collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Starting 11  (Read 5359 times)

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 86
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2015, 10:04:40 AM »
The reason I was dismissive of a poster's first post was because the use of the word "ludicrous" to describe the view that Sherwood must be replaced, held by me and by a substantial number of respected other posters smacked of trollery and as I read it again still does.

Offline Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28462
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2015, 10:07:21 AM »
The reason I was dismissive of a poster's first post was because the use of the word "ludicrous" to describe the view that Sherwood must be replaced, held by me and by a substantial number of respected other posters smacked of trollery and as I read it again still does.

He's entitled to his opinion though and he's hardly a troll, he's only posted once.

Offline brian green

  • Member
  • Posts: 18357
  • Age: 86
  • Location: Nice France
  • GM : 19.06.2020
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2015, 10:58:16 AM »
And I am entitled to mine. If I had said push off with your criticism of something in which I believe there might be a little justification in the brickbats I am getting used to but I did not, I chose simply not to extend my hand to somebody who chose to make his introduction into our midst with a charge of ludicrousness.

Offline Clampy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28462
  • Location: warley
  • GM : PCM
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2015, 11:06:17 AM »
I thought it was an ok opening post in fairness. He thinks it would be ludicrous to get rid of him now and some people think he should have gone by now. Both opinions are valid, whether it's via opening post or 10,000 posts in.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 10857
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2015, 11:08:23 AM »
We basically have no coherent forward line do we. There definitely has been no pre season work on how we are to play as a team and how we are going to score the goals. I'm pretty sure all we've done is some running.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #20 on: October 18, 2015, 11:16:49 AM »
One game at a time now. For Swansea if fit I'd go -

------------ Bunn ----------------

Richards. Clark. Okore. Amavi

Sinclair.  Sanchez.  Gana. Veretout

-------- Gabby ---- Kozak ------

Offline exigo

  • Member
  • Posts: 2782
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #21 on: October 18, 2015, 11:17:59 AM »
As the teams were announced yesterday, we were speculating in the pub whether the seven on the bench could beat the first team. Chuck Kozak, Gabby, Veretout and Clark into it and it's not so much strength in depth as strength in reserve.
« Last Edit: October 18, 2015, 11:23:32 AM by exigo »

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 22356
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #22 on: October 18, 2015, 07:56:32 PM »
            Bunn
Richards Okore Clark Amavi
                Sanchez
     Vertout          Gana
                 Jack
     Sinclair Gestede

Offline claret and blue blood

  • Member
  • Posts: 691
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #23 on: October 18, 2015, 08:47:23 PM »
Is Kodak injured?

Offline Rudy65

  • Member
  • Posts: 4423
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #24 on: October 18, 2015, 10:07:27 PM »
Clark should be playing instead of Lescott

Offline villan from luton

  • Member
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #25 on: October 18, 2015, 10:15:23 PM »
One game at a time now. For Swansea if fit I'd go -

------------ Bunn ----------------

Richards. Clark. Okore. Amavi

Sinclair.  Sanchez.  Gana. Veretout

-------- Gabby ---- Kozak ------

Why would you play your best player by far at right back? The fact we have shit right backs is not a defence. Richards is good enough to play for a top team, he has been excellent, I agree that Kozak to be fair

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #26 on: October 18, 2015, 10:18:03 PM »
Richards is a RB IMHO not a CB

Offline villan from luton

  • Member
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #27 on: October 18, 2015, 10:20:06 PM »
Richards is a RB IMHO not a CB

He has been our best player by far and wish there were a few more like him.

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #28 on: October 18, 2015, 10:22:48 PM »
Richards is a RB IMHO not a CB

He has been our best player by far and wish there were a few more like him.
Doesn't mean he's a CB

Offline villan from luton

  • Member
  • Posts: 3049
Re: Starting 11
« Reply #29 on: October 18, 2015, 10:26:27 PM »
Richards is a RB IMHO not a CB

He has been our best player by far and wish there were a few more like him.
Doesn't mean he's a CB

I would suggest he is a CB for a top 4 club, not a struggling club like us. Also, I wish a few more players had his will to win.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal