Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine
Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: ASHTONVILLA on August 08, 2011, 06:27:04 PM
-
Looking at the state of the defence, and the lack of any battlers in midfield, I wonder if it might be worth going back to playering three centre backs ala GT Mk1, Little and Gregory.
If we played Clark in the left of three centre it may work well for him, certainly didn't do Barry any harm. It would probably help Collins and Dunne look more assured, and may be a better way of shoring up the defence than playing people out of position as defensive midfield players (Clark) or relying on naturally attacking players to play a defensive midfield role (Delph / Petrov).
Could go with something like this:
..........................Given.................................
..........Collins.....Dunne.......Clark.................
Young..............................................Warnock
..............Bannan...Delph...Makoun..................
..........................Nzogbia................................
.......................Bent.......................................
or could play Gabby up front with Bent and Bannan for N'Zogbia in midfield.
I know this wasn't the most exciting formation under Gregory, but it may allow us to play our attacking midfielders without the defence creaking under the pressure.
Thoughts?
-
I think that formation has had its day. I don't think Young and Warnock have enough in them to play the wing back role which requries an awful lot of energy.
I wouldn't play N'Zogbia in the hole either. I've seen one or two on here suggest it but I think he should be on the wing, particularly when we yhave players like Ireland and Bannan who can play that role.
-
with a defensive manager now in charge of the club i didnt think we could be more negative! You how ever have achieved it!
-
Considering most teams play 4-5-1/4-3-3 its not a very good idea. You're basically wasting 2 players and surrendering any kind of control of the midfield.
-
Neither Young nor Warnock are wing backs and they're essential to making that formation work. What I think will happen in practice is they'll get pushed back and we'll be overrun in midfield
-
I'm still hoping we can pull one more signing out of the hat like Diarra or Palacios. That one single signing could make a huge difference to our season.
-
Neither Young nor Warnock are wing backs and they're essential to making that formation work. What I think will happen in practice is they'll get pushed back and we'll be overrun in midfield
Definitely. We don't have personnel to do it. Neither our full backs or wide players are versatile and/or fit enough to do the job.
-
Unfortunately the wing back system seems to have gone the way of tamagochis and Opal Fruits.
-
It was good while it lasted for us. In the late nineties Gareth Barry looked like another Bobby Moore in his position on the left side of a back three. Unfortunately the system got sussed. I can't think of anyone who uses it anymore.
-
Liverpool beat Chelsea using it last season.
-
1996 is on the phone, it wants its formation back.
-
Take the point on the full backs not being up to it. There again a flat back four of Young-Collins-Dunne-Warnock scares the shit out of me, especially with a powder puff central midfield in front of them. So you could say we haven't the personnel for that too.
Problem is whatever formation I look at, we just seem very lightweight in the middle of the park. This has been a problem for two or three seasons now, and it puts the defence under a lot of pressure. Minus Reo Coker, and with Petrov seemingly unable to last more than 60 minutes I am more worried than ever about it though.
If we really are not going to get any more players in, then McLeish will have to try and protect that back four somehow. Clark in a back three looks better to me than Clark out of position in midfield, Hogg in midfield, or any combination of our more attacking midfielders.
I suppose N'Zogbia could possibly operate as a wing back, having played left back in the past.
Edit: Clutching at straws really. Haven't felt this nervous about a new season in a long time.
-
No thanks. I want four at the back but with very mobile centre-halves and a quick defensive midfielder to be able to get back and cover at speed to allow our full-backs to go rampaging forwards like Cafu/Roberto Carlos. Sorry Mr Dunne.
-
No thanks. I want four at the back but with very mobile centre-halves and a quick defensive midfielder to be able to get back and cover at speed to allow our full-backs to go rampaging forwards like Cafu/Roberto Carlos. Sorry Mr Dunne.
I'd like that too!
Problem is though that we only have one mobile central defender (Clark), our right back is adequate at best, and our solitary left back is on recent showings a complete liability. Oh and we have no defensive midfielder at all and do not appear interested in getting one, even on a free transfer.
With the players we have we need to protect the defence a little, but if we play our best payers (N'Zogbia, Albrighton and maybe if he gets his form back Ireland) in their natural positions then we can't pack the midfield to make up for lack of bite there. The squad is disjointed, whatever formation we play there are critical weaknesses, even though we have some good players available.
-
Problem with the 5-3-2/3-5-2 formation is that we don't have the personell for it.
Problem with the 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation or the 4-4-2 formation is that we don't have the personell for it.
We need a decent defensive midfielder and no change in formation can paper over that crack, I think.
-
Neither Young nor Warnock are wing backs and they're essential to making that formation work. What I think will happen in practice is they'll get pushed back and we'll be overrun in midfield
think thats probably nail on head. Can't say i'm not too sure the midfield won't be overrun anyway
-
I think that formation has had its day. I don't think Young and Warnock have enough in them to play the wing back role which requries an awful lot of energy.
I wouldn't play N'Zogbia in the hole either. I've seen one or two on here suggest it but I think he should be on the wing, particularly when we yhave players like Ireland and Bannan who can play that role.
Amen to that
Wing backs please no
It's hard enough trying to get full backs just to defend
-
If we'd kept Walker and got Naughton on the other side, there might be a rationale for it. However, the main reason that it would not be right is that the current trend for teams to play with one recognised striker would mean that the back 3 would be marking one guy. As said above, that would mean we'd be light elsewhere around the pitch.
Our current plight lies in midfield: deal with that and the existing back four doesn't look quite as bad as you make out, ASHTON.
For mobile, tenacious midfielders in our current squad who wouldm cover the fullbacks, Hogg would be the best bet; but - judging on pre-sesaon line-ups - McGinge doesn't seem to agree.
-
I'd say it's a reasonable option for the occasional game where we feel we need to get solid.
-
to use Ronglish "I cannot for the life of me" understand why Aston Villa have not resigned Thomas Hitzlesperger!
it would make sense really, wouldn't it, agent bluenose
-
We dropped Charlie Aitken and played three centre halves at Bournemouth. I think we lost 3-0, if my memory is correct, so would oppose the motion.
-
The only place I'd ever play 3 at the back is at Stoke.
Everywhere else play a back 4.