collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Posts

Re: Snooker by BC Villain
[Today at 10:30:06 PM]


Re: Peter McParland 90 today by The Moose
[Today at 10:15:09 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:10:53 PM]


Re: Season Tickets - 2023/24 by London Villan
[Today at 10:10:08 PM]


Re: Season Tickets - 2023/24 by The Moose
[Today at 10:06:04 PM]


Re: Summer 2024 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Dave
[Today at 10:04:52 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Baldy
[Today at 10:02:03 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:01:32 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Athletics 2018  (Read 5083 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #15 on: August 13, 2018, 10:40:21 PM »
I did think she might be a decent bet for SPOTY, then thought Kane is bound to win. A quick Google reveals that Shearer didn't win in 96 and neither did Lineker in 86 so you never know.

If she can win double gold at the Olympics she's bound to win it. No pressure.I

Offline Comrade Blitz

  • Member
  • Posts: 10904
  • Location: Not far from the Big Chicken
  • GM : 25.05.2019
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2018, 12:08:30 PM »
It's a good year for everyone to work hard since there are no worlds or olympics.

Laura Muir currently leads the Diamond League women's 1500 list and Lorraine Ugen is top of the long jump. Asher-Smith is 5th in the 100m and 200m but hasn't competed at every event.

Full Diamond League standings here:

https://www.iaaf.org/competitions/iaaf-diamond-league/standings/2018/men

Offline Comrade Blitz

  • Member
  • Posts: 10904
  • Location: Not far from the Big Chicken
  • GM : 25.05.2019
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2018, 12:36:40 PM »

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2018, 01:18:33 PM »
Pretty poor that it wasn't the same bloke. Lazy bastard.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33444
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2018, 01:50:54 PM »
That Marathon record is seriously impressive, he didn't just beat it, he smashed it.

For the decathlon I honestly don't know what the record means in that context because it's so subjective.



Are all of those achievements really exactly the same difficulty?  I genuinely don't know but if you put the world records in each event into a calculator it suggests that the running events (110 hurdles and 400 in particular) are massively undervalued.

Offline Comrade Blitz

  • Member
  • Posts: 10904
  • Location: Not far from the Big Chicken
  • GM : 25.05.2019
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2018, 12:58:35 PM »
For the decathlon I honestly don't know what the record means in that context because it's so subjective.


Are all of those achievements really exactly the same difficulty?  I genuinely don't know but if you put the world records in each event into a calculator it suggests that the running events (110 hurdles and 400 in particular) are massively undervalued.

Some decathletes and heptathletes do compete in the individual disciplines from time to time - and occasionally do very well. But there is a trade-off as far as strength vs speed - but it is more about endurance in these events anyway - doing everything over two days. You can see it at the end of each day when they're all shattered doing the final runs.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33444
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Athletics 2018
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2018, 01:11:33 PM »
For the decathlon I honestly don't know what the record means in that context because it's so subjective.


Are all of those achievements really exactly the same difficulty?  I genuinely don't know but if you put the world records in each event into a calculator it suggests that the running events (110 hurdles and 400 in particular) are massively undervalued.

Some decathletes and heptathletes do compete in the individual disciplines from time to time - and occasionally do very well. But there is a trade-off as far as strength vs speed - but it is more about endurance in these events anyway - doing everything over two days. You can see it at the end of each day when they're all shattered doing the final runs.


I agree completely, so should better performance in the end of day events be worth more than the earlier ones and should day 2 be worth a little more, comparatively, than day 1.  As I say this is in no way undermining the achievement, it's purely pointing out that I'm not sure what the point of a 'world record' is in this instance.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal