I've seen the disallowed goal twice now and I still can't work out why it was chalked off. Wesley did jump in front of the keeper but the ball then went out wide and was played back in to Conor so the keeper was able to get back into place and make a save. Utterly farcical.
Quote from: Clampy on October 20, 2019, 09:34:56 AMI've seen the disallowed goal twice now and I still can't work out why it was chalked off. Wesley did jump in front of the keeper but the ball then went out wide and was played back in to Conor so the keeper was able to get back into place and make a save. Utterly farcical.It wasn’t exactly a clear and obvious error from the ref for the VAR guys to get involved.
Why wasn't their free kick that they scored from reviewed? Hourihane quite obviously wins the ball and there is no foul at all.
Quote from: Ads on October 20, 2019, 10:30:51 AMWhy wasn't their free kick that they scored from reviewed? Hourihane quite obviously wins the ball and there is no foul at all. No fan of VAR at all, but its for game changing decisions. The FK was in a fairly innocous area and we defended it abysmally. Going down that route Brighton could easily ask for the blatant Targett foul on the edge of the box to be reviewed.
Had a quick look on a Brighton forum, North Stand Chat, and even they were saying the decision to rule out the goal was ridiculous. Seem a mostly decent bunch on there.