Afghanistan tied with India. Even though India were all out and the Afghans only lost eight wickets, so they should be the winners really.Disappointingly the ICC haven't arranged any games for them for the next six months. They don't give one solitary shit about developing the game outside its traditional nations.
No, they play in the UAE. Their lack of matches has nothing to do with the security arrangements. Ireland and Scotland are similarly ignored by the ICC, and the decision to reduce to 10 teams in the World Cup is a disgrace, as is their continued policy of ignoring the Olympics. Only Indian TV money (and to a lesser degree the wishes of Australia and England) are taken into account.
Quote from: cdbullyweefan on September 26, 2018, 12:49:03 PMNo, they play in the UAE. Their lack of matches has nothing to do with the security arrangements. Ireland and Scotland are similarly ignored by the ICC, and the decision to reduce to 10 teams in the World Cup is a disgrace, as is their continued policy of ignoring the Olympics. Only Indian TV money (and to a lesser degree the wishes of Australia and England) are taken into account.As with everything, I guess money talks. Putting on games that are going to be watched by a few thousand in the UAE, Dublin or Edinburgh and by a small TV audience aren't really going to be a priority to the ICC. Agree about the World Cup mate, I don't think it would be too weakened by having 16 teams in it to be honest.
Boyd Rankin