Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 16, 2015, 07:23:34 PMQuote from: Risso on March 16, 2015, 06:50:06 PMWas Fox here when we gave Lambert the ridiculous contract extension? he was, but then again he was new in his job. The big boss comes out and says he wants to give his mate a new deal, the new boy in the office isn't going to have a ton of pull so early on. I imagine over time though Fox was able to convince Lerner to "rethink" the decision and made easier as we slipped quietly and conveniently into the bottom 3.It's easy to speak with hindsight, but I still think the decision to sack Lambert should have come earlier.
Quote from: Risso on March 16, 2015, 06:50:06 PMWas Fox here when we gave Lambert the ridiculous contract extension? he was, but then again he was new in his job. The big boss comes out and says he wants to give his mate a new deal, the new boy in the office isn't going to have a ton of pull so early on. I imagine over time though Fox was able to convince Lerner to "rethink" the decision and made easier as we slipped quietly and conveniently into the bottom 3.
Was Fox here when we gave Lambert the ridiculous contract extension?
Quote from: tomd2103 on March 16, 2015, 11:56:45 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 16, 2015, 07:23:34 PMQuote from: Risso on March 16, 2015, 06:50:06 PMWas Fox here when we gave Lambert the ridiculous contract extension? he was, but then again he was new in his job. The big boss comes out and says he wants to give his mate a new deal, the new boy in the office isn't going to have a ton of pull so early on. I imagine over time though Fox was able to convince Lerner to "rethink" the decision and made easier as we slipped quietly and conveniently into the bottom 3.It's easy to speak with hindsight, but I still think the decision to sack Lambert should have come earlier. I think we all wished it had. We'll never know why it didn't and as some are suggesting maybe there was a bottom 3 clause. Then again, given that he just signed a new contract on the back of 4 magnificent games, why would the club even write that in, or indeed Lambert accept having it in? My own opinion, it was a prolonged run of misery that saw us slip into the relegation zone, and that was just a step too far, even for his biggest backer.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on March 17, 2015, 12:34:15 AMQuote from: tomd2103 on March 16, 2015, 11:56:45 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on March 16, 2015, 07:23:34 PMQuote from: Risso on March 16, 2015, 06:50:06 PMWas Fox here when we gave Lambert the ridiculous contract extension? he was, but then again he was new in his job. The big boss comes out and says he wants to give his mate a new deal, the new boy in the office isn't going to have a ton of pull so early on. I imagine over time though Fox was able to convince Lerner to "rethink" the decision and made easier as we slipped quietly and conveniently into the bottom 3.It's easy to speak with hindsight, but I still think the decision to sack Lambert should have come earlier. I think we all wished it had. We'll never know why it didn't and as some are suggesting maybe there was a bottom 3 clause. Then again, given that he just signed a new contract on the back of 4 magnificent games, why would the club even write that in, or indeed Lambert accept having it in? My own opinion, it was a prolonged run of misery that saw us slip into the relegation zone, and that was just a step too far, even for his biggest backer.I'd go with that.
I don't understand why did Fox came out in his only public offering with that management blurb about false narratives - hardly the average fan's language. It was a fairly emphatic and ill judged backing for Lambert. One which was reversed not all that long after.
Thinking about it, keeping Lambert on for as long as we did ( against most fans' wishes) probably saved us from appointing Pulis. By the time Lerner saw sense, the Albion had already signed him up. More by luck than judgement, but we really dodged a bullet there
Has Tom Fox replied to anyone's emails as yet?