?
https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/you-and-youre-whats-the-difference-and-when-to-use-them/
I'm happy to move on, can you just do me a small favour and read the following?
https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/you-and-youre-whats-the-difference-and-when-to-use-them/
Incredibly patronising and offensive FWIW.
I'm happy to move on, can you just do me a small favour and read the following?
https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/you-and-youre-whats-the-difference-and-when-to-use-them/
Incredibly patronising and offensive FWIW.
I'll support the Villa always. There have been players and managers I don't like. Gerrard is my least favourite appointment. I'll support his team.
My impression of him is of an arrogant, unsavoury character, he fought hard on the pitch but thought nothing of cheating. There are allegations of attempts to pay people off, of assaults.
I'm not sure why people seem so happy about this. I just don't get it at all.
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.TBF - that's a pretty good summary of whats been said over the last 50 pages
Two kittens die every time someone compares this appointment to McLeish.
McLeish had just relegated Blues. Mcleish was renowned for really awful football. McLeish had just managed that lot over the road and they were relatively glad to see the back of him. It is nothing like McLeish.
I'm happy to move on, can you just do me a small favour and read the following?
https://www.oxfordinternationalenglish.com/you-and-youre-whats-the-difference-and-when-to-use-them/
I still love you CD 🤣
You know im.gonna continue to do this now just to wind you up 😉
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
If it makes you feel better, I don't think you'll need to worry about winning trophiesIf it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
I just don't get it. We should be aiming far higher than giving him a chance. I think we've settled and that Smith would have done better.
I hope I'm wrong and that we win trophies, I just feel like the stories will be about him winning them, not the Villa.
I'll support the Villa always. There have been players and managers I don't like. Gerrard is my least favourite appointment. I'll support his team.
My impression of him is of an arrogant, unsavoury character, he fought hard on the pitch but thought nothing of cheating. There are allegations of attempts to pay people off, of assaults.
I'm not sure why people seem so happy about this. I just don't get it at all.
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
I just don't get it. We should be aiming far higher than giving him a chance. I think we've settled and that Smith would have done better.
I hope I'm wrong and that we win trophies, I just feel like the stories will be about him winning them, not the Villa.
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
I just don't get it. We should be aiming far higher than giving him a chance. I think we've settled and that Smith would have done better.
I hope I'm wrong and that we win trophies, I just feel like the stories will be about him winning them, not the Villa.
McLeish was 100% committed to Villa whilst in post. He took an interest in every area of the playing sides, not just the first XI which cannot be said about quite a few other appointments in the last 10 or so years.
I'll support the Villa always. There have been players and managers I don't like. Gerrard is my least favourite appointment. I'll support his team.
My impression of him is of an arrogant, unsavoury character, he fought hard on the pitch but thought nothing of cheating. There are allegations of attempts to pay people off, of assaults.
I'm not sure why people seem so happy about this. I just don't get it at all.
Our captain last season broke lockdown rules after posting a video in support of the NHS, and also crashed into parked cars. John Terry was in court for assault as a younger man, but seems to have turned his public perception around. I don't think I've seen anybody "happy" about this, just seems people are prepared to give whoever the new manager is, a chance.
McLeish was 100% committed to Villa whilst in post. He took an interest in every area of the playing sides, not just the first XI which cannot be said about quite a few other appointments in the last 10 or so years.
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
I just don't get it. We should be aiming far higher than giving him a chance. I think we've settled and that Smith would have done better.
I hope I'm wrong and that we win trophies, I just feel like the stories will be about him winning them, not the Villa.
If it is Gerrard, he'll either come in and do well, or he won't, and he won't have the benefit of the doubt for as long as Smith did.
I just don't get it. We should be aiming far higher than giving him a chance. I think we've settled and that Smith would have done better.
I hope I'm wrong and that we win trophies, I just feel like the stories will be about him winning them, not the Villa.
If we win the FA Cup I’ll be too pissed to give a toss about what the stories are about it.
Agreed Risso. We are in a tailspin on the pitch.I don't think Smith would have taken us down - we are much stronger than 19/20. Im not saying it wasn't his time, or it wouldn't have been a disappointing season, but I think we would have finished lower middle half.
Not one person is happy with Gerrard. I can rationalise why the board want him though. I also think he'll do well.
I don't see myself ever really liking him, but then at the same time I never saw myself tolerating Terry and he didn't put a for wrong really.
Smith would have taken us down this season. The team was an absolute raggedy arsed shambles, the football was dismal and getting worse. The two first halves against Arsenal and Southampton were as bad as anything in the last 5 years.
You put it better than I didSmith would have taken us down this season. The team was an absolute raggedy arsed shambles, the football was dismal and getting worse. The two first halves against Arsenal and Southampton were as bad as anything in the last 5 years.
At the risk of starting a pretty pointless debate he wouldn’t, as has been talked about incessantly, he went on runs, winning and losing, we have the best squad we’ve had in many years and it would have come good to finish in about the position we did last. And I can grudgingly understand why that wasn’t good enough for ambitious owners. Although subsequent events are a little more difficult to fathom.
Smith would have taken us down this season. The team was an absolute raggedy arsed shambles, the football was dismal and getting worse. The two first halves against Arsenal and Southampton were as bad as anything in the last 5 years.
At the risk of starting a pretty pointless debate he wouldn’t, as has been talked about incessantly, he went on runs, winning and losing, we have the best squad we’ve had in many years and it would have come good to finish in about the position we did last. And I can grudgingly understand why that wasn’t good enough for ambitious owners. Although subsequent events are a little more difficult to fathom.
I think his biggest mistake there was trying to play both Ings and Watkins. One or the other, not both.
He had his four front players hopelessly out of form for the whole season so far (maybe I’m being unfair on Ings there), that would have improved and so would results.
I think his biggest mistake there was trying to play both Ings and Watkins. One or the other, not both.
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.That is one of the frustrations - its just anything but ambitious. Unless we just really are deluded.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
He had his four front players hopelessly out of form for the whole season so far (maybe I’m being unfair on Ings there), that would have improved and so would results.
And his defence, and his midfield. Literally every part of the team was rubbish, and falling out with him and each other.
I wonder if he’ll give Freddie another chance
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I agree, I think I said earlier that Houllier seemed to have his head in the clouds when we appointed him. I will give credit where it's due and say that I believe Gerrard would be too switched-on and professional to go in for that.
But I also agree that appointing Gerrard would show no ambition. Particularly not after fucking Tottenham just got Conte.
The London thing, okay, that's just a symptom of successive governments focusing investment in London to the detriment of the rest of the country. But to read people trying to justify Tottenham's new stadium as a selling point to a manager is baffling. Why? The manager isn't going to live in the stadium.
I am utterly fucked off by clubs based in unfashionable regions being expected to embrace a diminished place in the game because of geopolitical investment patterns. Even after 20 years of media propaganda, Tottenham are fucking nothing. 13 years ago, Man City were fucking nothing.
Why should we have to accept that we cannot either win respect through demography (as Tottenham did through being based in London), nor can we buy success (as Man City did through blood money)?
It's a rigged fucking game based on regional prejudices and concentration of the media in the South East and North West.
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.That is one of the frustrations - its just anything but ambitious. Unless we just really are deluded.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I think you're right, hell be closer to Terry in his conduct than Houllier.
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I agree, I think I said earlier that Houllier seemed to have his head in the clouds when we appointed him. I will give credit where it's due and say that I believe Gerrard would be too switched-on and professional to go in for that.
But I also agree that appointing Gerrard would show no ambition. Particularly not after fucking Tottenham just got Conte.
The London thing, okay, that's just a symptom of successive governments focusing investment in London to the detriment of the rest of the country. But to read people trying to justify Tottenham's new stadium as a selling point to a manager is baffling. Why? The manager isn't going to live in the stadium.
I am utterly fucked off by clubs based in unfashionable regions being expected to embrace a diminished place in the game because of geopolitical investment patterns. Even after 20 years of media propaganda, Tottenham are fucking nothing. 13 years ago, Man City were fucking nothing.
Why should we have to accept that we cannot either win respect through demography (as Tottenham did through being based in London), nor can we buy success (as Man City did through blood money)?
It's a rigged fucking game based on regional prejudices and concentration of the media in the South East and North West.
It's not the media's fault that Man City have spent a couple of billion on players since taking them over.
Scottish press running that it will be £3m for Gerrard and his backroom team.
Scottish press running that it will be £3m for Gerrard and his backroom team.
Phew!
At least we'll be making £3m from it then.
Unless you mean.....No, surely not?!
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I agree, I think I said earlier that Houllier seemed to have his head in the clouds when we appointed him. I will give credit where it's due and say that I believe Gerrard would be too switched-on and professional to go in for that.
But I also agree that appointing Gerrard would show no ambition. Particularly not after fucking Tottenham just got Conte.
The London thing, okay, that's just a symptom of successive governments focusing investment in London to the detriment of the rest of the country. But to read people trying to justify Tottenham's new stadium as a selling point to a manager is baffling. Why? The manager isn't going to live in the stadium.
I am utterly fucked off by clubs based in unfashionable regions being expected to embrace a diminished place in the game because of geopolitical investment patterns. Even after 20 years of media propaganda, Tottenham are fucking nothing. 13 years ago, Man City were fucking nothing.
Why should we have to accept that we cannot either win respect through demography (as Tottenham did through being based in London), nor can we buy success (as Man City did through blood money)?
It's a rigged fucking game based on regional prejudices and concentration of the media in the South East and North West.
It's not the media's fault that Man City have spent a couple of billion on players since taking them over.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
We have the same defence that were very solid a few months ago the difference is that the midfield and forward line have not been doing their job. No pressure up front and a powder puff midfield no wonder the back line is struggling.
Then there are the injury problems, we don't have players missing a couple of weeks, they are out that long we forget they are villa players. I said Dean should go but he never had a full squad to choose from.
It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I agree, I think I said earlier that Houllier seemed to have his head in the clouds when we appointed him. I will give credit where it's due and say that I believe Gerrard would be too switched-on and professional to go in for that.
But I also agree that appointing Gerrard would show no ambition. Particularly not after fucking Tottenham just got Conte.
The London thing, okay, that's just a symptom of successive governments focusing investment in London to the detriment of the rest of the country. But to read people trying to justify Tottenham's new stadium as a selling point to a manager is baffling. Why? The manager isn't going to live in the stadium.
I am utterly fucked off by clubs based in unfashionable regions being expected to embrace a diminished place in the game because of geopolitical investment patterns. Even after 20 years of media propaganda, Tottenham are fucking nothing. 13 years ago, Man City were fucking nothing.
Why should we have to accept that we cannot either win respect through demography (as Tottenham did through being based in London), nor can we buy success (as Man City did through blood money)?
It's a rigged fucking game based on regional prejudices and concentration of the media in the South East and North West.
It's not the media's fault that Man City have spent a couple of billion on players since taking them over.
I agree but I do get the anger though, there is a general vibe of us not being as fashionable, always just 'traditional' and not much more. Even little things like Martinez in an article about his Argentina exploits being referred to as 'Ex-Arsenal' rather than 'Villa keeper'. Not that I haven't accepted us being overlooked, we have done for a while and I guess our recent stint in the Champ doesn't help. A more ambitious manager option would help correct it a bit.
Yeah and Everton and Leeds are the worse for itWe have the same defence that were very solid a few months ago the difference is that the midfield and forward line have not been doing their job. No pressure up front and a powder puff midfield no wonder the back line is struggling.
Then there are the injury problems, we don't have players missing a couple of weeks, they are out that long we forget they are villa players. I said Dean should go but he never had a full squad to choose from.
Which team has? A few examples -
Everton missing Calvert-Lewin, Doucoure and Mina
Leeds missing Ayling and Bamford
Palace missing Hughes and Eze
You're thinking of coddle. A stew of potatoes, carrots and sausage served in Dublin.Is Scouse actually nice? I'm not sure I've ever met someone who has eaten it.
Yep, it's just a stew like Lancashire Hotpot. Nice and filling on a cold evening.
I've always assumed (based on nothing) that it's sausage-based. Is it sausage based?
Another lowbrow joke has become available, but it's a genuine question!
Fuck. Well, odds are massively against it working out, but I hope I'm wrong. In the meantime, I just feel a little embarrassed.
I agree Rory and it's pretty depressing to think about. We should be regarded as mega-bastards considering our size, history, location and now, owners.
When Gerrard takes us to the Champions League 3 years in a row we'll forget all about it 😉.
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
I agree Rory and it's pretty depressing to think about. We should be regarded as mega-bastards considering our size, history, location and now, owners.
When Gerrard takes us to the Champions League 3 years in a row we'll forget all about it 😉.
I hope you mean 'when he wins the European Cup three years in a row'. Qualifying is no achievement - even waxface Redknapp can manage that.
When he wins Aston Villa three European Cups, and then writes and performs a deliciously satirical skit just to prove he isn't a frowning humourless prick, I will indeed forget all about it 😊
When he wins Aston Villa three European Cups, and then writes and performs a deliciously satirical skit just to prove he isn't a frowning humourless prick, I will indeed forget all about it 😊
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Yep, definitely. I'll happily be a fatter prick on heaps of humble pie.
When he wins Aston Villa three European Cups, and then writes and performs a deliciously satirical skit just to prove he isn't a frowning humourless prick, I will indeed forget all about it 😊
Would you settle for him doing 'Born Slippy' as his initiation song?
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Yep, definitely. I'll happily be a fatter prick on heaps of humble pie.
Meanwhile I'll be a skinny prick on a hunger protest at his appointment. Bobby Sands did not die in vain, for his spirit lives on in me!
Thankfully, I'm a bit of a bloater, so it'll take me a good few years to waste away. Long enough, hopefully, for Gerrard to win one of the three European Cups you have PROMISED me.
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Yep, definitely. I'll happily be a fatter prick on heaps of humble pie.
Meanwhile I'll be a skinny prick on a hunger protest at his appointment. Bobby Sands did not die in vain, for his spirit lives on in me!
Thankfully, I'm a bit of a bloater, so it'll take me a good few years to waste away. Long enough, hopefully, for Gerrard to win one of the three European Cups you have PROMISED me.
Fuck me you're good on the up-sell. To be fair I can't get much fatter so this is literally life and death if he succeeds.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
Storm in a teacup stuff. We argue in here quite a bit, doesn't mean I wouldn't go for a beer with you and have your back if we ever ended up cornered by some dickheads at a match.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
Storm in a teacup stuff. We argue in here quite a bit, doesn't mean I wouldn't go for a beer with you and have your back if we ever ended up cornered by some dickheads at a match.
I reckon Risso has a private security team escorting him at all times.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
Storm in a teacup stuff. We argue in here quite a bit, doesn't mean I wouldn't go for a beer with you and have your back if we ever ended up cornered by some dickheads at a match.
I reckon Risso has a private security team escorting him at all times.
Why else do you think I'd have said it?!
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Yes. I've transitioned quicker on the grief scale than I expected and have reached Acceptance this morning. I shall now studiously ignore all the nay-sayers and cherry-pick only the bestest praise of Mr. Gerrard's qualities that the Internet can find. Even if that turns out to be a short search.
Time to park the reservations, give him the chance he deserves and back him unconditionally. The same as we did for Bruce, O'Leary and other berks that spring to mind.
Yes. I've transitioned quicker on the grief scale than I expected and have reached Acceptance this morning. I shall now studiously ignore all the nay-sayers and cherry-pick only the bestest praise of Mr. Gerrard's qualities that the Internet can find. Even if that turns out to be a short search.
Good reach, strong right hook. Surprisingly good at sudoku and can bake a mean cake.
Mings reported to be furious with him when he was dropped. Sanson giving him the finger, Buendia ignoring him and stropping off down the tunnel when subbed. Buendia and Konsa having a bust up after the West Ham match. Not a happy camp at all.
No. They were behind him.
I think it’s Hang the DJWhen he wins Aston Villa three European Cups, and then writes and performs a deliciously satirical skit just to prove he isn't a frowning humourless prick, I will indeed forget all about it 😊
Would you settle for him doing 'Born Slippy' as his initiation song?
Absolutely. I've got reservations about the appointment, but I'll give the guy the same chance as anyone else. I was very anti-Terry when he came to the club, but you couldn't really fault his time here and he left with the aura that, whatever his past was, the person who was at the club was a genuinely decent chap.I'll support the Villa always. There have been players and managers I don't like. Gerrard is my least favourite appointment. I'll support his team.
My impression of him is of an arrogant, unsavoury character, he fought hard on the pitch but thought nothing of cheating. There are allegations of attempts to pay people off, of assaults.
I'm not sure why people seem so happy about this. I just don't get it at all.
Our captain last season broke lockdown rules after posting a video in support of the NHS, and also crashed into parked cars. John Terry was in court for assault as a younger man, but seems to have turned his public perception around. I don't think I've seen anybody "happy" about this, just seems people are prepared to give whoever the new manager is, a chance.
Absolutely. I've got reservations about the appointment, but I'll give the guy the same chance as anyone else. I was very anti-Terry when he came to the club, but you couldn't really fault his time here and he left with the aura that, whatever his past was, the person who was at the club was a genuinely decent chap.I'll support the Villa always. There have been players and managers I don't like. Gerrard is my least favourite appointment. I'll support his team.
My impression of him is of an arrogant, unsavoury character, he fought hard on the pitch but thought nothing of cheating. There are allegations of attempts to pay people off, of assaults.
I'm not sure why people seem so happy about this. I just don't get it at all.
Our captain last season broke lockdown rules after posting a video in support of the NHS, and also crashed into parked cars. John Terry was in court for assault as a younger man, but seems to have turned his public perception around. I don't think I've seen anybody "happy" about this, just seems people are prepared to give whoever the new manager is, a chance.
Fuck. Well, odds are massively against it working out, but I hope I'm wrong. In the meantime, I just feel a little embarrassed.
Grauniad has the Gerrard story as its splash this morning:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/nov/09/aston-villa-want-steven-gerrard-next-manager-plan-rangers-approach
I'm not a fan of his appointment - were it to happen - but to say it lacks ambition is a bit disingenuous. He will, I think, be totally pumped to succeed and has a backroom team to make a strong case that he will do alright.
As a 2 or 3 year appointment, it may work out well for all concerned.
Grauniad has the Gerrard story as its splash this morning:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/nov/09/aston-villa-want-steven-gerrard-next-manager-plan-rangers-approach
I'm not a fan of his appointment - were it to happen - but to say it lacks ambition is a bit disingenuous. He will, I think, be totally pumped to succeed and has a backroom team to make a strong case that he will do alright.
As a 2 or 3 year appointment, it may work out well for all concerned.
If Gerrard won my club a trophy and made us fiercely competitive again I’d drive him to fucking Liverpool myself listening to ‘There she Goes’ by The LA’s on repeat, in a shell suit wearing a moustache and wig. He’d go with my absolute blessing
Fuck. Well, odds are massively against it working out, but I hope I'm wrong. In the meantime, I just feel a little embarrassed.
I’m intrigued. Why are the odds stacked in favour of someone like Favre when he’s been out of work for 12 months, never been near the premier league and couldn’t nail the Palace job but odds massively against Gerrard working out? What are you basing this on?
I think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
Fuck. Well, odds are massively against it working out, but I hope I'm wrong. In the meantime, I just feel a little embarrassed.
I’m intrigued. Why are the odds stacked in favour of someone like Favre when he’s been out of work for 12 months, never been near the premier league and couldn’t nail the Palace job but odds massively against Gerrard working out? What are you basing this on?
How often is it that a great player, especially one whose game was based on explosive individual quality, make a great manager? Maradona? Bryan Robson? Roy Keane? Being born a horse doesn't make you a jockey.
Face it, even if it works out it's a faintly embarrassing appointment, based on being impressed by fame and connections with another club. Not great reasoning for a club with apparently greater ambitions than making headlines from the middle of the Championship.
This is what I think - it may well be a success - but that would be more by luck then judgement.Fuck. Well, odds are massively against it working out, but I hope I'm wrong. In the meantime, I just feel a little embarrassed.
I’m intrigued. Why are the odds stacked in favour of someone like Favre when he’s been out of work for 12 months, never been near the premier league and couldn’t nail the Palace job but odds massively against Gerrard working out? What are you basing this on?
How often is it that a great player, especially one whose game was based on explosive individual quality, make a great manager? Maradona? Bryan Robson? Roy Keane? Being born a horse doesn't make you a jockey.
Face it, even if it works out it's a faintly embarrassing appointment, based on being impressed by fame and connections with another club. Not great reasoning for a club with apparently greater ambitions than making headlines from the middle of the Championship.
Grauniad has the Gerrard story as its splash this morning:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/nov/09/aston-villa-want-steven-gerrard-next-manager-plan-rangers-approach
I'm not a fan of his appointment - were it to happen - but to say it lacks ambition is a bit disingenuous. He will, I think, be totally pumped to succeed and has a backroom team to make a strong case that he will do alright.
As a 2 or 3 year appointment, it may work out well for all concerned.
If the managers drive is to manage Liverpool, he will certainly give it his all and I’d say he would have to have some kind of success over 3 years or so. Most managers shelf life these days seems to be that length of time anyway, so one way of looking at this is both us and he will have had a great period.
If we end up with a cup along the way and he moves on if accept that. After all the same may happen with any manager, especially the older more proven ones.
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
Yes: we're on a journey so, of course, it has (like all managerial appointments) an built-in impermanence.Grauniad has the Gerrard story as its splash this morning:And that's all it would be. An appointment with built-in impermanence.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/nov/09/aston-villa-want-steven-gerrard-next-manager-plan-rangers-approach
I'm not a fan of his appointment - were it to happen - but to say it lacks ambition is a bit disingenuous. He will, I think, be totally pumped to succeed and has a backroom team to make a strong case that he will do alright.
As a 2 or 3 year appointment, it may work out well for all concerned.
A motorway service station stop on the way to the real destination.
Is that where we're at?
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
How often is it that a great player, especially one whose game was based on explosive individual quality, make a great manager? Maradona? Bryan Robson? Roy Keane? Being born a horse doesn't make you a jockey.
Face it, even if it works out it's a faintly embarrassing appointment, based on being impressed by fame and connections with another club. Not great reasoning for a club with apparently greater ambitions than making headlines from the middle of the Championship.
Grauniad has the Gerrard story as its splash this morning:
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2021/nov/09/aston-villa-want-steven-gerrard-next-manager-plan-rangers-approach
I'm not a fan of his appointment - were it to happen - but to say it lacks ambition is a bit disingenuous. He will, I think, be totally pumped to succeed and has a backroom team to make a strong case that he will do alright.
As a 2 or 3 year appointment, it may work out well for all concerned.
If the managers drive is to manage Liverpool, he will certainly give it his all and I’d say he would have to have some kind of success over 3 years or so. Most managers shelf life these days seems to be that length of time anyway, so one way of looking at this is both us and he will have had a great period.
If we end up with a cup along the way and he moves on if accept that. After all the same may happen with any manager, especially the older more proven ones.
Apart from the usual rumours in the press is there any reliable source that says it will be Gerrard?
How often is it that a great player, especially one whose game was based on explosive individual quality, make a great manager? Maradona? Bryan Robson? Roy Keane? Being born a horse doesn't make you a jockey.
Face it, even if it works out it's a faintly embarrassing appointment, based on being impressed by fame and connections with another club. Not great reasoning for a club with apparently greater ambitions than making headlines from the middle of the Championship.
But there must be more to it, surely. Even if the assumption Purslow is star-struck is true, he still has to convince both owners this is the right move for the club. Are we then saying our owners either don't ask any questions about a very large investment of theirs or is the inference they are gullible idiots?
Apart from the usual rumours in the press is there any reliable source that says it will be Gerrard?John Percy is reporting it this morning, he is normally pretty good.
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
Two of his first team quit on him and he bought in some pretty useless people in judging on the crap we see from our set piece coach.
Smith was involved with the transfers so he has to take responsibility along with lange. I do think deans biggest mistake was not getting that dynamic bissouma type cm we all screamed for me. He said we had enough options but we all could all see we didnt.
Monty agree they are not common, but Cruyff, Ancellotti, Guardiola, Zidane, Deschamps, Simeone, Dalglish etc were all very successful players and went on to be successful managers. I accept it's not the norm, but it doesn't mean Gerrard can't go on to be an elite level manager.
We can analyse Gerrards potential appointment until we're blue in the face but it's a gamble and one that the club did not need to take. I'm still clinging to the faint hope that it's pure press speculation and the club actually have a masterstroke up their sleeves. I did hear an alternative view on the radio last night that the club is spooked by the 15k waiting list for season tickets and aren't ready to upgrade the stadium so they're doing this to calm our expectations down. For a brief moment I actually thought that there might be something in that. That's just how much my mind has been messed up by this whole shit show.Monty agree they are not common, but Cruyff, Ancellotti, Guardiola, Zidane, Deschamps, Simeone, Dalglish etc were all very successful players and went on to be successful managers. I accept it's not the norm, but it doesn't mean Gerrard can't go on to be an elite level manager.
Ancelotti, Simeone, Guardiola and Deschamps were ultimate team players, they achieved what they did through collaboration and executing a plan. And Cruyff was the star of Total Football, but it was still Total Football, one of the most team-focused systems ever devised.
As for Zidane and Dalglish, yeah it shows it can happen, especially back at their clubs for various reasons. None of these things apply to Gerrard or to us.
You're begining to sound like a 'woe is me' Blues fan.It can be argued whether you think Gerrard is any good or not, he may well be, but eitherway I don't think it can be argued that the appointment (should it happen) shows any serious ambition. It just doesn't in my opinion. I saw a clip of Simon Jordan on twitter saying we should be aiming higher than Gerrard, who may become elite but he's not there yet whereas Villa are and he's absolutely right... the tanned gob.
What I will say is I don't think he'll be anything like Houllier on the Liverpool fawning front. He doesn't give that vibe to me. It'll be the media that's the problem and not him.
I think he'll be offered the job and then it'll be up to him.
I agree, I think I said earlier that Houllier seemed to have his head in the clouds when we appointed him. I will give credit where it's due and say that I believe Gerrard would be too switched-on and professional to go in for that.
But I also agree that appointing Gerrard would show no ambition. Particularly not after fucking Tottenham just got Conte.
The London thing, okay, that's just a symptom of successive governments focusing investment in London to the detriment of the rest of the country. But to read people trying to justify Tottenham's new stadium as a selling point to a manager is baffling. Why? The manager isn't going to live in the stadium.
I am utterly fucked off by clubs based in unfashionable regions being expected to embrace a diminished place in the game because of geopolitical investment patterns. Even after 20 years of media propaganda, Tottenham are fucking nothing. 13 years ago, Man City were fucking nothing.
Why should we have to accept that we cannot either win respect through demography (as Tottenham did through being based in London), nor can we buy success (as Man City did through blood money)?
It's a rigged fucking game based on regional prejudices and concentration of the media in the South East and North West.
It's not the media's fault that Man City have spent a couple of billion on players since taking them over.
I agree but I do get the anger though, there is a general vibe of us not being as fashionable, always just 'traditional' and not much more. Even little things like Martinez in an article about his Argentina exploits being referred to as 'Ex-Arsenal' rather than 'Villa keeper'. Not that I haven't accepted us being overlooked, we have done for a while and I guess our recent stint in the Champ doesn't help. A more ambitious manager option would help correct it a bit.
The whole idea of there being a traditional 'top four' or 'big six' is a media invention. Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal - they have been regularly successful for the past 60-odd years. But look at the League, FA Cup and League Cup winners going back to the early 60s.
It's an artificial landscape. The media and the PL have paved over a rich and varied garden and supplanted it with a grotesque monoculture based in (ideally North) London and the North West.
Half of the national sports media support Tottenham, so of course they can appoint Mourinho or Conte. But us? Oh fuck no, we couldn't possibly tempt anybody from the Dutch league, and have to think twice about whether we could attract a manager from Brighton who has done no better than our previous manager.
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
Two of his first team quit on him and he bought in some pretty useless people in judging on the crap we see from our set piece coach.
Smith was involved with the transfers so he has to take responsibility along with lange. I do think deans biggest mistake was not getting that dynamic bissouma type cm we all screamed for me. He said we had enough options but we all could all see we didnt.
Personally I am not convinced that these two new appointments were his. I think they were forced on him - given that they didn’t get sacked like shakey did
We needed to ensure that Dean had the right team around him, arguably, and based on the last 4 months that went and was replaced with poor replacementsI think gerrard will be massively motivated which feels me with abit of confidence. I like that he is a tough charchter and he will command respect and will get it because of his huge name in the game.
I think despite what people might think of him attract a high calibre of player to the club. I do think there are some positives to this move but without question a huge gamble
About where I am. I am open minded on it, I don't think it lacks ambition in the boards mind. In their background checks etc, I am fairly sure they will have wanted a high profile manager with the potential to kick on. Gerrard has the drive and potential to do well, and is not stupid. He talks about his coaching staff at length in the articles I have read, it is clear we need to ensure we get the right team around him, but I look forward to him doing well.
Two of his first team quit on him and he bought in some pretty useless people in judging on the crap we see from our set piece coach.
Smith was involved with the transfers so he has to take responsibility along with lange. I do think deans biggest mistake was not getting that dynamic bissouma type cm we all screamed for me. He said we had enough options but we all could all see we didnt.
Personally I am not convinced that these two new appointments were his. I think they were forced on him - given that they didn’t get sacked like shakey did
He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Beale seems an interesting coach.
You're beginning to sound like a 'woe is me' Blues fan.Agree with most of what you're saying here, Chris.
The reason Spurs can attract Mourihno and Conte is that they've been in the top 6 for the last 10 years and played in the Champions League 5 of those. The fact that they now play in one of the best stadiums in the world and are located in one of the most cosmopolitan Cities in the world would be a bonus for some.
The reason we can't is that we haven't been close to the top 6 for 10 years and have spent 3 of those in the second division.
Newcastle, the richest club in world football have had to make do with Eddie Howe. Even Man City had to start with Stuart Pearce and Mark Hughes.
The other reason we're not getting a Conte is that one isn't available. Ten Hag would be an enormously attractive appointment but he's on a superb run with Ajax, did great in the CL last year and will be having another run at it this year with one of the best Ajax teams in memory. I strongly suspect he's then lined up for the Man Utd job in the summer.
Outside of him the pool looks pretty thin. I'd love Rodgers, but he's happy at Leicester and they're some way ahead of us team wise at the moment, have wealthy owners and are just about to up their stadium to c 40k. They're not as tin-pot as some think.
I've been pretty vocal about Gerrard being a poor / risky appointment, but to suggest we should be as attractive as the likes of Spurs right now to an ambitious manger already managing in the CL is laughable.
Eventually: we were on a rollercoaster until the last half-a-dozen games.Beale seems an interesting coach.... Be delighted to see mccalister back. He was great last time round with houllier.
He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Not all of us did. That was stupid fanboy wank and so is this.
I didn’t either , coul d not understand the hysteria.He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Not all of us did. That was stupid fanboy wank and so is this.
In terms of moving forward it looks like it's going to be Gerrard.
Not my favourite choice, but this is nothing to do with who he played for, media love ins, possibly losing him in a few years or who he currently manages.
On the upside he comes with a highly regarded coaching team and, pub league or not, had the wherewithall to manage a team that stopped Celtic winning a 10th title in a row.
More importantly for me, I understand his style of play is very similar to how Liverpool set up. This is by some distance my favourite type of football in the modern era and I think it will suit most of our players very well. Watkins, Ings and Bailey could be an excellent front three. Obviously we'll need to upgrade at least one fullback and will need a better DM (which we'll need anyway however we chose to play) but otherwise I think we're well set up for it.
I'm confident Gerrard will conduct himself with dignity in the same way Terry did and I don't for one minute expect to see the Liverpool fawning so many are fearful of.
I've heard people talk about Gerrard as a player (including Peter Crouch on his podcast) and one common theme was he demanded incredibly high standards. I expect our fitness and running stats to massively improve. I know people scoff at the 'born winner' tag, but there's nothing wrong with having a manager with the fierce drive and ambition Gerrard has. If it's backed up by an excellent coach (as it seems to be at the moment) then it could certainly be a recipe for success.
I remain a sceptical about his level of experience and of course this could go both ways. But now it's almost certainly him I'm all in. He has my 100% support and I'm very excited to see what we can do.
There is a 3rd guy that seems pretty important, Tom something, that Rangers fans seem to think is integral to what they do.
There is a 3rd guy that seems pretty important, Tom something, that Rangers fans seem to think is integral to what they do.
He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Not all of us did. That was stupid fanboy wank and so is this.
Did you not change your username using Norwegian letters?
Simon Jordan says we should be going for the Ajax manager. That would do.
My eyes! My eyes!
No more mega quotes please
Beale seems an interesting coach.
Ive done a bit of reading about him. He looks like a really impressive coach. Some rangers fans were even callimg for him to be manager at one point.
This definitely be a welcome addition. Be delighted to see mccalister back. He was great last time round with houllier.
Good idea.Simon Jordan says we should be going for the Ajax manager. That would do.
can we swap him for Purslow
There is a 3rd guy that seems pretty important, Tom something, that Rangers fans seem to think is integral to what they do.
Are you sure it wasn't Tim?
That's where Sherwood's popped up then!There is a 3rd guy that seems pretty important, Tom something, that Rangers fans seem to think is integral to what they do.
Are you sure it wasn't Tim?
When I want on yesterday they were speculating on whether a journalist linking SG with Villa was a 'Timmy'. In 2021.
Oh he gets it, that game is moved to be on sky
Not sure if it's been posted but here's a video interview with Michael Beale, Gerrard's first tem coach. It's a long watch a 30 mins and not been through it all yet, but there's some good stuff there.
Oh he gets it, that game is moved to be on sky
I don't think it can be now.
My son just text me saying ‘this project bullshit is becoming more and more a load of crap to me’
He’s 33
My other son is 13 and he doesn’t seem against the idea
Probably because he swayed by the big-name
Really good watch.Not sure if it's been posted but here's a video interview with Michael Beale, Gerrard's first tem coach. It's a long watch a 30 mins and not been through it all yet, but there's some good stuff there.
Micahel Beale is very impressive. Both his experience in great coaching setups, as well as the comments from players - are very attractive.
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
I think I've praised pretty much everything about this ownership, from hiring Dean to letting him go at the right time. I'm mightily underwhelmed by the Gerrard appointment however. He seems to want to play the right football and he has a good coaching staff so I'm not entirely pessimistic; the trouble is, take the same record, style and coaching team and remove the name 'Steven Gerrard' and I don't think we'd be looking at the Rangers manager, and therein lies my problem.
My son just text me saying ‘this project bullshit is becoming more and more a load of crap to me’
He’s 33
My other son is 13 and he doesn’t seem against the idea
Probably because he swayed by the big-name
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?That's very true. For me, it feels like since the summer a lot of bollocks have been dropped - and Deans taken the more than his fair share of the blame.
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Not all of us did. That was stupid fanboy wank and so is this.
Did you not change your username using Norwegian letters?
No, mate. I was moaning about it being a fanwank appointment with no experience. I could probably have saved a lot of time in the last few days if I'd just copied and pasted those threads and randomly interjected "St Johnstone" every couple of paragraphs.
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
Don't think it is that simple.
I understand the logic to sacking Smith - he had to go, in my opinion.
However, that's an opinion formed on an assumption that he'll be replaced with someone better qualified to move us to where we want to get, and i don't see how Gerrard addresses that.
https://twitter.com/TheIbroxChannel/status/1458405868303683590im in that London.
Doesn't look like a family holiday during the int'l break to me.
It would be like replacing El Ghazi with Dwight McNeil, it might turn out to be a better option but you do wonder if it is worth it and ultimately it's not what you had in mind with billionaire owners and talk of European football being the ambition.very good comparison
It would be like replacing El Ghazi with Dwight McNeil, it might turn out to be a better option but you do wonder if it is worth it and ultimately it's not what you had in mind with billionaire owners and talk of European football being the ambition.very good comparison
He wouldn't be my choice, but who knows what the right appointment is. Remember when we all got excited about Ole maybe coming because there was a film with people saying nice things about him from Norway. If he comes I hope it will be with his full backroom staff, because at least he seems to have a good team around him.
Not all of us did. That was stupid fanboy wank and so is this.
Did you not change your username using Norwegian letters?
No, mate. I was moaning about it being a fanwank appointment with no experience. I could probably have saved a lot of time in the last few days if I'd just copied and pasted those threads and randomly interjected "St Johnstone" every couple of paragraphs.
Personally that was very different, we'd just got rid of a ultra-defensive dull scot and the 2 alternatives that seemed to be doing the rounds were Lambert and Martinez, neither of whom I liked, Lambert felt very much like he was only included because fans had chanted his name a few weeks earlier and Martinez played pretty but ultimately ineffectual football. On top of that I was in the middle of moving to Norway so I'd been spending a lot of time in hotels over there and watching their domestic football, his Molde team were light years ahead of anyone else and created a lot of chances. I just wanted to see a Villa team that cared about scoring goals more than backs-to-the-wall defending.
Now we're replacing a popular manager who had us play some fantastic football at times but just couldn't find any consistency so we should be looking for someone with a reputation of providing consistent performances with talented players where you need to be 'on your game' almost every week. For me Gerrard doesn't tick the boxes, if he did I wouldn't give a shit about the 'fanboy wank' element of it.
Wasn't Rodgers in the running as well. I remember many thinking we'd got the better option with Lambert. Just further evidence for me that we haven't really got a clue who would work out. We are not in a position to pick a manager from the top-shelf and won't be till we get up towards the champions league places. Every appointment is therefore a gamble to some extent.
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
Don't think it is that simple.
I understand the logic to sacking Smith - he had to go, in my opinion.
However, that's an opinion formed on an assumption that he'll be replaced with someone better qualified to move us to where we want to get, and i don't see how Gerrard addresses that.
Yes perfectIt would be like replacing El Ghazi with Dwight McNeil, it might turn out to be a better option but you do wonder if it is worth it and ultimately it's not what you had in mind with billionaire owners and talk of European football being the ambition.very good comparison
Yep, sums it up very well for me with the small addition of leaking to the press that the new winger is going to be a very ambitious signing that will show everyone how serious we are about progressing.
A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
Don't think it is that simple.
I understand the logic to sacking Smith - he had to go, in my opinion.
However, that's an opinion formed on an assumption that he'll be replaced with someone better qualified to move us to where we want to get, and i don't see how Gerrard addresses that.
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
I think I've praised pretty much everything about this ownership, from hiring Dean to letting him go at the right time. I'm mightily underwhelmed by the Gerrard appointment however. He seems to want to play the right football and he has a good coaching staff so I'm not entirely pessimistic; the trouble is, take the same record, style and coaching team and remove the name 'Steven Gerrard' and I don't think we'd be looking at the Rangers manager, and therein lies my problem.
You're right but they had the forgiveness of being 'one of us'.SG is not my first pick by any stretch. But he comes with a similar background to a Gregory or a Little (three years in a league a level below).A lot of posts questioning our ambition. Is not fair to say that them not sacking Dean Smith, and thereby suggesting that 18 defeats in 35 games was acceptable, would be an even more worrying sign with us averaging less than a point per game?
Don't think it is that simple.
I understand the logic to sacking Smith - he had to go, in my opinion.
However, that's an opinion formed on an assumption that he'll be replaced with someone better qualified to move us to where we want to get, and i don't see how Gerrard addresses that.
Oh he gets it, that game is moved to be on sky
I don't think it can be now.
I think YOUR right
That was deliberate 😉
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
I think I've praised pretty much everything about this ownership, from hiring Dean to letting him go at the right time. I'm mightily underwhelmed by the Gerrard appointment however. He seems to want to play the right football and he has a good coaching staff so I'm not entirely pessimistic; the trouble is, take the same record, style and coaching team and remove the name 'Steven Gerrard' and I don't think we'd be looking at the Rangers manager, and therein lies my problem.
The flip side could be that another manager might not have got them to where they are now and being just a top half team rather than a league winners team
After watching that interview with their coach and knowing McAlister is on the coaching staff, too, seems that Gerrard has a decent team with him.
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
I think I've praised pretty much everything about this ownership, from hiring Dean to letting him go at the right time. I'm mightily underwhelmed by the Gerrard appointment however. He seems to want to play the right football and he has a good coaching staff so I'm not entirely pessimistic; the trouble is, take the same record, style and coaching team and remove the name 'Steven Gerrard' and I don't think we'd be looking at the Rangers manager, and therein lies my problem.
The flip side could be that another manager might not have got them to where they are now and being just a top half team rather than a league winners team
After watching that interview with their coach and knowing McAlister is on the coaching staff, too, seems that Gerrard has a decent team with him.
I meant the current Rangers manager based on how they're doing. Obviously a great manager can come from anywhere.
While there are questions regarding the quality of the Standard of opposition in Scotland, the same questions cant be asked about the teams in Europe in which Rangers have done well under Gerrard.
Especially for a third rate team according to many.
Can I ask what all this optimism about Gary MacAllister is based on? I like him and all, but is it just about him being OK for 8 games a decade ago?
As for whether another manager might have done what Gerrard's done at Rangers...I mean look, sure, maybe Rangers would have found a way to finish below that Celtic implosion, but they'd have to have been seriously, immensely incompetent to do so. Which doesn't mean Gerrard's done a bad job - just it remains hard to judge.
If we didn't find this regime in 2018 we might not have an Aston Villa to support right now, yet alone one back in the top flight. Some of the comments are ridiculous.
I think I've praised pretty much everything about this ownership, from hiring Dean to letting him go at the right time. I'm mightily underwhelmed by the Gerrard appointment however. He seems to want to play the right football and he has a good coaching staff so I'm not entirely pessimistic; the trouble is, take the same record, style and coaching team and remove the name 'Steven Gerrard' and I don't think we'd be looking at the Rangers manager, and therein lies my problem.
The flip side could be that another manager might not have got them to where they are now and being just a top half team rather than a league winners team
After watching that interview with their coach and knowing McAlister is on the coaching staff, too, seems that Gerrard has a decent team with him.
but as monty says in the bold bit if someone call Steven McGerrard with a playing career of middling along with Dundee had done the exact same would his name come up in this conversation?
While there are questions regarding the quality of the Standard of opposition in Scotland, the same questions cant be asked about the teams in Europe in which Rangers have done well under Gerrard.
Especially for a third rate team according to many.
The flip side could be that another manager might not have got them to where they are now and being just a top half team rather than a league winners team
After watching that interview with their coach and knowing McAlister is on the coaching staff, too, seems that Gerrard has a decent team with him.
but as monty says in the bold bit if someone call Steven McGerrard with a playing career of middling along with Dundee had done the exact same would his name come up in this conversation?
Flippin heck, Paul, if a manager got Dundee to win the SPL I’d be all for it 😂
Vieira's done an initially-brilliant job at Palace from a very unpromising previous managerial position.
I don't think it shows a lack of ambition at all. It may show a lack judgment, but I'm pretty sure the owners and Purslow will think it's a bit of a coup and an ambitious appointment.
Potter may have been more of a sure bet to at least not implode, but would it have been any more ambitious? Not for me.
Assuming Rodgers and Ten Hag would not have jumped ship (and I'm 100% convinced they wouldn't), it seems the short list was probably Gerrard, Martinez, Hasenhuttl and possible Favre or Fonseca (but these two were more fan talk than genuine links). I'm not convinced Gerrard is demonstrably less ambitious than any of the others. We all have our opinions on who we would have preferred and Gerrard wouldn't have been my choice. But I think it's a bit of a leap to say it shows a massive lack of ambition.
Hopefully Gerrard will put us in a position where we can realistically attract the likes of Ten Hag, but we're miles off that at the moment.
In terms of moving forward it looks like it's going to be Gerrard.
Not my favourite choice, but this is nothing to do with who he played for, media love ins, possibly losing him in a few years or who he currently manages.
On the upside he comes with a highly regarded coaching team and, pub league or not, had the wherewithall to manage a team that stopped Celtic winning a 10th title in a row.
More importantly for me, I understand his style of play is very similar to how Liverpool set up. This is by some distance my favourite type of football in the modern era and I think it will suit most of our players very well. Watkins, Ings and Bailey could be an excellent front three. Obviously we'll need to upgrade at least one fullback and will need a better DM (which we'll need anyway however we chose to play) but otherwise I think we're well set up for it.
I'm confident Gerrard will conduct himself with dignity in the same way Terry did and I don't for one minute expect to see the Liverpool fawning so many are fearful of.
I've heard people talk about Gerrard as a player (including Peter Crouch on his podcast) and one common theme was he demanded incredibly high standards. I expect our fitness and running stats to massively improve. I know people scoff at the 'born winner' tag, but there's nothing wrong with having a manager with the fierce drive and ambition Gerrard has. If it's backed up by an excellent coach (as it seems to be at the moment) then it could certainly be a recipe for success.
I remain a sceptical about his level of experience and of course this could go both ways. But now it's almost certainly him I'm all in. He has my 100% support and I'm very excited to see what we can do.
+1
While there are questions regarding the quality of the Standard of opposition in Scotland, the same questions cant be asked about the teams in Europe in which Rangers have done well under Gerrard.
Especially for a third rate team according to many.
Are you sure about that?
They've got a few wins against teams from Holland, Belgium and Portugal which are decent but not massively impressive and then lost as soon as they've come across teams from stronger leagues (Leverkusen and lyon).
I haven't seen it discussed, but what do we make of the quotes about them wanting to make Villa a "challenging and intense environment for players"? Did they think things were a bit too laid back at BH?
So it's the staff now. Amazing the number of reasons for hiring Gerrard which aren't 'there's evidence he's a good manager.'
While there are questions regarding the quality of the Standard of opposition in Scotland, the same questions cant be asked about the teams in Europe in which Rangers have done well under Gerrard.
Especially for a third rate team according to many.
Are you sure about that?
They've got a few wins against teams from Holland, Belgium and Portugal which are decent but not massively impressive and then lost as soon as they've come across teams from stronger leagues (Leverkusen and lyon).
My meaning was that he can manage a so called poor standard side on a bigger and better stage than the SPL, and get results.
With a good side at Villa, i hope he can work
I haven't seen it discussed, but what do we make of the quotes about them wanting to make Villa a "challenging and intense environment for players"? Did they think things were a bit too laid back at BH?
I think that's the sort of comment you see often when a team is looking for a new manager, not sure it means anything really.
So it's the staff now. Amazing the number of reasons for hiring Gerrard which aren't 'there's evidence he's a good manager.'
With the greatest respect I would suggest that you do not understand management
To be a good manager does not require you to be an expert in every aspect of the job
I have worked with a brilliant CEO who didn’t understand finance, but relied on me to provide the necessary input
Good management is making sure you have the required calibre of people around you
It'll probably all end in tears, but fuck it I'm going to get excited about it. Otherwise what's the point - moan that everything will be shite and wait to be proved right? If he can get the team on the front foot, win a couple of games and get some of the kids in the team things will start looking up again.
So it's the staff now. Amazing the number of reasons for hiring Gerrard which aren't 'there's evidence he's a good manager.'
With the greatest respect I would suggest that you do not understand management
To be a good manager does not require you to be an expert in every aspect of the job
I have worked with a brilliant CEO who didn’t understand finance, but relied on me to provide the necessary input
Good management is making sure you have the required calibre of people around you
Thanks for the revelations.
It'll probably all end in tears, but fuck it I'm going to get excited about it. Otherwise what's the point - moan that everything will be shite and wait to be proved right? If he can get the team on the front foot, win a couple of games and get some of the kids in the team things will start looking up again.
Exactly. On top of that I have a contrary streak too, and I think this relentless negativity has had the opposite effect on me.
I haven't seen it discussed, but what do we make of the quotes about them wanting to make Villa a "challenging and intense environment for players"? Did they think things were a bit too laid back at BH?
I think that's the sort of comment you see often when a team is looking for a new manager, not sure it means anything really.
I think it means something. And likely that, yes, it's was an area of concern under Smith.
Sky article was indeed a glimmer of hope. It was peppered liberally with phrases like 'League Cup exit to St. Mirren', however.
I haven't seen it discussed, but what do we make of the quotes about them wanting to make Villa a "challenging and intense environment for players"? Did they think things were a bit too laid back at BH?
I think that's the sort of comment you see often when a team is looking for a new manager, not sure it means anything really.
I think it means something. And likely that, yes, it's was an area of concern under Smith.
Does it not precede DS though?
It’s been my impression, not scientifically backed up, that over the last few seasons, no matter who our opponents are, we always seem to struggle for fitness - even against lower league opposition.
Maybe it’s because, generally speaking, our ball retention has been so poor that we end up having to do more chasing
Are we talking about the same Steven Gerrard who a few months back got knocked out of the Champions League at the first opportunity to Malmo?
I've chosen hope. I'm hoping that we abandon this ridiculous preoccupation with someone because they're famous and get someone in who is a proven manager.
To be fair mate, when was the last time we were in Europe? Not saying I want Gerrard but I think we are not the draw we perhaps think we are.
As I said earlier, don’t want this dragging out too much longer. Let’s just get some points on the board.
I've chosen hope. I'm hoping that we abandon this ridiculous preoccupation with someone because they're famous and get someone in who is a proven manager.
So who would be your choice CD?
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
I've chosen hope. I'm hoping that we abandon this ridiculous preoccupation with someone because they're famous and get someone in who is a proven manager.
So who would be your choice CD?
I don't entirely know, it isn't my job to know every top manager, though I would hope the person actually employed to make such an appointment would be doing meticulous research to get the best possible candidate rather than appointing someone because they're his mate.
However, of the names mentioned, I like the sound of ten Hag, Fonseca, Galtier, Emery and Favre.
Look, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
Edens and Sawiris haven't got to where they are by chance, and Edens clearly knows a thing or two about running a successful sporting team. Purslow isn't going to jeopardise his career by appointing Gerrard just because he's his 'friend', however true that is anyway. There's a very clear and obvious way that they seem to be setting up the club, and if they appoint Gerrard it will be because they see him as fitting in to those plans.
Look, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
That's pretty shit, mate. Sorry to hear it.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Oh come off it, that's just being pedantic for the sake of it. NSWE Limited were only incorporated in 2016, we're still Aston Villa.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Oh come off it, that's just being pedantic for the sake of it. NSWE Limited were only incorporated in 2016, we're still Aston Villa.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Oh come off it, that's just being pedantic for the sake of it. NSWE Limited were only incorporated in 2016, we're still Aston Villa.
Aston Villa wasn't liquidated, Rangers were. It's a different club, that's why they were required to enter the Third Division.
Edit: also, as Monty points out, it annoys the bigots.
Look, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
That's pretty shit, mate. Sorry to hear it.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Oh come off it, that's just being pedantic for the sake of it. NSWE Limited were only incorporated in 2016, we're still Aston Villa.
Aston Villa wasn't liquidated, Rangers were. It's a different club, that's why they were required to enter the Third Division.
Edit: also, as Monty points out, it annoys the bigots.
You, as I am, CD, must be finding the prospect of pissing them off massively to be the major silver lining on this appointment.
Look, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
That's pretty shit, mate. Sorry to hear it.
All the best Monty
All the best MontyLook, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
That's pretty shit, mate. Sorry to hear it.
All the best Monty
Just read that, good luck Monty.
Look, is my view on this appointment coloured by the fact that I've discovered my lease is being summarily ended, in 20 days, on my birthday? There is a chance.
I'm cheered by a few things. I like how upset it will make Rangers fans. I think he, Gerrard, clearly looks like he's trying to be a serious manager at the top, and hopefully that 'humble' mantra applies to him learning too, 'cause you're never too old or too good to learn (look at Moyes' renaissance). I maintain, however, that I think the hiring process is really very suboptimal, and at best we're going on minimal evidence.
Hoping we luck out on it. But it would, to an excessive degree, be luck.
On the plus side, the commercial department will make a killing on claret and blue shell suits
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Oh come off it, that's just being pedantic for the sake of it. NSWE Limited were only incorporated in 2016, we're still Aston Villa.
Not for the sake of it - for the sake of pissing off Sevco-ites. That seems worthwhile to me.
Both clubs engaged the same architect to build them stadiums of world renown. We pulled ours down.What's all this "we"? I don't remember Doug asking our opinions when he destroyed one of the finest architectural monuments in football.
All the best, Monty - hope you manage to get something sorted.
As I said earlier, don’t want this dragging out too much longer. Let’s just get some points on the board.
As I said earlier, don’t want this dragging out too much longer. Let’s just get some points on the board.
I'd sooner it drag out a week ot two than jump in quick and get either a Woy Hodgson-type or someone vastly inexperienced, who'd be coming here as a test case for The Other Job.
Edens and Sawiris haven't got to where they are by chance, and Edens clearly knows a thing or two about running a successful sporting team. Purslow isn't going to jeopardise his career by appointing Gerrard just because he's his 'friend', however true that is anyway. There's a very clear and obvious way that they seem to be setting up the club, and if they appoint Gerrard it will be because they see him as fitting in to those plans.
All the best, Monty - hope you manage to get something sorted.
Agreed, disgraceful way to treat a pensioner.
Edens and Sawiris haven't got to where they are by chance, and Edens clearly knows a thing or two about running a successful sporting team. Purslow isn't going to jeopardise his career by appointing Gerrard just because he's his 'friend', however true that is anyway. There's a very clear and obvious way that they seem to be setting up the club, and if they appoint Gerrard it will be because they see him as fitting in to those plans.
Just out of interest Risso, what do you see as being this clear and obvious way that the club is being set up as?
Both clubs engaged the same architect to build them stadiums of world renown. We pulled ours down.
Edens and Sawiris haven't got to where they are by chance, and Edens clearly knows a thing or two about running a successful sporting team. Purslow isn't going to jeopardise his career by appointing Gerrard just because he's his 'friend', however true that is anyway. There's a very clear and obvious way that they seem to be setting up the club, and if they appoint Gerrard it will be because they see him as fitting in to those plans.
Just out of interest Risso, what do you see as being this clear and obvious way that the club is being set up as?
That he isn't being appointed as manager is my guess, but someone who is head of a coaching tree with specialists around him. It appears that they want to carry that on from the model they had for Dean Smith. Which I don't know if Dean actually agreed with as in a way takes control away from him in a traditional sense. He would be involved in player acquisition for example but not the ultimate decider of who is bought. This provides continuity vs the older model which is built around a person and their style vs a club style.
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
I wonder if he had a word with his mate JT?
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
I think its a mistake - but TBH my opinion is pretty shite at the best of time.Telegraph are reporting that he could be in place before next Monday and that he's interested in the job.
If he is interested as that paper says then it will be him. I have no doubt about it.
Not my first choice but he will get my 100%backing. Time to get over smith people its the past now we need to move on from the smith era
All I hope is if this does turn out to be a mistake (And I hope it doesnt), that this doesnt cause a long term derailment of whats been achieved over the past 3 years
If true, it will be another sad day in this club's once illustrious history. i thought we had learned our mistake appointing chancers.
Sorry, he wont get my support at all. It will end in tears.
No wonder that lot over the road laugh at us.
I also doubt that they're mates. They were at the heart of the problem with Inglund squads not getting along for club reasons.
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
And I was excited about Garde, not to mention those near-misses Solskjaer and Henry.
Beale seems a bright likeable sort of fella with an enquiring mind and a willingness to look for new ideas. I did get the impression though that his skill was in working at the younger age groups. And, to be really arsey, there are lots and lots and lots of videos of bright young coaches speaking about their methods.
If he does come here, at least it is from another big historic team. He’ll understand what it means and the pressures.
Exactly, indeed, he comes from a bigger club than Little, Gregory, SGT and Deano and they all did fine.
They're not a big team, they were founded in 2012 and have won a third of Clyde's total honours.
Radio WM reporting that no official approach has been made by the club regarding SG.he'll be in by 8pm then if that's the case.
I haven’t been excited about a manager since MON came in. The rest were meh.
I was more positive about Smith though compared the the other useless fuckers we had before him.
Radio WM reporting that no official approach has been made by the club regarding SG.he'll be in by 8pm then if that's the case.
I back them all until they give me reason not toI haven’t been excited about a manager since MON came in. The rest were meh.
I was more positive about Smith though compared the the other useless fuckers we had before him.
Exactly the same here. Although i was strangely optimistic with Smith, for no other reason than he was Villa and we’d just had for the most part 8 years of charlatans, f**kwits and journeymen (we’ll be there or thereabouts).
Gerrard is coming that seems certain, so we might as well support him and hope its the inspired choice than most of us cant see at the moment.
His first interview will be very interesting.
I haven’t been excited about a manager since MON came in. The rest were meh.
I was more positive about Smith though compared the the other useless fuckers we had before him.
Exactly the same here. Although i was strangely optimistic with Smith, for no other reason than he was Villa and we’d just had for the most part 8 years of charlatans, f**kwits and journeymen (we’ll be there or thereabouts).
Gerrard is coming that seems certain, so we might as well support him and hope its the inspired choice than most of us cant see at the moment.
His first interview will be very interesting.
I haven’t been excited about a manager since MON came in. The rest were meh.
I was more positive about Smith though compared the the other useless fuckers we had before him.
Exactly the same here. Although i was strangely optimistic with Smith, for no other reason than he was Villa and we’d just had for the most part 8 years of charlatans, f**kwits and journeymen (we’ll be there or thereabouts).
Gerrard is coming that seems certain, so we might as well support him and hope its the inspired choice than most of us cant see at the moment.
His first interview will be very interesting.
I hope its better than the “inspirational” ones he gave as england captain.
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
And I was excited about Garde, not to mention those near-misses Solskjaer and Henry.
For those of you objecting to a Scouser becoming our Manager/Head Coach
I would just like to point out that in my 60 years of following this great club of ours the two managers giving me the biggest thrill ,in terms of watching entertaining football, were born in Birkenhead and Old Swan - Merseyside
Steven Gerrard was born in Whiston some 12 and 6 miles away from the above locations
Lets not let Regionalism cloud our judgement :) :) :)
He would not be my first choice but I will get right behind him (and maybe even cadge a lift off him to VP on match days ) :)
1/25 now on Gerrard.
For those of you objecting to a Scouser becoming our Manager/Head Coach
I would just like to point out that in my 60 years of following this great club of ours the two managers giving me the biggest thrill ,in terms of watching entertaining football, were born in Birkenhead and Old Swan - Merseyside
Steven Gerrard was born in Whiston some 12 and 6 miles away from the above locations
Lets not let Regionalism cloud our judgement :) :) :)
He would not be my first choice but I will get right behind him (and maybe even cadge a lift off him to VP on match days ) :)
Nobody is objecting to a Scouser. Where he was born is irrelevant.
It’s seems that plenty on the outside of Villa boards see this is a very good bit of business. We here seem to be in the minority on this one. Still I can’t say I’m getting in anyway more excited by the prospect.
Then again I was excited about Lambert, O’Leary and Sherwood.
And I was excited about Garde, not to mention those near-misses Solskjaer and Henry.
Me too with Garde.
Yeah must say, find the anti-Scouse stuff tedious at best.
Edit: by which I mean cheap jokes about the accent etc.
The more I think about it, the more I think it is just a way of getting a new, marketable, face for the project now Joes fucked off
It sounds like he plays a lot like Smith does, and has a set up similar to that. I think he'll do his best and be like JT and professional.
I don't think he would achieve any more than Smith would - but I think this is a "commercial" appointment by our CEO rather than a footballing one.
That pic is Euston isn't it?Looks like Euston. Definitely not New St.
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
That pic is Euston isn't it?
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
That pic is Euston isn't it?Looks like Euston. Definitely not New St.
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
That pic is Euston isn't it?Looks like Euston. Definitely not New St.
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
Wes lives in London dosen't he when he's over here? And imagine Purslow probably has a place down there after his spell at Chelsea so probably makes sense to trash out the small print down there away from Brum.
That pic is Euston isn't it?Looks like Euston. Definitely not New St.
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
Give it a rest. He is starting from a considerably stronger place than Smith was when we were first promoted.The more I think about it, the more I think it is just a way of getting a new, marketable, face for the project now Joes fucked off
It sounds like he plays a lot like Smith does, and has a set up similar to that. I think he'll do his best and be like JT and professional.
I don't think he would achieve any more than Smith would - but I think this is a "commercial" appointment by our CEO rather than a footballing one.
So,based on performance in the premier league, which is only fair, if Gerrard finishes 16th, 10th and makes a cup final he’s achieved more than Smith? I’ll take that bet if you offer it me
Maybe we're looking at a Gerrard Pulis combo?That pic is Euston isn't it?Looks like Euston. Definitely not New St.
Honestly though that yellow sign in top right was Do Not Slip.......
Looks like Tony Pulis standing on the platform by the train door.
Give it a rest. He is starting from a considerably stronger place than Smith was when we were first promoted.The more I think about it, the more I think it is just a way of getting a new, marketable, face for the project now Joes fucked off
It sounds like he plays a lot like Smith does, and has a set up similar to that. I think he'll do his best and be like JT and professional.
I don't think he would achieve any more than Smith would - but I think this is a "commercial" appointment by our CEO rather than a footballing one.
So,based on performance in the premier league, which is only fair, if Gerrard finishes 16th, 10th and makes a cup final he’s achieved more than Smith? I’ll take that bet if you offer it me
Great news. Steve Bruce is in Dubai watching the cricket.
Great news. Steve Bruce is in Dubai watching the cricket.
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
Give it a rest. He is starting from a considerably stronger place than Smith was when we were first promoted.The more I think about it, the more I think it is just a way of getting a new, marketable, face for the project now Joes fucked off
It sounds like he plays a lot like Smith does, and has a set up similar to that. I think he'll do his best and be like JT and professional.
I don't think he would achieve any more than Smith would - but I think this is a "commercial" appointment by our CEO rather than a footballing one.
So,based on performance in the premier league, which is only fair, if Gerrard finishes 16th, 10th and makes a cup final he’s achieved more than Smith? I’ll take that bet if you offer it me
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Not too bothered. Clearly Villa is in a much better position in that case to attract a name in after that. There’s also the possibility Klopp gets fed up with their owners lack of spending compared to other CL teams, before Gerrard has proven himself at Villa.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
Best case, he's here for 2 years. That is no time, so we should, at least, have an idea of his successor. What type of man, with what set of skills.Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
I can’t decide whether you are on the wind up? So what you are saying is, before he’s even started, we should look for a manager to replace Gerrard based on the fact Klopp might leave in 3 years ?
Best case, he's here for 2 years. That is no time, so we should, at least, have an idea of his successor. What type of man, with what set of skills.Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
I can’t decide whether you are on the wind up? So what you are saying is, before he’s even started, we should look for a manager to replace Gerrard based on the fact Klopp might leave in 3 years ?
Best case, he's here for 2 years. That is no time, so we should, at least, have an idea of his successor. What type of man, with what set of skills.Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
I can’t decide whether you are on the wind up? So what you are saying is, before he’s even started, we should look for a manager to replace Gerrard based on the fact Klopp might leave in 3 years ?
In a locked filing cabinet, every single club will have a list of potential managers/head coaches. The list will be taken out, dusted off and updated every time there is a managerial change that my be relevant to that club.
Despite Pep’s success, there will be a list somewhere in the Man City estate, ready to be be activated in the event that he decides to spend more time on the golf course or with his family.
Every self respecting company does it - its called “succession planning”
Best case, he's here for 2 years. That is no time, so we should, at least, have an idea of his successor. What type of man, with what set of skills.Klopp won't be there forever. And none of us are getting any younger.If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.Presumably then Klopp will be fired no matter how successful he continues to be in order to make way for Gerrard?
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
I can’t decide whether you are on the wind up? So what you are saying is, before he’s even started, we should look for a manager to replace Gerrard based on the fact Klopp might leave in 3 years ?
In a locked filing cabinet, every single club will have a list of potential managers/head coaches. The list will be taken out, dusted off and updated every time there is a managerial change that my be relevant to that club.
Despite Pep’s success, there will be a list somewhere in the Man City estate, ready to be be activated in the event that he decides to spend more time on the golf course or with his family.
Every self respecting company does it - its called “succession planning”
Yeah and succession planning doesn’t exist
Have you even seen the giddiness clubs get into trying to appoint a new manager they haven’t got a fucking clue mate
Why do people keep going on about him leaving for Liverpool for fuck’s sake who cares
Why do people keep going on about him leaving for Liverpool for fuck’s sake who cares
Indeed, we should be more worried about relegation.
Why do people keep going on about him leaving for Liverpool for fuck’s sake who cares
Indeed, we should be more worried about relegation.
Chin up mate. There’s only 27 games to go. It’s gonna be tight
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
I can't quite handle the manager of Aston Villa being barely older than me!
I haven't quite given up on making it as a professional player so what the hell's going on?!
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.First off I'm not happy that the club have ditched Smith in favour of a rookie manager. Its an unnecessary gamble. But saying we should start looking for his replacement is such a negative approach. I didn't want Gerrard I'd have given Smith more time but it's not my call. Once we appoint a new manager at Aston Villa he gets my full backing from day one. We support our club through thick and thin no matter what. Managers come and go.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
Why do people keep going on about him leaving for Liverpool for fuck’s sake who cares
If we’re sitting in the top six I don’t give a shit if he moves on
I’ve not been in favour of the pending appointment but not because he might piss off because he’s been to successful
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
So what. Who cares. If he goes to Liverpool it’s because he had done well at VP. A manager’s shelf live is 2 to 3 years so no point in worrying beyond that. We have a good squad bar a decent DM. We should be looking up, not down
I can't quite handle the manager of Aston Villa being barely older than me!
I haven't quite given up on making it as a professional player so what the hell's going on?!
Talking about grandads
My daughter’s waters broke yesterday and she is currently in hospital waiting for things to happen
So it could be a big day of announcements for me
Talking about grandads
My daughter’s waters broke yesterday and she is currently in hospital waiting for things to happen
So it could be a big day of announcements for me
Best of luck to her mate! First grandchild?
Not saying I think this is going to happen, but I don't think too many people are worried that he comes in, does great, then leaves for Liverpool. More that he comes in, his focus is elsewhere and we are shit.I think this is low risk for him - if he gets us some midtable finishes, the narrative will be he's done ok, cos its only Villa. Hes served his dues now give him the Liverpool job.
Again, not saying I think that'll happen, but that is the third possibility in the 'win/win' of him using us as a stepping stone for the Liverpool job.
I didn't want you here, but you're here now, so.. you know, well done... Welcome!
If we are to appoint SG, and it looks like this scenario is gathering considerable momentum, then I sincerely hope that we are already tracking his replacement.
Should he do well, he'll be off to Liverpool in 2-3 years, should he do badly, he'll be off in 1-2 years. There is no scenario where he stays.
So what. Who cares. If he goes to Liverpool it’s because he had done well at VP. A manager’s shelf live is 2 to 3 years so no point in worrying beyond that. We have a good squad bar a decent DM. We should be looking up, not down
Not saying I think this is going to happen, but I don't think too many people are worried that he comes in, does great, then leaves for Liverpool. More that he comes in, his focus is elsewhere and we are shit.
Again, not saying I think that'll happen, but that is the third possibility in the 'win/win' of him using us as a stepping stone for the Liverpool job.
Not saying I think this is going to happen, but I don't think too many people are worried that he comes in, does great, then leaves for Liverpool. More that he comes in, his focus is elsewhere and we are shit.
Again, not saying I think that'll happen, but that is the third possibility in the 'win/win' of him using us as a stepping stone for the Liverpool job.
Where on earth would his focus be if not on Villa? The club he would be managing.
Not saying I think this is going to happen, but I don't think too many people are worried that he comes in, does great, then leaves for Liverpool. More that he comes in, his focus is elsewhere and we are shit.
Again, not saying I think that'll happen, but that is the third possibility in the 'win/win' of him using us as a stepping stone for the Liverpool job.
Where on earth would his focus be if not on Villa? The club he would be managing.
Sorry mate, but have you missed the last five days?
I'm talking specifically about the scenario in which he sees us as nothing more than a stepping stone. Many people have been arguing that could work in our favour, I'm just positing one way in which it might not.