Play fair, "over" is a massive leap from "had it's peak" and "slowly decline in popularity".
Yeah cycling is over.Care to take a look at sales figures for bikes, bike parts, clothing and accessories for the past 12 months and come back and tell us it's over?
Quote from: Jon Crofts on January 07, 2016, 09:25:35 PMYeah cycling is over.Care to take a look at sales figures for bikes, bike parts, clothing and accessories for the past 12 months and come back and tell us it's over?It's a bit like fishing though; loads of people do it, few watch it. TV viewers for the Blighty stages of the 2014 Tour peaked at about 4m. The same weekend the British Grand Prix got 11m and the Wimbledon final (without Murray) peaked at over 19m. All three traditionally minority sports but the viewing gulf explains why you need an Olympic Gold and massive profile as an individual to win SPOTY as a cyclist. Wiggins and Hoy transcended the relatively low viewing figures for cycling, Froome probably never will even though way more people cycle than drive Formula 1 cars or play tennis.
Anybody who thinks cycling is in some sort of decline should come and see the roads in North Yorkshire on a weekend, the Grand Depart has a lot to do with it as people are keen to cycle some or all of the route but there is no way the numbers are declining.
Genuine question, were the TDF stages in Yorkshire shown on BBC1 like the Grand Prix and Wimbledon were? Besides, cycling isn't particularly a great TV sport, bugger all happens for hours in most stages unless they are up the mountains or approaching a finish. I mean I could watch it all day but it's not for everyone is it?