collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by langleylions
[Today at 09:51:04 AM]


Gordon Cowans by LeeB
[Today at 09:50:04 AM]


FFP by oldtimernow
[Today at 09:47:59 AM]


Aston Villa v Wolverhampton Wanderers Pre Match by dicedlam
[Today at 09:14:03 AM]


All aboard the shuttle bus. by algy
[Today at 08:04:45 AM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by Dogtanian
[Today at 07:10:41 AM]


Please Donate to Keep This Site Going - Link on Left & Top of Page by Bad English
[Today at 06:57:08 AM]


Muppet Donations by Bad English
[Today at 06:56:08 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by langleylions
[Today at 09:51:04 AM]


Re: Gordon Cowans by LeeB
[Today at 09:50:04 AM]


Re: FFP by oldtimernow
[Today at 09:47:59 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Dante Lavelli
[Today at 09:45:57 AM]


Re: Gordon Cowans by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 09:42:19 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by LeeB
[Today at 09:38:02 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Chico Hamilton III
[Today at 09:24:14 AM]


Re: FFP by Chico Hamilton III
[Today at 09:14:08 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Who'd take Pulis now?  (Read 22340 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61464
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2025
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #120 on: November 21, 2017, 10:06:16 AM »
Diego Lugano. Now at Sao Paulo. Has played 95 (!) times for Uruguay. Can only assume his hilarious Villa Park performance was an aberration and he's normally much better.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 14179
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #121 on: November 21, 2017, 10:10:14 AM »
Diego Lugano. Now at Sao Paulo. Has played 95 (!) times for Uruguay. Can only assume his hilarious Villa Park performance was an aberration and he's normally much better.

He was the one who was literally all over Benteke every time the ball came near him in that 4-3 game wasn't he?  He gave a penalty away in that game IIRC.   

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #122 on: November 21, 2017, 11:54:23 AM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

Online Dave

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 41701
  • Location: Bath
  • GM : 04.01.2024
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #123 on: November 21, 2017, 11:57:56 AM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

You realise this thread is a year and a half old?

Offline Gregorys Boy

  • Member
  • Posts: 4812
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #124 on: November 21, 2017, 12:05:31 PM »
Bruce has a better promotion record and knows the Championship more.  I wouldn't go with Pulis right now no.

You realise this thread is a year and a half old?

I didn't, but timing is everything I guess...

Offline stuart445

  • Member
  • Posts: 599
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #125 on: November 24, 2017, 09:35:17 AM »
Please let them appoint Mclaren to pay "Albion" style football. Their fans are so delusional about the way they should play and how huge a club they are. Plus was detestable and I would happily never see a side of his face a rugby field again.

We can't really mock Albion fans in regards to the demand about the style of football, all you need do is look at the Bruce Out thread and you'll see that we have a fair share of fans with the same mindset.

Offline Chinchilla Bathhouse

  • Member
  • Posts: 2291
  • GM : 25.01.2020
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #126 on: November 24, 2017, 10:22:21 AM »
Please let them appoint Mclaren to pay "Albion" style football. Their fans are so delusional about the way they should play and how huge a club they are. Plus was detestable and I would happily never see a side of his face a rugby field again.

We can't really mock Albion fans in regards to the demand about the style of football, all you need do is look at the Bruce Out thread and you'll see that we have a fair share of fans with the same mindset.

Indeed. Football fans wanting to watch decent football. Outrageous.

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28334
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #127 on: November 24, 2017, 01:09:01 PM »
I'm not sure you can compare the two anyway. Pulis is way out there on his own when it comes to mind numblingly dull football.

Online Stu

  • Member
  • Posts: 12814
  • GM : 09.04.2021
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #128 on: November 24, 2017, 01:16:49 PM »
Everyone wants to watch good football, but for some unknown reason boggies fans think they're entitled to it - as if there's an 'Albion Way' to play. This is a club that have been managed by Gary Megson for Christ's sake.

Offline Boz

  • Member
  • Posts: 1924
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #129 on: November 24, 2017, 01:41:52 PM »
Everyone wants to watch good football, but for some unknown reason boggies fans think they're entitled to it - as if there's an 'Albion Way' to play. This is a club that have been managed by Gary Megson for Christ's sake.

And are again, for time being anyway.

Offline wittonwarrior

  • Member
  • Posts: 4610
  • Age: 63
  • Location: Knotty Ash (really)
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #130 on: November 24, 2017, 01:41:58 PM »
Bloose would be a match made in heaven

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 22106
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #131 on: November 24, 2017, 01:43:27 PM »
How many fans associate their club with mind numbing  dull football ?
This reputation is caused by a managers philosophy.
Bolton Allardyce
Stoke Pullis
Villa McLeish Lambert Bruce

Online Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28334
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #132 on: November 24, 2017, 02:31:16 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 38937
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #133 on: November 24, 2017, 02:34:18 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.

It's frustrating because you care but a neutral would probably find it mind numbingly dull.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 22106
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Who'd take Pulis now?
« Reply #134 on: November 24, 2017, 02:36:13 PM »
I've never found Bruce's football under us mind numblingly dull. Frustrating sometimes but not dull.
Fair point.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal