b) Players - given a take it or leave it to convert 30 million of wages over their contracts (average 4 years) - thats only £130k of wages a week - probably less than 25% of the wage bill. I know a lot of you wouldnt give tuppence for the motivation of the current crop, my point is here that the players cant be allowed to just take their wages, they have to take responsibility but also reap a share of the spoils if the club is successful.
Re the players my point is that players have to take responsibility. Clearly if existing players don't want the opportunity over time they get sold or contracts run down. New contracts would all have to include an element of ownership / responsibility. When contracts end the player could then cash out based on financial position at that time and new players on new contracts take over.Like I said lots of detail to sort out but I'd also ask what your ideas are that are better ? Chinese or Arab tycoon ? We might as well forget the fans, the clubs history and connection to its local area if that is the only answer .... Being a soccer franchise isn't what interests me at any rate.
If the club is owned by 1000's people, who is going to choose which players to buy?Would that still be Paddy or would we all get a vote?
I honestly think this will never happen with a top club in the UK without them having clawed their way back to the top first. The examples of Portsmouth and Wimbledon don't match up to what you're suggesting about the Villa because Portsmouth were a toxic asset the Supporter's Trust managed to negotiate buying for a pittance, and AFC Wimbledon were a concern set up solely to preserve a club in that general area, so were not "bought out" as such. It would be fantastic if they could climb the divisions using their current business model, but there's no way a club with the value of Aston Villa would be bought by fans and local businessmen and run as a co-operative. There's far too much capital involved, which is the bottom line.As for Barca and clubs in Germany, they've never known any other way of operating, so it's an unfair comparison. I'm not going to go all David Conn and start weighing in with figures, but I'd also imagine Real and Barca owe huge sums to banks that are never going to call in their debts because of the ruckus it would cause. Who wants to be the bank that pisses off all those fans?
David Cameron is loaded. Perhaps he'd like to get involved in the running of his beloved club?!