collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who'd take Pulis now?  (Read 22458 times)

Online Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12179
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2016, 10:56:34 AM »
I don't see how having Pulis would help us. Garde has been shit on and just looks shell-shocked at the moment.

On a tangent, it made me laugh when Pep Guardiola said he was going to Man City as a challenge. He doesn't know the meaning of the word. If he wants a challenge he knows where to come.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 10856
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2016, 10:56:58 AM »
We don't have a style of play anyway, pointless football that produces pointless results.

Offline glasses

  • Member
  • Posts: 2546
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2016, 10:58:50 AM »
We could do worse, but we could also do better.

I'd rather not touch him with a bargepole. Whatever manager we have had though would have to deal with the bunglecunts above him though, so...

Offline SteveN

  • Member
  • Posts: 3670
  • Location: Surrey. Well .......Croydon
  • GM : Feb, 2014
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2016, 11:14:10 AM »
The answer to the question is not me.

Online shirley_villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 592
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2016, 11:19:36 AM »
What would be the point? He might keep us up the one season but then we'd all be moaning at his terrible football by the October of the next season (and rightly so).


Offline SashasGrandad

  • Member
  • Posts: 3260
  • Age: 65
  • Location: Retired in Walsall Wood
  • GM : Jan, 2013
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2016, 11:19:56 AM »
I don't see how having Pulis would help us. Garde has been shit on and just looks shell-shocked at the moment.

On a tangent, it made me laugh when Pep Guardiola said he was going to Man City as a challenge. He doesn't know the meaning of the word. If he wants a challenge he knows where to come.

And he could at least say he was coming to a team who have won the European Cup!

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 13094
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #21 on: March 02, 2016, 11:34:54 AM »
Only if the alternative was Billy Davies or Nigel Pearson.

This. Although even then it might be a worryingly close call.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #22 on: March 02, 2016, 11:38:48 AM »
If this morphs into a potential new manager thread, I'll say no to Pulis, Hoddle, Allardyce, Pearson and Di Mario.

Albion play awful football. They played Peterborough and it was like West Brom were the lower league side, desperately trying to scrape through with horrible, anti-football tactics. Stoke are way better off without him. Depending on who Baggies appoint when he leaves, they may be too.

Offline passport1

  • Member
  • Posts: 2046
  • "I'm a believer mate"
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #23 on: March 02, 2016, 11:47:28 AM »
'Yes we all know that Lerner wants to sell but can't.'

Anything can be sold its just a question of agreeing a price.

Offline clash city rocker

  • Member
  • Posts: 3733
  • Location: Out in the sticks these days
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #24 on: March 02, 2016, 11:51:14 AM »
A definite no to Pulis.

Offline Can Gana Be Bettered!?!?

  • Member
  • Posts: 6528
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #25 on: March 02, 2016, 01:00:14 PM »
You should talk to two of my 6th Formers who have season tickets down WBA. They generally look more depressed than I do (though not today after the last couple of games). Obviously they're taking the mickey because we're going down, but they really hate Pulis and are always complaining how mind-numbingly dull it is. After the game against us, they were almost inconsolable with how depressed they were.

(I'm on my 10 minute lunch break!)

Offline Can Gana Be Bettered!?!?

  • Member
  • Posts: 6528
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2016, 01:00:50 PM »
As for my thoughts, no, would never want Pulis. Or Allardyce. Or anyone of that ilk.

Offline German James

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5672
  • Location: 438.5 miles away
    • The Limpets
  • GM : 13.02.2025
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #27 on: March 02, 2016, 01:01:40 PM »
Pulis? Absolutely no fucking way! The man's "style" of football is an abomination; I'd rather be entertained in the third division, than bored shitless by a team of his cloggers in the first!

Aston Villa needs to find somewhere quiet to reset and stabilise - hopefully, with a different owner and staff. Pulis' turgid horse-shit would have either no effect or even make things worse.

Offline frankmosswasmyuncle

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5941
  • Location: The Right Side
  • GM : 05.09.2024
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #28 on: March 02, 2016, 01:04:12 PM »
You should talk to two of my 6th Formers who have season tickets down WBA. They generally look more depressed than I do (though not today after the last couple of games). Obviously they're taking the mickey because we're going down, but they really hate Pulis and are always complaining how mind-numbingly dull it is. After the game against us, they were almost inconsolable with how depressed they were.

(I'm on my 10 minute lunch break!)
10 minutes!
Get some marking done, you lazy git!




(And it's a NOT ME from...er...me!)

Online Nunkin1965

  • Member
  • Posts: 3157
  • Age: 58
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • This is only a problem.
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2016, 01:05:43 PM »
Only if the alternative was Billy Davies or Nigel Pearson.
Don't think either would come to us anyway. Villa is a total basket case. Why not have an angry Scot or a nutcase though? Would add to the soap opera.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal