Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: monkeyboy on December 28, 2013, 09:28:53 AM

Title: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: monkeyboy on December 28, 2013, 09:28:53 AM
Right, before the hand grenades start flying - I'm not suggesting I want us relegated or anything that silly.

Just a hypothetical question, how would you feel watching a competitive Villa in a lower league v being massively uncompetitive in the PL week in week out

Nothing behind the question - just one that was asked of me in the pub yesterday - i struggled to answer it to be honest.

Selfishly would love to go to VP with confidence and in expectation (and would clearly rather this was in the PL - however this currently means dropping a division) rather than what i go with now, which is expecting to lose and be appalled by the quality of the football we play, which is likely to be the case for the foreseeable future with Lambert's experiment failing and Lerner budget constraints

Wondered how others would answer the question :-)

UTV
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: olaftab on December 28, 2013, 09:41:59 AM
No no no. That would be terrible. Aston Villa has to be in the top division always competitive or not. If it was just about winning matches in any standard  how about Conference or wherever....no thanks.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: taylorsworkrate on December 28, 2013, 09:43:42 AM
I sense this thread will get a very welcome reception!
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: itbrvilla on December 28, 2013, 09:49:24 AM
Competitive please. We are no longer the big club the fans think we are. Give it 10-15 years and well be 6-7 most successful club in England. I doubt this load of rubbish would be competitive in the championship.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Legion on December 28, 2013, 09:49:52 AM
Competitive in the Premier League.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Mortimer's Bear on December 28, 2013, 09:51:50 AM
Premier League every time.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: monkeyboy on December 28, 2013, 09:57:07 AM
Competitive in the PL is of course the right answer,
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: monkeyboy on December 28, 2013, 10:00:15 AM
I sense this thread will get a very welcome reception!
I think you may be right :-)
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: richtheholtender on December 28, 2013, 10:00:50 AM
Has it really come to this?
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: olaftab on December 28, 2013, 10:00:55 AM
There we go sorted. Please lock this thread.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Steve kirk on December 28, 2013, 10:02:48 AM
In each of the last three and a half seasons I have suffered terribly worrying about relegation and it has been a real strain but for all that its sticking around in the top flight for me over the pain and humiliation of relegation, Villa have spent almost all of their history in the top division, that is where our great club should always be.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Villa in Denmark on December 28, 2013, 10:03:23 AM
The question is surely redundant.
If your competitive in the championship, you're likely to get promoted back into the situation you've just left, just with a year's parachute payments instead of the full pack of Sky filthy lucre.

If you're not competitive you're on your way to joining the likes of Forest, Wednesday or Leeds with years in the wilderness, not just because of player wages / contracts, but the whole infrastructure of the club is based around PL incomes. Shirt / kit sponsorships, corporate entertainment (which would require maintenance of the facilities, without the income). Bodymore Heath facilities will suddenly look a lot less attractive to young players, regardless of how cutting edge the facilities actually are.

We've seen how difficult and painful it's been to try and rebalance our finances whilst still having the Sky money.  Imagine what it would be like with ca. half the revenue streams over. 2 - 3 years.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Clampy on December 28, 2013, 10:08:00 AM
If being competitive means beating the likes of Barnsley and Huddersfield, i'd rather us stick to the Premier.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Lastfootstamper on December 28, 2013, 10:20:49 AM
Was the question posed by a follower of one of our other local sides? Sounds like the sort of thing they come out with to justify their team's yoyoing. Whilst exciting, swaggering, cavalier football is something we'd all love to see, dropping down a division is no guarantee of its arrival.
We belong in the top division.
Eventually things will get better. They always have.
These may be dark days, but they are very, very far from our grand old club's darkest. We'll be back, maybe not to the pinnacle of our finest hour, but we will, and we shall hold our heads high, and it will be in the premier.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: eastie on December 28, 2013, 10:22:43 AM
How bizarre.
Not many clubs go down and remain competitive in the championship, see blackburn, Bolton, blues, wigan, wolves .....
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: saunders_heroes on December 28, 2013, 10:32:59 AM
What a horrible topic. It's the Premier League all the way. Even the slightest suggestion that some fans would welcome the Championship just because we maybe be more competitive in it suggests Lerner and co have sucked every last bit of ambition out of the club.
We're Aston Villa FC, a club that's spent just 12 season out of the top flight in its entire history. Not some small time outfit who are just happy to plod along in the lower leagues.
Have some pride in the club for crying out loud!
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: richtheholtender on December 28, 2013, 10:34:38 AM
What a horrible topic. It's the Premier League all the way. Even the slightest suggestion that some fans would welcome the Championship just because we maybe be more competitive in it suggests Lerner and co have sucked every last bit of ambition out of the club.
We're Aston Villa FC, a club that's spent just 12 season out of the top flight in its entire history. Not some small time outfit who are just happy to plod along in the lower leagues.
Have some pride in the club for crying out loud!


Amen.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Charlie8182 on December 28, 2013, 10:47:42 AM
Actually one of my favourite season's was 1987/88 when we played in the old 2nd division for a season; I found it bizarre and completely different plus I used to go to away games then and enjoyed matches at Shrewsbury and Bournemouth.
Would I enjoy life in the Championship now though?  a massive NO!
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Ad@m on December 28, 2013, 11:00:14 AM
Interestingly I've been thinking a little about 'what if' recently.

In a weird way I reckon if the worst did happen and we got relegated, season ticket sales might even increase - firstly because of the potential that we might actually win some home games for a change and secondly for the novelty factor of playing a load of new teams.

On the pitch I think this squad wouldn't get close to promotion though. Benteke would leave but I think it's really damning of the quality of the squad that not many more would leave. The kids would then get massively bullied in the Championship and we'd finish mid-table. We wouldn't have a Leeds, Forest, Wednesday style meltdown because our finances are in much better shape than theirs were but we'd need to spend a lot of money to get back up.

I'd obviously prefer we didn't go down in the first place!

Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: supertom on December 28, 2013, 11:17:56 AM
The sad fact of the matter is, most of the players we have would still struggle in the Championship. That league isn't a dogs dinner, and honestly there's not a huge deal of difference between the bottom 9-10 Prem teams and the top 8 in the Championship at the moment in terms of quality, just that there's the odd star player among the lower prem ones, such as Berba, Benteke, etc. But players like that will be out the door quicker than you can blink if and when their clubs get relegated.

Our club should be aspiring to be a competitive side in the Prem. We need to be comfortably up in the top 10, within sniffing distance of the clubs above, because you'll always be able to make a push if/when 1-2 clubs start faltering. If you stay around 8-10, you've always got a chance of a final flurry and possible Euro push. We're in the wrong grouping in recent years. The dog feeders, the relegation scrappers. That's nowhere near good enough for Aston Villa. We've not come up from nowhere like Swansea, or pop in and out of the top flight over the years like Norwich or Soton. Aside from the odd blip we've always been a top division side. We've been here since the birth of football in 1992. Just the same as Everton should expect more than fighting for their lives at the bottom, or Spurs, we should too.
The odd dogfight is one thing, but we're in our 4th straight year of scrapping now. If you keep playing this game, eventually you'll lose. I would hate seeing us in the Championship. And for a club our size, and the way Randy's running it, we'd suffer from the drop. The hit would be massive. We could double drop.

And what of our players? If we run on a tight budget in the Prem, after the Sky windfall, yeah we might get a parachute payment if we dropped, but players would be out the door. What happens if players like Westwood and Lowton, who both got payrises, are now earning too much? Obviously Delph, Tekkey, Kozak, Vlaar would all move on. But I think even some of the players Lambert hopes will make it in the Prem in the next few years, like Westy, Lowton etc, might suddenly be pushed to the outdoor. I would think our wage cap, which is low, will get even lower. Then expect even more Bowery-esque level signings. And lets face it, he was struggling in League 2. Gabby would probably stay unless forced out. He'd do well at that level, but would he suddenly become a 20 goal forward just because he's in the Champ? I don't think so.

Unless we change tact, we're in a potentially very dangerous cycle right now.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: monkeyboy on December 28, 2013, 11:41:20 AM
Was the question posed by a follower of one of our other local sides? Sounds like the sort of thing they come out with to justify their team's yoyoing. Whilst exciting, swaggering, cavalier football is something we'd all love to see, dropping down a division is no guarantee of its arrival.
We belong in the top division.
Eventually things will get better. They always have.
These may be dark days, but they are very, very far from our grand old club's darkest. We'll be back, maybe not to the pinnacle of our finest hour, but we will, and we shall hold our heads high, and it will be in the premier.

My first year as a season ticket holder was the year we won the Super cup  - I was in the Holte the night Barcelona came a tried to kick us off the pitch - and i've been a season ticket holder ever since - I don't want to watch Championship football, of course not - and this wasn't why I posed the question - just i got stopped in my tracks when asked if i'd rather see us competitive, thats all, because we are not and we won't be for a while it would seem

Didn't mean to upset folk by posing it-  but please don't tar me with a SHA brush though!


Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Billy Walker on December 28, 2013, 12:19:14 PM
What a horrible topic. It's the Premier League all the way. Even the slightest suggestion that some fans would welcome the Championship just because we maybe be more competitive in it suggests Lerner and co have sucked every last bit of ambition out of the club.
We're Aston Villa FC, a club that's spent just 12 season out of the top flight in its entire history. Not some small time outfit who are just happy to plod along in the lower leagues.
Have some pride in the club for crying out loud!

Spot on.  This question/debate has surfaced a few times over the past three years and it makes me want to vomit.  (Apologies to anyone having their lunch as they read this!)
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: aj2k77 on December 28, 2013, 12:29:36 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Ad@m on December 28, 2013, 12:35:21 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: supertom on December 28, 2013, 12:36:17 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.
(http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/images/GifGuide/clapping/citizen_cane.gif)
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: saunders_heroes on December 28, 2013, 12:40:14 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: ktvillan on December 28, 2013, 12:46:31 PM
There is no reason why we shouldn't be able to compete in the PL (to an extent at least) if Lerner and Lambert only had a clue what they were doing.  Clubs with far fewer resources than us are able to give Man Yoo a game and beat Palace and Sunderland at home.  It's down to  mismanagement at almost every level of the club.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: onje_villa on December 28, 2013, 12:46:33 PM
Don't feel bad for asking the question, I've often wondered over the last twelve months if it would provide us with the opportunity for a "rebirth", to get come back stronger with a renewed identity. I don't think its a ridiculous thought at all.

I do however agree with the majority on here that the chances are high that we would suffer further and we would never see such a renaissance and we could languish in the lower reaches for some time.

Also agree with many saying that we need to sort ourselves out one way or another. Where we are now is not where we should be, we have the resources, support and infrastructure to be one of the top sides. Expectations need to be raised not lowered. We mustn't allow them to be lowered, that would be the most dangerous thing of all.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: aj2k77 on December 28, 2013, 12:46:43 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

Lamberts shit, hundreds of managers world wide, going over old ground again.

If you can't think of a better manager than Paul Lambert than you have an imagination about as exciting as Paul Faulkners.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Ad@m on December 28, 2013, 12:49:36 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

Lamberts shit, hundreds of managers world wide, going over old ground again.

If you can't think of a better manager than Paul Lambert than you have an imagination about as exciting as Paul Faulkners.

How very constructive.  Thanks for your input.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: aj2k77 on December 28, 2013, 12:49:48 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

It doesn't matter who the fans suggest anyway. If it is anyone of any note we will be told by the Lambert fans it's unrealistic.

Unless we suggest a pile of shit like Fat Sam or Holloway it will be laughed at.

No one was laughing when Swansea and Southampton showed some ambition and imagination though. We are bigger than those two, by far, we are selling ourselves short.

Houllier - retired
Mcliesh - relegation merchant
Lambert - 1 season in Premier League

Faulkner is not fit for purpose. He knows NOTHING about football
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Ian. on December 28, 2013, 12:50:53 PM
What a horrible topic. It's the Premier League all the way. Even the slightest suggestion that some fans would welcome the Championship just because we maybe be more competitive in it suggests Lerner and co have sucked every last bit of ambition out of the club.
We're Aston Villa FC, a club that's spent just 12 season out of the top flight in its entire history. Not some small time outfit who are just happy to plod along in the lower leagues.
Have some pride in the club for crying out loud!
Well said.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Villa in Denmark on December 28, 2013, 12:52:19 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

When we were looking for a replacement for both Houllier and McLeish I wanted Laudrup, not because of the Danish connection, but because of what he'd done at Brøndby here, and Majorca, mainly with kids and cast-offs due to financial restraints. Keeping Majorca up the year he was there was nothing short of a miracle as the club had sold just about anyone they could get cash for to stave off bankruptcy. He resigned when he was told to do it all again (sell the squad) with the players who'd now shown they could cut it at that level.
It would be the equivalent of us qualifying for the champions league with the current squad.

Plus being the player he was you couldn't imagine him settling for effort without technique.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 28, 2013, 12:53:59 PM
Keep it constructive and polite please.  Just because I'm at the ground doesn't mean I don't see all! And I have my new Christmas whomping stick to break out. So there!
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: saunders_heroes on December 28, 2013, 12:55:10 PM
Keep it constructive and polite please.  Just because I'm at the ground doesn't mean I don't see all! And I have my new Christmas whomping stick to break out. So there!

You're already at Villa Park?
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 28, 2013, 12:56:34 PM
Yep. To sell the fanzine.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: cheltenhamlion on December 28, 2013, 01:02:45 PM
Queuing round the block to read about why I think the loan system is shit so I was told.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Drummond on December 28, 2013, 01:12:43 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

No, because those clubs had been building and building, giving managers time to develop the style of play, the squad and ethos. It's not rocket science to see how Swansea have developed under Martinez, Rodgers and now Laudrup.

Atkins wasn't doing a bad job at Southampton, so their manager has inherited a strong base. Our manager has to undo years of poor management, contrasting playing styles and all whilst getting rid of overpaid lazy prima donnas.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Gareth on December 28, 2013, 01:15:03 PM
Keep it constructive and polite please.  Just because I'm at the ground doesn't mean I don't see all! And I have my new Christmas whomping stick to break out. So there!
Get round by the players entrance & give the manager & each of the players a good clout on their way in.... :-)
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: saunders_heroes on December 28, 2013, 01:15:26 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

No, because those clubs had been building and building, giving managers time to develop the style of play, the squad and ethos. It's not rocket science to see how Swansea have developed under Martinez, Rodgers and now Laudrup.

Atkins wasn't doing a bad job at Southampton, so their manager has inherited a strong base. Our manager has to undo years of poor management, contrasting playing styles and all whilst getting rid of overpaid lazy prima donnas.

Those two clubs have been gradually getting better year in year out. We're going in the opposite direction. That suggests something isn't right, so it's obvious fans will call for change.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: aj2k77 on December 28, 2013, 01:19:50 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

No, because those clubs had been building and building, giving managers time to develop the style of play, the squad and ethos. It's not rocket science to see how Swansea have developed under Martinez, Rodgers and now Laudrup.



Can anyone see what the style and ethos at this club is under Paul Lambert?

What are we waiting for him to build? It's 18 months and I see the team no more coherent than when he took over. The team is still a mish mash of uncomplimentary players, bits and pieces players. There is no style and ethos being built. Just another house of cards. Just a less expensive one.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Ad@m on December 28, 2013, 01:23:02 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

No, because those clubs had been building and building, giving managers time to develop the style of play, the squad and ethos. It's not rocket science to see how Swansea have developed under Martinez, Rodgers and now Laudrup.

Atkins wasn't doing a bad job at Southampton, so their manager has inherited a strong base. Our manager has to undo years of poor management, contrasting playing styles and all whilst getting rid of overpaid lazy prima donnas.

Those two clubs have been gradually getting better year in year out. We're going in the opposite direction. That suggests something isn't right, so it's obvious fans will call for change.

Going in the opposite direction despite four managers in as many years. So why would changing again make any difference?
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: saunders_heroes on December 28, 2013, 01:26:20 PM
Relegation so we can beat Doncaster and Burnley?

How about we just sort ourselves fucking out. Get a proper manager in, sign some real players and be competitive with Southampton, Swansea, Everton, clubs with smaller crowds and smaller incomes. We need to stop pissing about now, we are the only club in the Premier league buying players from fucking Crewe and Chesterfield. Piss take.

You really are Mr Sunshine aren't you?!

You've criticised Lambert on pretty much every thread you can find but I'm yet to see you actually offer an alternative.  So care to share with us who this 'proper manager' is we should be getting in?

It's not his job to find another manager, it's the club's. Just because fans can't come up with an alternative manager to please you doesn't mean their opinion he should be replaced isn't worthy. How many fans thought of Laudrup for Swansea or Pochettino for Southampton? They haven't done too badly have they?

No, because those clubs had been building and building, giving managers time to develop the style of play, the squad and ethos. It's not rocket science to see how Swansea have developed under Martinez, Rodgers and now Laudrup.

Atkins wasn't doing a bad job at Southampton, so their manager has inherited a strong base. Our manager has to undo years of poor management, contrasting playing styles and all whilst getting rid of overpaid lazy prima donnas.

Those two clubs have been gradually getting better year in year out. We're going in the opposite direction. That suggests something isn't right, so it's obvious fans will call for change.

Going in the opposite direction despite four managers in as many years. So why would changing again make any difference?

Actually I'd like to see him backed with money in January so he can buy real Premier League players, not cheap foreigners and lower league dross then see what he does with it.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 28, 2013, 02:54:15 PM
Is this really a question? Why not just make it Title Contenders in League 2 vs uncompetitive in PL? Anyone who believes getting relegated would be a good thing needs their head checked.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: levico on December 28, 2013, 05:52:01 PM
Has it really come to this?

Not yet but I think this will be very common by the end of January.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: not3bad on December 28, 2013, 06:45:52 PM
It's a sad day when this question is asked, especially for the 3rd year in a row.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Irish villain on December 28, 2013, 07:07:07 PM
Competitive in the Premier League.

This. We are Aston Villa. A bad season for us should be finishing outside the top ten.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: aj2k77 on December 28, 2013, 07:08:04 PM
Competitive in the Premier League.

This. We are Aston Villa. A bad season for us should be finishing outside the top ten.

This is modern football. There are some big clubs below us......
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Irish villain on December 28, 2013, 07:22:30 PM
Competitive in the Premier League.

This. We are Aston Villa. A bad season for us should be finishing outside the top ten.

This is modern football. There are some big clubs below us......

I know that and we have been down before. But we have had a solid run in the top flight and should be consolidating because look at those big clubs who went down in the PL era. Leeds and Sheffield Wed haven't got back up because it isn't like that 70s or 80s anymore.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 28, 2013, 07:25:46 PM
And plenty of clubs have gone down who have come straight back up.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: Irish villain on December 28, 2013, 07:28:22 PM
True, but it's a risk I'd rather not take.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 28, 2013, 07:29:59 PM
True, but it's a risk I'd rather not take.

Too right. It's also worth remembering, the last time we were down there our home record was pretty crap anyway.
Title: Re: Competitive in Championship v uncompetitive in PL?
Post by: BegbieAV on December 28, 2013, 07:37:35 PM
We had some cracking away days in the 70's though ;D
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal