collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: The Culverhouse theory  (Read 5269 times)

Offline silhillvilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 12681
  • GM : Dec, 2014
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2015, 09:16:27 PM »
It's depressing enough reading about lambert
I really just want to erase culverhouse and the other idiot from my memory

Offline Rudy65

  • Member
  • Posts: 4423
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2015, 09:22:53 PM »
Quote
What is the f***ing point of this thread?

My point is this:

We hired Lambert-Culverhouse-Karsa on the basis that their success at Colchester and (especially) Norwich qualified them to take on the job of managing Aston Villa. They put in place a plan (signing young players and playing on the break), tried it for a couple of years, it didn't work so we sacked them. As per standard practice.

But, wait a moment, rewind there. We didn't sack them. We sacked two-thirds of them. And kept Lambert who, in my opinion, had the least input and has no managerial success on his own. So, in effect, we have gone into this season with a rookie manager who is making it up as he goes along. Hence first time he is exposed to someone else's different philosophy (Guardiola's during a visit to Bayern), he suddenly changes our whole style of play mid-season. And that is something unprecedented, in my opinion. For instance, I remember Houllier refusing to change the way (zonal or man-to-man) we defended corners mid-season, preferring to imbed new ideas during pre-season.

So the point is not to simply say "Lambert is crap" but to analyse why has he been such a disappointment. And this is my theory. Without Culverhouse and Karsa to set the tactics, he has simply poached the Bayern Munich philosophy without understanding about the "move" in pass-and-move.

In my opinion, the Aston Villa job should always go to a proven experienced manager, never a rookie.

Pointless thread. We need to move forward not look back on the likes of Culverhouse who will be totally forgotten  very quickly

Offline adrenachrome

  • Member
  • Posts: 13464
  • Location: The Foundry
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2015, 09:30:09 PM »
Quite a few Norwich fans hold the view expressed in the OP. I remember somebody posting a link in this forum very early on in PL's tenure.


Offline b23

  • Member
  • Posts: 2352
  • GM : 02.09.2019
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2015, 09:39:11 PM »
The last time i posted about those two, the internet nearly melted.


Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12469
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2015, 09:42:14 PM »
Horseshit. Lambert out.

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 2942
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2015, 10:33:07 PM »
I seem to recall Lambert taking Wycombe to the LC SF while he was there.

That doesn't sound like failure to me.

Offline Des Little

  • Member
  • Posts: 12469
  • Location: A5 Ultra
  • GM : 03.05.2021
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #21 on: January 10, 2015, 11:46:25 PM »
Lambert has been a total and utter failure as our manager, and that's what matters. Time to sling it.

Offline KevinGage

  • Member
  • Posts: 13455
  • Location: Singing from under the floorboards
  • GM : 20.09.20
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #22 on: January 10, 2015, 11:56:00 PM »
A part of me died the day we ditched Culverhouse.

A prophet is never recognised in his own land.


Offline mark west

  • Member
  • Posts: 26
  • I am Troy
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2015, 12:02:17 AM »
Lambert has been a total and utter failure as our manager, and that's what matters. Time to sling it.

Good point, Des. Straight to the point. Lambert must go. He must be our worst ever manager.

Offline ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 29986
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #24 on: January 11, 2015, 12:12:23 AM »
To have not appointed an assistant is very strange. Very. Especially if we are struggling for creativity, a really top coach in as assistant might actually help matters!

Offline mr underhill

  • Member
  • Posts: 8493
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2015, 07:09:45 AM »
but the underlying problem will remain. The only answer now is to take the hard decision and sack him; Randy's got to wake up to the fact that the Lambert love-in hasn't suddenly stopped working, but rather it's never worked, and never will.

Offline Damo70

  • Member
  • Posts: 30877
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2015, 11:04:18 AM »
I seem to recall Lambert taking Wycombe to the LC SF while he was there.

That doesn't sound like failure to me.

On that basis we should appoint Phil Parkinson, Dave Smith, Lawrie Sanchez or Nigel Clough.

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 2942
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2015, 10:40:53 PM »
Not really sure why you've posted that.

I was just pointing out that most people would regard a fourth division team reaching that stage of a major competition as a fine achievement. Especially for a manager lacking his 'special' coaches.

Offline frankmosswasmyuncle

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5941
  • Location: The Right Side
  • GM : 05.09.2024
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2015, 10:51:27 PM »
I seem to recall Lambert taking Wycombe to the LC SF while he was there.

That doesn't sound like failure to me.

On that basis we should appoint Phil Parkinson, Dave Smith, Lawrie Sanchez or Nigel Clough.
Management by committee. (Worked in the old days!!! ;-))
Perhaps we make the most of our money and play them too?

Couldn't do much worse than the shite we turn out most games.

Online Small Rodent

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10113
  • Location: Streatham
  • GM : 30.11.2024
Re: The Culverhouse theory
« Reply #29 on: January 11, 2015, 11:04:21 PM »
Wouldn't it have been easier to have spentvall those words and imagination writing a Sci-Fi short story?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal