collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Gordon Cowans by VillaTim
[Today at 07:23:43 PM]


Re: Champions League Contention by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 07:23:42 PM]


Re: Chris Heck - President of Business Operations by VillaTim
[Today at 07:22:15 PM]


Re: Chris Heck - President of Business Operations by OCD
[Today at 07:20:22 PM]


Re: FFP by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 07:17:32 PM]


Re: FFP by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 07:02:54 PM]


Re: FFP by LeeB
[Today at 06:59:38 PM]


Re: Gordon Cowans by Toronto Villa
[Today at 06:56:28 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Keith Wyness  (Read 140278 times)

Offline alftitimus

  • Member
  • Posts: 150
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #795 on: July 20, 2018, 04:25:07 AM »
 :D

IMO... a totally meaningless "late-night-twitter-drunk" Twitt.

It has absolutely NO RELEVANCE to Xia.... other than a vieled threat... that "this could happen" ~ if so ~ this is the level of intelligence that was our CEO ?

Perhaps he's just trawling Wiki for vintage Chinese Law ?

And doesn't realise that China Law has evolved and changed in the last 40/50 years...as has Western Law.

The best I can think of, is he was pissed, or he was hacked.  :D :

Totally meaningless...especially withou emoticons...and equations

  ;D

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39424
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #796 on: July 20, 2018, 06:22:37 AM »
No, it's has meaning. The amount of idiotic clients I have who get into got water with Facebook posts made public would surprise you.

Somewhere, some paralegal will be scanning this site and other forms of media and at some point it will form part of standard disclosure.

Edit: the link is to four deposed and smeared party officials, blamed for the very worst excesses of the cultural revolution following Mao's departure.

I disagree with the analysis thus far of my colleagues; Xia is Mao, the "monster" and Wyness is the one being smeared and blamed for the very worst excesses of the regime.

I further submit that of Alfititmus is off his pickle. And those would be my submissions.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2018, 06:29:07 AM by Ads »

Offline TheTimVilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 11329
  • Age: 49
  • Location: German Germany
  • GM : 13.02.2022
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #797 on: July 20, 2018, 07:11:32 AM »
Can't be a reference to the other 3 owners because they aren't on the way out.

The gang of 4 must be Xia, Ho, Organ and one other. Perhaps Wyness thought there was some kind of conspiracy against him?

Pleasing to read because it adds fuel to the fire that we're being sold.

You forgot Shirley Williams.

Online eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 29738
  • Location: Down to Worthing...and work there
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #798 on: July 20, 2018, 09:01:33 AM »
I think Alfi's assertion that big old Keith has engaged in some "pissed posting" is a decent shout.

Offline Duncan Shaw

  • Member
  • Posts: 3259
  • Location: Epsom, Surrey
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #799 on: July 20, 2018, 09:56:54 AM »
Maybe he'll quote some Plan B lyrics next...........oh no wait, he won't be able to find those!

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #800 on: July 20, 2018, 11:05:20 AM »
Yes a bit too much single malt imbibing I think.

Online Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 4960
  • Location: Oh to be in the very north North Stand
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #801 on: July 20, 2018, 01:39:35 PM »
As Ads says, gang of four was blamed for problems under Mao when criticism of Mao was verboten. It's probably Wyness saying he's a patsy and Xia, as the great supreme leader, is really to blame but no-one's brave enough to say. Yet.

Or he's been on the sherbet.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 33280
  • Age: 44
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #802 on: July 20, 2018, 01:43:10 PM »
I'd say either way it's a pretty stupid thing to do if he's trying to put a constructive dismissal case together.

Online Simon Page

  • Member
  • Posts: 4960
  • Location: Oh to be in the very north North Stand
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #803 on: July 20, 2018, 01:45:42 PM »
Don't tell him that. This is what passes for entertainment nowadays.

Online Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53923
  • Age: 51
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 22.07.2024
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #804 on: July 20, 2018, 03:53:47 PM »
fuck off Keith

Offline TheMalandro

  • Member
  • Posts: 13465
  • GM : 06.03.2016
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #805 on: July 20, 2018, 04:15:19 PM »
fuck off Keith

Echo that. Choke on your pie.

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #806 on: July 22, 2018, 10:33:55 AM »
Aye, if he had such a problem with xia's plans you'd think he'd have resigned before the shit hit the fan or refused to go along with it in the first place. It may not have been his idea to gamble everything on promotion but he sat there taking the money until it was obvious to anyone with a brain it was going down the pan.  Bleating now that he's getting blamed for following orders - well a few people have used that defence before without much success

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #807 on: July 22, 2018, 12:21:30 PM »
Keith's a big fat lump of useless blubber.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #808 on: July 22, 2018, 12:35:19 PM »
I think Alfi's assertion that big old Keith has engaged in some "pissed posting" is a decent shout.

Why? Has he posted at three in the morning saying that he loves us and wants us back?

Offline Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35613
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 08.01.2025
Re: Keith Wyness
« Reply #809 on: July 22, 2018, 12:46:48 PM »
Aye, if he had such a problem with xia's plans you'd think he'd have resigned before the shit hit the fan or refused to go along with it in the first place. It may not have been his idea to gamble everything on promotion but he sat there taking the money until it was obvious to anyone with a brain it was going down the pan.  Bleating now that he's getting blamed for following orders - well a few people have used that defence before without much success

Not wanting to defend him for his contribution but why should he resign? It’s a job to him and, like most of us, he would expect paying off if the employer wishes to break the contract. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal