The smell at the club is worse than 86.
Quote from: bertlambshank on November 29, 2015, 10:16:01 AMThe smell at the club is worse than 86.Agreed. It was bad enough back then but this feels worse. Far worse.Back then we had a chairman in Doug Ellis, who despite calls to pack it in, actually cared and was there to be shot at. Now, we have a yank who couldn't give a monkey's toss (other than what$$$ in it for him) and who rarely ventures out of his bolt-hole five time zones away.
If we get beaten by 5 at Southampton next week that'll be another similarity.
Quote from: Chris Harte on November 29, 2015, 10:21:02 AMQuote from: bertlambshank on November 29, 2015, 10:16:01 AMThe smell at the club is worse than 86.Agreed. It was bad enough back then but this feels worse. Far worse.Back then we had a chairman in Doug Ellis, who despite calls to pack it in, actually cared and was there to be shot at. Now, we have a yank who couldn't give a monkey's toss (other than what$$$ in it for him) and who rarely ventures out of his bolt-hole five time zones away.The irony of defending Ellis while saying Lerner is in it for the money isn't lost.
There's the argument that we were very fortunate that Sir Graham was willing to drop down a division to manage us. If anyone saved our arse last tie round, it was him.
Quote from: Clampy on November 29, 2015, 10:33:39 AMThere's the argument that we were very fortunate that Sir Graham was willing to drop down a division to manage us. If anyone saved our arse last tie round, it was him.I agree, but it was Ellis who was responsible for bringing him to the club. Just as Lerner is responsible for who he employs now.
Quote from: Chris Harte on November 29, 2015, 10:35:48 AMQuote from: Clampy on November 29, 2015, 10:33:39 AMThere's the argument that we were very fortunate that Sir Graham was willing to drop down a division to manage us. If anyone saved our arse last tie round, it was him.I agree, but it was Ellis who was responsible for bringing him to the club. Just as Lerner is responsible for who he employs now.By the same token, he was also responsible for bringing in Graham Turner and Billy McNeil.
Quote from: Clampy on November 29, 2015, 10:40:58 AMQuote from: Chris Harte on November 29, 2015, 10:35:48 AMQuote from: Clampy on November 29, 2015, 10:33:39 AMThere's the argument that we were very fortunate that Sir Graham was willing to drop down a division to manage us. If anyone saved our arse last tie round, it was him.I agree, but it was Ellis who was responsible for bringing him to the club. Just as Lerner is responsible for who he employs now.By the same token, he was also responsible for bringing in Graham Turner and Billy McNeil. It'll take your Turner and McNeill and offer McCleish, Lambert and Sherwood.
Billy Walker I would love to have your optimism, I can see us being cut adrift well before the January window and again this is Randy's Aston Villa if we do buy anyone it will be on the 31st January, after another 3 or 4 games without a point.I really hope you are right as I think this could be a major disaster that 86/87 will not compare to if we go down,