Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: N'ZMAV on November 07, 2012, 09:43:20 AM

Title: Eric Lichaj
Post by: N'ZMAV on November 07, 2012, 09:43:20 AM
No wonder he can't defend. His eyes go in different directions.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~2972240,00.html

Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: The Left Side on November 07, 2012, 04:24:15 PM
That is a little creepy
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Legion on November 07, 2012, 06:43:06 PM
His eyes go in different directions.

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~2972240,00.html



It is a condition known as Strabismus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strabismus).
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: NiiLamptey on May 13, 2013, 07:53:57 AM
At the risk of getting a thread locked I am reusing an old thread for lichaj...

I haven't thought that much of him...

But he looked quite good on Saturday, especially going forward so wanted to share some love, as I feel it's deserved!
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Steve R on May 13, 2013, 10:13:52 AM
I quite like Lichaj. He certainly is no left back, but he's had some good games playing in his proper position.

Whether that's enough to secure him a new contract with us is a different matter. But he's a better player than he's given credit for.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: eastie on May 13, 2013, 10:14:43 AM
I quite like Lichaj. He certainly is no left back, but he's had some good games playing in his proper position.

Whether that's enough to secure him a new contract with us is a different matter. But he's a better player than he's given credit for.

Might be worth keeping as back up for Lowton.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: not3bad on May 13, 2013, 10:16:41 AM
One particularly good moment that was shown on Match of the Day when he closed down a Chelsea forward that had broke free.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Can Gana Be Bettered!?!? on May 13, 2013, 10:18:30 AM
He's a good enough player to be able to come in and do a job. Not sure about a first teamer, but definite squad player.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: tomd2103 on May 13, 2013, 11:26:23 AM
He's a good enough player to be able to come in and do a job. Not sure about a first teamer, but definite squad player.

Not sure about that.  He certainly puts the effort in, but I just don't think he is quite good enough.  He's not great on the ball and is prone to making costly errors (got caught out on Saturday for their second goal).  I would personally prefer to keep Herd as RB cover over Lichaj, as he can cover a number of other positions. 
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Concrete John on May 13, 2013, 11:29:30 AM
I quite like Lichaj. He certainly is no left back, but he's had some good games playing in his proper position.

Whether that's enough to secure him a new contract with us is a different matter. But he's a better player than he's given credit for.

Might be worth keeping as back up for Lowton.

Yep.

We could go get another lower league player to do this, but would they be any better than Lichaj, who already knows the club?
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: neo_Villan on May 13, 2013, 11:58:03 AM
I think he is at the stage in his career where he needs to be a regular somewhere. Probably best to let him go.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Mister E on May 13, 2013, 11:58:31 AM
He certainly puts the effort in, but I just don't think he is quite good enough.  He's not great on the ball and is prone to making costly errors (got caught out on Saturday for their second goal).  I would personally prefer to keep Herd as RB cover over Lichaj, as he can cover a number of other positions. 
I thought his ball use on Saturday was generally excellent ... but his error for their second was crap, admittedly. He looked nervous early on but after the first 15 minutes I thought he played Hazard (and later Moses) pretty well.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Hoppo on May 13, 2013, 12:03:40 PM
Wasn't it Westwood who gave the ball away for the goal? As backup Lichaj is fine.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: junxs on May 13, 2013, 12:23:08 PM
I'd rather have a cheap Lichaj as backup and spend the money saved towards other positions, Lowton will play majority of the games no matter who comes in at right back so if Lichaj is happy to play 2nd fiddle I say keep him on.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: not3bad on May 13, 2013, 12:25:56 PM
I would personally prefer to keep Herd as RB cover over Lichaj, as he can cover a number of other positions. 

Herd was very good when he came in at right back, on the other hand he was playing against Wolves if I remember correctly, which is not the same as Chelsea.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: tomd2103 on May 13, 2013, 01:29:10 PM
He certainly puts the effort in, but I just don't think he is quite good enough.  He's not great on the ball and is prone to making costly errors (got caught out on Saturday for their second goal).  I would personally prefer to keep Herd as RB cover over Lichaj, as he can cover a number of other positions. 
I thought his ball use on Saturday was generally excellent ... but his error for their second was crap, admittedly. He looked nervous early on but after the first 15 minutes I thought he played Hazard (and later Moses) pretty well.

Yeah I'd agree with that, but in the end he still got caught out and ended up lying exasperated on the turf as he does in most games he plays.  I'd rather us let him go and bring in a better option who can provide solid cover for both full-back positions.   
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: tomd2103 on May 13, 2013, 01:30:45 PM
I would personally prefer to keep Herd as RB cover over Lichaj, as he can cover a number of other positions. 

Herd was very good when he came in at right back, on the other hand he was playing against Wolves if I remember correctly, which is not the same as Chelsea.

True, but we never really got to see him given a run at RB.  He showed a bit of fight in that Wolves game and McLeish immediately moved him into midfield. 
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: supertom on May 13, 2013, 01:32:10 PM
Any ideas how much Lichaj earns? He's played for his national side and he's now getting beyond the age of being a youngster. I think possibly it might be better to let him go and get a younger player in to cover Lowts.

I don't think Eric's too bad, but he lacks a little bit of pace and I don't see him getting any better. I don't think he's Prem quality. If he's on say 15k, I'd let him go when his contract runs, get in a youngster on less money, with more potential.

Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: eamonn on May 13, 2013, 04:40:08 PM
Is it the enda the road for Eric and Stephens?
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: PeterWithesShin on May 13, 2013, 04:44:04 PM
I wouldn't mind keeping as a squad player, however i'd also hope that as he is 25 this year he'd want to play more often.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: Steve R on May 13, 2013, 06:05:09 PM
If he weren't out of contract, keeping him would allow current resources to go into other areas of the squad where we have next to no viable competition for places. We could revisit the right back position in a year's time.

He's out of contract in a few weeks, which is a different matter. We're looking at what we want longer term, and for the way Lambert plays I don't think it is Eric.
Title: Re: Eric Lichaj
Post by: SoccerHQ on May 13, 2013, 09:04:30 PM
I quite like Lichaj. He certainly is no left back, but he's had some good games playing in his proper position.

Whether that's enough to secure him a new contract with us is a different matter. But he's a better player than he's given credit for.

I agree.

He's like Herd for me. Can come in a game or two and do a decent job.

The problem is what we saw over xmas when he starts 5-6 games in a row and teams start to target him and then he struggles.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal