Why is the bottom of the Premier League different to any other part of it? You're playing the same teams. What you need is the manager who'll get you the most points, and to hell with this Dunkirk canard about the 'relegation scrap'. The teams which stay up score often score more goals and play better football than those which go down, yet there's this belief continues to linger that the only way to stay up is necessarily ugly.This, I submit, is rubbish. We have a group of players who are suited to a style of football, and we need a manager who can play that style with them. Definitely not Pearson. Maybe not Moyes (although, despite Rudy's clear outlining of his flaws, he wouldn't be a terrible appointment). Definitely, definitely, definitely not a Pulis or Allardyce type.
The last thing we need is a short-term horses for courses. We need a long-term strategy and the willingness to back the manager financially for a minimum of one transfer window. That's where you've fallen down and not been able to attract the good managers. Why would a half-decent manager come in when they're set up to fail?