Last time I saw Staunton he was walking down Savile Row with an arm full of shopping bags. He still looked badly dressed.
Quote from: Dominic22 on November 27, 2016, 11:50:15 AMThat's it in a nutshell. People like Staunton and Alex Ferguson "invested" money in film schemes, that were designed purely to avoid tax. When those schemes failed, the people involved have to pay back the tax, plus penalties, plus interest, which can be several times what they put in, in the first place. Plus they would have paid a fee to the promoter which they wouldn't get back.I'm going out in a limb here but I'd suggest you don't have an intimate knowledge of either Steve Staunton's or Alex Ferguson's tax affairs. If the government are going to offer tax incentives to support investment in to the UK film industry there must be some legitimate ways of utilising them. It could be as simple as Stan thought that it was a good investment and the film bombed. It happens. The fact he's declared bankruptcy doesn't immediately imply he was in to some dodgy tax scam.
That's it in a nutshell. People like Staunton and Alex Ferguson "invested" money in film schemes, that were designed purely to avoid tax. When those schemes failed, the people involved have to pay back the tax, plus penalties, plus interest, which can be several times what they put in, in the first place. Plus they would have paid a fee to the promoter which they wouldn't get back.
He is still only forty seven, a long way to go yet. He will lose the standard of living his family are used to but a lot of people are in a far worse position.Money,after all isn't everything. Will no doubt get a job as a pundit in Ireland perhaps if he is lucky.
Quote from: Risso on November 27, 2016, 12:06:51 PMQuote from: Dominic22 on November 27, 2016, 11:50:15 AMThat's it in a nutshell. People like Staunton and Alex Ferguson "invested" money in film schemes, that were designed purely to avoid tax. When those schemes failed, the people involved have to pay back the tax, plus penalties, plus interest, which can be several times what they put in, in the first place. Plus they would have paid a fee to the promoter which they wouldn't get back.I'm going out in a limb here but I'd suggest you don't have an intimate knowledge of either Steve Staunton's or Alex Ferguson's tax affairs. If the government are going to offer tax incentives to support investment in to the UK film industry there must be some legitimate ways of utilising them. It could be as simple as Stan thought that it was a good investment and the film bombed. It happens. The fact he's declared bankruptcy doesn't immediately imply he was in to some dodgy tax scam. Have a read of this to give you an idea http://citywire.co.uk/wealth-manager/news/football-stars-face-life-changing-tax-bills-over-film-scheme/a972226 . Lots of the investors (footballers) had the same agents or firm of agents. These firms were introducers to the financial advisors they were taking a hefty "introducer fee" on the investment. Lots are in real trouble including a fair few ex Villa players some still playing. Unfortunately the advising firm's were complete charlatans all Ltd companies and so most are now wound-up so no avenue to claim redress.
Quote from: Risso on November 27, 2016, 12:06:51 PMQuote from: Dominic22 on November 27, 2016, 11:50:15 AMThat's it in a nutshell. People like Staunton and Alex Ferguson "invested" money in film schemes, that were designed purely to avoid tax. When those schemes failed, the people involved have to pay back the tax, plus penalties, plus interest, which can be several times what they put in, in the first place. Plus they would have paid a fee to the promoter which they wouldn't get back.I'm going out in a limb here but I'd suggest you don't have an intimate knowledge of either Steve Staunton's or Alex Ferguson's tax affairs. If the government are going to offer tax incentives to support investment in to the UK film industry there must be some legitimate ways of utilising them. It could be as simple as Stan thought that it was a good investment and the film bombed. It happens. The fact he's declared bankruptcy doesn't immediately imply he was in to some dodgy tax scam.
... film schemes, that were designed purely to avoid tax. When those schemes failed, the people involved have to pay back the tax, plus penalties, plus interest, which can be several times what they put in, in the first place.
Quote from: myf on November 27, 2016, 02:06:24 PMApparently Gabby has a load of houses as wellHis kids need to live somewhere.I remember back in the 90s someone sent Steve Staunton's tax return into the Danny Baker Show. I can't remember what he earned, but apparently he added the extra information "...and more if I score".
Apparently Gabby has a load of houses as well
Trap 3 at Hove came nowhere so I will not be investing money in the production of the next bond movie.
Shame you aren't an expert on quoting
Serves them right for being greedy. My old man always used to say don;t mind paying tax, you've got to earn it in the first place to pay it. If they're earning massively over average wages pay your 50%, you're still earning loads.
Quote from: Duncan Shaw on November 28, 2016, 09:24:05 AMServes them right for being greedy. My old man always used to say don;t mind paying tax, you've got to earn it in the first place to pay it. If they're earning massively over average wages pay your 50%, you're still earning loads.My dad said the same and I still disagree with him.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on November 28, 2016, 11:11:23 AMQuote from: Duncan Shaw on November 28, 2016, 09:24:05 AMServes them right for being greedy. My old man always used to say don;t mind paying tax, you've got to earn it in the first place to pay it. If they're earning massively over average wages pay your 50%, you're still earning loads.My dad said the same and I still disagree with him.I just don't think the lyrics scan very well...