Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Off Topic => Sports Arena => Topic started by: Villan For Life on February 16, 2010, 08:55:58 AM

Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 16, 2010, 08:55:58 AM
The new English season starts in less than 2 months. Post your hopes/predictions here!

As a Bear, I think that we will score plenty of runs in the 4 day format but may struggle to bowl sides out. I'd like to see us to build on the progress that we've made in the limited overs game under Giles.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 16, 2010, 09:14:54 AM
I have high hopes for Woakes but I'd feel happier having another fast bowler in there.

I predict a solid if unspectacular season for the Bears.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on February 16, 2010, 09:17:34 AM
What Mazrim said.

Hopes?

To actually see a days play without rain when England play the Aussies!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 16, 2010, 09:27:26 AM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
What Mazrim said.

Hopes?

To actually see a days play without rain when England play the Aussies!


To see a full day without rain regardless of opposition surely Bazz?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OzVilla on February 16, 2010, 10:03:31 AM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
What Mazrim said.

Hopes?

To actually see a days play without rain when England play the Aussies!


Villasub, I suggest you Google 'Australian Cricket Family' as you'll need to join (it's free) if you want to get tickets - it'll be a ballot again so you need to have joined this and have an address Down Under.  Tickets on sale June/July I think.

The Aussies are getting paranoid about Poms buying up all the tickets.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Javu on February 16, 2010, 10:39:43 AM
Some good news for Afghanistan, who beat Ireland in the final of the qualifying event in Dubai to win entry into the ICC World Twenty20.

They also beat the USA on the way to the final.

Link (http://www.cricinfo.com/afghanistan/content/current/story/448435.html)
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on February 16, 2010, 11:56:39 AM
I predict Yorkshire will field the most English born players amongst all the counties but their leading run scorer by a mile will be a South African and it won't be enough to prevent them being relegated.

Adil Rashid will have a loss of form ater being treated shabbily by England in the winter.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on February 16, 2010, 12:57:29 PM
Derbyshire to flirt dangerously with promotion, only to let us all down at the last minute.  Again.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on February 16, 2010, 01:55:08 PM
I can't see the Bears doing too well, we have no bowlers.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: usav on February 16, 2010, 05:03:12 PM
Quote from: "ADVILLAFAN"
I can't see the Bears doing too well, we have no bowlers.


I could see how that would make things tricky.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 16, 2010, 05:06:38 PM
Bears only hope is a decent run in the Twenty20... less likely without Trott. Is Maddy likely to be fit this time round?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on February 16, 2010, 08:30:37 PM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"


Adil Rashid will have a loss of form ater being treated shabbily by England in the winter.


You have to wonder wha the selectors are playing at. Forthcoming tests against Bangladesh would have been ideal for him.

Instead, some of the older heads they've selected for this will probably feature once and get nowhere near selection again.

Pointless.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on February 17, 2010, 07:55:15 AM
Quote from: "OzVilla"
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
What Mazrim said.

Hopes?

To actually see a days play without rain when England play the Aussies!


Villasub, I suggest you Google 'Australian Cricket Family' as you'll need to join (it's free) if you want to get tickets - it'll be a ballot again so you need to have joined this and have an address Down Under.  Tickets on sale June/July I think.

The Aussies are getting paranoid about Poms buying up all the tickets.


Cheers for that Oz. I was hoping/aiming to get tickets through the Barmy Army - but they will only sell them as part of a package which would include accommodation. Unfortunately there isn't a "pikey backpacker in a dorm" option.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 17, 2010, 08:50:15 AM
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 17, 2010, 08:50:59 AM
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on February 17, 2010, 09:17:46 AM
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.


They don't travel in anything like the numbers we do so it's not really an issue. I reckon there were only about 300 hundred of them on the 2 days I was at Edgbaston last year.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on February 17, 2010, 10:16:54 AM
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.


They don't travel in anything like the numbers we do so it's not really an issue. I reckon there were only about 300 hundred of them on the 2 days I was at Edgbaston last year.


300 hundred is 30,000. I didn't see that many!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 17, 2010, 11:34:03 AM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
I predict Yorkshire will field the most English born players amongst all the counties but their leading run scorer by a mile will be a South African and it won't be enough to prevent them being relegated.

Adil Rashid will have a loss of form ater being treated shabbily by England in the winter.


He hasn't lost his form yet though, he's taken 3 - 13 off 3 overs for England Lions against the England first team.

Time for a run in the first team for Mr Rashid; they did the same with Broad in 2006 and it worked for him. Rashid has to be worth a punt especially with the world 20/20 around the corner.

Edit the first team have lost by 5 wickets to the Lions.

Oh dear
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 17, 2010, 02:21:11 PM
I definitely rate Rashid. Big future for him if he gets the right advice and coaching.

A leggy who can bat and field? Yes please.


Kieswetter is making a big case for the gloves. I can see him being ODI keeper very soon and pushing Prior hard for the test position too.
I'd certainly play him and Rashid in the 20/20 matches.


Trott
Kieswetter
Pietersen
Collingwood
Morgan
Wright
Rashid
Bresnan
Swann
Broad
Woakes
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on February 17, 2010, 02:29:49 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
I predict Yorkshire will field the most English born players amongst all the counties but their leading run scorer by a mile will be a South African and it won't be enough to prevent them being relegated.

Adil Rashid will have a loss of form ater being treated shabbily by England in the winter.


He hasn't lost his form yet though, he's taken 3 - 13 off 3 overs for England Lions against the England first team.

Time for a run in the first team for Mr Rashid; they did the same with Broad in 2006 and it worked for him. Rashid has to be worth a punt especially with the world 20/20 around the corner.

Edit the first team have lost by 5 wickets to the Lions.

Oh dear


He should be allowed time to learn his trade in county cricket rather than pushed into Test cricket before he's ready. He has talent but he's still a relative novice and in any case are you going to drop our best bowler this winter to accomodate him?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on February 17, 2010, 02:34:50 PM
I'm a big fan of Rashid but have said all along he needs another season or two playing for Yorkshire. He is a genuine allrounder, his fieldings excellent.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on February 17, 2010, 03:01:49 PM
Bears definitely still need another bowler.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 17, 2010, 04:32:28 PM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
I definitely rate Rashid. Big future for him if he gets the right advice and coaching.

A leggy who can bat and field? Yes please.


Kieswetter is making a big case for the gloves. I can see him being ODI keeper very soon and pushing Prior hard for the test position too.
I'd certainly play him and Rashid in the 20/20 matches.


Trott
Kieswetter
Pietersen
Collingwood
Morgan
Wright
Rashid
Bresnan
Swann
Broad
Woakes


I like the look of that side, even though it is 25% South African!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 17, 2010, 09:08:52 PM
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.


They don't travel in anything like the numbers we do so it's not really an issue. I reckon there were only about 300 hundred of them on the 2 days I was at Edgbaston last year.


That's their fault not ours. Why should England fans who passionately want to watch their team be penalised because the Ossies can't be arsed? It's just an extension of the disgraceful White Australia Policy. A bunch of bigots who hate foreigners should not be tolerated.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: villaross on February 18, 2010, 03:31:06 AM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "Mazrim"
I definitely rate Rashid. Big future for him if he gets the right advice and coaching.

A leggy who can bat and field? Yes please.


Kieswetter is making a big case for the gloves. I can see him being ODI keeper very soon and pushing Prior hard for the test position too.
I'd certainly play him and Rashid in the 20/20 matches.


Trott
Kieswetter
Pietersen
Collingwood
Morgan
Wright
Rashid
Bresnan
Swann
Broad
Woakes


I like the look of that side, even though it is 25% South African!


25% of our side has always been South African so there is no change there!!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on February 18, 2010, 09:34:50 AM
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.


They don't travel in anything like the numbers we do so it's not really an issue. I reckon there were only about 300 hundred of them on the 2 days I was at Edgbaston last year.


That's their fault not ours. Why should England fans who passionately want to watch their team be penalised because the Ossies can't be arsed? It's just an extension of the disgraceful White Australia Policy. A bunch of bigots who hate foreigners should not be tolerated.


Perhaps we should send a couple of gunboats into Sydney harbour to remind them who is in charge.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on February 18, 2010, 11:20:52 AM
Quote from: "villaross"

25% of our side has always been South African so there is no change there!!


Evidently the jokedoing the rounds amongst the South African press during the last tour was ' Where will the England players spend xmas day? Visiting their family.'
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on February 19, 2010, 12:46:56 AM
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Its pathetic how we give the convicts as many tickets as they like while they try to limit ours. We should just refuse to play and keep the Ashes forever.


They don't travel in anything like the numbers we do so it's not really an issue. I reckon there were only about 300 hundred of them on the 2 days I was at Edgbaston last year.


That's their fault not ours. Why should England fans who passionately want to watch their team be penalised because the Ossies can't be arsed? It's just an extension of the disgraceful White Australia Policy. A bunch of bigots who hate foreigners should not be tolerated.


Perhaps we should send a couple of gunboats into Sydney harbour to remind them who is in charge.


Tis the only way they will learn, bloody foreigners! Oophs I've contradicted my own post!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 19, 2010, 08:48:18 AM
Did anyone catch the last session in the India - South Africa test yesterday?

SA's last 3 batsmen lasted 50 + overs between and Harbhajan Singh took the final wicket with 9 balls left to wrap up an innings victory. Amla batted for 499 minutes and scored 123.

It was fascinating Test Cricket.

It can only be good for Test Cricket that the Indian public have woken up to the fact that they are top of the Test rankings. One day and Twenty20 in particular was in danger of relegating the longer form to minor status. The wealth of the Indian board makes them the global powerhouse in world cricket and following their World Twenty20 win and the creation of the IPL, test cricket was on its way out.

Now, enthusiasm is back and the crowds are returning to the Test matches.

They are a wonderful team and a delight to watch. I hope that they remain in the forefront of Test cricket for a while yet.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on February 19, 2010, 02:41:08 PM
England going well in the 20/20 warm-up game against Pakistan.

Pakistan 39 for 4 off 8.3.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on February 19, 2010, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
England going well in the 20/20 warm-up game against Pakistan.

Pakistan 39 for 4 off 8.3.


England 25-3!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on February 19, 2010, 04:56:19 PM
KP and Morgan are smashing us to victory in the 20/20
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on February 19, 2010, 05:17:05 PM
Yep, very comfortable victory that.  Would be good to see Pietersen get into some sort of form before the tournament.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 19, 2010, 09:55:27 PM
Seeing South African Pietersen and Irish Morgan bring home the bacon made me a proud Englishman.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 23, 2010, 09:00:07 AM
Kieswetter has just smashed 140 odd in a one day warm up match. He's a run machine. At this rate, he'll be in the test team before long. I really like Matt Prior and he's improving with the gloves, but if Kieswetter carries on like this, who could deny him?

In any case, we've found an opening batsman in limited overs Cricket and maybe even test. Or our South African academy has. The pieces are starting to fall into place to make a really strong team. We could do with unearthing an express fast bowler now.
I had high hopes for Jordan from Surrey.

I wonder if the Saffers have any?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 23, 2010, 09:06:26 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
Kieswetter has just smashed 140 odd in a one day warm up match. He's a run machine. At this rate, he'll be in the test team before long. I really like Matt Prior and he's improving with the gloves, but if Kieswetter carries on like this, who could deny him?

In any case, we've found an opening batsman in limited overs Cricket and maybe even test. Or our South African academy has. The pieces are starting to fall into place to make a really strong team. We could do with unearthing an express fast bowler now.
I had high hopes for Jordan from Surrey.

I wonder if the Saffers have any?


Kieswetter has the potential to be a replacement for the much-mised Trescothick who we have never replaced in the short format of the game.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 23, 2010, 09:09:11 AM
Indeed. I was thinking exactly along those lines. He's played enough with the great man too.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on February 23, 2010, 09:38:25 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
We could do with unearthing an express fast bowler now.
I had high hopes for Jordan from Surrey.

I wonder if the Saffers have any?


Stuart Meaker (I think he's as Surrey as well). Only 19 and bowling at 90-95 mph already.

And guess what? He was born in Durban. (English parents though).
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 23, 2010, 09:59:38 AM
Oh for a death-bowler like Darren Gough!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 23, 2010, 12:12:22 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "Mazrim"
We could do with unearthing an express fast bowler now.
I had high hopes for Jordan from Surrey.

I wonder if the Saffers have any?


Stuart Meaker (I think he's as Surrey as well). Only 19 and bowling at 90-95 mph already.

And guess what? He was born in Durban. (English parents though).


Yes, he's been talked about for a while now. Fast but sloppy. But if you have the natural pace the rest can be worked on. I know a guy at Loughborough who has said he's the fastest bowler he's seen there. Heres hoping then. Hopefully Chris Jordan can push on too. If he decides not to play for the WIndies of course.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on February 24, 2010, 12:48:15 PM
Tendulkar's just become the first person to score 200 in a One Day International, awesome batting.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 24, 2010, 01:50:22 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Tendulkar's just become the first person to score 200 in a One Day International, awesome batting.


It was an awesome innings. 200 out of 401 - 3 in 50 overs. It confirms him, in my opinion, as the best batsman of his generation.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Ads on February 24, 2010, 01:50:35 PM
To be fair Keiswetter has an English mother, so it was always 50/50 anyway. But I do enjoy that its put Fatty Smith's nose out of joint again.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on February 24, 2010, 01:52:48 PM
Quote from: "Ads"
To be fair Keiswetter has an English mother, so it was always 50/50 anyway. But I do enjoy that its put Fatty Smith's nose out of joint again.


To be strictly accurate she's Scottish, but we let them play for us at Cricket.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: peter w on February 24, 2010, 02:06:20 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Tendulkar's just become the first person to score 200 in a One Day International, awesome batting.


It was an awesome innings. 200 out of 401 - 3 in 50 overs. It confirms him, in my opinion, as the best batsman of his generation.


Hardly sticking your next out!

Probably best of all time.

Good list though: Bradman, Hobbs, Border, Gavaskar, Waugh S, Lara, Ponting
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 24, 2010, 02:31:01 PM
Quote from: "peter w"
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Tendulkar's just become the first person to score 200 in a One Day International, awesome batting.


It was an awesome innings. 200 out of 401 - 3 in 50 overs. It confirms him, in my opinion, as the best batsman of his generation.


Hardly sticking your next out!

Probably best of all time.

Good list though: Bradman, Hobbs, Border, Gavaskar, Waugh S, Lara, Ponting


Interesting to note that half of your list have played at the highest level during the last 10 years.

Has the game changed that much?

Tendulkar shades Waugh and Ponting as those two would never had to face the likes of McGrath or Warne. Lara was a sublime batsman but for me he never maintained the high standards that he set himself from 1993/1995. Gavaskar was a genius but was more effective on the dry Asian pitches. Border always reminded me of the David Platt of cricket, someone who made the most of his limited natural ability. Some ability, it has to be said!

Best of all time? I'm not sure. Bradman's test average at 99.94 has to place him at the top. If Eric Hollies had not bowled him 2nd ball of his last test innings then his average would have been over 100. That has to make him the best ever.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on February 24, 2010, 04:49:36 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"

Interesting to note that half of your list have played at the highest level during the last 10 years.

Has the game changed that much?


Yes it has, it's a batsman's game these days, pitches are generally flatter, the rules are skewed towards batting and whilst bat manufacturers can do almost whatever they want to improve bats, the ball is still exactly how it ever was.

I'm an advocate of some limited "ball tampering" being allowed, not picking the seam but roughing up the non-shiny side, just to redress the balance a bit.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on February 24, 2010, 05:00:22 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "Villan For Life"

Interesting to note that half of your list have played at the highest level during the last 10 years.

Has the game changed that much?


Yes it has, it's a batsman's game these days, pitches are generally flatter, the rules are skewed towards batting and whilst bat manufacturers can do almost whatever they want to improve bats, the ball is still exactly how it ever was.

I'm an advocate of some limited "ball tampering" being allowed, not picking the seam but roughing up the non-shiny side, just to redress the balance a bit.


So an Afridi bite is out of the question?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Ads on February 24, 2010, 05:01:14 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "Villan For Life"

Interesting to note that half of your list have played at the highest level during the last 10 years.

Has the game changed that much?


Yes it has, it's a batsman's game these days, pitches are generally flatter, the rules are skewed towards batting and whilst bat manufacturers can do almost whatever they want to improve bats, the ball is still exactly how it ever was.

I'm an advocate of some limited "ball tampering" being allowed, not picking the seam but roughing up the non-shiny side, just to redress the balance a bit.


So an Afridi bite is out of the question?


What about an Afridi shuffle down the middle of the track?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 02, 2010, 03:31:16 PM
Great ODI game England v Bangladesh, went down to the wire.

Excellent performance by Morgan - 110 off 104 to guide us to a 2 wicket victory.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 02, 2010, 03:33:50 PM
Fabulous knock from Morgan.  Some witless batting from the lower order turned what should have been a routine win into a nailbiter.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 02, 2010, 03:40:23 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
Fabulous knock from Morgan.  Some witless batting from the lower order turned what should have been a routine win into a nailbiter.


Indeed, some truly awful batting.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: exiled on the wirral! on March 02, 2010, 04:10:11 PM
England made hard work of that, Morgan looks a good acquisition in the middle order, another failure by Pieterson though is a big worry, he is lacking consistency and looks well out of sorts. Bangladesh look a half decent one day team, with a couple of useful players especially the captain and the opener who got a hundred the other day.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 03, 2010, 12:55:02 PM
Ive never seen so many decent batsmen play around straight deliveries before. But yes, a fabulous knock from Morgan. He really is a cool customer. Once Kieswetter settles down and KP is back in form, plus the return of Anderson and Flintoff, that will be some ODI/T20 team.
I dont see why Treadwell is getting in ahead of Rashid though. I think that will change soon enough though.

I like the look of Finn, Woakes and Taylor too. So there's plenty of talent emerging. We just need that one (or two) express fast bowler(s) to come through. hopefully Meeker and Jordan will come up trumps.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on March 04, 2010, 11:54:13 PM
West Indies lose to Zimbabwe at home.

Cracking finish... Windies needed 15 off last over with three wickets left.

Four...Six...One...Wicket...Wicket...Two

Zimabwe win by two.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 10, 2010, 11:35:00 AM
The ongoing farce that is Pakistan cricket has reached a new low.

Following their recent nightmare tour of Australia where they lost 9 out of 9 internationals, the Pakistani board has got tough.  Apparently the team was doing more fighting internally than it was on the pitch.

Mohammad Yousuf and Younis Khan have been deemed the ringleaders and have been banned from appearing for Pakistan for life.  So there go 40 test match hundreds in one fell swoop.

Rana Naved and Shoaib Malik have been banned for a year.

Shahid Afridi, Kamran Akmal and Umar Akmal have been put on probation for 6 months.

I suspect this isn't the end of it and it'll rumble on until they all get cleared to play against England in the summer.  But if not then the series could be very one sided indeed.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chico Hamilton III on March 10, 2010, 11:52:41 AM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
 I suspect this isn't the end of it and it'll rumble on until they all get cleared to play against England in the summer. But if not then the series could be very one sided indeed.


Hope not - I've got tickets for the Oval test in August
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 10, 2010, 12:21:45 PM
After the disaster which was their last tour of England. Are Holland their footballing equivalent?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on March 10, 2010, 12:26:34 PM
Never again will I watch a game against them after being surrounded by racist gobshites for the day at Edgbaston last time they were here.

I am amazed a riot didn't break out in the Eric Hollies.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 10, 2010, 01:34:12 PM
Quote from: "cheltenhamlion"
Never again will I watch a game against them after being surrounded by racist gobshites for the day at Edgbaston last time they were here.

I am amazed a riot didn't break out in the Eric Hollies.


Who was being racist? England or Pakistani fans or both?
Its usually good banter and good natured at Edgbaston and the Eric Hollies in particular.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on March 10, 2010, 01:41:51 PM
Pakistan.

I can only speak for our section but the majority of guys supporting them by us were aged 15-30 and looking to antagonise anyone that they could.

I sure as shit don't expect an Asian lad in an England shirt to be threatened with physical violence for doing so and nor do I find it acceptable to be accused of being a murderer by some ****** in a Saddam Hussein mask for celebrating Afridi losing his wicket.

We also had people running down aisles to try and throw their flags over England fans and blowing those fucking irritating horns two inches away from people's faces.

Like I said, never again.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 10, 2010, 02:02:06 PM
You shouldn't let twats like that deter you from watching a game. I would have handed out some slaps had I seen what you did though. Its not... Cricket.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 11, 2010, 08:18:09 PM
Quote from: "cheltenhamlion"
Never again will I watch a game against them after being surrounded by racist gobshites for the day at Edgbaston last time they were here.

I am amazed a riot didn't break out in the Eric Hollies.


There is a nasty violent undercurrent when they the opposition. It is the only test that I refuse to go to.

It really does produce extremities in crowd atmosphere and behaviour.

It's the total opposite to the Indian tests where the atmosphere is less threatening.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 11, 2010, 08:23:38 PM
Anybody else going to get up early tomorrow for the first test? I might get up in time for the afternoon session. It looks like one of Kieswetter or Morgan will make his Test debut. And Tredwell.

If Kieswetter opens with Cook, Trott 3, KP 4, Colly 5 and Bell 6.

Or Cook, Trott, Bell, KP, Colly, Morgan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 12, 2010, 05:56:44 AM
Cook, Carberry, Trott, KP, Colly, Bell, Prior, Broad, Bresnan, Swann, Finn

Lots of batting to protect KP? Only one spinner...

We're batting & it's 104 for 1 at lunch, a comfortable enough start.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on March 12, 2010, 09:45:08 AM
KP the div is out on 99. Still, 319/3 with Cook on 137 is a healthy place to be.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on March 12, 2010, 10:45:26 AM
Cook still there at the end of the day and a Run Rate of 4.15.

About 374/3 (I forgot the actual score).
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on March 12, 2010, 12:36:48 PM
Good days play then. Ideally we bat them out of the game in one innings and finish this early.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: DBTW on March 12, 2010, 01:56:58 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Quote from: "cheltenhamlion"
Never again will I watch a game against them after being surrounded by racist gobshites for the day at Edgbaston last time they were here.

I am amazed a riot didn't break out in the Eric Hollies.


There is a nasty violent undercurrent when they the opposition. It is the only test that I refuse to go to.
It really does produce extremities in crowd atmosphere and behaviour.

It's the total opposite to the Indian tests where the atmosphere is less threatening.


Same here, although the Bangladesh series will prove similar in my opinion.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 12, 2010, 02:04:23 PM
I watched the afternoon session and there was no atmosphere, it was like a practice match. We took advantage of some slack bowling and bored fielders.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on March 12, 2010, 03:30:00 PM
I have a feeling that Bangladesh only play Test Matches because they have to in order to keep their Test status so they can play in all the big one-day tournaments without qualifying.

They aren't interested at all.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on March 12, 2010, 07:30:58 PM
The encouraging thing about Pietersen was that he seems to have found a way of getting his front leg out of the way against the left arm spinner. He'll be alright now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 12, 2010, 09:13:35 PM
I feel sorry for Bangladesh because they have an entire team who is having to learn how to play Test cricket on the job.  It's difficult enough for an individual player to do it - Flintoff, for instance, or Stuart Broad - but for all eleven to have to do it at the same time is an almost impossible task.

They were given Test status far too early of course but I suppose some bright spark at the ICC thought there was a market there and that Bangladesh would add more power to the South Asian bloc.

Which is all well and good but at the moment they show no real signs of improvement.  I think they should be persevered with though - a number of other nations took ages to get going in Tests but are now competitive at least.

Trouble is, Tests against Bangladesh are rapidly becoming the 'Burnley at home' matches of cricket, where sides rest a few and blood a few*.  Which makes Bangladesh's inevitable crushing defeat even more dispiriting.  And for the top sides, all the players are on a hiding to nothing: if they score big it's only because it's Bangladesh; if they fail they can't even do it against Bangladesh.  Carberry's 30 isn't going to do him much good and he probably won't get another knock in this game.


* Apart from Villa, naturally.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: sali,salifou on March 12, 2010, 09:20:40 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
I feel sorry for Bangladesh because they have an entire team who is having to learn how to play Test cricket on the job.  It's difficult enough for an individual player to do it - Flintoff, for instance, or Stuart Broad - but for all eleven to have to do it at the same time is an almost impossible task.

They were given Test status far too early of course but I suppose some bright spark at the ICC thought there was a market there and that Bangladesh would add more power to the South Asian bloc.

Which is all well and good but at the moment they show no real signs of improvement.  I think they should be persevered with though - a number of other nations took ages to get going in Tests but are now competitive at least.

Trouble is, Tests against Bangladesh are rapidly becoming the 'Burnley at home' matches of cricket, where sides rest a few and blood a few*.  Which makes Bangladesh's inevitable crushing defeat even more dispiriting.  And for the top sides, all the players are on a hiding to nothing: if they score big it's only because it's Bangladesh; if they fail they can't even do it against Bangladesh.  Carberry's 30 isn't going to do him much good and he probably won't get another knock in this game.


* Apart from Villa, naturally.


When the hell are we playing bangladesh?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 13, 2010, 08:26:54 AM
27 for 2 at tea on the second day, chasing 599!

Stort the cor.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 13, 2010, 09:48:14 AM
The Kookaburra ball has gone soft and our attack is not looking too threatening on such a flat pitch. Let's hope it starts reverse swinging soon.

That said I think that the Bangladeshi batsmen lack the application to build an innings and when wickets come they will come in clusters.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on March 13, 2010, 10:04:18 AM
They are playing like it's a one-dayer. It's quite entertaining.
Should have picked a second spinner.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: sali,salifou on March 13, 2010, 10:47:31 AM
We didnt need to play 6 specialist batsman as well as prior, broad and swann. Depressingly negative
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OldUser on March 13, 2010, 11:50:50 AM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"

Trouble is, Tests against Bangladesh are rapidly becoming the 'Burnley at home' matches of cricket, where sides rest a few and blood a few*.  
* Apart from Villa, naturally.


Jesus wept, you just can't help yourself, can you?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 13, 2010, 12:15:18 PM
Quote from: "IanB"
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"

Trouble is, Tests against Bangladesh are rapidly becoming the 'Burnley at home' matches of cricket, where sides rest a few and blood a few*.  
* Apart from Villa, naturally.


Jesus wept, you just can't help yourself, can you?


What?  For God's sake, strap on a pair.  You have the sensitivity of a schoolgirl.  What was so offensive about that?  Did we actually rotate or am I just not allowed to mention it?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OldUser on March 13, 2010, 12:16:59 PM
EDIT: My apologies to hilts.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 13, 2010, 01:08:26 PM
Quote from: "IanB"
Fuck off you offensive prick.


I imagine the irony of that remark is lost on you.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: sali,salifou on March 13, 2010, 01:58:08 PM
Now come on guys that not cricket
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on March 13, 2010, 09:01:00 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
Quote from: "IanB"
Fuck off you offensive prick.


I imagine the irony of that remark is lost on you.


Not on me though. It's similar to what you posted the other week.

Do I win a prize?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 13, 2010, 09:08:42 PM
Quote from: "Percy"
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
Quote from: "IanB"
Fuck off you offensive prick.


I imagine the irony of that remark is lost on you.


Not on me though. It's similar to what you posted the other week.

Do I win a prize?


You can have a pat on the back from yourself, and not for the first time.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on March 13, 2010, 09:12:36 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
Quote from: "Percy"
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
Quote from: "IanB"
Fuck off you offensive prick.


I imagine the irony of that remark is lost on you.


Not on me though. It's similar to what you posted the other week.

Do I win a prize?


You can have a pat on the back from yourself, and not for the first time.


Haha, well done - more irony!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on March 13, 2010, 09:16:53 PM
Pack it in everyone, please.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 14, 2010, 07:41:21 AM
Three wickets in 5 minutes; that's the way to wrap up an innings. Bangladesh were scoring quite freely then a great runout thanks to Carberry, a fantastic reaction catch from Tredwell and Swann slid one down. Three wickets in 4 balls.

Not sure about us batting now. I suppose it gives the bowlers a rest, but we could always turn to KP, Colly or Trott for a bit.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 14, 2010, 07:50:21 AM
Back to the theme of the thread......

Great finish to the Bangladeshi innings. 295 - 7 to 296 all out in no time.

No follow on though which I find strange when your lead is 300 +. The seamers have been reasonably well rotated and should be fresh.

It used to be that the follow was always enforced with the only exception when a member of the attack was injured. Seems to me that there is a movement away from enforcing the follow on. Following on strikes me as much as a psychological move as a cricketing one. A victory by an innings really hammers home the gulf between the teams in that particular match and can set the tone for an entire series.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 14, 2010, 08:07:33 AM
I suppose if we can score 150-170 by lunch tomorrow they'll have 5 sessions to get 450+

I'd rather have fielded again and then knocked any score IF they'd gone past us. The bowlers can rest after the match!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: villajk on March 14, 2010, 09:46:01 PM
Quote from: "cheltenhamlion"
Never again will I watch a game against them after being surrounded by racist gobshites for the day at Edgbaston last time they were here.

I am amazed a riot didn't break out in the Eric Hollies.


A fight broke out around us, between pakistani supporters, and one lot got thrown out.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on March 15, 2010, 12:07:28 AM
Have Warwickshire signed anyone exciting for the new season? I'm guessing... no.

Anyone know if Maddy will be fit this year?

I will settle for staying up in the Championship and a decent run in the Twenty20. We look shit.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 15, 2010, 11:21:48 PM
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Have Warwickshire signed anyone exciting for the new season? I'm guessing... no.

Anyone know if Maddy will be fit this year?

I will settle for staying up in the Championship and a decent run in the Twenty20. We look shit.


The Bears have signed Imran Tahir the Pakistani leggie as their overseas player and also Varun Chopra the Essex opener.

Maddy is fit but has sustained a bad facial injury in the nets that will require surgery.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/counties/warwickshire/8567712.stm
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on March 15, 2010, 11:24:48 PM
Hope Maddy makes a speedy recovery. Any idea if Messrs Tahir and Chopra are any good? Must say, I would like it if we would occasionally sign a household name. Has Martin O'Neill taken over?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 15, 2010, 11:33:11 PM
Chopra is an ex-England under 19 captain whose career seems to have stalled a little. Hopefully the change of county will help him.

Tahir has a reasonable county record. He played a couple of seasons for Hampshire and got 90 - odd wickets, including as I recall 40-odd in about 6 matches in 1998.

I think that the days of showpiece signings in county cricket are long gone. International teams play all year round and so the top players will only come for a few weeks 20/20. There's no point in signing players on the verge of the England team as you will lose them to central contracts.

As for the Bears, another season of consolidation but Trott will leave a huge gap in the batting.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on March 15, 2010, 11:35:23 PM
Fair enough. I'm hoping for the best anyway. I predict Woakes will be a star... then bloody England will nab him and the season will fizzle out.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 16, 2010, 07:29:30 AM
England won by 181 runs. 10 wickets for Swann, the first time for an English spinner in the subcontinent. Two spinners in the second test?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 16, 2010, 08:32:27 AM
Couldn't believe my eyes when I got up this morning and saw Bangladesh still batting.
At least we wont take them lightly again and they're definitely improving.

Rashid should be there. They started introducing him to the England set up in T20, when bowlers are on a hiding to nothing and then, when he has the chance to go to the sub continent where he'd be most effective, they dont pick him. Or his replacement. Harsh I think.

Tredwell is decent enough but Rashid offers more dimensions and variety.
But hey ho, its not going to happen now. So its Tredwell for the next test and a batsman will miss out. When you have a "tail" of Bresnan, Broad and Swann you dont need to pick 6 batsmen plus Prior. Who msses out though?

I'd go:

Cook
Trott
Pietersen
Collingwood
Bell
Prior
Broad
Swann
Bresnan
Tredwell
Finn

Harsh on Carberry perhaps but I think Trott is the better player.
I like the look of Finn and have done for a year or so now. He's going to be a handful on a livelier pitch (basically any other pitch). He should put on a few yards of pace as he gets a bit older too so I expect him to be exceeding 90mph regularly when he's 22/23.

The other option is to play Wright (or Shahzad) if they're not going play Tredwell. Lengthens the batting and a genuine 5th bowling option.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on March 16, 2010, 09:01:22 AM
Tredwell will start the next game.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on March 16, 2010, 09:39:22 AM
Quote
Rashid should be there. They started introducing him to the England set up in T20, when bowlers are on a hiding to nothing and then, when he has the chance to go to the sub continent where he'd be most effective, they dont pick him. Or his replacement. Harsh I think.


I don't like the idea of rushing youg players into the international setup too soon. They need to play a few years of county cricket to hone their skills and become more street wise. That's why Swann is so much better now than when he was first picked.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 17, 2010, 06:17:32 PM
I think Rashid has played enough county cricket. But I take your point. Although sometimes we wait too long to blood players at the highest level.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 17, 2010, 08:29:09 PM
I think a worse problem and one, for the most part, we avoid these days was picking a player for one or two tests against strong opposition and then discarding them.

The number of talented players that were tried against the West Indies and Australia in the 80s and 90s only to be discarded after their initial failure is shocking.  As if failure on debut against arguably the two most dominant teams in Test cricket history is reliable evidence of a player's ability.

Admittedly a few of them were bad picks and a few were persevered with (notably Gooch, Atherton and Flintoff) but overall the management, such as it was, of the England side in the 1980s and early 90s was disgraceful.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on March 18, 2010, 06:56:51 PM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
 Rashid should be there. They started introducing him to the England set up in T20, when bowlers are on a hiding to nothing and then, when he has the chance to go to the sub continent where he'd be most effective, they dont pick him. Or his replacement. Harsh I think.
 


Agree, Swann and Rashid should be the spin options. I'd have also taken a punt on Monty and included him in the squad, though in truth his form over the past 12 months (batting heroics at Cardiff aside) hardly merits it.

But he has test experience, and a track record of getting some of the very best batsmen in trouble. Batsmen get cuter, and might work out plans to ounter that, true. But you surely don't lose all that natural ability and accuracy.

Hard to know just why his star has fallen so drastically, going from first choice spinner and indeed one of the first names on the teamsheet > not even considered for a trip to the Subcontinent.

Perhaps he just needs that one magic innings to get back in the groove.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 18, 2010, 07:13:19 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
I think a worse problem and one, for the most part, we avoid these days was picking a player for one or two tests against strong opposition and then discarding them.

The number of talented players that were tried against the West Indies and Australia in the 80s and 90s only to be discarded after their initial failure is shocking.  As if failure on debut against arguably the two most dominant teams in Test cricket history is reliable evidence of a player's ability.

Admittedly a few of them were bad picks and a few were persevered with (notably Gooch, Atherton and Flintoff) but overall the management, such as it was, of the England side in the 1980s and early 90s was disgraceful.


Mind you, the Ozzies have given a lot of debuts in the last twelve months.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on March 18, 2010, 10:13:39 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
I think a worse problem and one, for the most part, we avoid these days was picking a player for one or two tests against strong opposition and then discarding them.

The number of talented players that were tried against the West Indies and Australia in the 80s and 90s only to be discarded after their initial failure is shocking.  As if failure on debut against arguably the two most dominant teams in Test cricket history is reliable evidence of a player's ability.

Admittedly a few of them were bad picks and a few were persevered with (notably Gooch, Atherton and Flintoff) but overall the management, such as it was, of the England side in the 1980s and early 90s was disgraceful.


Robin Smith? Discarded prematurely to say the least.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on March 18, 2010, 11:21:50 PM
Quote from: "cheltenhamlion"
Pakistan.

I can only speak for our section but the majority of guys supporting them by us were aged 15-30 and looking to antagonise anyone that they could.
I sure as shit don't expect an Asian lad in an England shirt to be threatened with physical violence for doing so and nor do I find it acceptable to be accused of being a murderer by some c*** in a Saddam Hussein mask for celebrating Afridi losing his wicket.

We also had people running down aisles to try and throw their flags over England fans and blowing those fucking irritating horns two inches away from people's faces.

Like I said, never again.

Sadly I can only endorse your comments. There is a breed who know f all about cricket but pay big money to turn up  at matches for some  dreadful nationalistic behaviour. They have a major chip on shoulder  problem and can be compared with  lo life footie fans.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on March 19, 2010, 11:40:38 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
I think a worse problem and one, for the most part, we avoid these days was picking a player for one or two tests against strong opposition and then discarding them.

The number of talented players that were tried against the West Indies and Australia in the 80s and 90s only to be discarded after their initial failure is shocking.  As if failure on debut against arguably the two most dominant teams in Test cricket history is reliable evidence of a player's ability.

Admittedly a few of them were bad picks and a few were persevered with (notably Gooch, Atherton and Flintoff) but overall the management, such as it was, of the England side in the 1980s and early 90s was disgraceful.


Robin Smith? Discarded prematurely to say the least.


Possibly, although his demise coincided with the re-emergence of quality spin in Test matches - which was his particular Achilles Heel.  

I say that as his biggest fan though.  When he made his debut against the West Indies in 1988, I remember being so glad that someone actually looked to be relishing the fight.  I remember one particularly good stand with Allan Lamb until Lamb tore a hamstring or something.  But it was brilliant while it lasted.

I saw some stats on cricinfo recently though about the first half of Robin Smith's Test career compared to the second; the extent to which his form fell away was considerable.

But those square cuts.  Never seen anyone before or since play the shot with as much power as that.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on March 20, 2010, 05:20:13 AM
Tredwell in, Carberry out but that's not the story here. What a crazy session. Somebody told Tamim Iqbal it was a T20. They were 108 for 1 off 15 overs, Swann went for 20 in one over and we had 5 fielders on the boundary!

125 for 3 now though.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 20, 2010, 07:50:16 AM
Quote from: "TimVilla"
Tredwell in, Carberry out but that's not the story here. What a crazy session. Somebody told Tamim Iqbal it was a T20. They were 108 for 1 off 15 overs, Swann went for 20 in one over and we had 5 fielders on the boundary!

125 for 3 now though.


Harsh on Carberry really but the need to play 2 spinners would outweigh it. I wonder what would have happened if KP had not got runs in the 1st test? Would they have gone with the extra batsman this time?

Update.......Finn back on after his 1st spell of 2-0-22-0 and takes a wicket with his 1st ball!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on March 31, 2010, 02:07:44 PM
The squad for the 20/20 World Cup has been announced.

No huge surprises but I do question the logic of taking the injury-prone Sidebottom. I think he has very quickly become yesterday's man.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on April 09, 2010, 03:04:27 PM
Warwickshire 165/7 against Yorkshire.

It will be a struggle for Yorkshire this season but pleased to see 10 of the starting line up are Yorkshire born players.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on April 09, 2010, 03:12:37 PM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
Warwickshire 165/7 against Yorkshire.

It will be a struggle for Yorkshire this season but pleased to see 10 of the starting line up are Yorkshire born players.


I doubt we'll get many opportunities to play both Bell and Trott so it's a disappointing start. Then again cricket on 9th April in England is mad.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on April 09, 2010, 03:58:09 PM
217 all out.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave P on April 09, 2010, 04:06:17 PM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
217 all out.


Pissflaps!

And we cant get the rollers out to help our seamers tomorrow so that was a great toss for your lot to win.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 09, 2010, 05:50:16 PM
The Bears are going to be shite this year. Despite being massively wealthy, they never sign anyone any good. I predict relegation, but hope I'm wrong.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on April 09, 2010, 07:50:58 PM
Never sign anybody any good?
Lara? Donald? Pollock? Sangakarra?

We havent signed the players we should have in the last two years though, granted.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 09, 2010, 08:47:17 PM
Ok, I meant recently - 'never' may have been an exaggeration. Sangakkara and Steyn were the last two good ones I remember.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on April 10, 2010, 08:51:27 AM
Central contracts and the IPL mean that the days of having a Lara, a Donald or a Pollock for a season are gone which is a real pity.

I'm not sure that the Bears will set the world alight this year but we should sit comfortably in mid-table. I'd like to see them improve in the one day formats because we've been poor here for a while now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on April 10, 2010, 10:26:12 AM
A lot will depend on the bowling of Woakes and the two Tahir's, we should be able to bat well enough (yes, yes, 217 all out, I know) but we might struggle to bowl teams out.
Mid-table seems fair enough, it would be nice to reach a cup final for once.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 11, 2010, 03:46:09 PM
Anyone else keeping an eye on the score on Cricinfo?

They have got an advert above asking "who will win the Champions League" next to pictures of Lionel Messi and... err... Wayne Rooney.

Ho ho ho.

281/7 lead of 224. All three results possible. Could be a good day's cricket tomorrow for anyone luck enough to have the day off work.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 11, 2010, 03:50:34 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Central contracts and the IPL mean that the days of having a Lara, a Donald or a Pollock for a season are gone which is a real pity.

I'm not sure that the Bears will set the world alight this year but we should sit comfortably in mid-table. I'd like to see them improve in the one day formats because we've been poor here for a while now.


Former Bear Sangakkara is playing for Lancs in the Twenty20, lots of other stars are in that competition too... Gilchrist, Razzaq, Afridi, Kaneria, Tait. We should've got a star in for the Twenty20 Cup.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on April 11, 2010, 06:34:02 PM
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Central contracts and the IPL mean that the days of having a Lara, a Donald or a Pollock for a season are gone which is a real pity.

I'm not sure that the Bears will set the world alight this year but we should sit comfortably in mid-table. I'd like to see them improve in the one day formats because we've been poor here for a while now.


Former Bear Sangakkara is playing for Lancs in the Twenty20, lots of other stars are in that competition too... Gilchrist, Razzaq, Afridi, Kaneria, Tait. We should've got a star in for the Twenty20 Cup.


Makes you wonder if the money is available for a showcase signing or has it been diverted to fund the ground redevelopment?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on April 11, 2010, 06:55:02 PM
That's what my brother was just saying, while I was moaning as usual!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on April 12, 2010, 10:43:30 AM
Reports are claiming that two Essex players are being investigated for "spot fixing" where bets are placed on elements of the match rather than the actual result.

Without speculating about identities, this could be a very bad time for the game. The Cronje saga has lead to many changes but if betting now happens on such tiny elements of an innings then where will it end? It would be very hard to police.

http://www.cricinfo.com/countycricket2010/content/current/story/455657.html
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on May 02, 2010, 07:59:52 PM
I wish Pakistan had taken 5 Australian wickets in the first over, not the last...
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 11:30:43 AM
Should be interesting against the Windies today. I think England have a chance in this tournament, depending on whether KP's wife goes into labour!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 03, 2010, 11:40:34 AM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Should be interesting against the Windies today. I think England have a chance in this tournament, depending on whether KP's wife goes into labour!


Interesting that the ECB will allow KP to fly home in the middle of a tournament, despite paying him £250,000 on a central contract.  I wonder if his £1m+ IPL deal had a similar get out clause?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on May 03, 2010, 03:20:23 PM
First ball duck v SA the other day & Bopara is in good nick. No loss! Or, as Collingwood said, it's only a 3 hour match!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 03, 2010, 05:22:54 PM
Quote from: "TopDeck113"


Interesting that the ECB will allow KP to fly home in the middle of a tournament, despite paying him £250,000 on a central contract.  


Okay so it's a fair whack of cash, but you don't think he should be allowed to go to the birth of his child?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 03, 2010, 05:26:44 PM
In any other job you're allowed paternal leave. Cricket is no different, of course he would want to there for the birth of his child.

Tell her to eat a curry and get on with it so he can be back for the Super Eights.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 03, 2010, 05:37:36 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "TopDeck113"


Interesting that the ECB will allow KP to fly home in the middle of a tournament, despite paying him £250,000 on a central contract.  


Okay so it's a fair whack of cash, but you don't think he should be allowed to go to the birth of his child?


No problem with him being there for the birth of his child, but as it happens, I don't actually think he should be playing in a tournament when at moment's notice he's going to be leaving his colleagues to continue without him.  

I also wonder whether his plan is to witness the birth and head straight back to the Caribbean.  The whole concept of paternity leave is for the father to support their partner in the first weeks and to bond with their child, not to head back to work as soon as he's finished fetching the hot water and the towels.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 03, 2010, 05:41:59 PM
Fair one TD, I see where you're coming from now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 03, 2010, 06:38:19 PM
They were just talking about this on TMS.  Michael Vaughn said he reckoned that if it had been anyone else they would have said "DOn't come on tour. stay at home" but Pietersen is so key that they'd rather have him for those games he's available and then lose him, than not have him there at all.  I think that's fair enough.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 03, 2010, 06:45:53 PM
30-0 after 3 overs. Not bad!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 03, 2010, 06:46:42 PM
Am I cursed? Lumb is out. 36-1.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:16:59 PM
Hmmm we are being pegged back here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:20:36 PM
Luke Wright is hammering on the breaks here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:40:25 PM
This is better now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:43:46 PM
This is now awesome.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 03, 2010, 07:49:09 PM
Wow! What an over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:53:34 PM
it was a great innings from Morgan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on May 03, 2010, 07:55:53 PM
Ridiculous player.

You can see the old GAA hurling moves in some of those strokes.

Not sure there is a place for that in test cricket, but great in a 20/20 tear up.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 07:57:09 PM
Wright came back really well.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 03, 2010, 07:59:58 PM
Great start, iffy middle, and great finish.  Which means we've ended up just about where we should have been, given the first six overs.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 08:14:21 PM
Awful start Sidebottom.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on May 03, 2010, 08:16:13 PM
Apparently we thought 150 would be a par score...

Gayle 15 off the first over. Yikes!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ozzjim on May 03, 2010, 09:40:45 PM
Not sure Duckworth Lewis fits 2020 so well. Looks like there will be a fairly chaseable target when play resumes, harsh on England after a good knock. Need Gayle out straight away.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 03, 2010, 09:52:11 PM
Agreed, it does seem to favour the Windies a bit.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 12:21:51 PM
Got to say Duckworth Lewis absolutley mugged us yesterday. We played really well and did not get rewarded. Now we have to beat Ireland today.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 04, 2010, 03:57:27 PM
Can we not have a seperate thread for the hit and run rubbish for people with ADD and keep this for us old gits that like proper cricket?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OCD on May 04, 2010, 05:23:49 PM
The rain could screw us up again today.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 04, 2010, 06:42:39 PM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
Can we not have a seperate thread for the hit and run rubbish for people with ADD and keep this for us old gits that like proper cricket?


We could stick Twenty20 into the baseball thread.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 04, 2010, 06:47:28 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
Can we not have a seperate thread for the hit and run rubbish for people with ADD and keep this for us old gits that like proper cricket?


We could stick Twenty20 into the baseball thread.


Great idea Dave.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 07:03:07 PM
Bloody hell this is poor at the moment.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 04, 2010, 07:16:54 PM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Bloody hell this is poor at the moment.


Of course it is.

I assume you mean the beach cricket?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 04, 2010, 07:20:20 PM
Making a right old mess of this.

49 for 4 off 9.4 overs.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 04, 2010, 07:23:20 PM
Jesus, we need the Irish fellow to save us. Nobody tell him who we're playing. Shhhhhh.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 07:30:34 PM
This is poor, but the pitch is really really dead.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 07:37:56 PM
Bloody hell.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 08:03:41 PM
Well 120 may not be terrible. Morgan well done.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 04, 2010, 08:04:39 PM
120!?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 08:05:36 PM
Quote from: "Legion"
120!?


pitch was horrible, but not great aside from Morgan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 08:07:24 PM
We need to use slow bowlers on this.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 04, 2010, 08:35:18 PM
Surprisingly Yorkshire continue to make a great start to the season, 313 for 3 on the first day against Essex.

Be good to have Bresnan and Shazhad back sooner than planned it seems.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 08:51:57 PM
what a catch!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 09:03:01 PM
Rain again
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 04, 2010, 09:11:02 PM
Is that good this time?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 04, 2010, 09:53:36 PM
Yes!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 09:58:58 PM
Good stuff, well that has levelled out for us we are through
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 04, 2010, 09:59:40 PM
Why don't they have reserve days? Ridiculous way for a group to be decided. While England were unlucky yesterday you have to feel a bit sorry for the Irish today. They might not have won but after restricting England to 120 they deserved to at least try.

Typical ICC farce.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 04, 2010, 10:06:56 PM
I don't see why it couldn't go later, why can't they play in the evening?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 05, 2010, 07:08:45 PM
Come on Bangladesh!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 05, 2010, 08:57:53 PM
Pakistan await on Thursday at 2pm.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 05, 2010, 08:58:32 PM
Yep not happy it's 2 pm really, but that goes for all our Super 8 games.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 06, 2010, 02:25:28 PM
England won the toss and are fielding.

Could be a good game this one.

"God save the Queen" being played on steel drums.  Fantastic.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 06, 2010, 02:30:26 PM
Sidebottom's first ball - the first of the match - goes for 6.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on May 06, 2010, 02:42:57 PM
Aside from the Internationals, Warwickshire have just gone into the lead with an unbroken century partnership between Westwood and Bell.

About time that Westwood scored some sodding runs.

Another 300 runs with these 9 wickets and we've got a chance!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 06, 2010, 02:45:11 PM
Meanwhile Yorkshire thankfully continue to prove my prediction of a long hard struggle this season by having Essex follow on and are now 226 runs behind with 7 wickets remaining. Hope the rain stays away.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 06, 2010, 03:40:49 PM
Villa fan Ian Bell looking good.

Lets hope Villa fan Craig Kieswetter is too.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 06, 2010, 03:53:35 PM
Westwood gone for 68.

Bell still there on 91.

167 for 2.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 06, 2010, 04:06:28 PM
Do i take it from the lack of updates on the silly cricket that England are struggling?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 06, 2010, 04:14:05 PM
Not really. We've bowled alright, a bit sloppy at times. Pakistan finished 147/9.

I'd fancy England to chase them on this track.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OCD on May 06, 2010, 05:21:15 PM
Been a bit lucky with some of their fielding but looks pretty routine otherwise.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 06, 2010, 05:42:14 PM
England win by 6 wickets with 3 balls to spare.

Made a bit of a meal of it but a good knock from Pietersen saw us home.  He's not even firing on all cylinders yet either.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on May 06, 2010, 06:09:52 PM
Warwickshire have now scored more in the 2nd innings than the first, with 7 wickets to go.

Draw is staring to look likely, well batted today.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 06, 2010, 07:35:51 PM
Great win that for England, Pietersen did very well. We  look good to me, if we get rid of Sidebottom and replace him with Anderson.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on May 06, 2010, 07:39:34 PM
Another excellent win for Yorkshire against some southern softies.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on May 06, 2010, 07:48:42 PM
South Africa have some amazing batsmen, not so sure about their bowling attack. Steyn is excellent, but the rest seem fairly average.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on May 07, 2010, 12:56:48 PM
Kent need 201 to win against Warwickshire going into their second innings.

Bit of a collapse from the Bears today, hopefully means that the pitch has deteriorated.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 07, 2010, 05:44:57 PM
Kent all out for 156.
Excellent.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on May 07, 2010, 05:45:23 PM
Kent 156 ao 2nd innings, 44 runs less than Wark's.

YOOOOOOOOUUUUUUU BEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRSSSS!!!!!!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 07, 2010, 06:06:39 PM
Only just caught up with this - fantastic result.

Chasing 201 to win, Kent were favourites at 113 for 3 so to bowl them out for just 156 is a terrific effort.

To bowl Kent out twice without any wickets from Neil Carter - our best bowler so far this season - is even more special.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 07, 2010, 06:55:58 PM
Great result. Things looking a lot healthier than a fortnight ago.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on May 07, 2010, 07:29:32 PM
Good work Bears.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 07, 2010, 09:00:21 PM
Phenomenal victory. Well done yooouuuuu Beeeeeaaaaars.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 05:26:25 PM
Come on England another dynamic display please.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 06:36:29 PM
Lumb gone in first over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 06:37:57 PM
Pietersen looks in great touch.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 06:42:20 PM
Kieswetter was out off a no ball, brilliant.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 06:56:06 PM
This is really really good!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 08, 2010, 06:56:50 PM
Currently 10+ an over. Superb stuff.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Bernie on May 08, 2010, 07:08:20 PM
Kallis & Botha putting the brakes on a bit , 12 in the last 3 overs
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: john e on May 08, 2010, 07:09:27 PM
yes, the South Africans are doing well
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 07:12:07 PM
6 out of the ground for KP!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 07:13:28 PM
brilliant 50 from KP.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 07:15:20 PM
out but brilliant effort.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 08, 2010, 07:15:29 PM
And then he's out....
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 07:23:08 PM
6's are coming again!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 07:57:16 PM
decent score, but lost some impetus towards the end.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 08, 2010, 08:02:41 PM
Hmm.  About 20 runs short of what we should have been looking at when KP and Kieswetter were in.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 08, 2010, 08:07:40 PM
Agreed, but I'd go for 30 or 40.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 08:26:28 PM
Good start by the bowlers.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 08:37:20 PM
Gibbs gone, big big wicket.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 08:44:18 PM
We should definately win from here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 08, 2010, 09:22:00 PM
Nelson strikes! Should win now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 09:35:08 PM
That was a brilliant all round display by England, we look very very good.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 08, 2010, 09:42:44 PM
Great effort.  I was worried about how our attack would fare against the Saffers but we bowled really well.  Sidebottom, who I reckoned would be the weak link, was superb.  3 for 23 off 4 overs against that batting line-up is a great return.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 08, 2010, 09:43:48 PM
From cricinfo.com:

"Breaking news Kevin Pietersen will return to the UK in the next 24 hours. It's baby time for KP! "Provided there are no complications he will return to the Caribbean in time for the semi-finals," according to the ECB."
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 08, 2010, 09:59:28 PM
Well hopefully he can be back for the semi's, because it is going to take an almighty thrashing from NZ now to put us out.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 08, 2010, 10:23:29 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"
From cricinfo.com:

"Breaking news Kevin Pietersen will return to the UK in the next 24 hours. It's baby time for KP! "Provided there are no complications he will return to the Caribbean in time for the semi-finals," according to the ECB."


Excellent timing. Well done Mrs P.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 08, 2010, 10:37:17 PM
Very good win by England. Bowlers must take the credit for this one but good all around.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 10, 2010, 05:48:01 PM
Right then, that's the Proteas gone!
Lets do the Beige boys good and proper then we can play the Crims in the final!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 06:10:24 PM
Well so we are through then, need to beat NZ to keep our momentum now.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 07:15:32 PM
Looking good again here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 07:29:03 PM
shocking captainacy and bowling by Sidebottom at the moment, just giving 2's every ball.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on May 10, 2010, 07:30:18 PM
I wish he would get his barnet sorted.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 07:41:31 PM
Sidebottom has been terrible today, so far.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 10, 2010, 08:04:29 PM
Great last over by Bresnan.  Only 7 from it.

150 to win.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 10, 2010, 08:07:50 PM
I think we may have allowed the Kiwis to score 20 too many!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 08:16:48 PM
Kieswetter is off. Great first over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 08:23:59 PM
and he's out.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 10, 2010, 08:28:47 PM
We just need to reach 119, win or lose...then we top the group and avoid the Crims in the semi's.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 08:47:24 PM
We are rocking a bit here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 08:53:26 PM
bad collapse here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 09:09:12 PM
Morgan really is very very good.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 09:25:58 PM
Well we are cruising here, we look like a really top side.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 09:29:10 PM
fine innings by Morgan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 10, 2010, 09:33:07 PM
This England (well Anglo-Irish-Boar) side is suddenly looking the business.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Breezeblock on May 10, 2010, 09:33:18 PM
what are they playing at? they could run four singles!!! pillocks!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Breezeblock on May 10, 2010, 09:37:29 PM
there we go. Our antipodeans have kicked the shit out of their antipodeans.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 10, 2010, 09:39:20 PM
Like I said we look a very very good side, especially with KP back in.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 10, 2010, 09:39:43 PM
Get in!!  Important that we won that to keep the momentum going.

Good knock from Bresnan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 10, 2010, 09:46:04 PM
Are Eng...Ahem...England on a roll here?

So Sri Lanka or the Windies. I fancy it will be Sri Lanka but what do i know!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 10, 2010, 10:21:41 PM
KP's wife has had a baby boy so KP should be back in time to play in the semi-final.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 11, 2010, 09:25:08 PM
Looks like Sri Lanka in semi's then.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on May 11, 2010, 10:48:47 PM
Windies can't be bothered.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 12:35:27 PM
Should be home for most of this semi final, so looking forward to it. It'd be great if we could win this tournament, we have shown real intent.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on May 13, 2010, 12:36:59 PM
I am stuck in the office until at least 5pm which is a bit of a bitch.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on May 13, 2010, 12:39:09 PM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Should be home for most of this semi final, so looking forward to it. It'd be great if we could win this tournament, we have shown real intent.


We have but so have the Aussies.

I'm going out this evening from work but hoping the pub has it on, will give me a good excuse not to talk to anyone.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on May 13, 2010, 04:46:49 PM
3 wins in a row in the Championship for Gloucestershire.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:08:45 PM
Well that's an excellent effort to keep Sri Lanka down to 128. Now bat well England, please!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:22:14 PM
don't like all these spinners.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:25:45 PM
good over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:30:55 PM
Kieswetter not given out when he should be dead out! and then hits a six!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:48:11 PM
great stuff from England here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 06:51:09 PM
Kieswetter gone, but did a great job.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 13, 2010, 06:59:03 PM
Excellent again from England so far. Helped by some dreadful Sri Lankan fielding, something which I doubt Australia will be guilty of, but we look very, very good at the moment.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 07:04:20 PM
Huge six KP
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TopDeck113 on May 13, 2010, 07:37:31 PM
Great win.  

It's amazing how all of a sudden we're a force in Twenty20
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on May 13, 2010, 07:40:30 PM
Job done.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: john e on May 13, 2010, 08:11:07 PM
Any one else think Nick Knight as a pundit is a Toss Basket
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 13, 2010, 08:55:03 PM
Top top performance, plus if Australia get to the final they will come at us with pace and that is what we play best.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 13, 2010, 08:59:37 PM
Quote from: "john e"
Any one else think Nick Knight as a pundit is a Toss Basket


No and how dare you speak of a Bear legend in such terms.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on May 13, 2010, 10:33:46 PM
Quote from: "john e"
Any one else think Nick Knight as a pundit is a Toss Basket



Asked a question it's a long pause, pull a face like he is squeezing out a massive turd and then make whatever he is saying sound as negative as he can. I would guess it's down to all the time he spent amongst Brummies.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 14, 2010, 01:25:49 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
Quote from: "john e"
Any one else think Nick Knight as a pundit is a Toss Basket


No and how dare you speak of a Bear legend in such terms.


I agree. Knight's a Bear superstar who we never really replaced. I tend to like pretty much all the cricket pundits / commentators. Bumbe's probably my favourite. This is in contrast with the football commentators who are just about all utter shite.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: john e on May 14, 2010, 08:58:25 AM
Quote from: "cdvillafan"
Quote from: "Mazrim"
Quote from: "john e"
Any one else think Nick Knight as a pundit is a Toss Basket


No and how dare you speak of a Bear legend in such terms.


I agree. Knight's a Bear superstar who we never really replaced. I tend to like pretty much all the cricket pundits / commentators. Bumbe's probably my favourite. This is in contrast with the football commentators who are just about all utter shite.



i agree,  most of the cricket pundits are listenable, that is why i picked out Knight, he might have been a good player etc,

 but as a pundit he just tries to hard, i dont find him easy listening
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 14, 2010, 05:40:39 PM
Australia are taking a bit of a battering here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 14, 2010, 06:30:34 PM
If they win this one  192 runs ..well I will hate them even more!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 14, 2010, 06:43:32 PM
Well well looks like the aussies can't handle the pressure.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: bob on May 14, 2010, 08:13:25 PM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Well well looks like the aussies can't handle the pressure.


Incredible finish.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 14, 2010, 08:13:26 PM
Quote from: "aftab235"
If they win this one  192 runs ..well I will hate them even more!


Wow. What a finish!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Warren Aspinall on May 14, 2010, 08:20:34 PM
The perfect final, the two best teams overall will be doing battle.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: The Man With A Stick on May 14, 2010, 08:23:11 PM
Belting game that.  It'd be much sweeter hammering the Aussies in the final, so I'm happy.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: LionVilla on May 14, 2010, 10:39:57 PM
Aussies will not win on Sunday. Today's game took a lot out of them. (Hopefully)
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 14, 2010, 10:41:24 PM
That was just astonishing, 6646 to win the game! Wow.

I'm not actually a massive fan of this baseball cricket stuff being a Test Match purist at heart, but that was impressive.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 15, 2010, 12:01:08 PM
Fucking useless Pakistan cost me a tenner, even Scotland could have seen that last over out. Have a feeling the Aussies are destined to win it now.

Still, Bears won again. ** smiley chap **
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on May 16, 2010, 04:26:54 PM
Come on England!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OCD on May 16, 2010, 04:40:31 PM
7-2 1.5 overs
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OCD on May 16, 2010, 04:42:20 PM
8-3 - Come On!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on May 16, 2010, 04:42:31 PM
Feck me, 8-3!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 16, 2010, 04:48:35 PM
Quote from: "LionVilla"
Aussies will not win on Sunday. Today's game took a lot out of them. (Hopefully)


Could be hell of a prediction based on 10-3 at the moment.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 16, 2010, 04:59:51 PM
Fantastic bowling and fielding so far.

Hussey still in though, this ain't over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 16, 2010, 05:08:24 PM
Yes Hussey's... Dave  in and Micheal to follow however all his luck was used up in the semi!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave on May 16, 2010, 05:39:01 PM
White gone.

Now for the Husseys.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 16, 2010, 05:40:29 PM
Good bottle from Broad, dropped one but held his nerve.

This is great fun.

The Aussies are going to go for it in the last three overs but I reckon we can chase down anything less than 150.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: bobcat on May 16, 2010, 05:42:44 PM
I agree, keep them to 130/140 and we have a chance here.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 16, 2010, 05:46:09 PM
M. Hussey looking good again though - the bastard.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 16, 2010, 05:47:39 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
M. Hussey looking good again though - the bastard.


Dave stop stereotyping Aussies!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave on May 16, 2010, 05:49:00 PM
Cracker of a shot there.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: bobcat on May 16, 2010, 06:01:06 PM
This is going to be a tough total to chase. It's gonna be squeaky bum time later.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: richard moore on May 16, 2010, 06:04:38 PM
Game on. Got to walk the dogs in the break!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on May 16, 2010, 06:07:24 PM
Would prefer if they'd got 20 runs less, which isn't totally unrealistic based on their start.

That little cameo from White and a solid knock from the other Hussey could yet turn out to be match-winning contributions.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on May 16, 2010, 07:29:05 PM
Don't screw it now lads.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on May 16, 2010, 07:41:48 PM
Well done England.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mike Jeffries on May 16, 2010, 07:42:17 PM
Blimey, that was an impressive win.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Legion on May 16, 2010, 07:43:29 PM
Nice one.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on May 16, 2010, 07:43:58 PM
Bloody fantastic.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Andy Poole on May 16, 2010, 07:45:56 PM
Bloody brilliant!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Fin Feds Dad on May 16, 2010, 08:07:08 PM
Get in there !  One thing I would love to do is watch the cricket abroad - either west indies or the Ashes in Australia.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 16, 2010, 08:19:01 PM
Was up the pub with the old man, brilliant. Basically we demolished them like we have pretty much everyone. We deserved to win. Broad, Sidebottom, Kieswetter and Pietersen were magnificent. It was absolutely brilliant.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on May 16, 2010, 08:20:03 PM
Superb effort well done lads.

Bears and Scotland won too so overall a great day's cricket.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: richard moore on May 16, 2010, 08:27:24 PM
Excellent - always nice to spot a Villa shirt in the crowd too!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on May 16, 2010, 08:30:30 PM
Excellent, comprehensive win.

I admit it doesn't sit well with me the amount of guns for hire in that team, but that's an argument for another day. There is a school of thought that says the team reflects modern England as a society, and there might be a degree of logic to that. But outside of London I don't think you'll find that many South Africans ;)

One good thing that can come from it (apart from trophies, obv) is that up and coming players in county cricket might adopt a more aggressive approach, like your Kieswetters, Lumbs and Pietersons et.c. Could bode well for the future.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: evalast1910 on May 16, 2010, 08:38:11 PM
Well done. COME ON ENGLAND!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on May 16, 2010, 09:13:25 PM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Was up the pub with the old man, brilliant. Basically we demolished them like we have pretty much everyone. We deserved to win. Broad, Sidebottom, Kieswetter and Pietersen were magnificent. It was absolutely brilliant.


What you said Paul. England were the  best team and they won. It's good when a tournament  ends like this.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 16, 2010, 10:07:01 PM
What is brilliant is that from the Super 8's onwards we have pretty much demolished anyone in our path. We genuinely are the best and we won.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 16, 2010, 11:20:59 PM
Sorry, would have commented sooner, but I've been wanking myself into oblivion over beating the Aussies in a final, and thoroughly deserving to beat them too.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on May 17, 2010, 09:12:33 AM
Very pleased with that result and to see us finally win an ICC trophy.

A win against the Crims should always be cherished especially when we outclass them.

Kieswetter, Pietersen, Lumb and Broad were on top form but the man of the tournament for me has to be Swann. I don't think that anyone came close to tearing him apart.

Sets things up nicely for the cricketing summer.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 17, 2010, 09:44:36 AM
That was absolutely marvellous. I'm still reeling from it.
I knew we had a good team going into the turnament and that we had a good chance but I'd never imagine we'd be so ruthless and systematic as well as imaginative and belligerent.

They all did their job. Collingwoods batting wasnt up to much but his fielding and leadership made up for it. Our lower middle order hardly had a bat.
Great stuff. Its not bad this 20/20 lark is it?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on May 17, 2010, 10:03:38 AM
Being used to seeing England limited over sides flying by the seats of their pantt and mixing months of inadequacy with the rare brilliant performance to suddenly see one look so confident and competent is a shock to the system.

Great stuff.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on May 17, 2010, 10:12:13 AM
Quote from: "Chris Smith"
Being used to seeing England limited over sides flying by the seats of their pantt and mixing months of inadequacy with the rare brilliant performance to suddenly see one look so confident and competent is a shock to the system.

Just like the Villa, eh Chris? (winky)
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Risso on May 17, 2010, 10:12:49 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
That was absolutely marvellous. I'm still reeling from it.
I knew we had a good team going into the turnament and that we had a good chance but I'd never imagine we'd be so ruthless and systematic as well as imaginative and belligerent.

They all did their job. Collingwoods batting wasnt up to much but his fielding and leadership made up for it. Our lower middle order hardly had a bat.
Great stuff. Its not bad this 20/20 lark is it?


I'm not a huge cricket fan, but I really like 2020, and I loved the England win.  Does that make me the cricketing equivalent of a gloryhunting plastic Manc new footy fan?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: LeeB on May 17, 2010, 10:16:17 AM
Quote from: "Risso"
Quote from: "Mazrim"
That was absolutely marvellous. I'm still reeling from it.
I knew we had a good team going into the turnament and that we had a good chance but I'd never imagine we'd be so ruthless and systematic as well as imaginative and belligerent.

They all did their job. Collingwoods batting wasnt up to much but his fielding and leadership made up for it. Our lower middle order hardly had a bat.
Great stuff. Its not bad this 20/20 lark is it?


I'm not a huge cricket fan, but I really like 2020, and I loved the England win.  Does that make me the cricketing equivalent of a gloryhunting plastic Manc new footy fan?


Yes.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 17, 2010, 10:32:39 AM
You have to start somewhere Risso.

Now, you have to earn your stripes by watching an enthralling day or five of Test cricket.
But be warned, shouting obscenity and insisting the coaching staff resign after losing a wicket simply isnt on.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Risso on May 17, 2010, 01:05:48 PM
Quote from: "Mazrim"
You have to start somewhere Risso.

Now, you have to earn your stripes by watching an enthralling day or five of Test cricket.
But be warned, shouting obscenity and insisting the coaching staff resign after losing a wicket simply isnt on.


Oh I like the tests as well of course, I've just never got as far as following a county.  I did get down to Warwickshire a couple of times in the early 90s when I was a student, and saw the final bit of Lara's 501.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on May 17, 2010, 01:27:13 PM
I've been walking around Sydney today with my England Cricket hat on. Has been much fun!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 17, 2010, 01:32:34 PM
I was pissed as a rat that day but even still, I'll never forget it.
The standing ovation lasted about 20 minutes.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on May 17, 2010, 02:12:53 PM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
I've been walking around Sydney today with my England Cricket hat on. Has been much fun!


I was going to text you but was too excited at the win. Stick it to the fuckers good man!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 17, 2010, 02:21:11 PM
Dont go too mad though. You're not a Bluenose.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on May 18, 2010, 02:30:17 AM
I'm saving myself for the Ashes!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: SteveD on May 18, 2010, 04:13:32 PM
Something odd happening at Edgbaston. Bears 113 all out, then Lancs 21-5. The splendour of the four-day game....
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on May 27, 2010, 01:04:23 PM
Reasonable start to the 1st test by England, 105 - 1 at lunch. They've recovered well from the early loss of Cook who was at the wrong end of a bad LBW decision.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 27, 2010, 06:19:35 PM
Trott going superbly, 175* at the close.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 27, 2010, 06:26:48 PM
Was a top knock.  Can't recall him playing a false stroke all day.

Morgan looked good too in the final session, as far as you can tell against Bangladesh who were poor all round.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 27, 2010, 08:04:33 PM
Trott did very well, Morgan impressive too. I do think KP can struggle against teams he thinks are beneath him.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on May 27, 2010, 08:59:08 PM
Hope Trott will crack on and get the double ton tomorrow.

Hasn't been enough England players do that over the years. What odds a dismissal soon after the restart, eh?

Get 500+  first up and shouldn't need to bat again I'd have thought. Being cautious,  the Lords pitch has contributed to a fair few draws in recent years.   But that was against far better opponents TBF.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 28, 2010, 05:24:41 PM
Pretty poor bowling, lots of short rubbish. We do have problems deviating from a plan.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 28, 2010, 06:23:30 PM
Finn bowled alright, but the other pace bowlers not good enough. Also I think we have to play 5 bowlers to add variety. Bresnan is not a Test bowler.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on May 28, 2010, 07:16:13 PM
A disappointing day for England.

We're really missing the balance that an all rounder brings to the line up. It is surprising that we went with 6 batsmen against Bangladesh. A 5-man bowling attack is a must.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 28, 2010, 07:20:25 PM
I'm prepared to give Bresnan more of a chance.  He got wickets out in Bangladesh, which isn't easy for seamers to do.

I reckon England's bowling plan was off today.  The ball that got Bell yesterday was a beauty, on a very good length and hitting the top of off.  That's what we needed today but we bowled far too short.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 29, 2010, 06:01:18 PM
Fucking hell this bringing the players off for bad light then sending them out 5 minutes later is getting old. It's not dangerous, just get on with it. Finn bowling well.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 30, 2010, 09:08:27 AM
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Fucking hell this bringing the players off for bad light then sending them out 5 minutes later is getting old. It's not dangerous, just get on with it.


Not convinced I would want a cricket ball hurtling at me at 80+mph unless I could see it perfectly to be honest.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on May 30, 2010, 10:47:15 AM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "PaulWinch"
Fucking hell this bringing the players off for bad light then sending them out 5 minutes later is getting old. It's not dangerous, just get on with it.


Not convinced I would want a cricket ball hurtling at me at 80+mph unless I could see it perfectly to be honest.


Do you honestly believe that the light changed enough to make a difference 3 times in 20 minutes when they were going off and on last night? As the commentators said they'd play 20/20 in those conditions, why not test cricket? It's an expensive business and the public should be able to expect to see as much cricket as is possible.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 30, 2010, 12:39:27 PM
Bresnan is maybe a first change bowler at best, he really shouldn't be on with the new ball. If we are going to have a four man attack, Bresnan has to be replaced by Broad.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 30, 2010, 12:53:09 PM
Quote from: "Chris Smith"


Do you honestly believe that the light changed enough to make a difference 3 times in 20 minutes when they were going off and on last night? As the commentators said they'd play 20/20 in those conditions, why not test cricket? It's an expensive business and the public should be able to expect to see as much cricket as is possible.


Ah, right, I didn't realise they were buggering about like that, I was at work and just keeping an eye on the score.

They need to tweak the rule that the umpires will offer the light to the batsmen at a pre-selected reading on the light meter.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 01:06:01 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"


They need to tweak the rule that the umpires will offer the light to the batsmen at a pre-selected reading on the light meter.


They've taken the decision away from the batsman now though haven't they?  It's solely at the umpire's discretion.

Which has to be right.  I can't think of a single instance in all the years I've been watching cricket when the batting side came off for bad light because they thought they were in danger, as opposed to it being in their interests given the match situation.  It was all too cynical.

As England proved in Pakistan that time, teams will bat on in appalling light if they think they can win a Test match.  

Umpires should only bring the teams off if it is simply too dark for the teams to see what they're doing.  And I mean proper dark.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on May 30, 2010, 01:11:45 PM
We do struggle in conditions that aren't suited to swing. We need to address that.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 03:20:05 PM
Good batting conditions but Tamim Iqbal's century is one of the most entertaining innings I've seen for a long time.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 30, 2010, 03:47:27 PM
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"


They've taken the decision away from the batsman now though haven't they?  It's solely at the umpire's discretion.


Not sure this is a great idea, it now puts a lot of pressure on the umpires in failing light, they won't want to be responsible when a batsman gets put in hospital by a ball he couldn't see so are probably more likely to err on the side of caution. Previously they could just say, "Well, it was the batsman's decision to carry on."


Quote
Umpires should only bring the teams off if it is simply too dark for the teams to see what they're doing.  And I mean proper dark.


Too dangerous, and not particularly good for spectating either.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 04:13:34 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
Quote from: "hilts_coolerking"


They've taken the decision away from the batsman now though haven't they?  It's solely at the umpire's discretion.


Not sure this is a great idea, it now puts a lot of pressure on the umpires in failing light, they won't want to be responsible when a batsman gets put in hospital by a ball he couldn't see so are probably more likely to err on the side of caution. Previously they could just say, "Well, it was the batsman's decision to carry on."


Quote
Umpires should only bring the teams off if it is simply too dark for the teams to see what they're doing.  And I mean proper dark.


Too dangerous, and not particularly good for spectating either.


Atherton was saying on Sky yesterday that the 'danger' to batsmen, such as it is, is overstated.  In this era there is only a handful of really quick bowlers, a preponderance of flat pitches, and plenty of protective equipment for batters.

The rule about bad light being dangerous to batsmen was more applicable in an era of uncovered wickets where the ball came off very quickly, a plethora of genuinely quick bowlers and little in the way of helmets etc.

So the light should only be an issue if it just too dark to play (and, as you say, to watch) properly.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 30, 2010, 04:54:40 PM
I agree that batsmen are better protected, but the contest should be as equal as possible between batsman and bowler, if the batsman can't see the ball properly I don't see how it's an equal contest.

For the same reason you are not allowed to bowl the ball massively wide or throw down a succession of waist high beamers, the batsman has to actually be able to hit the ball! And if he can't see it how is he supposed to hit it!

It's okay for Atherton to say it's not dangerous now he's retired, but he was quick enough to walk off when he was batting!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 05:03:59 PM
Quote from: "Dave Cooper"
I agree that batsmen are better protected, but the contest should be as equal as possible between batsman and bowler, if the batsman can't see the ball properly I don't see how it's an equal contest.

For the same reason you are not allowed to bowl the ball massively wide or throw down a succession of waist high beamers, the batsman has to actually be able to hit the ball! And if he can't see it how is he supposed to hit it!

It's okay for Atherton to say it's not dangerous now he's retired, but he was quick enough to walk off when he was batting!


Well that's exactly my point - you come off if you can't see to play properly.

At the moment they come off in light that, while not perfect, is perfectly playable.  Like I said, the danger thing is way over-stated.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 30, 2010, 05:28:25 PM
They could just switch to a luminous bad light ball. It would take the batsman a while to adjust but its better than nothing.

They could have a selection of balls ready that have seen the requisite number of overs like they used to in ODIs.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 06:39:05 PM
Anyone going to Lords tomorrow?  It's only a tenner in.  I'm going for it.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on May 30, 2010, 06:52:02 PM
Hmm.  Couple of late wickets and I'm now wondering how much play there will be tomorrow.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 30, 2010, 07:50:49 PM
At just two down I seriously thought about it, at five down I'll pop down the local for an hour or two!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Mazrim on May 30, 2010, 10:26:49 PM
They'll be all out just before lunch I reckon, leaving a fairly tedious run chase of about 175.

I've spent a tenner on worse things.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on May 31, 2010, 08:58:38 AM
Quote from: "Mazrim"


I've spent a tenner on worse things.


It's the travel costs that put me off.
I've booked my tickets for the T20 at Edgbaston on Thursday instead.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on June 04, 2010, 11:26:55 AM
Another test match and a weekend of good weather. Looking forward to a couple of nice long afternoons spent in the garden with TMS on the radio.

As long as the Manchester sunshine doesn't make an appearance!!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Stu on June 04, 2010, 02:46:41 PM
Quote from: "Villan For Life"
Another test match and a weekend of good weather. Looking forward to a couple of nice long afternoons spent in the garden with TMS on the radio.

As long as the Manchester sunshine doesn't make an appearance!!


What a pity England have stunk the place out so far huh? 159-4 as we speak, Strauss, Trott, Cook and Pietersen gone. Fucks sake lads.

Time to shine Ian!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on June 04, 2010, 04:21:46 PM
I do wish KP could focus a bit more sometimes.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on June 05, 2010, 03:45:34 PM
Our bowling attack looks painfully limp and lacking in options.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: KevinGage on June 05, 2010, 05:47:45 PM
Bangladesh should be about 8 down at this point.

Some desperate shots being played.

...and just as they say that Jimmy strikes.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on June 05, 2010, 06:49:50 PM
Epic collapse that
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on June 06, 2010, 02:29:25 AM
That is mental, when I went to bed last night Bangladesh were 108-0, then to find when I wake up that England are thinking about the follow on. That must have been one crazy last session.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on June 06, 2010, 06:30:17 AM
I'm on night shifts and so turned on the TV when I got up just when the final session was starting, England hadn't taken a wicket.

I watche Tamin get his 100 and then saw all ten wickets in the short time before I had to leave for work again! Crazy stuff.

I think England should bat again, that pitch is falling apart, a lead of even 150 for Bangladesh in the last innings could be tricky for England to get, the ball will be spinning at right angles by then.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on June 06, 2010, 06:47:14 AM
I'm not sure what the weather forecast is for the next 3 days, but I think England should just go out and bat all day today, put on a big enough chase that we know Bangladesh can never get anywhere near, and then give ourselves 2 days to bowl them out.

Job done.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on June 06, 2010, 02:22:57 PM
Pretty Dire from Bangladesh this.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on June 06, 2010, 02:25:50 PM
39-6

Yet more proof I now naff all about cricket!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on June 06, 2010, 02:58:40 PM
Bears chasing 312 to win are 91-5. Useless fuckers.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on June 06, 2010, 08:53:45 PM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
39-6

Yet more proof I now naff all about cricket!


That's why I'm not the England captain.

That and the fact that I can't bat or bowl.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on June 08, 2010, 03:07:15 PM
From this weeks The Spin:

Quote
The best match of the week was not played in Manchester, Port-of-Spain, or Bulawayo, but in Pembroke, Bermuda, at the Western Stars Sports Club. The Bahamas were taking on Argentina in division one of the World Cricket League's Americas region.

Argentina, without a win in their previous four games in the competition, won the toss and chose to bat. That decision was vindicated when 28-year-old Lucas Paterlini scored 138 at just over a run-a-ball, the key contribution to a formidable total of 333-5 from 50 overs. More like 54 overs actually, as the Bahamas bowled 23 wides. Things got better still for Argentina's when their opening bowlers reduced Bahamas to 16-2.

And then No3 Rohan Parkes went berserk. He hit 133 from 59 balls (14 fours, 11 sixes), an innings of such startling ferocity that his partner's 93 from 57 (six fours and eight sixes) "seemed sedate in comparison", as one reporter put it. Parkes was particularly severe on the off-spin of the Argentina captain Esteban MacDermott, who wisely decided to withdraw himself from the attack with figures of 4-0-72-0.

Parkes was stumped in the 20th over, with Bahamas needing another 121 runs and with seven wickets in hand. They lost four of those in getting to 332-7 in the 32nd over. Two runs needed then, from 18 overs and with three wickets in hand. Two of those duly fell in the next two balls. No10 Jonathan Barry scraped a single to tie the scores, and then, with all of 105 balls to find the winning run, ran himself out off the next delivery. Rarely before in the field of human conflict can so many runs have been scored so quickly to such little effect.

Argentina 333-5 (50 overs); Bahamas 333 (33.3 overs). Match tied.


Sounds absolutely mental!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on June 08, 2010, 03:12:56 PM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
From this weeks The Spin:

Quote
The best match of the week was not played in Manchester, Port-of-Spain, or Bulawayo, but in Pembroke, Bermuda, at the Western Stars Sports Club. The Bahamas were taking on Argentina in division one of the World Cricket League's Americas region.

Argentina, without a win in their previous four games in the competition, won the toss and chose to bat. That decision was vindicated when 28-year-old Lucas Paterlini scored 138 at just over a run-a-ball, the key contribution to a formidable total of 333-5 from 50 overs. More like 54 overs actually, as the Bahamas bowled 23 wides. Things got better still for Argentina's when their opening bowlers reduced Bahamas to 16-2.

And then No3 Rohan Parkes went berserk. He hit 133 from 59 balls (14 fours, 11 sixes), an innings of such startling ferocity that his partner's 93 from 57 (six fours and eight sixes) "seemed sedate in comparison", as one reporter put it. Parkes was particularly severe on the off-spin of the Argentina captain Esteban MacDermott, who wisely decided to withdraw himself from the attack with figures of 4-0-72-0.

Parkes was stumped in the 20th over, with Bahamas needing another 121 runs and with seven wickets in hand. They lost four of those in getting to 332-7 in the 32nd over. Two runs needed then, from 18 overs and with three wickets in hand. Two of those duly fell in the next two balls. No10 Jonathan Barry scraped a single to tie the scores, and then, with all of 105 balls to find the winning run, ran himself out off the next delivery. Rarely before in the field of human conflict can so many runs have been scored so quickly to such little effect.

Argentina 333-5 (50 overs); Bahamas 333 (33.3 overs). Match tied.


Sounds absolutely mental!


Fantastic.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: LeeB on June 08, 2010, 03:59:06 PM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
From this weeks The Spin:

Quote
The best match of the week was not played in Manchester, Port-of-Spain, or Bulawayo, but in Pembroke, Bermuda, at the Western Stars Sports Club. The Bahamas were taking on Argentina in division one of the World Cricket League's Americas region.

Argentina, without a win in their previous four games in the competition, won the toss and chose to bat. That decision was vindicated when 28-year-old Lucas Paterlini scored 138 at just over a run-a-ball, the key contribution to a formidable total of 333-5 from 50 overs. More like 54 overs actually, as the Bahamas bowled 23 wides. Things got better still for Argentina's when their opening bowlers reduced Bahamas to 16-2.

And then No3 Rohan Parkes went berserk. He hit 133 from 59 balls (14 fours, 11 sixes), an innings of such startling ferocity that his partner's 93 from 57 (six fours and eight sixes) "seemed sedate in comparison", as one reporter put it. Parkes was particularly severe on the off-spin of the Argentina captain Esteban MacDermott, who wisely decided to withdraw himself from the attack with figures of 4-0-72-0.

Parkes was stumped in the 20th over, with Bahamas needing another 121 runs and with seven wickets in hand. They lost four of those in getting to 332-7 in the 32nd over. Two runs needed then, from 18 overs and with three wickets in hand. Two of those duly fell in the next two balls. No10 Jonathan Barry scraped a single to tie the scores, and then, with all of 105 balls to find the winning run, ran himself out off the next delivery. Rarely before in the field of human conflict can so many runs have been scored so quickly to such little effect.

Argentina 333-5 (50 overs); Bahamas 333 (33.3 overs). Match tied.


Sounds absolutely mental!


And what a fantastic name that is.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on June 22, 2010, 10:07:33 AM
A 5 game ODI series against the crims starts today.

C'mon England. Time to lay down a marker for the Ashes!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on June 22, 2010, 10:05:23 PM
Absolutely marvellous innings from Morgan, 103 from 85 balls and England canter home with four overs to spare.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on June 22, 2010, 10:21:19 PM
It's good to have another batsman to rely on alongside KP. At times, Morgan's timing was sublime.

Always nice to beat the Crims!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OCD on June 22, 2010, 10:58:40 PM
Luke Wright looks like he's maturing too. Seems to be a better bowler and instead of just trying to smash everything, he played a bit more simpler and let Morgan get in.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on June 23, 2010, 12:59:02 AM
Well done England.

Bears on the box tomorrow... 5.30 start I think so nicely timed to squeeze between the Ingerlund and Germany matches.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on June 23, 2010, 07:52:06 AM
And out comes my England Cricket Sunhat!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: LeeB on June 24, 2010, 03:59:39 PM
Good start again, 88-3 as I type, Ponting and Clarke gone already.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: LeeB on June 24, 2010, 04:07:30 PM
There goes another! 94-4, Watson the big useless lump.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on June 24, 2010, 10:03:01 PM
Easy win again for England. I would love it if it was this easy in Australia this December/January.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on June 27, 2010, 06:17:37 PM
Who else is watching this?! From 185 for 3 to 210 for 9, needing 3 from the last over!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on June 27, 2010, 06:18:44 PM
4 from the first ball. What was all the fuss about?!

I'm shattered.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Drummond on June 27, 2010, 07:01:41 PM
3-0. Something to cheer at last! (The fact the England team is made of of South Africans and Welshmen is irrelevant!)
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on June 27, 2010, 08:06:14 PM
Never in doubt!

The thing is, in previous years we all know what would have happened with eight wickets down and fifteen runs to get, not these days, someone always seems capable of steadying the ship and doing what is necessary. England are looking like what Australia used to be.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on June 28, 2010, 08:24:00 PM
Dale Steyn is a naughty boy!  He spat at Benn after he was dismissed. Here's cricinfo's take:

 Oh dear. Controversy: Steyn spat on the ground to the right of Benn' . Controversial scenes here. It could balloon into something ugly. Benn got close to Steyn and was seen laughing. Tauntingly. Or so it appears. That seemed to angry Steyn and he spat to the right of Benn.At the ground. Not on Benn but I can't believe he spat in the first place. Oh what a mess. Benn is enraged, takes a step or two towards Steyn who walks away. The umpires get into act and talk to Benn. Oh dear what has Steyn done here. The provocation seems to be the fact that Benn laughed. Perhaps there is something more in the history between the two, perhaps this was a reaction to the past battles between Benn and South African players. Whatever be the catalyst, it seems to have got to Steyn. Match referee has to surely get into this. He will look at the provocation and the reaction. It will be interesting to see what he will decide.
Surely, Steyn can't get away with this. Unless of course, the judge decides the provocation was very strong. It's going to be a very interesting hearing later on. And what about Benn: Will he take stock of the situation after this and mellow down a bit? In his brief career so far, he seems to have already got into a few controversies.

West Indies 231 & 75/6
South Africa 346
West Indies trail by 40 runs with 4 wickets remaining

This could be over in three days!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OldUser on June 30, 2010, 08:50:04 PM
What became of all that then?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Bernie on July 10, 2010, 06:34:15 PM
England v Bangladesh going down to the wire, 28 needed off 23 balls with 2 wickets- glad it's close, good for the game in general even though disappointing from an England point of view
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on July 10, 2010, 06:49:42 PM
Talk about squeaky bum time! We need 10 from 6, no wickets in hand... Ian Bell using his bat as a crutch.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on July 10, 2010, 06:58:54 PM
I'm going to Edgbaston on Monday so fairly pleased that the series is still to play for.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on July 10, 2010, 07:44:33 PM
Fair play to Bangladesh
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on July 10, 2010, 11:47:03 PM
Bell out for 6 weeks.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on July 12, 2010, 03:38:33 PM
That's more like it! A superb knock and partnership from Strauss and Trott, with a brilliant cameo from Bopara at the end. What a fantastic last over.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 14, 2010, 08:44:14 AM
I enjoyed the day one highlights of Pakistan - Australia at Lords last night.

Pakistan look a tight unit and did wonderfully well to restrict the crims to 229 - 9 from 171 - 2. Weather permitting, it should turn out to be a good test.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on July 14, 2010, 12:40:39 PM
I hadn't a clue the Australia v Pakistan series was going on in this country until last week when I was given a ticket for a day at Headingley for my birthday. I was quite excited as I thought I was getting flights and hotel as well.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on July 14, 2010, 01:21:39 PM
Quote from: "Chris Jameson"
I hadn't a clue the Australia v Pakistan series was going on in this country until last week when I was given a ticket for a day at Headingley for my birthday. I was quite excited as I thought I was getting flights and hotel as well.


That reminds me of the time my wife told me I was going to Liverpool for my birthday, Villa were playing them that day too. Turned out we were just going to Liverpool, anyway we lost 3-0 and I got a speeding fine on the M62. So all in all it turned out to be a rather bad day all round.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 21, 2010, 02:52:02 PM
Another fascinating game between Australia and Pakistan at Headingley.

The Crims were all out for 88, another shocking decision by Punter Ponting to bat after he won the toss. He's got form for misreading pitches (Edgbaston 2005) and it looks like he's done it again.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on July 22, 2010, 11:31:09 AM
A couple of the cricket following co-workers were going mad about that today. Oh how I laughed!
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 22, 2010, 11:36:40 AM
On a seperate cricket theme Murali has reached the milestone of 800 test wickets. Stunning performance really and one that is unlikely to be beaten.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on July 22, 2010, 11:45:02 AM
And looking on the BBC story about that, 112 of them against England.

He truly is one of the greats when it comes to bowling. In fact I'd say he is the only spin bowler I can think of better than Warne. Like you say VFL, that milestone is unlikely to be beaten.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on July 22, 2010, 11:45:03 AM
And looking on the BBC story about that, 112 of them against England.

He truly is one of the greats when it comes to bowling. In fact I'd say he is the only spin bowler I can think of better than Warne. Like you say VFL, that milestone is unlikely to be beaten.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on July 22, 2010, 11:47:41 AM
And about 200 against Bangladesh & Zimbabwe.

Not sure if 800 wickets is a measure of his greatness, the fact that he's played so many Test matches (a lot against Bangladesh & Zimbabwe) or that the rest of the Sri Lanka attack has been poor in the last 15 years.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 22, 2010, 12:58:11 PM
He was a fantastic bowler and 800 wickets cannot be lightly dismissed.

If you break his stats down then you find that his most frequent victims include Mark Boucher, Sourav Ganguly and Sachin Tendulkar.

Also Sri Lanka have had a decent attack for a few years, Malinga and Jayawardene would grace any test side.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on July 22, 2010, 01:08:12 PM
I know what you're saying but Malinga has been around for, what, six years. Who else bowled alongside MM before that? And Jawardene is a batsman.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 22, 2010, 02:05:56 PM
Quote from: "TimVilla"
I know what you're saying but Malinga has been around for, what, six years. Who else bowled alongside MM before that? And Jawardene is a batsman.


Whoops I meant Jayasuria!

They've had plenty of top class bowlers other than Murali.

Chaminder Vaas has 355 test match wickets, Jayasuria and Fernando were pretty handy too.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on July 23, 2010, 04:38:10 PM
Hope Pakistan knock these runs off tonight to save me going to Headingley tomorrow for a few overs of cricket.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on July 24, 2010, 03:48:52 PM
Never ceases to amaze me how people who put their hands in their pockets and make the effort to attend sporting events are treated.

There were a few hundred very noisy (also very well behaved although judging by the amount of officious stewards watching over them you'd think it was the pissed up bunch of morons that used to populate the Western Terrace) Pakistan supporters in the ground today who were naturally delighted to see their team beat the Aussies. The presentation ceremony and interviews were of course conducted in the area of the ground farthest from where they were and screened off so they were unable to see and all for the benefit of tv and the 27 people sat in the massive white elephant that is the new pavilion at Headingley.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on July 29, 2010, 07:59:59 PM
Great 1st day for England in the Trent Bridge test against Pakistan.

After lunch when we lost 2 quick wickets things could have got very ropey very quickly. Great performance by Morgan and Colly to steady the ship and kick on. Morgan brought his century up in style with a six!

Couple of umpire referals which I'm looking forward to seeing on the highlights later.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: peter w on August 01, 2010, 07:01:05 PM
Was Anderson given the Man Of The Match award? I think he probably was - just checked the Beeb and yes he was.

But surely as it was a very bowler friendly pitch with the ball swinging like a reckless Swede in a sauna, the accolade should have gone to either Morgan or Prior due to them getting 100s in those conditions?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on August 01, 2010, 07:49:14 PM
Good Solid win for the Bears today against the Jocks
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Rotterdam on August 03, 2010, 11:58:27 AM
According to the BBC, Flintoff will not play again in 2010. I fear we won't see him play again.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on August 05, 2010, 11:11:19 AM
Great performance by Surrey against Glamorgan in the day/night one day game last night. They scored 386 - 3 off 38 overs which is an amazing total and sets a new record in this form of cricket. 40 fours and 9 sixes!

The rain intervened and Glamorgan ended up chasing 227 off 20 overs under D/L and still scored at over 9 an over making 187 - 5 off 20.

Looks as though the 20/20 aapproach is starting to appear in the longer forms of the one day game.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 07, 2010, 12:02:52 AM
Are we that good, or are Pakistan that bad?
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on August 07, 2010, 01:25:58 AM
Quote from: "VillaSubmariner"
Are we that good, or are Pakistan that bad?


Both. Pakistan are bad but let's not forget that they rolled the Aussies over on a similar pitch in similar conditions.
England have finally discovered something they have been missing since Botham's time, ruthlessness. Fuck whether the opposition are in disarray and being humiliated, pile it on! The West Indies were masters of this, and then Australia honed it into a fine art, finally we have not just the players, but also the mentality to put ourselves into that sort of company.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 07, 2010, 01:48:40 AM
I think you make a very good point there Dave about ruthlessness.

Another thing I like about this England side though is the fact that we don't have to rely on just 1/2 players. Look at the bowlers, for example. We can see that Jimmy is in the form of his life at the moment, but should he have a day/match where he struggles we've got Broad and Swann to come in and take the pressure off. I also think Finn will become a key bowler for us over the next few years.

The same can be said with the bat. For 5/6 years now KP has been the key wicket for any opposing side, but now we're seeing the likes of Morgan, Trott and Collingwood play with a bit of confidence.

For me though, our main weakness is opening. I'm not a massive fan of Cook, and do worry sometimes that losing both him and Strauss in quick succession or early on can put a bit too much pressure on the rest of our line up. Question is though, who is there that can come in and open? I was chatting to someone about this a couple of weeks ago, and he was of the opinion that Collingwood would make a good opener alongside Strauss. I don't know if he's played that role before, but I don't think it would be too bad a shout.
Title: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on August 07, 2010, 03:30:17 PM
I agree to a point Bazz, but feel that Jimmy will struggle down under with the Kookabura ball.

He's a fantastic bowler when the conditions are right but tends to struggle when the sun beats down and movement through the air is non-existent.

It's the same with Mitchell Johnson for the Crims. Brilliant in Oz, awful over here.

Braod and Finn will be key bowlers.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on August 08, 2010, 08:19:55 PM
Spent a very good day at Edgbaston today. Was  very apprehensive at the start of the day about VFM for our  60 quid tickets and  at lunch time I thought it'll be home early. However dogged resistance by Pakistan 7th, 8th and 9th wicket made it a full day. Swan  bowled well and felt sorry for Haider not getting a ton.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Monty on August 09, 2010, 02:55:54 PM
So one win by 354 and one by 9 wickets, bowling out the opposition for double figures twice. Still can't shake the feeling that the four-man attack might not be enough in less favourable Aussie conditions, though.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 18, 2010, 11:10:01 AM
Cook gone for 6.

Someone on TMS earlier (think it was Aggers) made a very good point about how Strauss and Bell were both dropped and sent back to their counties when they were struggling as much as Cook is. I think he should've sat out this series so far and been allowed to get his confidence back at county level.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on August 18, 2010, 11:47:33 AM
Cook gone for 6.

Someone on TMS earlier (think it was Aggers) made a very good point about how Strauss and Bell were both dropped and sent back to their counties when they were struggling as much as Cook is. I think he should've sat out this series so far and been allowed to get his confidence back at county level.

There's not much 4 day cricket left this season where he could rebuild his confidence.

He does need to be taken out of the firing line. Move Trott up to open and whilst Bell is still unfit bring in Carberry or maybe Owais Shah.

Just don't play Shah against the Crims please Straussy......
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Drummond on August 21, 2010, 09:49:50 AM
Drop Cook, are you mad?

winky man
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 27, 2010, 04:48:02 PM
It's a good job Trott likes playing at Lords for England!

262 in his only previous innings there, and just got his century today too.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Monty on August 27, 2010, 04:49:20 PM
Brilliant knock from Trotty, showing the rest of them what you can achieve with a modicum of patience. Face-saving partnership with Broad this.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Monty on August 27, 2010, 05:56:45 PM
And now Broado's gone to his maiden century. At Lords. From no. 9. Absolutely brilliant. If he takes three wickets in both innings he'll get to 100 in tests as well. Freddie who?
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hipkiss92 on August 27, 2010, 06:08:08 PM
Brilliant batting from these two, 200 n.o partnership, who would have thought it when Broad came in? If only warwickshire could produce something like this. Their batting has been shocking all season.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on August 28, 2010, 10:08:54 AM
Brilliant batting from these two, 200 n.o partnership, who would have thought it when Broad came in? If only warwickshire could produce something like this. Their batting has been shocking all season.

Hardly surprising when their best batsmen are either in at number 3 for England or recovering from an injury sustained when playing for England.

The Bears would be in for the title with Bell and Trott in the team and scoring runs.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 28, 2010, 03:06:07 PM
World Record partnership at Number 9 from Broad and Trott. What a fantastic and series saving knock that was from the pair of them.

Couple of early wickets too for Broady - let's hope he can carry this over to the winter!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Monty on August 28, 2010, 04:50:39 PM
70-8. Whoops.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Meanwood Villa on August 28, 2010, 04:56:18 PM
All out. Wickets tumbling regularly. We can win this tonight!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on August 28, 2010, 11:44:06 PM
This story sours what has been a remarkable couple of days of cricket. There is going to be serious trouble for someone ...

http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/content/current/story/474890.html
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on August 29, 2010, 12:50:21 AM
I got an email a couple of days ago from a friend who works at sky saying that something major was brewing with regards to the Pakistan cricket team, but didn't know/wouldn't say what. If this is all true, and it is still an if at the moment, I think this will have major repercussions around the cricketing world. Bigger even, I think, than the Cronje incident. Especially if they can prove that they have influenced the outcome of games (although something that big hasn't yet been alleged, I think it possibly might come up).

News of the Screws story (http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/924349/Cricket-in-the-dock-as-we-expose-betting-scandal-England-Pakistan-Test.html)

For example, the games they are alleged to have had dodgy dealings in, could fans who paid to go to them days claim money back because they too have been conned?
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: OzVilla on August 29, 2010, 09:48:08 AM
The biggest tragedy in all this potentially, could be the involvement of Mohammed Amir.

Amir has bowled beautifully against both England and Australia, the boy really looks the business.  He gets good players out and gives them a working over while he's at it.

It'd be such a shame if as his career just got started, he did something so stupid and got a ban.  He's the only decent thing about watching Pakistan right now.

Well, that's excluding Farhats comedy opening batsman repotoir and Akmals keeping. 
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on August 29, 2010, 11:33:47 AM
I was hoping  for once they could turn up play cricket, good or bad win or lose, and go home  and keep re-building the team. That would have been too good to be true and once again Pakistani cricketers are or could  heap shame upon the nation.

As you say OzVilla  this would be a tragedy  for young Amir and all of us who love pure talent in this game.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Bernie on August 29, 2010, 01:05:38 PM
The match finished quickly today thank goodness....
Let's not let the news last night/today mask the excellent cricket played (at times)  by both sides. That said, a nasty tastes is left in the mouth- I really hope it will found that there was nothing serious, or at least nothing endemic, in the allegations. It's all very upsetting
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on August 31, 2010, 01:51:31 PM
KP dropped from England T20 squad for up coming matches apparently. Not happy if twitter is to be believed.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: villaross on August 31, 2010, 02:50:29 PM
England paceman Stuart Broad believes the upcoming one-day series with Pakistan should go ahead despite the scandal hanging over the tourists. Have a look at this interesting Ashes Betting article (http://betting.betfred.com/713/sport-betting-news/broad-keen-to-continue/)
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on August 31, 2010, 02:55:14 PM
KP dropped from England T20 squad for up coming matches apparently. Not happy if twitter is to be believed.

He's a tit. Hopefully this might be enough of a kick up the arse to get him performing in Oz... I would say he'd retire out of pique, but even he'd be mad to turn down the money.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on August 31, 2010, 03:45:18 PM
KP dropped from England T20 squad for up coming matches apparently. Not happy if twitter is to be believed.

He's a tit. Hopefully this might be enough of a kick up the arse to get him performing in Oz... I would say he'd
retire out of pique, but even he'd be mad to turn down the money.

I really don't think he cares any more.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on September 01, 2010, 08:45:41 AM
As I said to an Aussie earlier, since his Missus gave birth it's as if his heart isn't in cricket anymore. Wouldn't surprise me to see him retire after this Ashes.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on September 01, 2010, 08:47:06 AM
He hasn't given much of a toss for quite some time now, even before his babby.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on September 01, 2010, 09:01:06 AM
I really don't see how playing for Surrey in the second division of the county championship and then taking a month off is any preperation for the Ashes.

Surrey are 8th in the second division and have nothing to play for. They are in with an outside chance of making the semi finals of the CB40. The 4 day days will no doubt be typically dead end of season games and the CB40 ganes could be rendered meaningless tonight.

Any form that is regained will be lost during a period of inactivity.

Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on September 05, 2010, 07:05:48 PM
The point of Pietersen playing for Surrey is getting time in the middle and getting his touch back and confidence I think. Whilst there is a break before the winter, I think it's the confidence that is the key.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on September 07, 2010, 03:06:02 PM
Pietersen out for a duck on his Surrey Championship debut.
That should help then.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on September 07, 2010, 03:24:49 PM
Perhaps he could play for Beaconsfield? It's quite near to London.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on September 07, 2010, 05:56:55 PM
Yeah not great, but still the second innings.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on September 07, 2010, 06:41:50 PM
The amount of people in the crowd for this T20, is shocking.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on September 09, 2010, 04:05:15 PM
Get in there!

Yorkshire beaten Notts to ensure the Championship goes into the final week with 3 teams in with a chance of winning it. Fuck the quick cricket nonsense.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on September 12, 2010, 09:04:27 PM
The new English season starts in less than 2 months. Post your hopes/predictions here!

As a Bear, I think that we will score plenty of runs in the 4 day format but may struggle to bowl sides out. I'd like to see us to build on the progress that we've made in the limited overs game under Giles.

Oh how wrong was I on the first point?

At least we've done Ok in the one dayers......

Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on September 16, 2010, 05:07:27 PM
Went to Headingley today and it was truly bizarre. Yorkshire were rattling along at 8 an over with 9 wickets left and then just collapsed, losing 9 wickets in less than an hour.

Considering they were tipped for relegation they've had a brilliant season using 9 or more products of the Academy in each game. Moin Ashraf looks like yet another exciting young fast bowler, the bowling coaches at Yorkshire are doing a brilliant job.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on September 17, 2010, 09:59:57 PM
Pakistan seem to have played a lot better since Ramadan finished. Who'd have thought not eating or drinking water all day does not produce brilliant sport?
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on September 18, 2010, 10:16:05 PM
It is unlikely CD that  they would be fasting whilst on tour or at least on match days. However  preparation is affected if they fast on non match days.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on September 19, 2010, 09:24:01 PM
The seemingly never-ending match-fixing story rumbles on.  This time, Ijaz Butt - the chairman of the PCB and owner of less than a full complement of marbles - accused the England team of throwing the last ODI.

When asked if he had any proof, Butt - in a response worthy of the Spurs salary thread - said "Did you ask the other people who made allegations against our players whether they had any proof? What did they say? We have thought about this properly and we have positive proofs here before us just like they say they have also."

http://www.cricinfo.com/england-v-pakistan-2010/content/current/story/477814.html

Finances dictate the rest of the ODI series will probably go ahead but in this climate it's difficult to see how it can be played in anything like the proper spirit.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on September 20, 2010, 12:20:06 PM
The seemingly never-ending match-fixing story rumbles on.  This time, Ijaz Butt - the chairman of the PCB and owner of less than a full complement of marbles - accused the England team of throwing the last ODI.

When asked if he had any proof, Butt - in a response worthy of the Spurs salary thread - said "Did you ask the other people who made allegations against our players whether they had any proof? What did they say? We have thought about this properly and we have positive proofs here before us just like they say they have also."



This bloke Ijaz Butt is a complete pratt and in the world of rabid Sports Administrator he stands out on his own a  complete f in p*ick. Cricket fans in Pakistan regard him as a complete  idiot and are  rather familiar with his  rants.
FFS  after this  baseless accusation how does Umar Gul feel? That was a fantastic bowling performance and his mental chairman has to go and sour it  by utter stupid  remarks.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on September 20, 2010, 12:35:10 PM
The seemingly never-ending match-fixing story rumbles on.  This time, Ijaz Butt - the chairman of the PCB and owner of less than a full complement of marbles - accused the England team of throwing the last ODI.

When asked if he had any proof, Butt - in a response worthy of the Spurs salary thread - said "Did you ask the other people who made allegations against our players whether they had any proof? What did they say? We have thought about this properly and we have positive proofs here before us just like they say they have also."



This bloke Ijaz Butt is a complete pratt and in the world of rabid Sports Administrator he stands out on his own a  complete f in p*ick. Cricket fans in Pakistan regard him as a complete  idiot and are  rather familiar with his  rants.
FFS  after this  baseless accusation how does Umar Gul feel? That was a fantastic bowling performance and his mental chairman has to go and sour it  by utter stupid  remarks.

I completely agree with you Aftab. Gul's bowling performance was excellent.

In the midst of all of the match fixing furore I really feel for the ordinary Pakistani cricket fan. Not only are they denied the opportunity chance to see their team play a home test series, they now find that the performance of their talented one-day squad may be tainted by the bookmaker's dollar.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on September 20, 2010, 05:41:54 PM


This bloke Ijaz Butt is a complete pratt and in the world of rabid Sports Administrator he stands out on his own a  complete f in p*ick. Cricket fans in Pakistan regard him as a complete  idiot and are  rather familiar with his  rants.
FFS  after this  baseless accusation how does Umar Gul feel?[/] That was a fantastic bowling performance and his mental chairman has to go and sour it  by utter stupid  remarks.

Exactly, the chairman of your own cricket board has now told you that your 6-fer match winning performance means bugger all because England lost those wickets on purpose! Great.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on September 20, 2010, 06:33:51 PM
Umar Gul had Strauss caught off a no ball. How many people - ICC, ECB, PCB officials, bookies, etc - looked at that and found it dodgy?! Even if it wasn't?!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Gareth on September 20, 2010, 07:37:05 PM
Would have thought the last thing any member of the Pakistan administration should be doing is chatting to a bookie

Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on September 20, 2010, 08:11:08 PM
It is outrageous, and this summer of cricket is as an absolute disgrace.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: olaftab on September 20, 2010, 08:54:09 PM
Well despite the fuckwits running cricket in Pakistan just watched a fantastic  1 day game. Series square roll on Rose Bowl.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: richl on September 22, 2010, 08:55:54 PM
From what i understand another story about fixing is in the papers tomorrow
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: andyaston on September 22, 2010, 09:46:52 PM
We are whipping them tonight. Bunch of cheats dont deserve anything else, good on Struass he has kept his dignity throughout.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: hilts_coolerking on September 22, 2010, 09:51:21 PM
England were well pumped up for it tonight and their obvious delight at winning the series says a lot about how much they wanted to beat Pakistan.  I think defeat would, under the circumstances, have been very deflating for England.

But they batted pretty well, bowled very well and fielded brilliantly.

Ashes squad announced tomorrow ...
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on September 22, 2010, 10:13:04 PM
KP must be in, as he hasn't tweeted anything to the contrary.

I'm glad the series is over and can't see Pakistan coming back for a while. I don't think we're a 'neutral' country any more!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on October 04, 2010, 11:00:23 AM
Australia don't look much cop in India at the moment, batted poorly in second innings.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on October 04, 2010, 11:13:52 AM
Not the best start for India either!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on October 04, 2010, 12:35:55 PM
No true!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on October 05, 2010, 12:55:50 PM
Not the best start for India either!

Oops!
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on October 05, 2010, 01:07:00 PM
Not the best start for India either!

Oops!

What an intense ending. Although the convicts should've won, that LBW decision with a couple of balls left was a disgrace.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Bald Eagle on October 12, 2010, 01:43:23 PM
Looks like the Ausies will be facing us with a 2-0 defeat against India shoved up their rear end. 202 for 7. 185 ahead, one day left. Tendulkar will get those runs on his own. :)
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Villan For Life on October 14, 2010, 09:14:22 AM
Looks like the Ausies will be facing us with a 2-0 defeat against India shoved up their rear end. 202 for 7. 185 ahead, one day left. Tendulkar will get those runs on his own. :)

That result puts England above the crims in the ICC Test Championship.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on October 14, 2010, 09:16:49 AM
Two really good tests. Glad to see players like Clarke, Hauritz, Johnson, even Hussey under pressure.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on October 14, 2010, 10:53:30 PM
Nice to see the Convicts lose.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on October 15, 2010, 07:44:45 AM
Nice to see the Convicts lose.

Always.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on October 15, 2010, 09:03:40 AM
Nice to see the Convicts lose.

Always.

And long may it continue.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on October 15, 2010, 11:52:10 AM
Why the f**K was James Anderson boxing at the Ashes boot camp? Have English cricket coaches learnt nothing about the dangers of our best players trying other sports?
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on October 15, 2010, 12:01:08 PM
Rat Face looks like he is taking a bit of a panning in the press over there at the minute. What a shame.
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: villaross on October 18, 2010, 09:11:09 PM
rmer Australian Test pace bowler Brett Lee believes Ricky Ponting is the right man to lead the country to success in this winter’s Ashes series against England on their home soil. Find out more on this  Cricket betting blog (http://betting.betfred.com/713/sport-betting-news/cricket-betting/ponting-gets-lee-backing/).
Title: Re: Cricket 2010 Thread
Post by: Countryside Villain on November 10, 2010, 08:24:27 AM
One for the cricket 2011 thread really, but tickets are on sale today for next summers tests against India and Sri Lanka.  Just bagged mine for the 4th India test at the Oval.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal