collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Posts

Re: All aboard the shuttle bus. by Chris Smith
[Today at 02:15:26 PM]


Re: FFP by rob_bridge
[Today at 02:01:05 PM]


Re: FFP by Risso
[Today at 02:00:06 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by pablo_picasso
[Today at 01:59:07 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by WassallVillain
[Today at 01:54:03 PM]


Re: Aston Villa v Wolverhampton Wanderers Pre Match by Toronto Villa
[Today at 01:50:22 PM]


Re: All aboard the shuttle bus. by Risso
[Today at 01:43:13 PM]


Re: Other Games - 2023/24 by pablo_picasso
[Today at 01:30:57 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Bruce Sacked at last (now official)  (Read 2113370 times)

Offline oswald funkletrumpet

  • Member
  • Posts: 2157
  • Location: Hayley Green
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2355 on: May 07, 2017, 03:40:29 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Totally agree

Offline Diablo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2160
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2356 on: May 07, 2017, 04:18:09 PM »
Bruce said he wants to strengthen in every area,
Yes let's start with the manager....

Haha! Superb!

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 31127
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2357 on: May 07, 2017, 07:58:26 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Brentford for me, over both games.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49020
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2358 on: May 07, 2017, 08:36:15 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Brentford for me, over both games.

Indeed I think Ryan Woods is a quality player.

Offline VinnieChase84

  • Member
  • Posts: 2958
  • GM : May, 2012
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2359 on: May 07, 2017, 10:20:21 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Brentford for me, over both games.

Indeed I think Ryan Woods is a quality player.
We've watched him this season

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 41695
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2360 on: May 07, 2017, 10:24:20 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Lambert in, Lambert in...

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12124
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2361 on: May 07, 2017, 10:28:42 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Lambert in, Lambert in...
Walter Zenga was their manager when they turned up at VP.

Offline Rudy65

  • Member
  • Posts: 4414
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2362 on: May 07, 2017, 10:38:06 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Brentford for me, over both games.

Fulham at their place and Huddersfield second half at VP

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 41695
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2363 on: May 07, 2017, 10:41:50 PM »
I think the best team I saw down VP were Wolves, second half anyway.

Lambert in, Lambert in...
Walter Zenga was their manager when they turned up at VP.

Zenga in, Zenga in...

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23173
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2364 on: May 08, 2017, 08:38:14 AM »
I'm not convinced by the "mole removal" story. Since when does it leave you with a black eye? And why can't you see a mole on his face in older pics? Not convinced by the rumour about a fight with one of the players either so smeg knows.
I know someone that does some work at a private hospital used a lot by footballers etc. The stitches for one, they're more A&E stitches. Also, the state of the work. I imagine he'd have been paying for it, and it looks a right mess. So I think it's all horseshit. Wonder if he's had a scrap with Hutton and it's all been brushed under the carpet.

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2365 on: May 08, 2017, 08:51:51 AM »
why Hutton?

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39424
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2366 on: May 08, 2017, 08:53:50 AM »
I'd hope we attempt to replicate what we did yesterday with Hourihane and Lansbury, getting them a lot higher up the pitch and in the box.  Lansbury has been far too deep and Hourihane shackled, but yesterday they both posed a threat and could have had a couple of goals.

I still didn't think we brought Hogan into it well enough and I think we need more width and pace to do that.

There's been snippets of games where we've got the midfield functioning, but consistency, epecially away from home is our biggest let down.

Offline CJ

  • Member
  • Posts: 7888
  • Age: 70
  • Location: Downtown Cookley
  • GM : 12.07.2017
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2367 on: May 08, 2017, 09:33:49 AM »
why Hutton?

Heard this rumour in the ground yesterday - and Hutton was out with (allegedly) two broken ribs. If they were stitches from having moles surgically removed I wouldn't trust the surgeon to sew a button on my shirt, and, as PWS says, looking at earlier pictures of Bruce I can't see any evidence of moles. What we need is a mole in the camp (see what I did there...) to spill the beans

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2368 on: May 08, 2017, 10:22:44 AM »
wow if this is true it hardly bodes well for either party

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23173
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: Bruce out?
« Reply #2369 on: May 08, 2017, 10:28:43 AM »
Simple case of 2 + 2 = 5. With Hutton having bashed up ribs and all.

Bruce could be telling the truth, but he looks rough and something just smells a bit fishy about it.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal