Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: itbrvilla on December 01, 2010, 11:57:42 PM

Title: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: itbrvilla on December 01, 2010, 11:57:42 PM
Having a look at the injury list as people keep mentioning how these have affected the team and have cost us tonight but really has it been that much of an issue?

I know we have missed Gabby as has been demonstrated in his last 2 games and its great to see him back.but the others are primarily youngsters that haven't done anything at the club yet or older players who have spent the last 2 years being called 'shit' and 'not good enough'. 

So whats changed?
        
 M Albrighton - got Bannan, Young and Downing in same position.
 C Cuellar    - crap in possession, gives ball away constantly
 S Sidwell    - Useless?
 N Reo-Coker - Shit, not good enough sell to Fulham etc?
 E Heskey    - Donkey Eeyore etc?
 S Petrov   - Too old passenger?
 A Weimann -  youngster
 F Delph - youngster

Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 02, 2010, 12:02:42 AM
You say Petrov is too old and a passenger, that NRC is not good enough, that Sidwell is shit (alright, I'll give you that one, there's no answer there) but tonight we started with two players with a combined age approxmately that of our goal keeper in midfield today.

Hogg and Bannan also started against Manchester United recently.  I can honestly say I had never heard of Jonathon Hogg until Rapid Vienna away.  How much better off would we have been with the experience and calm head of Petrov?

Or the tenacity of NRC? Or, errr, the invisibility of Sidwell? Ok, forget that one, then.

The situation is a very long way from being ideal.

i do think it is an interesting point, however, that the players who have let us down are by and large the more experienced ones.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Bent Neilsens Screamer on December 02, 2010, 12:03:41 AM
NRC and Albrighton are the main players that we could do with back. NRC provides energy and bite in the middle and Marc has been one of the best players this season.

Heskey was in fine form but was only covering for the injured Gabby and although Cuellar played well against Wolves he was dropped for the next game so it would remain to be seen whether he would come back into the team anyway.

Good options on the bench is the main advantage of having the players back.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: itbrvilla on December 02, 2010, 12:25:11 AM
You say Petrov is too old and a passenger, that NRC is not good enough, that Sidwell is shit (alright, I'll give you that one, there's no answer there) but tonight we started with two players with a combined age approxmately that of our goal keeper in midfield today.

Hogg and Bannan also started against Manchester United recently.  I can honestly say I had never heard of Jonathon Hogg until Rapid Vienna away.  How much better off would we have been with the experience and calm head of Petrov?

Or the tenacity of NRC? Or, errr, the invisibility of Sidwell? Ok, forget that one, then.

The situation is a very long way from being ideal.

i do think it is an interesting point, however, that the players who have let us down are by and large the more experienced ones.
I'm not saying that, just highlighting what a majority of opinions have been about those players.

I just find it funny that the players people are crying out to return weren't good enough for us not so long ago.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: avfcpg on December 02, 2010, 12:40:16 AM
Interesting point but it does give us options when they are back. Something we lack right now.

Albrighton and NRC would make a difference for me. And still waiting to see what Delph will offer us when he's up and running.

Also gives us a chance to drop Clark back to centre back maybe. I think him being more comfortable on the ball than Dunne or Collins would sit well with GH's philosophy.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 02, 2010, 12:50:09 AM
NRC and Albrighton would make a big difference , as would Delph.. I wouldnt even mind Heskey on the bench at the moment.   
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 02, 2010, 12:56:05 AM
NRC and Albrighton would make a big difference , as would Delph.. I wouldnt even mind Heskey on the bench at the moment.   

Heskey would have won us that game tonight. Just having someone in the box would have caused them all sorts of trouble.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 02, 2010, 12:57:42 AM
NRC and Albrighton would make a big difference , as would Delph.. I wouldnt even mind Heskey on the bench at the moment.   

Heskey would have won us that game tonight. Just having someone in the box would have caused them all sorts of trouble.


the way he was playing , yes you are probaly right.. I would always have Heskey before JC
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: TheSandman on December 02, 2010, 01:24:50 AM
 M Albrighton - He's a different kind of option out wide and thus is a massive miss. He is a better crosser and more incisive than our other wingers.
C Cuellar    - He's a good solid stopper. If Dunne and Collins had been exhibiting their form from last season then we wouldn't miss them. With the two of them playing like clowns he is a big loss.
S Sidwell    - Who?
N Reo-Coker - I feel a lot of people overrate him if I'm honest but he'd be a good player to help Bannan as they would compliment each other in midfield.
E Heskey    - A focal point to the attack. We have missed him. Even with Gabby fit he would be an excellent player to be on that bench and come on to turn games.
S Petrov   - An experienced solid pro who did an important job that a lot of people on here didn't seem to understand.
A Weimann -  Agree but he is a promising one.
F Delph - A youngster yes but could you really tell me he is not a better one than Hogg?

If we had a few of these guys back (for me Cuellar, NRC and Albrighton would be the key three) we would perhaps be the better for it as Albrighton has been our most impressive attacker this season, Cuellar could replace Dunne who has been hopeless and NRC could help in midfield. Even Heskey has been a big miss as he could add goals and a centre to our attack.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: usav on December 02, 2010, 01:32:06 AM
NRC and Albrighton would make a big difference , as would Delph.. I wouldnt even mind Heskey on the bench at the moment.   

Heskey would have won us that game tonight. Just having someone in the box would have caused them all sorts of trouble.

Couldn't agree more.   Several times Gabby made great runs down the channel with nobody to give the ball to in the middle.

Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: BannedUserIAT on December 02, 2010, 03:20:58 AM
M Albrighton - He's a different kind of option out wide and thus is a massive miss. He is a better crosser and more incisive than our other wingers.
C Cuellar    - He's a good solid stopper. If Dunne and Collins had been exhibiting their form from last season then we wouldn't miss them. With the two of them playing like clowns he is a big loss.
S Sidwell    - Who?
N Reo-Coker - I feel a lot of people overrate him if I'm honest but he'd be a good player to help Bannan as they would compliment each other in midfield.
E Heskey    - A focal point to the attack. We have missed him. Even with Gabby fit he would be an excellent player to be on that bench and come on to turn games.
S Petrov   - An experienced solid pro who did an important job that a lot of people on here didn't seem to understand.
A Weimann -  Agree but he is a promising one.
F Delph - A youngster yes but could you really tell me he is not a better one than Hogg?

If we had a few of these guys back (for me Cuellar, NRC and Albrighton would be the key three) we would perhaps be the better for it as Albrighton has been our most impressive attacker this season, Cuellar could replace Dunne who has been hopeless and NRC could help in midfield. Even Heskey has been a big miss as he could add goals and a centre to our attack.

Nail on the head, Sandie.

I'd also add that Albrighton has the ability to storm into the box (as opposed to jinking in like Young does). I know who'd I'd rather not have to face.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: brontebilly on December 02, 2010, 06:40:21 AM
NRC and Albrighton would make a big difference , as would Delph.. I wouldnt even mind Heskey on the bench at the moment.   

Heskey would have won us that game tonight. Just having someone in the box would have caused them all sorts of trouble.

Emile Heskeys goal scoring record in a Villa shirt aswell as his awful performance against the same defenders a month or so make this wishful thinking unfortunately.

Heskey is finished as is Carew. We should pay up their contracts in January if needs be and bring in a proper partner/ competition for Gabby.

While all the players missing would provide competition only Reo Coker would automatically have come back into the team. Downing and Young will always get the nod ahead of Albrighton. Blaming injuries anyway is pointless, we had more than enough experienced players on the pitch to Bham yet again the team failed and were again beaten by a very average team.


Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: sfx412 on December 02, 2010, 08:10:13 AM
Not only does GH find it hard to field the same team 2 weeks running some of those he has to play are carrying injuies and some too much weight.
But this is part and parcel of any post Mon departure. We are lucky to have some useful cover players in the reserves.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: nick harper on December 02, 2010, 08:22:10 AM
We should also bear in mind that Dunne is carrying a knee injury and and Collins has been struggling with a calf problem. I accept they are both out of sorts at the moment but I think they are being nursed from game to game and are not 100% fit.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 02, 2010, 08:50:26 AM
We should also bear in mind that Dunne is carrying a knee injury and and Collins has been struggling with a calf problem. I accept they are both out of sorts at the moment but I think they are being nursed from game to game and are not 100% fit.

That's a good point, nick, but I can't help thinking Dunne's knee would be under less duress if it wasn't forced to carry quite so much weight.

*wink*
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: nick harper on December 02, 2010, 08:53:57 AM
We should also bear in mind that Dunne is carrying a knee injury and and Collins has been struggling with a calf problem. I accept they are both out of sorts at the moment but I think they are being nursed from game to game and are not 100% fit.

That's a good point, nick, but I can't help thinking Dunne's knee would be under less duress if it wasn't forced to carry quite so much weight.

*wink*

Can't argue with that - he looked very laboured.

I think if we'd had their centre halves last night, we'd have won the game comfortably.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 02, 2010, 09:15:48 AM
We should also bear in mind that Dunne is carrying a knee injury and and Collins has been struggling with a calf problem. I accept they are both out of sorts at the moment but I think they are being nursed from game to game and are not 100% fit.

 Thats right mate,the only times they looked dangerous was when one of our two centre backs made a cock up. Think its time Cuellar is put in to freshen things up.

That's a good point, nick, but I can't help thinking Dunne's knee would be under less duress if it wasn't forced to carry quite so much weight.

*wink*

Can't argue with that - he looked very laboured.

I think if we'd had their centre halves last night, we'd have won the game comfortably.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 02, 2010, 09:20:15 AM
Thats right mate,the only times they looked dangerous was when one of our two centre backs made a cock up. Think its time Cuellar is put in to freshen things up.

That's a good point, nick, but I can't help thinking Dunne's knee would be under less duress if it wasn't forced to carry quite so much weight.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 02, 2010, 09:26:01 AM
Sorry pauliewalnuts, i somehow put my post amongst your quote,im the Dunne and Collins of posting today!
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: darren woolley on December 02, 2010, 09:43:52 AM
I would have liked Albrighton, NRC, heskey, Cuellar, and Delph back if we had them last night we would have won the match without a doubt.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: TimTheVillain on December 02, 2010, 09:57:37 AM
Bannan has now joined the injury list.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Merv on December 02, 2010, 10:19:40 AM
They are a big issue because:

We have our four most senior central midfield players (in fact all our senior midfield players) currently unavailable.

We have two centre-backs in poor form and are unable to replace either because one option is injured, and has been for weeks, and the other is needed to prop up the midfield.

Our best striker has been unfit for most of the season and has been intermittently fit since returning.

Our most productive striker this season is currently injured.

Albrighton, arguably our player of the season so far, is currently unavailable.

Our only signing of the summer, Stephen Ireland, has also been troubled with injuries and illness - he had been officially ruled out last night and I was amazed he was on the bench.

You can make cases for NRC, Petrov, Albrighton, Heskey and Cuellar all coming in to the first X1 if they were fit.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: TimTheVillain on December 02, 2010, 10:39:53 AM
It's a massive issue to address the OP - we are almost down to playing Gary McAllister in the middle !
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: itbrvilla on December 02, 2010, 10:42:56 AM
They are a big issue because:

We have our four most senior central midfield players (in fact all our senior midfield players) currently unavailable.

We have two centre-backs in poor form and are unable to replace either because one option is injured, and has been for weeks, and the other is needed to prop up the midfield.

Our best striker has been unfit for most of the season and has been intermittently fit since returning.

Our most productive striker this season is currently injured.

Albrighton, arguably our player of the season so far, is currently unavailable.

Our only signing of the summer, Stephen Ireland, has also been troubled with injuries and illness - he had been officially ruled out last night and I was amazed he was on the bench.

You can make cases for NRC, Petrov, Albrighton, Heskey and Cuellar all coming in to the first X1 if they were fit.
Goo point.  But don't most people think the midfield was our strongest position last night and previous games?
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Merv on December 02, 2010, 11:14:51 AM
If most do, I'm not included in that group. I'll never slate the kids in there at the mo because I really rate Clark, albeit I think centre-back is his best position, Bannan I like and Hogg.... Hogg seems to be doing a reasonable job and expectations of him are so much lower that if he does 'ok' we're happy with that. But we'd be a great deal stronger with even just two of Reo-Coker, Petrov, Sidwell, Delph available.

Take those players I mentioned in my earlier post: if fit, we could have lined up like this v Arsenal, our last league game:

                              Friedel

L Young        Cuellar       Collins      Warnock

Albrighton     Reo-Coker   Petrov     Downing

                    A Young
                                      Heskey

With the only contentious selection being Cuellar over Dunne; I think Houllier might have stuck with Dunne, despite everything.

So yep, injuries are hurting us, no two ways about it.

Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Shrek on December 02, 2010, 12:10:21 PM
No it isn't.

We have lost so many games, because of constant mistakes by our defence, mostly Dunne.

We are rarely getting cut wide open by teams, just making mistake after mistake. Not one of these mistakes is from the young lads who have come in. They have been by our useless experienced defence.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Ger Regan on December 02, 2010, 12:13:42 PM
No it isn't.

We have lost so many games, because of constant mistakes by our defence, mostly Dunne.

We are rarely getting cut wide open by teams, just making mistake after mistake. Not one of these mistakes is from the young lads who have come in. They have been by our useless experienced defence.
I'd disagree with that to be honest.

I think that CM is the most vital area in a team, both from an attacking and defending perspective. The fact we have so many central midfielders out injured is hurting us a lot more than some people realise I think.

Granted, our defense is useless, but they wouldn't be getting exposed half as much if they had the cover that our first-choice central midfielders would give them.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Merv on December 02, 2010, 12:14:56 PM
No it isn't.... what? No, injuries have not hurt us this season?

Defenders have been making mistakes, but we've hardly been bossing games from midfield and imposing ourselves on matches.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: themossman on December 02, 2010, 12:55:51 PM
You raise an interesting point. It's a bit of a novelty after years of talking about proper full backs and a creative cmf being the missing piece of the jigsaw, but these are the least of our problems at the moment. Middle of defence, which we all assumed was an area of strength, needs wholesale changes. We can't buy goals and JC is no good even off the bench anymore. And yet, mainly thanks to the kids and Downing's form, we are getting hold of the ball and passing it through the middle better than we have for a long long time.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Karl Bridges on December 02, 2010, 01:10:49 PM
Just one player would have made all the difference last night Marc Albrighton. It would have meant  Downing on the left, Ash in the hole and Bannan in the middle. I think we would have cleaned up with that team.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 02, 2010, 01:19:49 PM
Bannan has now joined the injury list.

 Really? Ash is suspended for Monday,we really have no one else now to come in.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: TheSandman on December 02, 2010, 01:30:27 PM
How long is Barry Brainer out for?
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Shrek on December 02, 2010, 03:10:24 PM
The problem is this has happened all season, even before the injuries, we havent started conceding goals since all the injuries it's been all season.

It's no coincidence that our best defensive performances have been without Dunne, wolves away, Chelsea home.
Title: Re: Injuries- that big an issue?
Post by: Merv on December 02, 2010, 03:38:37 PM

It's no coincidence that our best defensive performances have been without Dunne, wolves away, Chelsea home.

So who would you play at CB instead of Dunne (who I agree has been poor)?
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal